Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas ranked
> into of difficulty:
>
> - file a bug report when a help patch is not working
> - write and improve help patches, and submit them to the patch tracker
is there a convention about how to make
On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas
>> ranked into of difficulty:
>> - file a bug report when a help patch is not working
>> - write and improve help patches, and submit them to the pat
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
>> i.e. [declare -stdlib mrpeach] to packOSC-help.pd
>> then it would work with pd vanilla too.
>
> The declare/namespace/import stuff is still very undefined, so I
> think some experiementation would be good. I
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> >> i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
> >> i.e. [declare -stdlib mrpeach] to packOSC-help.pd
> >> then it would work with pd vanilla too.
> >
> > The declare/namespace/import stuff is
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
>
> > Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas
> >> ranked into of difficulty:
> >> - file a bug report wh
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> >> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
> i.e. [declare -stdlib mrpeach] to packOSC-help.pd
>
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
>
>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas ranked
>>> into of difficulty:
>>> - file a bug report when a help patch is not working
>>> - write and improve
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 12:09 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
> > Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> > >> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > i'm not a developer but i would vote for declar
On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 02:30 -0700, Rich E wrote:
>
>
>
> Personally, I would use namespace prefixes:
> [mrpeach/packOSC].
> This will make more sense when there are libraries organized
> around
> concepts rather than authors. So something like [osc/packO
Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
i.e. [declare -stdlib mrpeach] to packOSC-help.pd
then it would work with pd vanilla too.
>>> The declare/namespace/i
On May 18, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Rich E wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas
>> ranked into
On May 18, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
>> Roman Haefeli wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> i'm not a developer but i would vote for declare
>> i
On May 18, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Enrique Erne wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On May 17, 2008, at 5:50 PM, Enrique Erne wrote:
>>> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
There is much that can and should be done. Here's some ideas
ranked into of difficulty:
- file a bug report whe
On 18/05/2008, at 12.16, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> i don't see a benefit in having to tell _in_ a help-file where to find
> the class.
I agree.
And the same goes for the other way around. That would be very good
for giving the help browser a bash, especially (dynamically creation
of) the refer
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On May 18, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
>>> Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> i'm not a developer
On May 19, 2008, at 6:55 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> On May 18, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2008-05-18 at 05:40 -0400, Enrique Erne wrote:
Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 19:50 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>> Ha
Hallo,
Martin Peach hat gesagt: // Martin Peach wrote:
> I open it manually it won't make [tcpclient] either. So I'm just
> wondering what I can do about that...
It's a packaging problem, you can do nothing about it.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ __footils
Frank Barknecht wrote:
> It's a packaging problem, you can do nothing about it.
you can help the packager solve the problem.
fgmasdr
IOhannes
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/
Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> > It's a packaging problem, you can do nothing about it.
>
> you can help the packager solve the problem.
But not by changing the help file or the object itself, only by
changing the packaging or
On May 20, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>
>> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>
>>> It's a packaging problem, you can do nothing about it.
>>
>> you can help the packager solve the problem.
>
> But not by changing the h
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Pd-extended did not introduce namespace prefixes, Miller did that
> probably before I even heard of Pd. Pd-extended is just organized
> around that idea. Pd-vanilla fully supports namespace prefixes. I
> don't kn
Both layout 1 and 2 would be nice to have, for different situations.
Concerning patches that are included in pd extended, it seems best to use
layout 1 that you mention, which is compatible on everyone's system, as of
right now. [declare]/[import] seems like something for personal patches,
where s
Rich E wrote:
> Both layout 1 and 2 would be nice to have, for different situations.
i would be interested in the situations where layout 2 would be nice to
have.
i don't see any.
mgsdf
IOhannes
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:58 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Rich E wrote:
>
>> Both layout 1 and 2 would be nice to have, for different situations.
>>
>
> i would be interested in the situations where layout 2 would be nice to
> have.
> i don't see any.
>
For the same reaso
Hallo,
Rich E hat gesagt: // Rich E wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:58 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Rich E wrote:
> >
> >> Both layout 1 and 2 would be nice to have, for different situations.
> >>
> >
> > i would be interested in the situations where layout 2 wou
Quoting Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> But you type the same with both layouts. To not have to type the prefix,
> you just add the "prefix" directory directly to your path with a pd-path
> setting, declare, import or whatever. The issue of help files not being
> found is not related to that
26 matches
Mail list logo
