That doesn't take you far when your patches break because of changes.
We can make a way where we aren't crippled by name conflicts. There
are many examples to follow: Lua, Python, Tcl, etc. etc. etc. I tried
to cover all the issues that I could find in my PdCon paper:
http://at.or.at/h
vanilla pd should always have priority.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo wrote:
>
>> about the library loading thing: is it possible to put vanilla loading
>> before all other libraries as default? that should ensure
>> vanilla-compatibility before anything else.
> IMHO there ideally shouldn't be overlap between va
about the library loading thing: is it possible to put vanilla loading
before all other libraries as default? that should ensure
vanilla-compatibility before anything else.
IMHO there ideally shouldn't be overlap between vanilla and other
libraries, at least in names, so that if someone comes
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Pd-vanilla added pow~, abs~, exp~, and log~. Pd-extended had those from
> cyclone by default since 0.39.3. IIRC, pow~ is the only one that has
> issues since it it incompatible with the cyclone one. So I am wondering
I don't know how annoying it would be, as I don't use it that often
anyway (I usually stick something like that in [expr~]) but what if a
little warning message showed up in the Pd window when a patch loads
with [pow~], at least in the next release or two? I think that would
just help peopl
While I like the idea of backward compatibility, I would prefer more
cross compatibility. If Pd-extended continues to default to cyclone's
[pow~], there will still be issues with compatibility between different
versions of Pd in the future and the [pow~] problem will persist. While
old patches
If that is true, there could be a lot of patches out there that use
[pow~] as cyclone's pow~ and would need to be changed. Therefore we'd
need to make some kind of way to alert people which one they are using
and the differences between them. The SVN is pretty clean, there is
only one p
i think you have to look at which method would benefit the greatest amount
of people. so, i think you'll find that far more people will benefit from
proper vanilla compatibility straight out of the box, than will benefit from
the cyclone library.
___
Pd-
Pd-vanilla added pow~, abs~, exp~, and log~. Pd-extended had those
from cyclone by default since 0.39.3. IIRC, pow~ is the only one that
has issues since it it incompatible with the cyclone one. So I am
wondering how best to handle this in the next Pd-extended release.
I have started m
10 matches
Mail list logo