Bugs item #3597385, was opened at 2012-12-18 20:55
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by jancsika1
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3597385&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Bugs item #3597384, was opened at 2012-12-18 20:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by jancsika1
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3597384&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Bugs item #3597383, was opened at 2012-12-18 20:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by jancsika1
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3597383&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Bugs item #3597353, was opened at 2012-12-18 19:16
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by jancsika1
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3597353&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Bugs item #3597352, was opened at 2012-12-18 19:11
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by jancsika1
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3597352&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
On Dec 18, 2012, at 3:24 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 20:48, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:01 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>>
>>> hi hans,
>>>
>>> so i did a number of tests, and of course found one case, where my solution
>>> did not behave as it
just in case,enybody was wondering about the beginning of this conversation.
fgmasrd
IOhannes
Original Message
Subject: pd-gui's tests and Qs on singletons
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:00:35 +0100
From: IOhannes m zmölnig
To: Hans-Christoph Steiner
hi hans,
so i did a number
On 12/18/2012 21:24, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 12/18/2012 20:48, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I remember that part of the code being a pain to get right thru all of
the possibilities... remember, Windows and probably even GNOME are
going to behave differently from XFCE and probably each oth
On 12/18/2012 20:48, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:01 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
hi hans,
so i did a number of tests, and of course found one case, where my solution did
not behave as it should :-)
starting one pd and then one pd-gui, would result in having 2 instanc
On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:01 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> hi hans,
>
> so i did a number of tests, and of course found one case, where my solution
> did not behave as it should :-)
> starting one pd and then one pd-gui, would result in having 2 instances
> running (starting another pd-gui would
Patches item #3587404, was opened at 2012-11-14 22:29
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by zmoelnig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3587404&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the commen
On 12/18/2012 20:28, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
autotools works with MinGW, except with ASIO. It builds with ASIO, but doesn't
make sound last I checked. That was a long while ago.
thanks for the clarification.
i guess i have to download the asio-sdk at some point...
fgmadsr
IOhannes
On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:05 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>
>> On 12/18/2012 19:34, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> It seems to be MinGW-only. I just submitted a patch to get the
>>> makefile.mingw working again.
>>
>> is aut
On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:05 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 19:34, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> It seems to be MinGW-only. I just submitted a patch to get the
>> makefile.mingw working again.
>
> is autotools still not working with mingw?
autotools works with MinGW, except
On 12/18/2012 19:34, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
It seems to be MinGW-only. I just submitted a patch to get the makefile.mingw
working again.
is autotools still not working with mingw?
fgmasrd
IOhannes
___
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@iem.at
http
Patches item #3597283, was opened at 2012-12-18 10:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by millerpuckette
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3597283&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Yeah... i need to get mingw up and running here someway :)
M
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:34:54PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> It seems to be MinGW-only. I just submitted a patch to get the
> makefile.mingw working again. Were you building with msvc?
>
> .hc
>
> On Dec 18, 2012, at
It seems to be MinGW-only. I just submitted a patch to get the makefile.mingw
working again. Were you building with msvc?
.hc
On Dec 18, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> Hmm, I can't reproduce the problem right away (reading/writing mono .wav
> files using soundfiler is working fin
Patches item #3597283, was opened at 2012-12-18 10:33
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3597283&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Patches item #3597233, was opened at 2012-12-18 08:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3597233&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comme
Yeah, let's skip Solaris support. The current version you just pushed works for
me.
.hc
On Dec 18, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> OK... my suggestion would be just to try not to worry about Solaris :)
>
> M
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:54:29PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
OK... my suggestion would be just to try not to worry about Solaris :)
M
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:54:29PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2012-12-18 18:44, Miller Puckette wrote:
> > OK.. so how's this:
> >
> > For close I'll just edi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-12-18 18:44, Miller Puckette wrote:
> OK.. so how's this:
>
> For close I'll just edit in your sys_close hack :)
good.
>
> For sys_open, let's just unconditionally say:
>
> int imode = va_arg (ap, int); mode=(mode_t)imode;
>
> without the
try out what I just pushed which is probably no worse than Hannes's..
cheers
M
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 06:42:17PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2012-12-18 18:22, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > /* close a previously opened file this
OK.. so how's this:
For close I'll just edit in your sys_close hack :)
For sys_open, let's just unconditionally say:
int imode = va_arg (ap, int);
mode=(mode_t)imode;
without the surrounding if(sizeof(mode_t) < sizeof(int)).
I'll hack that in by hand and push to see how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-12-18 18:22, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> /* close a previously opened file this is needed on platforms where
> you cannot open/close resources across dll-boundaries */ int
> sys_close(int fd) { #ifdef _WIN32 return _close(fd); #else return
Patches item #3597233, was opened at 2012-12-18 08:43
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by millerpuckette
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3597233&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Windows is most definitely not POSIX compliant. If it was, we wouldn't be
having this discussion since the Win32 open() would just work. It has lots
POSIX compliant things, but is also missing many key ones. For example, WIN32
does not define any of the POSIX open() flags (O_CREAT, O_TRUNC,
... but if POSIX has a close() I think there's no issue here - MSW is POSIX
compliant, they say, and hence they're committeed to maintaining close().
So I think it's fine just to use close() and not have a sys_close() at
all (or if someone is actually using sys_close() we choud just:
> int sys_clo
On Dec 18, 2012, at 4:56 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 04:40, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> I think this approach works.
>
> thanks
>
>> The patch you provided seems totally untested, as in not even compiled on
>> GNU/Linux or Mac OS X. It includes the _close() function
Patches item #3597233, was opened at 2012-12-18 08:43
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3597233&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of
Bugs item #3597187, was opened at 2012-12-18 05:24
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by ceplatel
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=3597187&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
Patches item #3587404, was opened at 2012-11-14 22:29
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by zmoelnig
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478072&aid=3587404&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the com
On 12/18/2012 04:40, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think this approach works.
thanks
The patch you provided seems totally untested, as in not even compiled on
GNU/Linux or Mac OS X. It includes the _close() function in sys_close() which
only works on Win32 and it gives this warning when
34 matches
Mail list logo
