Re: [PD] pix_image & memory use

enrique franco wrote: Hello, I have a problem loading images into the pix_image object. It seems that anytime I load a picture it fills the RAM memory, even if I load the same image every time (I just need one image at a time). Is there a way to empty the memory when I change the image? There is

Re: [PD] implications of pd~ for 'poly' objects

Phil Stone wrote: Hi Hans, Thanks for replying. I don't quite understand what you mean by "manually manage". As far as I know, without something like [pd~], there's no way to divide up and assign the Pd audio process to more than one core. Half of the cores on a quad-core are therefore use

Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

of course music has to do with body and feedbacks ; knowing that the arbitrary distance between body and mind is quite cultural, what about cyborgs and cyborg's bodies ? fred chris clepper wrote: On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:39 PM, ydego...@gmail.com

Re: [PD] implications of pd~ for 'poly' objects

Sorry if this question is obvious, may be an alternate for live audio processing with clusters: does it exist some netsend/netreceive for audio in Puredata ? I remember having using one (experimental) few years ago but was within MaxMSP... fred IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Phil Stone wrote:

[PD] netsend~

did someone succeeded in making x86 pd_darwin or ppc pd_linux for netsend~/netreceive~ ? or is there something newer than http://www.nullmedium.de/dev/netsend~/ ? thank's for your help, fred fred-ordi wrote: Sorry if this question is obvious, may be an alternate for live audio processing with

Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

hola thx for your thoughtful post. On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Fernando Gadea wrote: > 1- physical instruments well, yes; body, rhythm, instruments, music. but i think there is also something interesting in 'mental' music. or music that is achieved only through programming sounds. like th

[PD] [PD-announce] gem 0.92.0

after a year of silence and hard labour, i decided to take advantage of the nice date today and finally made a new release of Gem: 0.92 binaries available for w32 (installer), OS-X (universal) and the brave (source code) grab it while it's hot: http://gem.iem.at/releases/0.92.0 alternativel

Re: [PD] netsend~

There's a recent update here: http://www.remu.fr/sound-delta/netsend~/?page_id=7 Nick soundsorange.net > did someone succeeded in making x86 pd_darwin or ppc pd_linux for > netsend~/netreceive~ ? > or is there something newer than http://www.nullmedium.de/dev/netsend~/ ? > > thank's for your hel

[PD] R: Feedback discussion

http://www.larseneur.net/NewsENG.php http://www.youtube.com/user/larseneur a pd patch: http://www.th-th.fr/larsenophone ciao! --- Mer 9/9/09, Jerome Covington ha scritto: > Da: Jerome Covington > Oggetto: [PD] Feedback discussion > A: pd-list@iem.at > Data: Mercoledì 9 settembre 2009, 03:25 >

Re: [PD] implications of pd~ for 'poly' objects

Networking has a lot of latency and jitter, so not so good for realtime audio. As for manually managing pd~, I mean just manually creating as many pd~ instances as you have cores. .hc On Sep 9, 2009, at 5:06 AM, fred-ordi wrote: Sorry if this question is obvious, may be an alternate for

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] gem 0.92.0

Wow, lots of stuff. So maybe its time to start thinking about the next Pd-extended release... .hc On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:07 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: after a year of silence and hard labour, i decided to take advantage of the nice date today and finally made a new release of Gem: 0.9

Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

Hey guys, I just wanna say that in terms of live computer music, to me lack of physical interaction makes it totally boring for me. When I've mentioned this to some artists who's 'live performance' consists of them staring at a computer screen hitting buttons-maybe there'll be some arbitrary v

Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:43:49 + babsyco babsyco wrote: > If that's your attitude fine, but in that case what's the point of a live > performance at all It's an fair question. The answer to that, for those of us that do livecoding type perfomances, is the accompanying visual display (usually

Re: [PD] implications of pd~ for 'poly' objects

Thanks for clarifying that, Hans, and for pointing out the issue with threads, IOhannes. One shouldn't be profligate with [pd~]s, strewing them all about and expecting performance gains -- therefore, one [pd~] per voice instance in a [polypoly] patch is probably not a good idea until we have 6

Re: [PD] pix_image & memory use

ben, have you an example of using the "save" message with pix_buffer ? what is this "save" message function ? because there is nothing about that in the documentation thx s. 2009/9/8 B. Bogart > Hey Enrique, > > In cases like this I use the "open" and "save" messages to pix_buffer. > > You c

Re: [PD] Pd-list Digest, Vol 54, Issue 38

> > Hello Iohannes, > Please look at the answers below... > > > -- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:13:39 +0200 > From: IOhannes m zmoelnig > Subject: Re: [PD] pix_image & memory use > To: pd-list@iem.at > Message-ID:

Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

john saylor escribió: hola hola john thx for your thoughtful post. thankyou for reading :) On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Fernando Gadea wrote: 1- physical instruments well, yes; body, rhythm, instruments, music. but

Re: [PD] pix_image & memory use

Hey Ben, I don´t understand how to use the "open" and "save" messages to pix_buffer.. I´ve been trying to load jpgs with pix_buffer without pix_image but the problem of memory is the same. I just can empty the RAM when I close PD. Any ideas? Enrique On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:56 PM, B. Bogart w

Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:43:49 + > From: babsyco babsyco > > I think the area of MIDIcontroller technology is so ignored, probably cause > there's no market fo it cause of that dumb attitude. I wish someone would > come up with some interesting physical controller that actually requires >

[PD] future of the "Text Editor"

Now that cut/copy/paste works in all object boxes, comments, etc. on all platforms, is there any reason to keep the "Text Editor"? .hc News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is publicity.

[PD] future of the "Text Editor"

> > Message: 5 > Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:52:42 -0400 > From: Hans-Christoph Steiner > > > Now that cut/copy/paste works in all object boxes, comments, etc. on > all platforms, is there any reason to keep the "Text Editor"? > > .hc > There's a "text editor" ... ? :D ... actually, you'll keep if

Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

She writes continually like a long nozzle spraying the air, and she argues continually; theres is nothing I can say that is really not something else, so, I stop saying and finally she argues herself out the door saying something like — I´m not trying to impress my self upon you. Charles Bukowski

[PD] Re : "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

Hi Babsyco You'll probably enjoy this guy's work : http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/09/tristan_shones_sound_machines.html?CMP=OTC-0D6B48984890 De : babsyco babsyco À : pd-list@iem.at Envoyé le : Mercredi, 9 Septembre 2009, 16h43mn 49s Objet : Re: [PD] "co

Re: [PD] future of the "Text Editor"

On Sep 9, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Now that cut/copy/paste works in all object boxes, comments, etc. on all platforms, is there any reason to keep the "Text Editor"? Shift+arrows : select Ctrl+arrows : skip words Shift+Ctrl

Re: [PD] future of the "Text Editor"

On Sep 9, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Daniel Wilcox wrote: Message: 5 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:52:42 -0400 From: Hans-Christoph Steiner Now that cut/copy/paste works in all object boxes, comments, etc. on all platforms, is there any reason to keep the "Text Editor"? .hc There's a "text editor" ...

Re: [PD] future of the "Text Editor" (fwd)

resending because i accidentally had used a different "From:". -- Forwarded message -- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:49:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Mathieu Bouchard To: Hans-Christoph Steiner Cc: PD list Subject: Re: [PD] future of the "Text Editor" On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Hans-Christoph Ste

Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

> Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:19:09 -0300 > From: Gabriel Vinazza > Subject: Re: [PD] "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event >on the BBC > To: pd-list@iem.at > Message-ID: ><5d782c50909091219m50188513ga6a1babecab29...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plai

Re: [PD] future of the "Text Editor" (fwd)

I just added a triple-click binding. The others seem possible but not easy. Matju, did you embed a full 'text' widget into the canvas using a window? .hc On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:52 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: resending because i accidentally had used a different "From:". -- Forw

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] gem 0.92.0

yes, this looks great, I'll check it soon... thanks for the work...! J On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Wow, lots of stuff. So maybe its time to start thinking about the next > Pd-extended release... > > .hc > > > On Sep 9, 2009, at 10:07 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig

Re: [PD] future of the "Text Editor" (fwd)

I think it is useful to press the down key and be in the same position in the next line.If I understand the problem correctly... On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:22 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > I just added a triple-click binding. The others seem possible but not > easy. Matju, did you embed

Re: [PD] future of the "Text Editor"

is it the same module that is used to display properties of data structures? if so, this is still useful (for example to set coordinates, or the odd value). besides that, I never used the text editor myself (for what it's worth) Now that cut/copy/paste works in all object boxes, comments,

Re: [PD] Re : "computer music" WAS: Re: Pd at a livecoding event on the BBC

Hey Thanks! I did enjoy that-not so much the music, but those are the kind of controllers I mean-why aren't they popular, or even available? I think being able to be as physical as possible in producing music would be such a liberating experience-to feel like you're physically sculpting the mu

[PD] Feedback discussion

what kind of feedback??? Andrés Ferrari G. http://www.myspace.com/anfex ¡Obtén la mejor experiencia en la web! Descarga gratis el nuevo Internet Explorer 8. http://downloads.yahoo.com/ieak8/?l=e1 _

Re: [PD] future of the "Text Editor"

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Now that cut/copy/paste works in all object boxes, comments, etc. on all > platforms, is there any reason to keep the "Text Editor"? data-structures + clarity of editing. i'm not sure if viewing the struct in DS launches the same 'Text Editor', but it is quit

Re: [PD] future of the "Text Editor"

On Sep 9, 2009, at 9:53 PM, dmotd wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Now that cut/copy/paste works in all object boxes, comments, etc. on all platforms, is there any reason to keep the "Text Editor"? data-structures + clarity of editing. i'm not sure if viewing the struct in DS launc

Re: [PD] Pd-GUI-Rewrite test builds

On Sep 7, 2009, at 11:46 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: --- On Sat, 9/5/09, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: From: Hans-Christoph Steiner Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-GUI-Rewrite test builds To: "Jonathan Wilkes" Cc: g...@itchybit.org, "PD List" Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 3:24 AM Ok, so it s

Re: [PD] Pd-GUI-Rewrite test builds

> >> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner > >> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-GUI-Rewrite test builds > >> To: "Jonathan Wilkes" > >> Cc: g...@itchybit.org, > "PD List" > >> Date: Saturday, September 5, 2009, 3:24 AM > >> > >> > >> Ok, so it seems there was some kind of > permissions > >> problem.  I reset > >>