[Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-02 Thread Marcel Reuter (External)
Aloha, dear colleagues! This is my very first E-mail ever to IETF. So please forgive me, if I dont follow all rules. I have a question about the RFC5440 Section 6-2 https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5440.html#section-6.2 The RFC says: 6.2. Open Message ... The format of an Open message

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-02 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi Marcel, Welcome, please consider joining the PCE mailing list so that we don't have to manually approve your email to the list - https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce See inline... On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:11 AM Marcel Reuter (External) < marcel.reuter.exter...@telefonica.com> wrote: > A

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-02 Thread Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Marcel, Hi! Thanks for bringing this to the list! I interpret the text in RFC5440 regarding "one OPEN object" to just mean that the Open Message cannot carry more than one "OPEN" object. Dhruv, Hi! I would propose updating draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor to explicitly allow the use of the "VEND

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-02 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi Pavan, On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:39 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram wrote: > Marcel, Hi! > Thanks for bringing this to the list! I interpret the text in RFC5440 > regarding "one OPEN object" to just mean that the Open Message cannot carry > more than one "OPEN" object. > > Dhruv, Hi! > I would propose

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-02 Thread Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Please see inline.. On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 7:19 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote: > Hi Pavan, > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:39 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram > wrote: > >> Marcel, Hi! >> Thanks for bringing this to the list! I interpret the text in RFC5440 >> regarding "one OPEN object" to just mean that the Open M

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-02 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi Pavan, In my personal opinion, the vendor TLV makes sense when the TLV is associated with an existing PCEP Object (and it allows optional TLV) and the vendor Object for something new! I would mostly consider anything sent in Open message to be related to existing OPEN object :) Just to be clea

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-02 Thread Vishnu Pavan Beeram
I'm asking for the usage of the VENDOR_INFORMATION object to be allowed in the OPEN message (and not in notification, close and any other message where it is not already included). I would let the WG decide if it needs to be part of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor (case can be made to include it

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-03 Thread Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
) ; pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep I'm asking for the usage of the VENDOR_INFORMATION object to be allowed in the OPEN message (and not in notification, close and any other message where it is not already inc

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-03 Thread Marcel Reuter (External)
regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep Hi Pavan, On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 8:39 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram mailto:vishnupa...@gmail.com>> wrote: Marcel, Hi! Thanks for bringing this to the list! I interpret the text in RFC5440 regarding "one OPEN object" to just mean that the Open Message cannot car

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-03 Thread Vishnu Pavan Beeram
draft-dhody-pce-pcep-object-order). > > > > Thanks, > > Samuel > > > > *From:* Vishnu Pavan Beeram > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 2, 2023 7:01 PM > *To:* Dhruv Dhody > *Cc:* Dhruv Dhody ; Marcel Reuter (External) < > marcel.reuter.exter...@telefonica.com>; p

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-03 Thread Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep I'm asking for the usage of the VENDOR_INFORMATION object to be allowed in the OPEN message (and not in notification, close and any other message where

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-03 Thread Vishnu Pavan Beeram
t; pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep > > > > Samuel, Hi! > > > > The requirement is to be able to carry "vendor specific information" in > the OPEN message. Some of this informat

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-04 Thread Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
-pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep If we can conclude that the use of the VENDOR-INFORMATION-TLV in OPEN object is not precluded by any of the existing documents (and that seems to be what Dhruv is saying as well), that is good enough for me

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-04 Thread Cheng Li
PM To: Samuel Sidor (ssidor) ; Vishnu Pavan Beeram Cc: Dhruv Dhody ; Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep Hi Samuel! Many thanks for your detailed answer! Many thanks to Dhruv and Pavan for all input and

Re: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep

2023-08-04 Thread Marcel Reuter (External)
-pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] Mail regarding draft-ietf-pce-pcep Hi Pavan, Please see inline . Regards, Samuel From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 4:40 PM To: Samuel Sidor (ssidor) Cc: Dhruv Dhody ; Dhruv Dhody ; Marcel Reuter (External) ; pce