Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-07-10 Thread Margaria, Cyril (Coriant - DE/Munich)
6:17 PM To: JP Vasseur (jvasseur); Julien Meuric; pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on 1

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-07-10 Thread JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Vasseur (jvasseur); Julien Meuric; pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on 1. the need

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-07-08 Thread Margaria, Cyril (Coriant - DE/Munich)
Meuric; pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on 1. the need for an applicability document for stateful PCE and 2

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-07-08 Thread Ina Minei
Minei Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 6:17 PM To: JP Vasseur (jvasseur); Julien Meuric; pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful PCE, we wanted to hear

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-07-02 Thread JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
[mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 3:20 AM To: Ina Minei; pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Thanks Ina - good question : WG, please voice your opinion Thanks JP. On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Ina

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-07-02 Thread Ina Minei
. Regards, Young From: pce-boun...@ietf.orgmailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 3:20 AM To: Ina Minei; pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Thanks Ina - good question : WG

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-06-27 Thread Quintin Zhao
, June 22, 2013 3:20 AM To: Ina Minei; pce at ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Thanks Ina - good question : WG, please voice your opinion Thanks JP. On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Ina Minei wrote: Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-06-26 Thread Ramon Casellas
El 21/06/2013 18:16, Ina Minei escribió: In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on 1. the need for an applicability document for stateful PCE and 2. whether draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app satisfies this

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-06-26 Thread Fatai Zhang
Hi all, Definitely, Yes for both. Best Regards Fatai From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 4:20 PM To: Ina Minei; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Thanks Ina - good question : WG

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-06-26 Thread Robert Varga
As a contributing author, I believe there is a need for an applicability document. I think this document covers the topic well enough and I'm not aware of any huge gaps. Thanks, Robert On 06/21/2013 06:16 PM, Ina Minei wrote: Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-06-26 Thread Zafar Ali (zali)
@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Thanks Ina - good question : WG, please voice your opinion Thanks JP. On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Ina Minei wrote: Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful PCE, we wanted

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-06-26 Thread Oscar González de Dios
Hi PCErs, I think it is key to have a document about the stateful PCE applicability, so the rationale behind stateful and active PCE is well understood. Let me point out that I also speak as a contributing author, so I am biased.. The applicability draft documents a set of use cases considered

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-06-26 Thread Leeyoung
to include this work in PCE WG. Regards, Young From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 3:20 AM To: Ina Minei; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability Thanks Ina - good question : WG, please

Re: [Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-06-22 Thread JP Vasseur (jvasseur)
Thanks Ina - good question : WG, please voice your opinion Thanks JP. On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Ina Minei wrote: Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on 1. the need

[Pce] Stateful PCE applicability

2013-06-21 Thread Ina Minei
Dear chairs and working group, In light of the recent working group re-charter which now includes stateful PCE, we wanted to hear the opinions of the group on 1. the need for an applicability document for stateful PCE and 2. whether draft-zhang-pce-stateful-pce-app satisfies this