I just skimmed your changes, but I think that's a great addition to the
docs.
-Jonathan
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
In your quote of Miller's help patch you left off half the sentence. Here's
the
full quote:
"Route checks the first element of a message against each of
its arguments, which may be numbers or symbols (but not a
mixture of the two.)"*
The part before the comma is wrong-- that's not how [route]
--- On Mon, 2/28/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Reading and writing binary files
> To: "David"
> Cc: "pd-list" , "Martin Peach"
> Date: Monday, February 28, 2011, 3:31 AM
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, David wrote:
>
> > I have another question, though. How
--- On Sat, 3/5/11, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> From: IOhannes m zmölnig
> Subject: Re: [PD] Download Pd?
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Saturday, March 5, 2011, 12:10 AM
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/04/2011 11:53 PM, George Ker wrote:
> > 2011/3/4 Pierre Massat
>
Right. We discussed before somewhere on the list but I
couldn't figure out where. Here's the same solution but only using a
subpatch. Just use "testab.pd" as an abstraction, give it some args,
and bang [pd get-my-args] to get your args.
(Then just copy/paste [pd get-my-args] into any abstrac
--- On Mon, 3/7/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any
> external?
> To: "Miller Puckette"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Monday, March 7, 2011, 9:07 PM
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, Miller Puckette
> wrote:
>
--- On Mon, 3/7/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any
> external?
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Miller Puckette" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Monday, March
--- On Mon, 3/7/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Toughts on PD vs. Max stability on macintels on
> analogindustries.com
> To: "chris clepper"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Monday, March 7, 2011, 10:45 PM
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2011, chris clepper
> wrote:
>
>
--- On Mon, 3/7/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] Toughts on PD vs. Max stability on macintels on
> analogindustries.com
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "chris clepper" , "Mathieu Bouchard"
>
--- On Tue, 3/8/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] Toughts on PD vs. Max stability on macintels on,
> analogindustries.com
> To: "Mathieu Bouchard"
> Cc: "Peter Kirn" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 12:43 AM
>
> On Mar 7, 20
--- On Tue, 3/8/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Toughts on PD vs. Max stability on macintels on
> analogindustries.com
> To: "Max"
> Cc: "PD list"
> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 4:34 AM
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Max wrote:
>
> > just to throw in a equa
--- On Tue, 3/8/11, Chris McCormick wrote:
> From: Chris McCormick
> Subject: Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any
> external?
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 5:56 AM
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:07:08PM
> -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> > On
1) You're seeing one model of the economics of free software in action on the
Ardour
website. Click the link to the "news" page and there's a status bar that shows
the
amount of donations given per month relative to the amount it would take to
fund full-
time development of the software. Th
SHA1
>
> On 2011-03-08 06:34, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> >
> > I think a better question would be put to Miller or
> Hans, or the other
> > admins-- can someone please explain how the patch
> review process works?
>
> it's very simple:
> each patch is
Have you looked at the [switch~] object? It doesn't allow you to
create/destroy the abstractions, but it does allow you to turn off dsp in
each of them as necessary.
-Jonathan
--- On Tue, 3/15/11, Jérôme Abel wrote:
> From: Jérôme Abel
> Subject: [PD] Dynamic patching with audio - review
>
In the "Basic Sintax" (sic) section, you say:
"Data types in Pd are basically: float, symbol, list bang."
But throughout that section you refer to anythings as lists:
[my 3 dogs 4 you( <-- Note: this is not a list!
|
[route list]
|
[bng]
In 02.Selectors.pd:
"These gives (sic) us three possibl
--- On Sat, 3/19/11, dmotd wrote:
> From: dmotd
> Subject: Re: [PD] The economics of Open source
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Saturday, March 19, 2011, 4:41 AM
> On 03/18/2011 11:46 PM, Pierre Massat
> wrote:
> [...]
> Still I believe Ardour has had limited contributors to the
> code, so if
--- On Sat, 3/19/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Am I alone?
> To: "ailo"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Saturday, March 19, 2011, 11:27 PM
>
> sorry, my following reply sat a long time in my email
> account.
>
> On Sun, 30 Jan 2011, ailo wrote:
>
> >
--- On Sat, 3/19/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] The economics of Open source
> To: "Bernardo Barros"
> Cc: "pd-list"
> Date: Saturday, March 19, 2011, 8:34 PM
> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Bernardo Barros
> wrote:
>
> > Hello , Mathieu! Well, I did not ref
[pd twinkle-twinkle-or-something]
|
[expr $f1 ???] <- put operators and numbers here!
|
[pd some-oscillator~]
| \
[dac~]
Or just have them use arbitrary binops in place of expr if you want to
go that way.
In other words, give them a way to just hack away at a specific part
of the object chain
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Am I alone?
> To: "ailo"
> Cc: "Jonathan Wilkes" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 6:24 PM
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, ailo wrote:
>
> >
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] overriding objects
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Frank Barknecht" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 6:50 PM
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Jonathan Wi
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Am I alone?
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "ailo" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 8:42 PM
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Jonathan Wilkes
> wrote:
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Am I alone?
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "ailo" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 10:15 PM
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Jonathan Wilkes
> wrot
--- On Thu, 3/24/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Am I alone?
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "ailo" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, March 24, 2011, 11:19 PM
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Jonathan Wilkes
> wrote:
&
--- On Thu, 3/31/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Get list of a the arguments of a patch without using any
> external?
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011, 3:40 AM
> On Mon, 7 Ma
Here's a hack to get around the hacky creator names of the list objects
(I also added "list", but I'm not sure if you want to use aliases.)
Is there no way to just get a list of all the creator names that are
available when Pd loads up?
-Jonathan
--- On Sun, 4/3/11, yvan volochine wrote:
>
--- On Sun, 4/3/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] 3 new gui-plugins
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "yvan volochine" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Sunday, April 3, 2011, 11:38 PM
>
> To get all available o
--- On Mon, 4/4/11, Billy Stiltner wrote:
> From: Billy Stiltner
> Subject: [PD] Data Structures GOP and installing latest PD
> To: "pd-list"
> Date: Monday, April 4, 2011, 9:37 PM
> Hey
>
> I didn't know you could GOP data structures.
> This opens up a new world.
> Where is an up to date tu
--- On Mon, 4/4/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] 3 new gui-plugins
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Monday, April 4, 2011, 10:55 PM
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Jonathan Wil
--- On Tue, 4/5/11, João Pais wrote:
> From: João Pais
> Subject: Re: [PD] Data Structures GOP and installing latest PD
> To: "Billy Stiltner"
> Cc: "pd-list" , "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2011, 6:22 PM
> > The other messa
--- On Tue, 4/5/11, Billy Stiltner wrote:
> From: Billy Stiltner
> Subject: Re: [PD] Data Structures GOP and installing latest PD
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "João Pais" , "pd-list"
> Date: Tuesday, April 5, 2011, 8:36 PM
> João
> Thanks
Also see the PDDP docs related to [expr] (
http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/doc/pddp/ ):
expr-help.pd
all_about_expr_functions.pd
all_about_expr_and_value.pd
all_about_expr_if.pd
all_about_expr_multiline.pd
-Jonathan___
Pd-li
There are links to them in each relevant help patch (like expr-help.pd in this
case).___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--- On Thu, 4/7/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Making a Realtime Convolution External
> To: "IOhannes m zmoelnig"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, April 7, 2011, 5:15 PM
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, IOhannes m
> zmoelnig wrote:
>
> > using "threats" d
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2005-05/028678.html
So if the dsp tree gets resorted when you load the soundfile, wouldn't this
still produce dropouts with the threaded version?___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-managem
--- On Sat, 4/23/11, Saul wrote:
> From: Saul
> Subject: Re: [PD] Toggle Status
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Saturday, April 23, 2011, 6:00 PM
> Hi All,
>
> I'm sure this has been asked many times, but nothing comes
> up in an archive search.
>
> I'm using a multiple toggles to activate each
That would be excellent to hear about useful forgotten patches.
In the meantime maybe I can hijack this thread with a practical question. Look
at the supercollider and pure data example at the beginning of the following
tutorial:
http://en.flossmanuals.net/pure-data/ch002_graphical-programming
--- On Wed, 5/11/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Switch from PureData!
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Derek Holzer" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 12:53 AM
> On Mon, 2 May 2011, Jonathan Wil
--- On Wed, 5/25/11, Patrice Colet wrote:
> From: Patrice Colet
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] canvas get method
> To: "pd-list"
> Cc: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 1:28 AM
> lol, it's fun, your file misses YZM's
> canvas_cl
--- On Sun, 6/19/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED
> To: "Marco Donnarumma"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Sunday, June 19, 2011, 3:50 PM
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Marco Donnarumma
> wrote:
>
> > it seems quite sad to me that the first
--- On Sun, 6/19/11, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> From: IOhannes m zmölnig
> Subject: Re: [PD] pd crashed
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Sunday, June 19, 2011, 9:22 PM
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/18/2011 06:57 PM, Funs Seelen wrote:
> >>
> > I also had this proble
--- On Mon, 6/20/11, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> From: IOhannes m zmoelnig
> Subject: Re: [PD] pd crashed
> To: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Monday, June 20, 2011, 9:29 AM
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2011-06-20 03:04, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
--- On Tue, 6/21/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Marco Donnarumma" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 3:39 AM
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Jonathan W
--- On Wed, 6/22/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED
> To: "Onyx Ashanti"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Wednesday, June 22, 2011, 5:08 PM
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2011, Onyx Ashanti
> wrote:
>
> > The thing is, nobody asks a violin player wha
Dear Miller,
B07.sampler.pd is a technological parody.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Please tell me whether that means that a) Miller should remove that tutorial,
b) he should revise it to be better, c) it's a waste of time for Miller to read
it at all,
c) something else.
If you didn't choose a or b, then p
ampling was a technological parody.
There are lots of things you can do with samples and loops that you wouldn't be
able to do with whatever was being sampled.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Dear Miller,
B07.sampler.pd is a technological parody.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Pl
How is the guitar hero example not just an example of locked down proprietary
consoles
vs. free software ideals?
Put another way: if the console/game were free and open, guitar hero would be
the
equivalent of a starting point, or maybe (even a tutorial like B07.sampler.pd),
that
you do befo
set of parodies that have to do with technology. As a term of
derision
I think it's confusing/confused.
-Jonathan
--- On Wed, 6/22/11, ALAN BROOKER wrote:
From: ALAN BROOKER
Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED
To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
Cc: pd-list@iem.at, "Cody Loyd"
You're right-- the creator's intentions don't matter here, that's beside the
point.
-Jonathan
--- On Wed, 6/22/11, Charles Henry wrote:
From: Charles Henry
Subject: Re: [PD] [OT] technological parody was: Pd performance at TED
To: "Jonathan Wilkes" , pd-list@i
#x27;s the point,
really-- if you could it we'd be talking about free software, and technological
parody or
no, we'd quickly be doing some cool things with that game. :)
-Jonathan
--- On Wed, 6/22/11, Charles Henry wrote:
From: Charles Henry
Subject: Re: [PD] [OT] technological pa
Certainly could be. :)
Or on the other hand:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cuuRG6-IT8
-Jonathan
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Tyler Leavitt wrote:
From: Tyler Leavitt
Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED
To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
Cc: "ALAN BROOKER" , pd-list@iem.at
Date: Thursd
The only point that's not irrelevant is that you can load up soundfiles
without needing a new physical object for each one.
It's not musically interesting that it takes up less room.
That the patch can become something else is a distraction from the particularly
narrow point I'm making, which
[ unpack ] [ unpack ]
| | | |
| | [unpack] [unpack]
[unpack] [unpack] | | |
etc.
-Jonathan
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Pagano, Patrick wrote:
From: Pagano, Patrick
Subject: Re: [PD] Pd performance at TED
To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
Cc: "Mathieu Bouchard" , "p
I tested the patch from
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3030159&group_id=55736&atid=478070
with pd-l2ork (Pd version 0.42.5-extended-l2ork-20110427)
and every time I clicked the tgl in the parent patch it put me into edit mode.
(Doesn't
do that in pd vanilla).
Also, selecting an
--- On Thu, 7/7/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Ivica Ico Bukvic"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, July 7, 2011, 5:33 PM
>
> On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 16:39 +0200, "Ivica Ico Buk
[route] outputs an empty list which, for simplicity's sake, is supposed to be
interpreted as a "bang" message. But [pack] isn't doing this:
[list(
|
[pack]
|
[print]
Should be a pretty easy fix-- just check for an empty list in pack_list and if
so, call pack_bang.
-Jonathan
--- On Thu, 7/7/1
More specifically, a simple conditional in pack_list in x_connective.c seems to
work:
static void pack_list(t_pack *x, t_symbol *s, int ac, t_atom *av)
{
if (ac==0)
pack_bang(x);
else
obj_list(&x->x_obj, 0, ac, av);
}
-Jonathan
--- On Thu, 7/7/11, Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Thu, 7/7/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic
> Subject: Re: [PD] GOP Rendering Issue
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Christian Haines" , Pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, July 7, 2011, 9:10 PM
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 09:32 -0700,
--- On Thu, 7/7/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes" , "Ivica Ico Bukvic"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Thursday, July 7, 2011, 9:2
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic
> Subject: RE: [PD] GOP Rendering Issue
> To: "'Jonathan Wilkes'"
> Cc: "'Christian Haines'" , Pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 4:54 PM
> > Ok, now
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic
> Subject: RE: [PD] route - pack issue
> To: "'Jonathan Wilkes'"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 4:54 PM
> > static void pack_list(t_pack *x,
> t_symbol *s,
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic
> Subject: RE: [PD] route - pack issue
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 8:12 PM
>
>
> Jonathan Wilkes
> wrote:
>
> >
>
--- On Sat, 7/9/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
[...]
> The problem with forks is if improvements don't migrate
> upstream.
I think it's both a problem-with and a cause-of.
> Then we don't benefit from sharing the
> fixes. Making things migrate upstream takes time in
> itself.
How does o
--- On Sat, 7/9/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic
> Subject: RE: [PD] route - pack issue
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Saturday, July 9, 2011, 10:33 AM
>
>
> Jonathan Wilkes
> wrote:
>
> >
>
--- On Sat, 7/9/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Ivica Ico Bukvic" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Saturday, July 9, 2011, 10
--- On Sun, 7/10/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer
> To: "Hans-Christoph Steiner"
> Cc: "PD List"
> Date: Sunday, July 10, 2011, 5:05 PM
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2011, Hans-Christoph
> Steiner wrote:
>
> > One goal for me i
--- On Sun, 7/10/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Ivica Ico Bukvic" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Sunday, July 10, 2011, 7
--- On Mon, 7/11/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes" , "Hans-Christoph Steiner"
>
> Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Monday, July 11, 2011, 2:
--- On Mon, 7/11/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Ivica Ico Bukvic" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Monday, July 11, 2011, 4:
--- On Mon, 7/11/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Hans-Christoph Steiner"
> Cc: "Jonathan Wilkes" , pd-list@iem.at
> Date: Monday, July 11, 2011,
--- On Mon, 7/11/11, Martin Peach wrote:
> From: Martin Peach
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "pd-list"
> Cc: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Date: Monday, July 11, 2011, 6:42 PM
> On 2011-07-11 12:06, Jonathan Wil
Peach
> wrote:
> > On 2011-07-11 12:06, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> >> But I'm not sure where to store the tooltip
> string...
> >
> > Not sure if that's what you mean, but in max the
> assist method receives a number corresponding to the inlet
> or ou
chard
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Martin Peach wrote:
> >> On 2011-07-11 12:06, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> >>> But I'm not sure where to store the tooltip
> string...
> >>
> >> Not sure if that's what you mean, but in max the
> ass
--- On Mon, 7/11/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: implementing tooltips WAS: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of
> new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Martin Peach" , "Mathieu Bouchard&
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: implementing tooltips WAS: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots
> of new editing features
> To: "Hans-Christoph Steiner"
> Cc: "Jonathan Wilkes" , "Martin Peach&q
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: implementing tooltips WAS: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots
> of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Mathieu Bouchard" , "Martin Peac
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: implementing tooltips WAS: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots
> of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Mathieu Bouchard" , "Martin Peac
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: implementing tooltips WAS: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots
> of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" , "Martin Peach&q
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: implementing tooltips WAS: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots
> of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Mathieu Bouchard" , "Martin Peac
--- On Thu, 7/14/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Martin Peach" , "pd-list"
> Date: Thursday, July 14, 2011, 3:51 AM
&
--- On Sat, 7/16/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer
> To: "Mathieu Bouchard"
> Cc: "Jonathan Wilkes" , "PD List"
> Date: Saturday, July 16, 2011, 11:00
--- On Sat, 7/16/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Martin Peach" , "pd-list"
> Date: Saturday, July 16, 2011, 5:54 PM
&
--- On Sat, 7/16/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] implementing tooltips WAS: Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots
> of new editing features
> To: "Hans-Christoph Steiner"
> Cc: "pd-list" , "Martin Peach"
> Date: Saturday, July 16, 2011, 6:11 PM
> On Mon, 11
--- On Sun, 7/17/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] implementing tooltips WAS: Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots
> of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Mathieu Bouchard" , "pd-list"
[inlet~] and [outlet~] already take the args "hold" and "lin" for
upsampling/downsampling.
-Jonathan
--- On Sun, 7/17/11, András Murányi wrote:
From: András Murányi
Subject: Re: [PD] implementing tooltips WAS: Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of
new editing features
To: "PD List"
Date: Sunday
--- On Sun, 7/17/11, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> From: Mathieu Bouchard
> Subject: Re: [PD] Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots of new editing features
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: "Martin Peach" , "pd-list"
> Date: Sunday, July 17, 2011, 8:22 PM
&
So does adding to struct _widgetbehavior count as adding to t_class?
--- On Sun, 7/17/11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
> Subject: Re: [PD] implementing tooltips WAS: Pd-extended 0.43 updates: lots
> of new editing features
> To: "Jonat
How well do these things scale without having a low level way to delete/copy
scalars or insert/remove arbitrary array elements?
-Jonathan
>
>From: Hans-Christoph Steiner
>To: Frank Barknecht
>Cc: pd-list@iem.at
>Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2011 4:23 PM
>Subject:
There's also the (currently) underutilized "send-window" method of [pointer],
which forwards a message to the canvas of the scalar that [pointer] is
currently pointing at. Additionally, you can use the "traverse" method to
point to the head of a glist (which doesn't even need to contain a scala
Aw c'mon, Miller, you didn't even try.
It's just a little sprintf hacking and that idiosyncratic recursion that
outputs everything backwards.
-Jonathan
>
>From: Miller Puckette
>To: Alexandre Torres Porres
>Cc: pd-lista puredata
>Sent: Wednesday, August 3
tand the relationship between # of
objects in recursive chain and max # function calls before stack overflow.
-Jonathan
>____
>From: Alexandre Torres Porres
>To: pd-lista puredata ; Jonathan Wilkes
>Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2011 11:44 AM
>Subject: Re: [P
Technically it seems to be this: they output in reverse creation order. (The
last [receive] you created in the patch will output first.)
Conceptually, imagine an evil demon changing the order in real-time to screw up
your patch. Thwart the demon by using wired connections, trigger, and
subpat
I don't understand what you're saying about receive symbols. How do you get
the single characters in the first place?
-Jonathan
>
>From: Mathieu Bouchard
>To: Jonathan Wilkes
>Cc: Miller Puckette ; Alexandre Torres Porres
>;
Search plugin revision:
*added status bar shows link locations and search text (if searching for a
keyword tag)
* quoted text works, e.g., "it's a secret to everybody"
* regexes seem to work, e.g., "outlet.*symbol" will match all objects that
output a symbol
* pd-style word boundaries, e.g., "cl
I wouldn't attribute any didactic purpose whatsoever to peculiarities in
unattributed patches that live inside a directory titled "7.stuff".
If you want to revise those patches, feel free.
-Jonathan
>
>From: Ludwig Maes
>To: Pd List
>Sent: Saturday, August
athan
>
>From: Mathieu Bouchard
>To: Jonathan Wilkes
>Cc: Miller Puckette ; Alexandre Torres Porres
>; pd-lista puredata
>Sent: Sunday, August 7, 2011 2:18 PM
>Subject: Turing Tarpit (was Re: (breaking symbols))
>
>On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Jon
(attached)
-Jonathan
signal-chorus.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
1 - right. You can't fix this without refactoring the canvas_motion stuff in
g_editor.c. I'm still not sure why these events are handled in c and not with
tk bindings.
2 - There isn't a key combination that will delete it (and doesn't
cmd-Backspace just delete the previous word anyway?). Th
Hm... I'm not sure I understand the danger.
Isn't this:
[noise~]
|
[*~ 99]
|
[dac~]
an implicit version of:
[noise~]
|
[*~ 99]
|
[clip~ -1 1]
|
[dac~]
?
Doesn't the signal generated by either of these create the greatest perceived
volume-- something approaching a bunch of square waves
501 - 600 of 1688 matches
Mail list logo
