Hi Tomonori,
Many thanks for your review. New version addresses the comments:
New Version:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-07
Diff with previous version:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-07
Regards,
Mahendra
Hi Ines,
Many thanks for your review. If you please see inline [MN] for your
questions/comments.
Regards,
Mahendra
-Original Message-
From: Ines Robles via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2019 9:36 AM
To: rtg-...@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection@ietf.org;
Yes/Support
Thanks,
Mahendra
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 14 July 2019 18:30
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-leedhody-pce-vn-associat...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association
Hi WG,
Hi Julien,
Many thanks for the detailed review comments, we have fixed all the comments
and new version is posted, please find the new-version and version-diff links
below:
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity
Diff:
Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 7:09 AM
To: pce@ietf.org; ar2...@att.com; ag6...@att.com; jakar...@cisco.com; Siva
Sivabalan (msiva) ; Mahendra Singh Negi
Subject: Re: Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-05
+ Authors.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6
identified by an unknown
PSP-ID)) would be triggered.
So this I-D can be progressed independently, while the WG decides how to handle
the missing statement in RFC 8231.
Thanks for your review,
Mahendra
------
Mahendra Singh Negi Mahendra
Mobile
Support, this is an important extension in Redundant PCE deployments motivated
by real use cases.
Thanks,
Mahendra
-Original Message-
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 June 2019 10:18
To: Farrel Adrian
Cc: pce@ietf.org;
...@cisco.com; jdpar...@cisco.com; Mahendra Singh Negi
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04
Hi Authors,
In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all
authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance
Hi Julien,
All the outstanding issues are resolved except "number of authors".
Please find the new draft-version and version-diff links below:
.
Version-06:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-06
Version Diff:
I am aware of IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed
to the IETF.
Thanks,
Mahendra
From:Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
To:draft-ietf-pce-association-divers...@ietf.org
Cc:pce@ietf.org
Date:2019-04-10 08:27:41
Subject:IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity
Hi
is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP Extensions for Segment Routing leveraging the
IPv6 data plane
Authors : Mahendra Singh Negi
Hi Chairs,
We would like to request for a slot to discuss updates on PCECC drafts. Please
note I'll be remote.
- the draft(s) you want to discuss:
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller
draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr
- the expected presenter name:
Support as co-author.
This document defines required PCEP extensions to support SRv6 path
provisioning by PCE (Controller), and is a necessary building block of SRv6
control plane.
Regards,
Mahendra
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Hi Adrian,
I have read the document and support the publication.
To authors few references are missing in sections 1.1/1.1.2/1.1.3, in case not
taken care.
Thanks,
Mahendra
-Original Message-
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 08 February 2019
Hi WG,
We have made an update to the PCECC WG I-D as well as to the PCECC-SR I-D.
I-D:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-01
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-01
I-D:
Yes/Support
Regards,
Mahendra
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick
Sent: 13 October 2018 20:17
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-control...@ietf.org;
pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for
Yes/Support
Thanks,
Mahendra
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian
(Zhenghaomian, Optical Technology Research Dept)
Sent: 25 September 2018 07:19
To: Jonathan Hardwick ; pce@ietf.org;
draft-zhang-pce-resource-shar...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce]
Yes/Support..
Regards,
Mahendra
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lizhenbin
Sent: 29 March 2018 08:36
To: Jonathan Hardwick; pce@ietf.org;
draft-ananthakrishnan-pce-stateful-path-protect...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] 答复: WG adoption poll for
go forwards with that?
Best regards
Jon
From: Mahendra Singh Negi [mailto:mahendrasi...@huawei.com]
Sent: 25 July 2017 13:12
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; 'Julien Meuric' <julien.meu...@orange.com>; Jonathan
Hardwick <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhod
19 matches
Mail list logo
