Hello,
I was wondering what everyone would consider to be the most portable format
for:
1. multi-zone
2. unstructured
3. 2d or 3d
mesh data.
Thanks Everyone,
Juan
___
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@paraview.org
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinf
What do you mean by portable? Across visualization applications or
across platforms? Across visualization applications, you best bet is
probably EnSight.
-berk
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:56 PM, j s wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering what everyone would consider to be the most portable format
> f
> Thanks for your response. I guess I was talking about visualization. Would
> Ensight be considered an industry standard?
As close as you will get to a standard. If you are in the CFD field,
you may want to look into CGNS too. We will have CGNS support
relatively soon.
-berk
On Tue, Jan 20,
Hi Juan,
Please direct your questions to the ParaView mailing list instead of
me. I believe that we will have some sort of CGNS support in the next
release. It may take some time to mature though.
-berk
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 6:45 PM, j s wrote:
> I am from the TCAD field, which is CFD related
Please change the mailing list so the default "reply to" is the list and not
the person who last responded.
I realized my mistake once it was already sent, but I didn't follow up to
the list since I figured you'd reply to the list if you thought it warranted
public attention.
Juan
On Tue, Jan 20
