please make sure you cc pd-dev too!
Anderson Goulart wrote:
Hello dmotd,
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:59 AM, dmotd inaudi...@simplesuperlativ.es wrote:
i guess i understand where you're coming from and
in some ways i think you are right, however
packaging debs is not as simple
nice to see a lot of discussion, i can't fathom
replying to the various threads happening
here as i am fairly time poor at present, but i
thought i'd take the time to make my position as
clear as possible before getting mixed up with any
particular argument. apologies if i become a bit
Steffen Juul wrote:
On 21/09/2009, at 16.59, dmotd wrote:
or pehaps pd could go down the path of perl/cpan,
php/pear etc, where extra non-base libs are housed
in a dedicated on demand server where users can
automagically fetch / compile and install extras
outside of the confines of a
Patches item #2864259, was opened at 2009-09-22 11:59
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by maxn
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=2864259group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Patches item #2864259, was opened at 2009-09-22 11:59
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by maxn
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=478072aid=2864259group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
dmotd wrote:
please make sure you cc pd-dev too!
oh i'm sorry, it seems that something is wrong
with my mail delivery - i checked the archives and
messages recieved only to my personal inbox did
make it to pd-dev i just didn't recieve them from
pd-dev and some messages from pd-dev never made
On Sep 21, 2009, at 5:10 PM, mescali...@gmail.com wrote:
Jakob Leben wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:01 PM, mescali...@gmail.com
mailto:mescali...@gmail.com mescali...@gmail.com
mailto:mescali...@gmail.com wrote:
if I were writing an external that is somewhat an interface to
arrays
First off, just to be clear, I don't think anyone wants to keep the
big monolithic build system or the package. Its a big hack/kludge
that is not maintainable going forward. I answered some other random
questions below as well.
On Sep 21, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Anderson Goulart wrote:
And
dmotd wrote:
dmotd wrote:
please make sure you cc pd-dev too!
oh i'm sorry, it seems that something is wrong
with my mail delivery - i checked the archives and
messages recieved only to my personal inbox did
make it to pd-dev i just didn't recieve them from
pd-dev and some messages from
On Sep 22, 2009, at 12:38 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
2) remove m_pd.h from externals and use m_pd.h (why do I need
to have PD source to compile my external? This should be installed
as any other library and linked with -l option; the m_pd.h should
be
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Sep 21, 2009, at 5:10 PM, mescali...@gmail.com wrote:
Jakob Leben wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:01 PM, mescali...@gmail.com
mailto:mescali...@gmail.com mescali...@gmail.com
mailto:mescali...@gmail.com wrote:
if I were writing an external that is
On Sep 22, 2009, at 1:04 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
i agree (and honestly i don't think a CPAN-like system will happen
anytime soon).
It will happen as soon as someone does it. :D I don't think
anyone objects to the idea, right?
well, like always - i
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
dmotd wrote:
dmotd wrote:
please make sure you cc pd-dev too!
oh i'm sorry, it seems that something is wrong with my mail delivery -
i checked the archives and messages recieved only to my personal inbox
did make it to pd-dev i just didn't recieve them from
13 matches
Mail list logo
