Re: [pca] Patch 142901-05: installation woes

2010-03-08 Thread Alan Wilson
Has anyone else successfully deployed 142901-05? Any ideas what we're doing wrong? Many thanks, --Scott Severtson We're having exactly the same issue as you The patch installed fine on one x4140 but not the other. We had exactly the same symptoms as you. The only difference is the

Re: [pca] Patch 142901-05: installation woes

2010-03-08 Thread Scott A. Severtson
Alan, We have a case open with Sun (#72559404), which you may want to reference. They've done some diagnostics, and have some clues, but nothing definitive yet. All the machines involved run Postgres within a zone, regardless if the patch was successful or not. However, I'm glad to know I'm

Re: [pca] Patch 142901-05: installation woes

2010-03-08 Thread Ben Taylor
Escalate higher. This is a ridiculous argument by some clueless Sunsolve engineer. On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Scott A. Severtson scott.severt...@digitalmeasures.com wrote: All, Per Sun's support engineer: --- PCA is not a supported way to apply patches and it must be used at the

Re: [pca] Patch 142901-05: installation woes

2010-03-08 Thread Martin Paul
Scott A. Severtson wrote: Per Sun's support engineer: PCA is not a supported way to apply patches and it must be used at the user's own risk. But patchadd is a supported way to apply patches, and that's exactly what's being used by PCA. PCA never tried to install patches on its own,