Please merge them in... Thanks, Chris
On 3/5/2015 18:37, Zakariyya Mughal wrote:
> On 2015-03-05 at 18:29:57 -0500, Chris Marshall wrote:
>> The fixes need to be in master before the CPAN developers release.
> I'm just pointing them out in case you want to merge them in or should I
> do it now?
>
On 2015-03-05 at 18:29:57 -0500, Chris Marshall wrote:
> The fixes need to be in master before the CPAN developers release.
I'm just pointing them out in case you want to merge them in or should I
do it now?
Regards,
- Zaki Mughal
>
> --Chris
>
> On 3/5/2015 18:26, Zakariyya Mughal wrote:
> >O
The fixes need to be in master before the CPAN developers release.
--Chris
On 3/5/2015 18:26, Zakariyya Mughal wrote:
> On 2015-03-05 at 18:05:42 -0500, Chris Marshall wrote:
>> As mentioned previously, I would like to push a new PDL-2.007_12
>> CPAN developers release. If you have any fixes, me
On 2015-03-05 at 18:05:42 -0500, Chris Marshall wrote:
> As mentioned previously, I would like to push a new PDL-2.007_12
> CPAN developers release. If you have any fixes, merges, etc. to be
> included, please do so.
>
> As for status of a PDL-2.008 release, here are the remaining bug
> tickets w
Don't worry that PDL-2.009 will be a "light" release since there
are plenty of juicy feature request tickets to plump it up with.
--Chris
On 3/5/2015 18:05, Chris Marshall wrote:
> As mentioned previously, I would like to push a new PDL-2.007_12
> CPAN developers release. If you have any fixes,
As mentioned previously, I would like to push a new PDL-2.007_12
CPAN developers release. If you have any fixes, merges, etc. to be
included, please do so.
As for status of a PDL-2.008 release, here are the remaining bug
tickets with priority 5 or greater:
> Pri Bug# Description
>
> 7
On 2015-03-05 at 14:55:19 -0500, Chris Marshall wrote:
> All-
>
> Thanks for all the progress. I would like to push another CPAN Testers
> release from the current git master this evening. Is everyone good with
> that?
In the IRC, we were discussing how to get all the feature branches with
fix
On 2015-03-05 at 20:51:56 +0100, kmx wrote:
> Some time ago I have reported a bug "2.007_11 fails on MS Windows
> 64bit" (not a big issue itself).
>
> The interesting point is that I have received two notifications 1/
> from github; 2/ from sf.net (I have reported the bug at sf.net)
>
> I might h
All-
Thanks for all the progress. I would like to push another CPAN Testers
release from the current git master this evening. Is everyone good with
that?
--Chris
--
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming The Go P
Some time ago I have reported a bug "2.007_11 fails on MS Windows 64bit"
(not a big issue itself).
The interesting point is that I have received two notifications 1/ from
github; 2/ from sf.net (I have reported the bug at sf.net)
I might have missed something but do we have now 2 bug trackers
Hi what does "fixed inv()" mean? You have fixed the threading issue?
- Karl
> On 5 Mar 2015, at 8:37 am, Chris Marshall wrote:
>
> I've added the test and fixed inv(). I don't think we need the
> mod to PDL::Fit::Polynomial. This does point out that PDL really
> could use a clean, supported
I've added the test and fixed inv(). I don't think we need the
mod to PDL::Fit::Polynomial. This does point out that PDL really
could use a clean, supported linear algebra framework rather
that the roll-our-own patchwork...
On 3/5/2015 11:38, Chris Marshall wrote:
A couple of points-
(1) plea
A couple of points-
(1) please open a bug and add a test for the inv() failure
(2) modify PDL::Fit::Polynomial to use matinv() in preference to inv()
*if available*
(3) I'll take a look at inv(), I remember it threading correctly. It
definitely needs fixing.
The problem may be a result
13 matches
Mail list logo
