Re: [PD] receiving messages in [expr] ?

2011-08-25 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-25 17:32, Andrew Faraday wrote: > > I'm liking the look of this to streamline a few patches. Only trouble is > there doesn't seem to be an audio rate version. So Funs' patch will give you > zipper noise. [value] doesn't seem to have an au

Re: [PD] multichannel instalation

2011-08-25 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-25 06:56, Jaime Oliver wrote: >> I haven't been able to get the Sapphire to output more than two channels >> through Pd (though it is supposed to be capable of 8). > > don't know this card but have you set the number of output channels to 4

Re: [PD] making puredata headphone-safe

2011-08-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-24 07:32, Richie Cyngler wrote: > I don't get why no one is talking about reducing the signal level before > dac~? > because we are talking about a safety net here. everything done before the [dac~], you can easily circumvent within the p

Re: [PD] making puredata headphone-safe

2011-08-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-24 02:33, Chris McCormick wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:48:05PM -0400, Martin Peach wrote: >> An [osc~] multiplied by will sound louder >> but it won't actually be louder than an osc multiplied by one (the >> amplitude at the

Re: [PD] notes/questions from a beginner

2011-08-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-23 14:16, Stephen Lavelle wrote: > > 1 - Inlets/outlets too small for me to accurately click on (touchpad) - > checking on pd-dev, they can be visually reskinned, but their actual > clickable size can't be changed. [ so I guess this one ha

Re: [PD] control alsamixer from pd?

2011-08-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-22 16:25, tim vets wrote: > Hi,when I'm using my internal soundcard, each time I boot, the input setting > is too low, > forcing me each time to raise it manually in alsamixer. > I tried "alsactl store", but that didn't work. > Is there a wa

Re: [PD] interpreting arrays as waveforms

2011-08-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-22 04:55, ronni montoya wrote: > Hello, i need to sonify a big pd array with numbers. I would like to > generate a waveform from the values of my array at a sample level > using waveform segments approach . > Can anybody point me how to achi

Re: [PD] Dynamic patching with audio - review

2011-08-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-18 13:49, Olivier B wrote: > The last created abstraction produce sound as wanted. > But the previous ones seems to be in a double sample rate or something like > that... > If I put and cut a box, everything becomes fine... > ??? a) you

Re: [PD] pd message order?

2011-08-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-04 16:08, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > I sometimes just get the receive as the "master receive", and then channel > it down in sub receives that are numbered, and I use trigger. > > something like > > [r a] > | > [t f f] > | | > |

Re: [PD] (breaking symbols) was Re: find a list of numbers in a text file

2011-08-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-03 23:45, Andy Farnell wrote: > > I used to use [symbol2list] a lot, so Iohannes suggestion > is interesting. But could that split on an arbitary > symbol like Chris suggests for the proposed [split] ? > definitely. fgmasdr IOhannes ---

Re: [PD] pd message order?

2011-08-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-04 00:06, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Technically it seems to be this: they output in reverse creation order. (The > last [receive] you created in the patch will output first.) > > > Conceptually, imagine an evil demon changing the order in

Re: [PD] (breaking symbols) was Re: find a list of numbers in a text file

2011-08-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-03 08:21, Chris McCormick wrote: > > Hm, I should just contribute a patch. > you could also just take the code of zexy's [symbol2list] object. it does exactly what you describe. fgmasdr IOhannes PS: i hereby grant miller s. puckette (t

Re: [PD] netsend/netreceive + GUI bug

2011-08-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-08-02 22:44, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: > > > This is however not the case whenever you have a high throughput traffic that > arrives form various sources at unexpected intervals as the netreceive sends > out its message whenever it receives it

Re: [PD] positioning the camera in specific point

2011-08-01 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-31 12:34, Olivier B wrote: > Hi... > > It's not exactly what you want, but [camera] may be solve your problem. > i would rather not, as i would rather have [camera] out of Gem as in. normally the way to position the camera is by using th

Re: [PD] Gem / glsl_fragment

2011-07-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-25 18:07, u...@xdv.org wrote: > i did give the --with-pd option as ../pd/src so ./configure did not > complain in the first place. > weirdly now trying to reproduce it, libtool says, it can't determine the > absolute directory name. > i swea

Re: [PD] Gem / glsl_fragment

2011-07-25 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-25 14:51, u...@xdv.org wrote: > hey there, > > On 25.07.2011 09:26, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 2011-07-24 17:05, u...@xdv.org wrote: >>&

Re: [PD] Gem / glsl_fragment

2011-07-25 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-24 17:05, u...@xdv.org wrote: > i'm running: pd-0.42.5-extended > my gem version is: 0.92.3 > on x86_64 ubuntu 10.10 there are some known problems with shaderID->t_float mapping on 64bit systems which are fixed in current trunk. fgmasdr IO

Re: [PD] Is there an object like [opendirectory]?

2011-07-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-21 16:01, Antonio Roberts wrote: > I'm using the [playlist] object and I want to be able to load a > directory by using the filebrowser dialogue. Usually you would do this > by sending [location /path/to/directory ( to [playlist] but I want

Re: [PD] OSX and pd-extended 0.43.1

2011-07-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-12 00:47, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> Ok, I think I found it, there were lots of 32-bit .x%x.c patterns in >> the magicglass/nlet highlighting code, I replaced them with proper >> .x%lx.

Re: [PD] Gem OSX10.6 (was Re: Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features)

2011-07-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-11 16:36, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> so rather than writing plugins for the (deprecated) QuickTime API, >> people should write plugins for the (afaiu: supported and feat

Re: [PD] pdcon.org off and spammed

2011-07-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-10 16:45, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jul 2011, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > >> I believe the info on the conventions (early and future) should be >> in http://puredata.info/ , maybe under "community", if not by a >> separate t

Re: [PD] pdcon.org off and spammed

2011-07-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-09 18:29, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Sat, 9 Jul 2011, Marco Donnarumma wrote: > >> I was surfing for pd papers and found this http://pdcon.org/ for the >> conference in Brazil, but it's offline. There's a fancy, spammy pink >> page instea

[PD] Gem OSX10.6 (was Re: Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features)

2011-07-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-06 04:35, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > esources/Scripts/../extra/Gem/Gem.pd_darwin, >> >> 10): Symbol not found: __Z10initGemWinv >>Referenced from: >> /Applications/Pd-0.43.1-extended-20110705.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/

Re: [PD] Compiling...

2011-07-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-07-08 19:58, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > - edit the file WorkerThread.cpp and add #include at around > line 43 (after #include ) fixed now in current Gem SVN, so it should compile again. fgamsdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: G

Re: [PD] drawing in pd

2011-06-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-29 22:52, cyrille henry wrote: it bugs >>> >>> definitely not. >> >> >> That's a rough answer, what does it mean? > > it mean that "it bug" is both rough and inexact (at least on my computer). exactly. the main motivation for the rou

Re: [PD] pdp removing v4l in favour of v4l2 [WAS] Re: Pd-extended build for Ubuntu 11.04 x64 ?

2011-06-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi i haven't had a look at your code but: On 2011-06-29 15:31, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > Previously sent to Hans only forwarding to the list. > Hi again... > >> The best thing would be to help Lorenzo get pdp working with v4l2 and >> remove the v4l s

Re: [PD] video backend for pix_record in linux?

2011-06-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-29 13:09, Jaime Oliver wrote: > hello again, > > what is the video backend for pix_record in linux? > there are several: - - libquicktime (for writing files) - - v4l2 and v4l2 (for writing streams into loopback devices) you will need the

Re: [PD] Webcam not working in Gridflow on Ubuntu

2011-06-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-29 11:14, Stefan Donchev wrote: > I nistall this one > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/i386/libv4l-dev/0.8.3-1 ,but it not > works... you recompiled gridflow? mfg.zu.bh IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/

Re: [PD] Pd-extended build for Ubuntu 11.04 x64 ?

2011-06-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-28 17:50, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: >> this guide : http://puredata.info/docs/developer/DebianWheezyAmd64 > As stated on the wiki page that is currently broken (on wheezy not sure > about ubuntu). I still have the .deb which I managed to install

Re: [PD] Webcam not working in Gridflow on Ubuntu

2011-06-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-28 09:45, Stefan Donchev wrote: > Thanks a lot for replay. I tried this, but it doesn't work again:( > could you try that as well and report back? fgmadsr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment:

Re: [PD] Webcam not working in Gridflow on Ubuntu

2011-06-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-28 00:15, Bastiaan van den Berg wrote: > Here is a little trick I use for getting webcams working in different linux > programs : > > - to get 'weird' v4l2 cameras working with 'normal v4l2 expecting' programs, > you can do this: > > LD_PR

Re: [PD] Pd "monosymphonia"

2011-06-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-27 23:56, Andrew Faraday wrote: > > This is probably because I created it on the mac, there may be a syntax issue > with other operating systems... > Usually the sends to create dynamic objects is titled pd-*Whatever's in the > title bar*

Re: [PD] GEM and gmerlin

2011-06-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-27 13:27, Jaime Oliver wrote: > Copying them makes it work fine... > got gem_videoV4L.so and gem_videoV4L2.so > while I was at it... > > Is there any reason to do the make install instead of placing them in > the self-contained /src folder?

Re: [PD] GEM and gmerlin

2011-06-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-27 12:27, Jaime Oliver wrote: >> you do have the resulting plugins copied/linked besides your Gem-binary, >> do you? > > No. Do I need to copy them manually? > unless you do a "make install" (which i have to admit, should work but i dunno

Re: [PD] GEM and gmerlin

2011-06-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-27 12:04, Jaime Oliver wrote: > > but do not get any image or video working... > you do have the resulting plugins copied/linked besides your Gem-binary, do you? $ ls Gem.pd_linux gem_filmGMERLIN.so gem_imageMAGICK.so gem_imageTIFF.so ge

Re: [PD] drawing in pd

2011-06-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2011-06-24 10:54, Albena Baeva wrote: > I saw some of the examples, looked at look at example > 07.texture/08.MotionBlur.pd, but when i draw a circle instead of the teapot, > it bugs definitely not. fgmasdr IOhannes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [PD] get console messages within patch

2011-06-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2011-06-23 18:39, Mirko Maier wrote: > Hi list, > > I wonder if there is a possibility to receive console messages within a > patch. Could be helpful, for instance, when there is a certain error that > should immediately trigger a reaction. > Thanks for advice. i guess there are some answer

Re: [PD] GEM and gmerlin

2011-06-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2011-06-23 11:43, Jaime Oliver wrote: > > from ./configure (and after ./autogen.sh): > > checking for PKG_GMERLIN_AVDEC_CFLAGS... > checking for PKG_GMERLIN_AVDEC_LIBS... > checking for gmerlin_avdec-config... no > checking for gavl_start in -lgmerlin_avdec... no ah, it seems like the pkg-con

Re: [PD] Bessel object

2011-06-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2011-06-23 00:05, mami music wrote: > Hi Guys > I have been tryung to find a polynomial solution to bessel functions but > instead have found solutioions for Jn(x) for different x and n. > Im asking if maby someone has created an object (or abstraction) that > computes Jn(x) for different n eith

Re: [PD] GEM and gmerlin

2011-06-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-22 11:38, Jaime Oliver wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In Fedora 11, Pd 0.42 and GEM ver: 0.92.2, > > I am trying to re-compile GEM with gmerlin. > > > I can see gmerlin (and quicktime for that matter) in usr/local/lib, > but gem doesn't see

Re: [PD] PPA for libpd?

2011-06-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-22 05:47, august wrote: > > > > Is there a version number for libpd? > > I see you guys have added a pd.pc in > http://gitorious.org/~aalex/pdlib/aalexs-libpd > just to chime in: please note that "pd" also provides a "pd.pc". i would hi

Re: [PD] Re : pix_image and pix_film : Unable to find files after two hours

2011-06-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-21 17:36, david lemarechal wrote: > > Is this a bug of pix_image ? Is there a limit of opened files somewhere ? > How can I avoid that ? > it's a bug in Pd, that has been fixed with 0.43 unfortunately, Gem will also have to adapt to the f

Re: [PD] loading patches much faster with -realtime

2011-06-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-21 11:43, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > > I guess this is because realtime gives it a higher overall priority, but > I wouldn't expect this to affect the loading of patches, would you? I no, i wouldn't have guessed that either. > don't know

Re: [PD] kinect external

2011-06-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-20 23:53, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Ah, yes, I have fink installed and use it for Pd builds. I included > FTGL here: > i cannot test this object, but i guess that it won't do any font rendering. so why is FTGL linked to/included

Re: [PD] Cannot compile Gem on Linux (Ubuntu)

2011-06-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-20 22:01, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > Any idea? > you might want to get the SVN-version of 0.92 [1], which has all these bugs fixed. this SVN branch is really only a bug-fixing branch, so it is quite safe to use it (rather than the SVN-tru

Re: [PD] Problem with 'invalid enumerant' with only gemwin

2011-06-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-19 22:42, manecante wrote: > hi, > > i have got the same problem since i compiled the last Gem : 0.93.SVN > rev4063, Pd 0.43.1test2, ubuntu 10.04, video card :ATI Mobility FireGL > V5700. > So it is a bit difficult to use the post window to

Re: [PD] pd crashed

2011-06-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-20 03:04, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > >> Under the heading "Add Artifact" please add that a backtrace >> would be useful to include in a bug report[1] (rather than >> mentioning it casually in a sidenote). indeed the "Add Artifact" is a bi

Re: [PD] pix_film can't open almost any file after upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10

2011-06-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-15 09:17, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > On 06/15/2011 09:11 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> you should update the ld cache, by running >> $ sudo ldconfig > > Oh, thanks! > (why doesn't make install do

Re: [PD] pix_film can't open almost any file after upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10

2011-06-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-14 22:18, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > On 06/14/2011 08:26 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >>> Unfortunately the latest version from CVS is equally broken. > > I wrote this after installing it and trying in Ge

Re: [PD] pix_film can't open almost any file after upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10

2011-06-14 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-14 19:43, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > On 06/14/2011 06:59 PM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: >> I've recently upgraded ubuntu 10.04 to 10.10, and I had to uninstall >> pd-extended and reinstalled the new package for 10.04. >> After that, pix_film

Re: [PD] frozen GUI

2011-06-14 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-14 12:24, Jeppi Jeppi wrote: > > Thanks IOhannes, > well I use PD extended 0.42.5 under Windows 7. ok. could you try a 0.43 build and see what happens. note that some people think, that 0.43 is not ready for prime-time, so you probably do

Re: [PD] frozen GUI

2011-06-14 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-14 10:52, Jeppi Jeppi wrote: > > Hi all, > I know this is quite a recurrent topic...we are having serious issues with PD > under Windows. The GUI gets frozen after 15-30min working, possibly due to > excess of GUI updates, though not sure

Re: [PD] 3d sinewave

2011-06-07 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-07 13:21, cyrille henry wrote: > > hello, > > Le 07/06/2011 09:45, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : > On 2011-06-07 09:15, Max wrote: >>>> Hi cyrille, >>>> >>>> i've been wonderin

Re: [PD] Concerning the Spiritual in Code

2011-06-07 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-04 15:49, Pall Thayer wrote: > > The whole thing is open sourced under the GPL and available for download at: > > http://pallthayer.dyndns.org/spiritual_code/ > two notes: - - would you mind providing the LICENSE as an ordinary LICENSE.tx

Re: [PD] 3d sinewave

2011-06-07 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-07 09:15, Max wrote: > Hi cyrille, > > i've been wondering if there is a helppatch for scopeXYZ? it's called [scopeXYZ~] and not [scopeXYZ]. the help-patch can be found here: https://pd-gem.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pd-gem/trunk/Gem/help

Re: [PD] post signed puredata.info cert

2011-06-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-02 02:37, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> however, note that: >> the puredata.info certificates are signed by cacert.org [1], so trusting >> the cacert.org authority would help establish a web of trust (similar to >> gpg) for free server ce

Re: [PD] Debian: Pd-extended VS debian packages

2011-06-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-06-06 00:08, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > It looks like many extended libraries are now packaged in debian. But > what is the difference with the extended distribution? > Also would it make sense to have something (TM) that would install > packages

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] completion-plugin new version

2011-05-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-27 17:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > You have to compile Pd against Tcl/Tk 8.5 to make it work with 8.5. If hmm, but 0.43 is not compiled against any version of tcl/tk but uses a tcl/tk interpreter found on the disk. or is this so

[PD] bug: [tabwrite~] (worse: PD_BIGORSMALL) broken with 0.43 (linux)

2011-05-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ola, i just noticed that [tabwrite~] is not doing as exptected in 0.43. i attached a patch that triggers the problem for me. chances are, that the bug is only exposed on linux, as it turned outm that the PD_BIGORSMALL macro doesn't work anymore with

Re: [PD] problem in Gem to get properties from PS3Eye Camera

2011-05-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-24 19:13, Jack wrote: > I can remember, it was last month, i could have properties from my > PS3Eye. But it was with Ubuntu 10.10 (can't remember the kernel). > ++ there is a patch for the ov534 module in the wild internet [1], that gives y

Re: [PD] 4 cameras for tracking people in a space

2011-05-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-23 19:55, Pedro Lopes wrote: > It seems just: image blending. Each camera sees a portion (quarter) of the > floor, and you blend (or stitch) the images, then supply them to the > tracking algorithm as single image. > computationally more

Re: [PD] XY abstraction

2011-05-19 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-19 16:20, Pedro Lopes wrote: > I'm trying to find an already-made XY abstraction, and it seems that > this could be the one: > - http://puredata.info/Members/bbogart/XY-Controller/view > > Although I cannot use it, what file type is this? >

Re: [PD] ports

2011-05-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-18 14:13, Max wrote: > hi list, > > the IT dept. asked me which ports shall be open in the free WLAN they are > going to install for the convention. my lists so far: > http, https, ssh, pop-ssl, imap-ssl, smtp/tls, smtp-ssl, netpd (3025) >

Re: [PD] four PS3 Eye on Mac Pro and Pd-ext and GEM

2011-05-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-18 13:12, j...@rybn.org wrote: > Hello, > > I'm going to work on a Mac Pro with MacOsX.6.7 and the latest stable > Pd-extended 0.42.5. > I would like to connect four PS3 Eye on this computer and use GEM with > pix_video to read these four d

Re: [PD] dsp external pointer problem

2011-05-12 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-12 10:34, Ahmet Kizilay wrote: > > while(n--) { > *out = 0.0; signals can share memory, e.g. the pointer to the/an input vector might be the same as the pointer to the/an output vector. therefore the above _might_ overwrite the data i

Re: [PD] missing broadcast in netsend<0.43

2011-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-11 11:38, Andy Farnell wrote: > On Wed, 11 May 2011 09:36:49 +0200 > IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > >> my point is rather, that i don't see why not being able to broadcast >> should be considered a bug: no

[PD] missing broadcast in netsend<0.43 (was: Re: 0.43 should still be a test version)

2011-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-10 21:00, Martin wrote: > I guess if something like that were to be added to the netsend_connect > function it would work. > sure, and this has already been added to [netsend]. however, it's only available in Pd>=0.43 (or so). my point is

Re: [PD] helpbrowser and the paths

2011-05-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-09 15:48, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2011, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> given that both GF and Gem are to add their paths automatically on >> startup, the left column if the help-browser might have >50

Re: [PD] auto-completion with popup [was: 3 new gui-plugins]

2011-05-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-08 18:40, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Also, I think Pd-extended should include a number of plugins by default, > like perhaps your completion plugin. So that would mean that the plugin > reports would be shown by default. though it'

Re: [PD] udpsend performance issue

2011-05-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-08 19:48, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > Hi, > > If I send a few hundreds packed OSC messages with [udpsend], it blocks > for about 100-200 milliseconds or more (I see the message "udpsend > blocked for xxx milliseconds" in the console, and I

Re: [PD] helpbrowser and the paths

2011-05-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-04 18:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Using Pd-extended 0.43.1-20110430 on Mac OS X I don't see this behvaior > with Gem or gridflow. The helpbrowser.tcl code is the same between > pure-data and pd-extended. the problem also appears

Re: [PD] helpbrowser and the paths

2011-05-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-04 18:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Using Pd-extended 0.43.1-20110430 on Mac OS X I don't see this behvaior > with Gem or gridflow. The helpbrowser.tcl code is the same between > pure-data and pd-extended. > the Gem/GF auto-addin

Re: [PD] multiple [udpreceive n] instances

2011-05-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-04 14:02, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: > You could (but see caveat below) make an abstraction [myudpreceive]: > > 8< > [udpreceive $1] > | > [send MYUDPRECEIVE-$1] > > [receive MYUDPRECEIVE-$1] > | > [outlet] > 8< > > The

Re: [PD] multiple [udpreceive n] instances

2011-05-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-04 13:32, Jamie Bullock wrote: > Instead, in the case of mrpeach, the second object can't be instantiated, and > iemnet/udpreceive just fails silently. with iemnet, it's not so "silently". rather, you can query the object whether it was ab

[PD] helpbrowser and the paths

2011-05-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 while preparing a debian package of Gem, i stumbled across a help-browser weirdness, which i'm not sure how to fix. the background: Gem comes both as a big binary (Gem.pd_linux) and a number of abstractions. everything is installed into /u/l/p/extra/G

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] Workshop: Switch from PureData! (Barcelona)

2011-05-02 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-02 16:02, john saylor wrote: > greeting > > am i the only one who thinks it's odd to promote an anti-pd workshop > on a pd list? well, i guess, asking people on the sc3 list to switch from Pd to SC is kind of pointless. fgamdr IOhannes --

Re: [PD] readanysf for windows? (again)

2011-05-02 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-29 17:54, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Apr 29, 2011, at 3:40 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: > > On 04/29/2011 12:23 PM, matteo sisti sette wrote: Apparently it doesn't. I had put the dll's in the same folder where I p

Re: [PD] readanysf for windows? (again)

2011-05-02 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-30 03:36, Patrice Colet wrote: > > I tried to implement setDllDirectory but it doesn't work, > you need to use SetDllDirectory() within Pd, not within your external. quoting myself: > > that's a bootstrapping problem, as the external canno

Re: [PD] gridflow issues

2011-04-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-26 15:23, yvan volochine wrote: > salut Matthieu > > another question: > > is there a way to force gridflow external to load from a specified path? > > ie: I'm trying to setup pd-vanilla wth gridflow-9.13 where the user > already has pd-e

Re: [PD] Toggle Status

2011-04-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
> > Also, I started coding a "get" method for canvases, which happens to do > what Miller describes in his comment about the above patch. > so in the meantime you can either apply a diff to the sources of Pd, recompile Pd and change your patch accordingly, so it is incompatible with all past ve

Re: [PD] Gem: 12 Screens

2011-04-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-21 13:47, Max wrote: > Hi List, > > what's the best hardware approach to render 12 screens with Gem? A computer > with a quad head GFX card and four triple head2go? or better for synced > computers? The screens display multiple movies at

Re: [PD] gem2pdp state (Gem compatibility)

2011-04-07 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-05 13:34, Daniel Roviriego wrote: > Hi. > > *did you compile gem2pdp against the new version of Gem?* > > Yes, I did. Should I try a more recent than the 11th March, svn ? > yes, try the one i just committed (rev15063) :-) -BEGIN PGP

Re: [PD] GEM - multimodel performance issue

2011-04-07 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-06 17:58, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > interesting. thanks for testing. > please file a bug-report at the gem bug-tracker. > and while doing so, it would be great if you could also provide a simple test patch that triggers

Re: [PD] Making a Realtime Convolution External

2011-04-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-06 21:04, Seth Nickell wrote: > I use a thread per core, it does parallelize nicely. > that's what i thought. please don't let yourself turn down by all those misers :-) fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.

Re: [PD] Making a Realtime Convolution External

2011-04-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-06 20:26, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Pd has its own scheduling system which is best to stick to as long as > you can so that you can keep the deterministic operation intact. For > convolution, I can't see a reason to use a thread. I

Re: [PD] GEM - multimodel performance issue

2011-04-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-04-06 16:32, Pierre wrote: > > Ok, > I've just compiled the Gem stable release 0.92.3 (Gem compiled as before > against pdvanilla svn 0.43 latest sources), > and all the bottlenecks seams to be gone, I have a nice frame rate even > with [multi

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.43-0 released

2011-03-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-21 03:05, Miller Puckette wrote: > Hi all, > > Pd version 0.43-0 is available on http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htm > or via git from sourceforge: > git clone git://pure-data.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pure-data/pure-data 2 minor is

Re: [PD] [part_source]

2011-03-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-24 05:48, Richie Cyngler wrote: > Thank you IOhannes, > > So how does the shape/form of the domain effect the source? What do > the source/interactor > fields do? it's a simmilar concept as pmpd's interactor objects. e.g. if you set the d

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] pd 0.43-0 released

2011-03-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-24 08:26, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: >> >> Perhaps that's from your ~/.pdsettings? > Yes. It's in a pathN (path2) variable. So basically if I understand > correctly gui plugins are treated like externals? That is if I place a > plugin in /foo/bar

Re: [PD] 64 channel MADI HDSP

2011-03-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-22 21:55, mercer b. (bm7v07) wrote: > Hi there, > > I am trying to get pure data outputting 40 channels using 64 channel RME > HDSP-MADI. With little success so far... I can only get two channels working > at a time whilst using ASIO and

Re: [PD] pix_film frame control offset 8 MacOsX

2011-03-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-20 20:34, tim vets wrote: > hi, > f.y.i., I wanted to check this, but opening that video with [pix_film] > crashes pd instantly here, saying: > please report a bug for maverick's libquicktime library. fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNA

Re: [PD] pix_image can't open some tiffs

2011-03-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-17 02:54, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: > >> So I told them to use Tiff (the only other format supported in windows >> being jpg afaik), and they are used to Photoshop for creating and >> saving im

[PD] [PD-announce] Audio Mostly 2011

2011-03-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 fwd from andy: * Audio Mostly 2011? ?A conference on interaction with sound? in co-operation with ACM - SIGCHI September, 7 - 9 ? Coimbra, Portugal ***

Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external?

2011-03-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-09 15:25, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > >> it has to get assigned to a person. >> this can either be done at commit time or later. > > Excuse me ? I thought that the process of assignation was just so that > each ticket is handled by the person

[PD] sourceforge tracker (was: Re: Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external?)

2011-03-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-08 20:16, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> On 2011-03-08 09:47, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: >>> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >>>> iirc, this was discuss

Re: [PD] Download Pd?

2011-03-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-09 06:07, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > It would be nice to see the website look better, I don't have an time to > invest in working on this project. One easy first step would be to make > a mockup of what you are thinking somewhere an

Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any external?

2011-03-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-08 20:08, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > >> it's very simple: >> each patch is assigned to a person (well, let's assume it is). > > Why can we assume that

Re: [PD] Toughts on PD vs. Max stability on macintels on, analogindustries.com

2011-03-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-08 16:46, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Matt Barber wrote: > >> Which reminds me: there used to be a problem with [delwrite~] where it >> would allocate its memory when the patch containing it loaded, based >> on the sample

Re: [PD] Download Pd?

2011-03-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-08 16:32, Pierre Massat wrote: > Is IOhannes the only member in charge of maintaining the website? i think he is the only one with a limited knowledge of plone and zope. and he is the only one who has filesystem access to the server. gams

Re: [PD] digression on sample rates

2011-03-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-03-08 14:35, Caio Barros wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong but the same applies to the bit rate, right? > I don't know any sound intarface that work with more than 24-bit, but Pd > make all the calculations in 32-bit and than the sound you hear

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >