Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

Hi, I support the idea of the need for Stateful PCE applicability. As stated in the latest draft, this document is pivotal in providing an overarching stateful PCE applicability to various scenarios. This draft should have preceded any other stateful PCE related drafts, but it is not too late t

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

Hi PCErs, I think it is key to have a document about the stateful PCE applicability, so the rationale behind stateful and active PCE is well understood. Let me point out that I also speak as a contributing author, so I am biased.. The applicability draft documents a set of use cases considered

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

Hi- Yes, I see a need for applicability doc. Thanks Regards … Zafar From: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" mailto:jvass...@cisco.com>> Date: Saturday, June 22, 2013 4:19 AM To: Ina Minei mailto:i...@juniper.net>>, "pce@ietf.org" mailto:pce@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

+1 Best, Ravi On Jun 26, 2013, at 6:23 AM, Robert Varga mailto:robert.va...@pantheon.sk>> wrote: As a contributing author, I believe there is a need for an applicability document. I think this document covers the topic well enough and I'm not aware of any huge gaps. Thanks, Robert On 06/21

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

As a contributing author, I believe there is a need for an applicability document. I think this document covers the topic well enough and I'm not aware of any huge gaps. Thanks, Robert On 06/21/2013 06:16 PM, Ina Minei wrote: Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working gro

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

Hi all, Definitely, Yes for both. Best Regards Fatai From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 4:20 PM To: Ina Minei; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Thanks Ina - good question : WG,