Hi WG,
Thanks to all who responded to the adoption poll. We have support to
adopt this as a WG item. Please continue to provide your comments as
the document moves through the WG process.
Authors, please post a -00 version
'draft-ietf-pce-stateful-interdomain-00' with only the name/date
change, a
Hi all,
Co-author hat on, I support the adoption the I-D and second Olivier in
agreeing with Dhruv's point.
Cheers,
Julien
On 12/01/2021 11:38, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> The response has been limited so far. Thanks to Oliver for responding
> to the comments.
>
> Since the adoption period
ic of
>> inter-domain path computation and e2e service setup.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sergio
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 11:38 AM
>> To: pce@ietf.org
>> Cc: pce-chairs
>>
Sergio
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 11:38 AM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Cc: pce-chairs
> Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for
> draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04
>
> Hi WG,
>
> The respo
, January 12, 2021 11:38 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04
Hi WG,
The response has been limited so far. Thanks to Oliver for responding to the
comments.
Since the adoption period coincided with holidays, we are extending
-
From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: den 12 januari 2021 11:38
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04
Hi WG,
The response has been limited so far. Thanks to Oliver for responding to the
comments.
Since the
Hi WG,
The response has been limited so far. Thanks to Oliver for responding
to the comments.
Since the adoption period coincided with holidays, we are extending
the adoption call for another week (i.e. Monday 18th Jan). We *need*
to hear from more of you before taking a call. Please respond with
the egress Border Node, BNB2. The
> instructions also tell BNB1 the incoming label or SID that
> will be stitched to the intra-domain path, and the label or
> SID to use on the inter-domain link to BNC.
> c. In Domain-C, the PCE instructs the ingress Borde
8, 2021 12:27 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for
draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04
Hi WG,
Happy New Year!
Just a reminder, the WG Adoption poll ends on Monday 11th Jan, please
respond to the call with your support (or not), comments, etc.
Please be
I support the adoption given points rased by Dhruv are addressed ( post
adoption in fine)
Cheers,
Jeff
On Jan 8, 2021, 1:32 AM -0800, Dhruv Dhody , wrote:
> Hi WG, Authors,
>
> Speaking as a WG participant...
>
> I find the functionality described in this I-D to be very useful. But,
> I have one
Hello Dhruv,
Thanks for your comment.
When we started writing this draft, our main goal was to propose a
mechanism for inter-domain tunnel setup in a coordinated way while
remaining operator independent. We chose to re-use as much as possible
existing PCEP objects and just proposed to request new
Hi WG, Authors,
Speaking as a WG participant...
I find the functionality described in this I-D to be very useful. But,
I have one concern that I would like to be addressed before adoption
or at least get an agreement on (to be handled post-adoption).
I am not in favor of how the PST is being use
Hi WG,
Happy New Year!
Just a reminder, the WG Adoption poll ends on Monday 11th Jan, please
respond to the call with your support (or not), comments, etc.
Please be more vocal on the list [1].
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/slides-109-pce-1-intro
path to reach the Destination. The instructions also
tell BNC the incoming label or SID that will be stitched to the
intra-domain path.
-Original Message-
From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 18 December 2020 12:52
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs
Subject: [Pce] WG adoption
Support.
Thanks.
Young
2020년 12월 18일 (금) 오후 9:53, Dhruv Dhody 님이 작성:
> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for
> draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04.
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04
>
> Should this draft be adopted by the PC
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons
- Why / Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after
16 matches
Mail list logo
