Hi,
I've noticed a bug when using the windbladereader; the portion of the code that
reads the blade file is one timestep behind the code that reads the field. For
instance, if one is at timestep i, the field data will correspond with timestep
"i" but the blade data will correspond with the las
I'll take a look at it. I may need a time dependent data set if I can't
figure it out though.
Andy
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Sohail Shafii wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed a bug when using the windbladereader; the portion of the code
> that reads the blade file is one timestep behind the cod
I believe that data set went you (related to the updates I made for the wind
blade reader)...the one with ten timesteps, should do the trick. Do you still
have it?
Sohail
--- On Thu, 7/7/11, Andy Bauer wrote:
From: Andy Bauer
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Interesting bug when using
Andy Bauer * wrote:
>
>
> From: Andy Bauer
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Interesting bug when using windbladereader and
> multiple time steps
> To: "Sohail Shafii"
> Cc: paraview@paraview.org
> Date: Thursday, July 7, 2011, 7:09 PM
>
>
> I'll take a
n Fri, 7/8/11, Andy Bauer wrote:
From: Andy Bauer
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Interesting bug when using windbladereader and multiple
time steps
To: "Sohail Shafii" , "Fasel, Patricia K"
Cc: paraview@paraview.org
Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 9:59 AM
Ok, I'm able to repli
r to what you are
> using now, actually), problem is my DSL connection has a poor upload. Would
> three or four timesteps do?
>
> Sohail
>
>
> --- On *Fri, 7/8/11, Andy Bauer * wrote:
>
>
> From: Andy Bauer
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Interesting bug when using
ile); only with .wind and the most up-to-date release version of
ParaView as opposed to 3.8.0.
Sohail
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Andy Bauer wrote:
From: Andy Bauer
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Interesting bug when using windbladereader and multiple
time steps
To: "Sohail Shafii"
Cc: "
enFOAM file); only with .wind and the most up-to-date release
> version of ParaView as opposed to 3.8.0.
>
>
> Sohail
>
> --- On *Fri, 7/8/11, Andy Bauer * wrote:
>
>
> From: Andy Bauer
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Interesting bug when using windbladereader and
> mul
7, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Sohail Shafii
>> http://mc/compose?to=sohailsha...@yahoo.com>
>> > wrote:
>>
>> I believe that data set went you (related to the updates I made for the
>> wind blade reader)...the one with ten timesteps, should do the trick. Do
>> you still
can send you a data set with more timesteps (similar to what you are
> using now, actually), problem is my DSL connection has a poor upload. Would
> three or four timesteps do?
>
> Sohail
>
>
> --- On *Fri, 7/8/11, Andy Bauer
> http://mc/compose?to=andy.ba...@kitware.com>
By "current development version" are you referring to the master branch?
Sohail
--- On Wed, 7/13/11, Andy Bauer wrote:
From: Andy Bauer
Subject: Re: [Paraview] Interesting bug when using windbladereader and multiple
time steps
To: "Sohail Shafii"
Cc: "Pa
it
> separately from the field.
>
> I can send you a data set with more timesteps (similar to what you are
> using now, actually), problem is my DSL connection has a poor upload. Would
> three or four timesteps do?
>
> Sohail
>
>
> --- On *Fri, 7/8/11, Andy Bauer
> htt
12 matches
Mail list logo
