Alan,
That's not possible currently. The implementation heavily relies on
the being "under" or "over" all dataset in the scene. This assumption
makes it possible to place 2D labels in 3D without having to worry
about labels showing through surfaces even when data is distributed
among ranks. Thus,
> Is there any reason why switching to shared libs would break things (aside
> from the obvious -- i.e. wrong DLL being picked up)?
None that I can think of.
> Does Qt have to be built with shared libs as well for this to work (Qt is
> built statically -- which I wouldn't think would be a probl
Are you building Debug ParaView with Release Qt? That won't work. If
not, make sure your PATH is clean and is not bringing in other
versions of Qt, ParaView. We build/test with VS2013 with no issues. I
personally have built with VS2015 with no issues to report either --
although in both cases we us
Rahul,
It's under development. You can build from source, if you're keen. Or
wait till the changes get merged in `master` and try the nightly
binaries. The feature is targeted for 5.2 release slated for Oct/Nov
timeframe.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
everything else works!
>
> Tim
>
>
> --
> *From:* ParaView on behalf of Gallagher,
> Timothy P
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 12:41 PM
>
> *To:* Utkarsh Ayachit
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Status of Bo
ion or suggestions on debugging paraview? Is there a
> way to get more verbose output on why it isn't able to create the reader?
>
>
> Thanks again,
>
>
> Tim
>
> --
> *From:* Utkarsh Ayachit
> *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 8:46 AM
>
Matthias,
You should not get contours for min/max values unless you asked for
them. Note, original input is not hidden when you apply the Contour
filter. Is that what you're seeing?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Zenker, Dr. Matthias
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have a (hopefully) simple question: I
ml file, but that wasn't
> enough I guess.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Tim
>
>
> --
> *From:* ParaView on behalf of Gallagher,
> Timothy P
> *Sent:* Friday, August 26, 2016 11:53 AM
> *To:* Utkarsh Ayachit
>
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *S
> Would it be easy for you to make the ParaView installation directory usable
> as VTK_DIR by adding the required cmake files? Or is there a more difficult
> problem underneath? The missing VTKTargets.cmake has been discussed several
> times in the past with no real solution.
We can certainly supp
> For this purpose I configure ParaView with the
> -DUSE_EXTERNAL_VTK=ON option, but I get a bunch of errors.
> Before I attach lengthy error logs, I'd like to ask whether this can work at
> all?
No, it's not supported and there are no indications that it will any
time soon unless someone from the
I saw in apt was 5.5.
>
> Maybe I need to purge 5.5 from my system
>
>
> Thank you as always Utkarsh!
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> wrote:
>> I built with Qt 5.7 (build from source) on Ubuntu. That's my primary
>> development
I built with Qt 5.7 (build from source) on Ubuntu. That's my primary
development config.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:58 PM, andrealphus wrote:
> Anyone had success building Paraview from source using Qt5 on Ubuntu?
> If so, was it straight forward? Which version of Qt5? Did you install
> Qt from s
Tim,
I am not exactly sure what's the status of the reader, but I can
certainly look it up. Do you have a sample dataset also to test that
it's working (or not)?
Utkarsh
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Gallagher, Timothy P
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Our code is moving away from traditional structured
I think this is what you want is similar to "SPHVolumeInterpolator".
See :
1.
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/blob/master/ParaViewCore/VTKExtensions/Points/points.xml#L671-699
2.
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/blob/master/ParaViewCore/VTKExtensions/Points/points.xml#L7
Chris,
Try changing CMakeLists.txt, changing the `find_package(ParaView .. )`
and `target_link_libraries(..)` as follows:
find_package(ParaView 4.1 REQUIRED COMPONENTS vtkPVPythonCatalyst vtkIOXML)
and
target_link_libraries(CFullExampleAdaptor vtkPVPythonCatalyst vtkIOXML)
Utkarsh
On W
kPVDisplayInformation::CopyFromObject(vtkObject*) ()
>from
> /p/app/DAAC/paraview/5.1.2/lib/paraview-5.1/libvtkPVClientServerCoreRendering-pv5.1.so.1
> #7 0x2df6723b in
> vtkPVSessionCore::GatherInformationInternal(vtkPVInformation*, unsigned int)
> ()
>from
> /p/app/DAAC/pa
t;
> server glx vendor string: VirtualGL
> server glx version string: 1.4
>
>
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone: 410-278-6266
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Utkars
Rick,
I am assuming with is with VTK_RENDERING_BACKEND set to OpenGL2.
Do you know what VirtualGL version is being used?
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY
RDECOM ARL (US) wrote:
> We are trying to build/run ParaView 5.1.2 on a particular HPC system with
> gr
No, using actors in the Programmable Source is indeed not a supported use-case.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Рустем Хабетдинов
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Is it possible to use vtk actors in programmable source(using python not
> c++)? I want to handle click events but when I use custom interactor t
Luigi,
For an image data distributed across multiple ranks with no ghost
cell, there still exists a single point overlap for the points. The
points along the shared boundary are expected to be duplicated among
ranks. I am thinking your 3D regular grid should be mapped as
cell-data rather than poi
Replace it by pqRenderViewBase::widget() [1].
[1]
http://www.paraview.org/ParaView3/Doc/Nightly/www/cxx-doc/classpqView.html#ae44839f94fd03cd4ef28640366df3f17
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Шагит Зиганшин
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with PythonQt plugin building:
>
>
>
> c:\users\builds
OSMesa is only needed if your simulation run environment doesn't have
access to an X server. X is needed to create an OpenGL context.
Without X, OSMesa is one of the ways to create that OpenGL context
necessary for rendering.
Utkarsh
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Christopher Neal
wrote:
> Hi,
See the attached plugin XML. You just need to specify the array index
as default_values other it gets initialized to 0.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Evan Kao wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Just a bump in case anyone who can answer my question missed this.
> Basically, is it possible to specify two i
Error 2
> Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> It seems like it just can’t find the include directory in the Catalyst
> edition.
>
>
> On 8/15/16, 12:06 PM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" wrote:
>
> In
st, development files, and no gui.
>
> On 8/15/16, 11:41 AM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Cool. There's indeed a bug in the install rules. I'll have to it
> fixed. BTW, I am assuming /home/neal/software/ParaView_build is the
> direc
_PATH=/home/neal/software/Catalyst/Catalyst-v5.1.0-Base-Enable-Python-Essentials_build
> -DBUILD_FORTRAN_EXAMPLES:BOOL=ON
> -DCMAKE_INCLUDE_PATH=/home/neal/software/Catalyst/Catalyst-v5.1.0-Base-Enable-Python-Essentials_build/include/paraview-5.1
> /home/neal/software/ParaView/Exampl
es/Catalyst/
>
> Am I not specifying the include path correctly?
>
> Thank you,
> Chris Neal
>
> On 8/15/16, 10:15 AM, "Utkarsh Ayachit" wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> Some thing like this should do the trick:
>
> > [...]/cmake.sh -DCMAKE_INSTAL
Chris,
Some thing like this should do the trick:
> [...]/cmake.sh -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/tmp/install [... path to Catalyst
> src ...]
Utkarsh
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Christopher Neal
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I was wondering what the appropriate way to specify a value for the
pass pass /m:4 to my
> msbuild to get 4 msbuild instance. When I used to build paraview (not
> superbuild), the cpu utilization during the build was always at maximum but
> with superbuild it is always around 20%.
>
>
>
> Do I also need to pass /MP parameter to enable multi-proces
I'd suggest using ParaView Superbuild to build redistributables
(https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview-superbuild).
Utkarsh
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:23 PM, michal wozniak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building ParaView from source. When we test my release version on a
> different system, we can't
That's indeed a bug. I've reported it here:
http://www.paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=16813
We will have it looked into for the next release.
Utkarsh
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Lúcio Corrêa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to save one screenshot with a very high resolution.
>
> I try to run in se
e import *
>> File
>> "/Applications/paraview.app/Contents/Python/paraview/vtk/vtkPVServerImplementationCore.py",
>> line 9, in
>> from vtkPVServerImplementationCorePython import *
>> ImportError:
>> dlopen(/Applications/paraview.app/Contents/Lib
rt
> DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH="$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH:/Applications/paraview.app/Contents/Library
>
> but have not been able to make it work
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> wrote:
>>
>> Here's a sample launch script:
>>
>> #-
"Glyph Source" is a group title. All properties under that header
until the the next group header or a separator affect the "Gylph
Source". "Glyph Type" allows you to pick the type of glyph source. The
rest of the properties in that group update based on the chosen glyph
type.
Utkarsh
On Tue, Au
Here's a sample launch script:
#--
#!/usr/bin/env bash
pvprefix=/tmp/ParaView-5.1.2-Qt4-OpenGL2-MPI-Linux-64bit/
export
PYTHONPATH=$pvprefix/lib/paraview-5.1/site-packages/vtk:$pvprefix/lib/paraview-5.1/site-packages
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$pvprefix/lib
Can you try removing relevant configuration files from your
~/.config/* directory and see? We've had similar issues with config
files messing with the menus in the past. I wonder if you're running
into that. Running your app with "-dr" command line argument should
have the same effect.
On Tue, Aug
o
> longer there.
>
> I'm not really sure what solved it, but it seems to be working now. I have
> been playing with this for a week or so and for it to just start working is
> a bit puzzling.
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Cheers,
> Clayton
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
> Clayton
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit
> wrote:
>>
>> Clayton,
>>
>> I could not reproduce this. What was the size of the images you're
>> saving? I w
View5.2/build/lib:"
> NEW_RPATH "")
>
> -Chris
>
>
> On 8/5/16, 11:40 AM, "ParaView on behalf of Christopher Neal"
> wrote:
>
> Thank you Utkarsh,
>
> I will try cmake 3.5.1 to see if that has any effect on the issue that
&g
Andy,
Surface LIC is now supported with 5.1.2 . Can you try it out and let
us know if you see the same issue?
Thanks,
Utkarsh
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Andy Smith wrote:
> A colleague of mine is having an issue using Surface LIC in ParaView 4.4:
>
>
> I am having issues while running a Py
Sorry, no luck producing on Ubuntu 16.04 with CMake 3.5.1.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit
wrote:
> That's odd. Trying to see if I can reproduce this with your command
> line. I'll report back once the build is done.
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Chr
That's odd. Trying to see if I can reproduce this with your command
line. I'll report back once the build is done.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:22 PM, Christopher Neal
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I’m seeing something strange when I try to compile ParaView 5.1 from the
> source. I execute the following c
Clayton,
I could not reproduce this. What was the size of the images you're
saving? I wonder if that matters.
Utkarsh
On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Clayton C wrote:
> I will try to make this short:
>
> -Running Paraview 5.1.0 on Windows
> -Layout with vertically split view port; toggled view
** Paper deadline extended to Aug 22, 2016 ***
-
Call for Participation: ISAV 2016
=
ISAV2016: In Situ Infrastructures for Enabling Extreme-Scale Analysis
and Visualization
In cooperation with SIGHPC and held
Charts overlaid in 3D views are not supported in ParaView.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:53 PM, Seong Mo Yeon wrote:
> Can Paraview overlay charts on 3D render view as shown in vtk document
> www.na-mic.org/Wiki/images/1/18/NA-MIC-VTK-Charts-2011.pdf?
>
> ---
> Sent from Boxer | http://getboxer.com
>
Less the better. Since users cannot "unload" plugins loaded by
default,it's better to keep the list minimal. Users can always change
a plugin to be automatically loaded, if they tend to use it
frequently.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Scott, W Alan wrote:
> What plugins should I turn on by def
http://www.paraview.org/download/
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Seong Mo Yeon wrote:
> I can't find the download link according to the 5.1.2 release note.
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Sent from Boxer | http://getboxer.com
> ___
> Powered by www.kitware.com
>
> Vi
>
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone: 410-278-6266
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Utkarsh Ayachit
> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2016 at 1:57 PM
> To: Rick Angelini
> Cc
rename]
> -- extracting... [clean up]
> -- extracting... done
>
>
>
>
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone: 410-278-6266
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Utkarsh Aya
aview-5.1".
>
>
> make: *** [install] Error 1
>
>
>
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone: 410-278-6266
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ParaView on behalf of
Thanks for reporting, Fabian. Please stay tuned. We'll be working on
making the superbuild work with Qt5 better in coming days as we
official migrate to Qt 5.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Fabian Wein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an up-to-date OS X system (10.11) and try to compile PVSB by mysel
Folks,
ParaView 5.1.2 is now available for download [1]. Please refer to the
release notes on the Kitware blog [2]. As always, we look forward to
your feedback [3].
Also stay tuned to the Kitware Blog [4] for upcoming features and
enhancements to ParaView, ParaView Catalyst, ParaViewWeb and much
Folks,
ParaView 5.1.2 has been tagged.
Git tag name: v5.1.2
Source tar/zip files are available for download:
http://www.paraview.org/download/
Binaries will be available for testing within the next few days.
This release includes the following fixes:
- Fixed depth peeling issues when running
Hopefully next week. A never ending stream of "oh can i sneak in this
one fix..." that keeps coming my way, but I am not going to entertain
any requests past today.
Utkarsh
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Nenad Vujicic wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Can anyone estimate when ParaView v5.1.1 will
ards,
> Juan
>
>
> On 08/07/16 13:45, Utkarsh Ayachit wrote:
>
> Juan,
>
> Can you share a sample dataset to reproduce this issue?
>
> Thanks
> Utkarsh
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Juan Valverde
> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> We are working wit
> The dark side of this patch is that you are limited to one or two inputs
> portsit would be nice to have more flexibility. It would be nice to
> define the number of input ports directly in the XML plugin file.
Yes indeed. This was just a quick hack to demonstrate the
functionality with mini
> Elaborate. Why would changing names create backwards compatibility issues?
> You mean for Python scripts?
Yes, Python and XML state files will be affected. We can handle that,
but it's worth weighing the pros and cons for any such changes.
___
Power
The attached patch for vtkPythonProgrammableFilter along with a minor tweak
to your plugin XML does the trick. I can have this cleaned up and merged in
"master" for 5.2 if that's acceptable.
Utkarsh
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com
I am going to say it's just historical. Maybe since filtering is an action,
"Transform" filter went with action verbs while since the Display
properties (on the Properties tab) are the state of the item, they went
with noun forms -- but that's just a guess.
While I have no objection changing one o
(0x6c7a510): Attempt to connect input port
> index 1 for an algorithm with 1 input ports.
>
> Should I add something to tell ParaView that this filter has multiple
> input ports?
> Should I use a different class than the vtkPythonProgrammableFilter?
>
> Regards,
> --
> Loïc
Sorry for chiming in late, but here are some things to note:
* Both Dennis and Cory are talking about multiple connections on the
same input port. This is arguably not too well supported since the
order cannot be determined easily.
* Seems to me you want multiple input ports, each with a single
co
I believe the best way to deal with this would be using a Python
programmable filter. Let me see if I can put something together for
you. I'll get back to you.
Utkarsh
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Marie Kajan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working with data on a spherical mesh and want to create a
Robert,
I am not sure I follow the issue you're seeing. Do you have a
screenshot or something to share to help?
Thanks
Utkarsh
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Robert Sawko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the new version of ParaView displays only the boundaries
> of an object in an opaque w
> I'll check the meaning of MTime.
See the implementation of vtkSetMacro() in vtkSetGet.h. Every time the
value changes, it call this->Modified() which updates the MTime. Since
VTK is a demand-driven pipeline, changes to MTime is what tells the
pipeline that the algorithm has been modified and nee
There are a couple of things wrong with your plugin :).
1. A RequestData() implementation should never change MTime of the
filter. You code call SetNPoints() which changes MTime.
2. ParaView's properties are not bi-directional. They are only
intended to be set on the UI side and pushed to the VTK
I have been seeing flackiness with X with OpenGL2 too .. things like
the pvserver windows taking forever to startup with pvserver. Haven't
dug in much, but thought i'd mention.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Cory Quammen wrote:
> Christophe,
>
> I doubt it has anything to do with the particula
> If collaboration is experimental in ParaView, I'd say so in the very
> beginning of any article documenting or blogging about those functions.
> Still, in an experimental feature, there should be suffiecient interest to
> fix bugs, or "unsupported" would be a better term.
Makes sense. Note th
jects. ParaView finds those objects that are added
>>> before ParaView starts and those that are added later. But during ParaView
>>> startup one of the objects is lost.
>>> I'll see if I can make this reproducible and send a code example in the
>>> next days.
&
single process does
> not solve the problem.
>
> Gunnar
>
> 2016-07-11 20:35 GMT+02:00 Utkarsh Ayachit :
>>
>> Odd. I wonder if it's driver related. Did you build ParaView with
>> VTK_RENDERING_BACKEND set to OpenGL2? Also, "-tdx"/"-tdy" could i
> I got bitten by the default masking settings a couple of times as well. Maybe
> change the default to not do masking when the number of input points is low,
> like 1?
I hear you, but isn't that just as arbitrary? You'd run into the same
problem when your data has 10001 points, but now it w
Folks,
Thanks to all those who responded. I've create a calendar invite.
Others are welcome to join in on July 13th, between 10 am - 5 pm EDT
(NY time) to participate remotely using the following hangout link:
https://hangouts.google.com/hangouts/_/kitware.com/paraview
Everyone is free to help o
Odd. I wonder if it's driver related. Did you build ParaView with
VTK_RENDERING_BACKEND set to OpenGL2? Also, "-tdx"/"-tdy" could indeed
slow things down as it's now rendering for a tiledisplay rather than
for a client. The rendering works in that case, since the client is
rendering on it's own. Al
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Burlen Loring wrote:
> certainly seems like a bug worth fixing. let me know if you want me to start
> a bug report.
That'd be great. Thanks, Burlen.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source project
.1.1?
>
> Steven
>
> On 6/29/16, 10:05 AM, "ParaView on behalf of Utkarsh Ayachit"
>
> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Since there we a couple of crucial issues reported after the 5.1.0
> release, we are planning on putting out a 5.1.1 patch release.
>
>
t;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, July 08, 2016 1:08 PM
> *To:* Scott, W Alan
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [Paraview] Tesselate filter
>
>
>
> It should. As
Dean,
Current numpy support in VTK doesn't include string arrays, You can
overcome that as follows:
colNames = [ 'simulation', 'v0 (m/s)', 'k (%)' ]
col0 = [ 'm01-sim001', 'm01-sim002', 'm02-sim001' ]
...
strArray = vtk.vtkStringArray()
strArray.SetName(colNames[0])
strArray.SetNumberOfTuples
That's weird. If you create a Sphere source instead, does that work?
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Felix Winterhalter
wrote:
> So I've been trying to get parallel rendering to work for my Paraview.
>
> I built the server myself with MPI support enabled. I then started the
> parallel server us
It should. As I am looking at the code, I notice that there may be a bug in
the code that passes the cell data information which is causing the arrays
to be lost.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Scott, W Alan wrote:
> Shouldn’t the tessellate filter pass on cell data? Currently point data
> is
I got over such problems by delaying importing of those modules until
needed. They are not needed for most common use-cases.
See:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/commit/3af48fffd924bf5ffd11f576a261ef4eb3ff5897
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Burlen Loring wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm e
Juan,
Can you share a sample dataset to reproduce this issue?
Thanks
Utkarsh
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 5:37 AM, Juan Valverde
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We are working with Syrthes thermal. The output of such program is
> written in Ensight case format, version 6. All data is imported
> correctly from
Following on the footsteps of the successful VTK hackathon, we'll be
doing a ParaView hackathon next week on Wed. July 13.
Please email me (or the list) if you're attending. The objectives will
be similar:
* clean up pending MRs
* clean up bugs reported on bug tracker
* update/triage dashboard ma
Eugene,
BTW, the reader does support not merging points. I'll check if ParaView
exposes that option, if not, it should. That'll speed this up too.
Utkarsh
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:
> Eugene,
>
> I am pretty s
> first of all, is 5.1 production ready? or is 4.4 still the way to go in a
> production environment? this would be the only install available for users so
> it's important that it function reliably/correctly.
See this thread:
http://public.kitware.com/pipermail/paraview/2016-June/037389.html
>
Eugene,
I am pretty sure the community will be interested in this! While I'll need
to look into the reader to understand, to get things going, do you have a
sample dataset to demonstrate the issue?
Utkarsh
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Eugene de Villiers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> When importing
Ben, do you have any insight? I remember this was something to do with
CMake and Qt.
FWIW, our dashboards to test with ninja so that's not the issue.
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
> I’m trying to build ParaView for the first time in many years on a Windows
> machine w
Yes. Just tested it with g1s1 on 8 servers.
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Scott, W Alan wrote:
> Does that work multiple remote servers?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Utkarsh Ayachit [mailto:utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com]
> Sent: Wedne
Can you share the dataset to reproduce the issue? Feel free to send it
off the list if needed.
Thanks
Utkarsh
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:50 PM, wrote:
> I have just updated from Paraview 4.3.1 to 5.1.0 and am having trouble with
> a Python script that no longer works correctly.
>
> The attached
> I am trying to find the sum of a variable for all cells at one timestep.
Try using the Python calculator. Make sure you set the "Array
Association" to "Cell Data" and then enter the expression sum(ARRAY).
Example for can.ex2, I can do "sum(EQPS)".
___
> I'd like to get the reduced CMake requirement in for 5.1.1. See pull
> request #8 from GitHub, https://github.com/Kitware/ParaView/pull/8
Roger. I'll include this one as well.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
(grrr, I really need to start proof reading my emails before sending
them. Sorry about all the glaring grammatical errors -- things often
seem to get lost in translation between my mind and fingers :) )
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Utkarsh Ayachit
wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Since there we
Folks,
Since there we a couple of crucial issues reported after the 5.1.0
release, we are planning on putting out a 5.1.1 patch release.
Currently, this will include the following fixes:
1. Address issues with depth peeling not working as expected in
client-server mode.
2. Address issues with Ex
The "Point Interpolation" filters need a scalar array to be present on
the dataset.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:38 AM, stephaneンドング メファネ
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On what kind of input does the "interpolating point cloud" does work?
> I imported a VRML point cloud and even extracted the points of interes
> As soon as I set the threshold to 0 the warning about the OpenGL 3.2 context
> pops up (but no segfault in this case).
No segfault just means that the scene didn't attempt to rendering
something that needed newer OpenGL.
> I tried a very minimal example that creates a 3.2 context (using SDL) an
Attached a fixed version. I've also change the "Script" to just print
the value for sFields which is a array of selected array names. You'll
need to update your code accordingly. Note, if the user selected
nothing then sFields will not be defined. So you may want to handle
that in your code as well
of what you're
rendering, but just the fact that remote rendering kicks in. We can
then debug further.
Utkarsh
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Paul Melis wrote:
>
>
> On 06/27/2016 05:29 PM, Paul Melis wrote:
>>
>> On 04/19/2016 01:04 PM, Paul Melis wrote:
>>>
Do you have a sample dataset to share to reproduce this issue? Also
what version of ParaView are you trying this with?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Jim wrote:
> I can import (raw binary) a 3D file (1178x1202x1000x1float), extract a
> subset and display it using sphere glyphs where the spheres
Josh,
Can you narrow down the error to specific pv.Hide() call? The error
is popping up due to something calling the Hide with arguments that
have not been setup properly. Let's isolate that and we can then trace
backwards from there. If you want to send me the reset of the code +
data, feel free
Thanks for reporting that. We may need to do a 5.1.1 patch release
soon. If so, I'll make sure this one gets addressed too.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 6:37 AM, kenichiro yoshimi
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I use ParaView 5.1.0 version installed from a binary file
> ParaView-5.1.0-Qt4-OpenGL2-Windows-64bit.
e:36 (file):
> file INSTALL cannot find
> "/home/angel/PV/5.1.0/Build/install/lib/paraview-5.1".
>
>
>
> Rick Angelini
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Phone: 410-278-6266
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From
> To replicate it load bake.e.In v4.4 and v5.0.1, there are 3 cell
> variables, Object IDs, Global Element IDs, and processor_id, which can be
> loaded from the file.
Could not reproduce this (see attached image). Can you try running with "-dr"?
___
301 - 400 of 3534 matches
Mail list logo
