Check the help patch for -maxsize, you can override the max with that.
.hc
On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:58 AM, Ricardo Dueñas Parada wrote:
I realized that soundfiler truncate the file to 400 elements.
Is there a way to load a file into an array, withuot this restriction?
What I'm trying to do
Ok, then in a few days might be ready.
Edit the existing help patch and add this stuff, then add it to the
patch tracker, and it should be included. At least, I'd include it in
Pd-extended.
.hc
On Jun 22, 2008, at 12:06 PM, João Pais wrote:
who is responsible for this object? these
On Jun 23, 2008, at 5:58 AM, Max Neupert wrote:
Hans, thank you for doing that.
I have some remarks though:
Am 2008-06-23 um 06:58 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
- default locations for user-installed externals, helpfiles, etc.
Mac OS X: /Library/Pd and ~/Library/Pd
i still think it
I see now. My guess is that this issue is related to the very large
search path caused by having the hexloader and all of the libraries
loaded by default. Could you guys try a couple things:
- take hexloader out of the start up libs and try opening
- take all of the libs out of the
On Jun 23, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Andy Farnell wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:50:44 -0400 (EDT)
Mathieu Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Andy Farnell wrote:
with [tabread4~] being good enough for playing back files at
their original rate,
If you are going to playback at
Hi Luigi,
my abstraction is just sending a save message to Pd. The same way as if
you clicked FileSave. As i understand Pd it should save all subpatches
if the mainpatch is saved. So if you put the empty [pd $0-subpatch] (see
autosaver-help.pd) as receiver in your mainpatch it should do the same.
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:38:27 +0200
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps these could have more descriptive names, especially if there
was a tabread, etc. library. Some quick ideas:
[tabread_tweak~]
[tabread_transpose~]
Hard to argue against, but I'm such a fan of
On Jun 23, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Andy Farnell wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:38:27 +0200
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps these could have more descriptive names, especially if there
was a tabread, etc. library. Some quick ideas:
[tabread_tweak~]
[tabread_transpose~]
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:18:11 +0200
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This compactness only really helps speed up the typing of code. It
hinders the reading of code and the learning of code. Plus it means
that us mere mortals, who cannot remember what c in [tabread4c~]
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 06:52 +0100, Andy Farnell wrote:
Yes that'right, hmm I guess I knew that but said it in a woolly way
Amend that to
[tabread~] - play back at exactly the original rate
[tabread4~] - play back at close to the orginal rate
[tabread4c~] - play back with wider
On Mon, June 23, 2008 2:17 pm, Roman Haefeli wrote:
the only good reason to keep [tabread4~] in pd is to keep backwards
compatibility with patches that exploit [tabread4~]'s wierd behaviour,
imo.
Witch is a good enough reason to keep it, imho.
I much prefer Frank's suggestion. I.e. using the
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 14:35 +0200, Steffen Juul wrote:
On Mon, June 23, 2008 2:17 pm, Roman Haefeli wrote:
the only good reason to keep [tabread4~] in pd is to keep backwards
compatibility with patches that exploit [tabread4~]'s wierd behaviour,
imo.
Witch is a good enough reason to
**Piksel08: code dreams
december 4-7 2008
Bergen, Norway
How does code dream? What are the dreams of code?
Piksel08 examines the other side of code, an alternative side to a hard-coded
reality of work and play. Open hardware and free software project a utopic
vision, yet exist within
Hi,
just installed the last XP build. The program loads quite fast (but maybe
that's because I did it on my new desktop). But the problem with the
loading the patch still persists. Is there any relevant information that
can be collected from somewhere?
João
There is a bug in the prefs
well, tabread4c~ is far from perfect, it has the same aliasing problem than
tabread4~ and
it create more distortion than tabread4~. (but in lower frequency).
one told me that modern commercial audio software can use 32 points shannon
interpolation.
Other people are reporting this too. It doesn't happen with my
patches, I ran an installation a couple of weeks ago with the latest
version and it worked fine. Could you create a bug report and
include a patch or collection of patches that has this problem?
.hc
On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:12
On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 14:35 +0200, Steffen Juul wrote:
On Mon, June 23, 2008 2:17 pm, Roman Haefeli wrote:
the only good reason to keep [tabread4~] in pd is to keep backwards
compatibility with patches that exploit [tabread4~]'s wierd
Dear PDeople,
I'm looking for a volunteer to do some simple graphics and icons for the
Pure Data FLOSS Manual. The general description of the images needed
follows. Please get in touch with me so we can discuss them a bit more
in depth if you are interested to help.
PD FLOSS Manual:
Hi,
just have rebuilt one of my patches to fetch single videoframes not from
harddisc but from RAM with the pix_buffer objects. It works great, about 20
times faster - the problem is I can`t load more than 960 frames of Quicktime DV
PAL in RAM and the 2 GB of RAM are full this is strange
...where are they gone in GEM ver: 0.91.1 'tigital' ??? This breaks approx.
99,% of my patches.
best regards,
Rainer
_
Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces.
It's easy!
My guess is because pix_buffer stores uncompressed frames, which are
much bigger. But I could be wrong.
.hc
On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:18 PM, rainer _ wrote:
Hi,
just have rebuilt one of my patches to fetch single videoframes not
from harddisc but from RAM with the pix_buffer objects. It
hello,
i want to use the guitar hero wii guitar with Pd.
Actually is a wiimote inside a guitar hero axe,and the connection between
the computer is via bluetooth with the wiimote. Seems like the wiimote +
nunchuck.
Have any of you test it yet? Can i use the same wii library to pd or
darwinmote
They are in the markex lib, where they always have been. It is
just that markex is no longer included in Gem. It is included in
Pd-extended, and is easy enough to build.
.hc
On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:23 PM, rainer _ wrote:
...where are they gone in GEM ver: 0.91.1 'tigital' ??? This
There was a lot of discussion on this topic a few months ago. Check the
archives:
http://lists.puredata.info/search/Pd-list?query=guitar+heromax=20result=normalsort=score
best!
d.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi list,
i want to use the guitarhero wii guitar with pd.
it´s actually a wiimote
Hmm, it seems that the ram message never made it into the pix_film/
movie help patches. Are there any details that should be added?
.hc
On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:35 PM, chris clepper wrote:
pix_buffer store the frames uncompressed which is many times larger
than DV. You may try the 'ram'
There is a GNU/Linux Pd object for the wii remote floating around.
The Mac OS X version doesn't work (yet), you'll need to use OSCulator
for now:
http://www.osculator.net/wiki/
.hc
On Jun 23, 2008, at 6:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
i want to use the guitar hero wii guitar
Hi IOhannes,
just getting back around to these edits..
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Installing:
i find it highly confusing that the Installing Pure Data on Debian
(and ubuntu) does not mention in a single word that you could just run
aptitude install puredata
Does this install PD
Hi there, I'd like to learn fft/convolution methods (especially to build
reverbs or amp. simulation patches), does anyone know of good tutorials around?
Thanks a lot!
D.S
http://www.flickr.com/photos/schafferdavid/
Hi HC or somebody else that knows this offhand,
I know this has been a big subject of debate on the list this month, so
I'll keep this short and simple:
Where are the current user preferences files on each platform for
Pd-Extended? I have only OS X in front of me now, so I see
Hi Chris,
pix_film movie dont want the ram message - error: pix_filmNEW: no method for
'ram' . I have tried it with GEM 0.90 tigital - ???
cheers,
Rainer
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:35:10 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PD] GEM pix_buffer question
CC:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:23 AM, cyrille henry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, tabread4c~ is far from perfect, it has the same aliasing problem than
tabread4~ and
it create more distortion than tabread4~. (but in lower frequency).
Strictly speaking, these interpolations don't create distortion
Hi list,
I need to use a bmp file as a score, and I need to read a pixel value from a
bmp file.
I've been looking for an object that can do that, but I haven't found it
yet, do you know
a way to do that?, maybe with gem?
_Ricardo
___
Pd-list@iem.at
Hello,
The speed of this conversation makes me a little uncomfortable.
Perhaps [tabread4~] is not so weird after all: if I'm not mistaken,
this is algebraically identical to the interpolation used in csound's
opcodes (e.g. oscil3)... I'm pretty sure both are piecewise Lagrange
polynomial
33 matches
Mail list logo
