Quoting Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But you type the same with both layouts. To not have to type the prefix,
> you just add the "prefix" directory directly to your path with a pd-path
> setting, declare, import or whatever. The issue of help files not being
> found is not related to that
Hallo,
Rich E hat gesagt: // Rich E wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:58 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Rich E wrote:
> >
> >> Both layout 1 and 2 would be nice to have, for different situations.
> >>
> >
> > i would be interested in the situations where layout 2 wou
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:58 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Rich E wrote:
>
>> Both layout 1 and 2 would be nice to have, for different situations.
>>
>
> i would be interested in the situations where layout 2 would be nice to
> have.
> i don't see any.
>
For the same reaso
Rich E wrote:
> Both layout 1 and 2 would be nice to have, for different situations.
i would be interested in the situations where layout 2 would be nice to
have.
i don't see any.
mgsdf
IOhannes
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-
Both layout 1 and 2 would be nice to have, for different situations.
Concerning patches that are included in pd extended, it seems best to use
layout 1 that you mention, which is compatible on everyone's system, as of
right now. [declare]/[import] seems like something for personal patches,
where s
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Pd-extended did not introduce namespace prefixes, Miller did that
> probably before I even heard of Pd. Pd-extended is just organized
> around that idea. Pd-vanilla fully supports namespace prefixes. I
> don't kn
On May 20, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>
>>> It's a packaging problem, you can do nothing about it.
>>
>> you can help the packager solve the problem.
>
> But not by changing the h
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> > It's a packaging problem, you can do nothing about it.
>
> you can help the packager solve the problem.
But not by changing the help file or the object itself, only by
changing the packaging or
Frank Barknecht wrote:
> It's a packaging problem, you can do nothing about it.
you can help the packager solve the problem.
fgmasdr
IOhannes
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/
Hallo,
Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote:
> I open it manually it won't make [tcpclient] either. So I'm just
> wondering what I can do about that...
It's a packaging problem, you can do nothing about it.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ __footils
On May 19, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On May 18, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> Ha
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On May 18, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
>>> Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> i'm not a developer
On 18/05/2008, at 12.16, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> i don't see a benefit in having to tell _in_ a help-file where to find
> the class.
I agree.
And the same goes for the other way around. That would be very good
for giving the help browser a bash, especially (dynamically creation
of) the refer
On May 18, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
>> Roman Haefeli wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
>> i
On May 18, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Enrique Erne wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
>>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas
ranked into of difficulty:
- file a bug report whe
On May 18, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Rich E wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas
>> ranked into
Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
i.e. [declare -stdlib mrpeach] to packOSC-help.pd
then it would work with pd vanilla too.
>>> The declare/namespace/i
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
>
>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas ranked
>>> into of difficulty:
>>> - file a bug report when a help patch is not working
>>> - write and improve
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 02:30 -0700, Rich E wrote:
>
>
>
> Personally, I would use namespace prefixes:
> [mrpeach/packOSC].
> This will make more sense when there are libraries organized
> around
> concepts rather than authors. So something like [osc/packO
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 12:09 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
> > Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> > >> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > i'm not a developer but i would vote for declar
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> >> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
> i.e. [declare -stdlib mrpeach] to packOSC-help.pd
>
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
>
> > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas
> >> ranked into of difficulty:
> >> - file a bug report wh
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> >> i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
> >> i.e. [declare -stdlib mrpeach] to packOSC-help.pd
> >> then it would work with pd vanilla too.
> >
> > The declare/namespace/import stuff is
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
>> i.e. [declare -stdlib mrpeach] to packOSC-help.pd
>> then it would work with pd vanilla too.
>
> The declare/namespace/import stuff is still very undefined, so I
> think some experiementation would be good. I
On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas
>> ranked into of difficulty:
>> - file a bug report when a help patch is not working
>> - write and improve help patches, and submit them to the pat
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas ranked
> into of difficulty:
>
> - file a bug report when a help patch is not working
> - write and improve help patches, and submit them to the patch tracker
is there a convention about how to make
26 matches
Mail list logo
