the
> numeric values included in description of the identity
>
> I am almost done but not quite - I am trying to match 8231 with the YANG
> and have not quite made it but is is CoB on Friday afternoon:-(
>
> Tom Petch
> ____
> From: Pce on behalf of tom petch <
&g
match 8231 with the YANG
> and have not quite made it but is is CoB on Friday afternoon:-(
>
> Tom Petch
>
> From: Pce on behalf of tom petch <
> ie...@btconnect.com>
> Sent: 22 November 2022 12:19
> To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@i
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your further comments!
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 5:49 PM tom petch wrote:
> From: Pce on behalf of tom petch <
> ie...@btconnect.com>
> Sent: 17 November 2022 10:42
>
> From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com <
> julien.meu...@orange.com>
> Sent: 17 November 2022 09:3
22 November 2022 12:19
To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-19
From: Pce on behalf of tom petch
Sent: 17 November 2022 10:42
From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 17 November 2022 09:38
As mentioned in the PC
@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-19
From: Pce on behalf of tom petch
Sent: 17 November 2022 10:42
From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 17 November 2022 09:38
As mentioned in the PCE session during IETF 115, this WGLC has ended.
Thanks Tom
From: Pce on behalf of tom petch
Sent: 17 November 2022 10:42
From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 17 November 2022 09:38
As mentioned in the PCE session during IETF 115, this WGLC has ended.
Thanks Tom for your review. Comment resolution is in progress.
-20 did appear in
From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 17 November 2022 09:38
As mentioned in the PCE session during IETF 115, this WGLC has ended.
Thanks Tom for your review. Comment resolution is in progress.
-20 did appear in October. Is that worth looking at or waiting for -21?
Tom Petc
Hi all,
As mentioned in the PCE session during IETF 115, this WGLC has ended.
Thanks Tom for your review. Comment resolution is in progress.
Regards,
Julien
On 26/09/2022 15:01, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
Hi PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-y
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your detailed review!
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:13 PM tom petch wrote:
> From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com <
> julien.meu...@orange.com>
> Sent: 26 September 2022 14:01
>
> This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for
> draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-19. Please revie
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: 07 October 2022 10:45
Hi Tom, WG,
I was about to send a note to the WG but you beat me to it. You made a valid
point regarding TLS 1.3. But I suggest a different approach.
RFC 8253 states that TLS v1.2 or "later" is supported for PCEP. IMHO, a draft
fixing the issues w
Hi Tom, WG,
I was about to send a note to the WG but you beat me to it. You made a
valid point regarding TLS 1.3. But I suggest a different approach.
RFC 8253 states that TLS v1.2 or "later" is supported for PCEP. IMHO, a
draft fixing the issues with TLS 1.3 for PCEPS is a much better idea than
s
From: Pce on behalf of tom petch
Sent: 03 October 2022 11:02
From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 26 September 2022 14:01
Hi PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-19. Please review and share any feedback using
the PCE mailing list.
T
From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 26 September 2022 14:01
This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-19. Please review and share any feedback using
the PCE mailing list.
This WGLC will end on Tuesday October 11.
I commented before that this has
From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 26 September 2022 14:01
Hi PCE WG,
This message starts a 2-week WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-19. Please review and share any feedback using
the PCE mailing list.
This WGLC will end on Tuesday October 11.
There are several lit
14 matches
Mail list logo
