I really cannot help here, but if you want your friend to buy Pentax (are
you prepared to share your lenses with him?), I think the best way is to
show the differences between flare control. There are only 2 choices - SMC
and T*. You know which he would choose. 8-)
regards,
Alan Chan
A
Hi Mafud,
Personally, I have no problem with cropping, but it is pretty easy to see
the majority of the pics in the PUG that have been cropped--simply because
of the 'not full frame' proportions. However, If the cropper stuck to the
same ratio of length to height for full frame, I wouldn't be
Recently Pentax Clover wrote:
I do not know if it is because of my bad practice of english, but it seems
that nobody understood what I am explaining
Yes, yes, we did understand it. You have one lnes (FA*85), and read in a
magazine that it is better than all others. But there are people on
Hi Team,
I am trying to secure some black Underwater Kinetics 716 cases, I have tried
to contact Root International (see http://rootintl.com/html/kineticscases.html)
however they have not responded since 19th Feb. I am quite keen on these
cases in particular as they are just under the limit
Hi,
I'm only aware of one photo from over 70 years of photography and
many, many thousands of photographs that HCB cropped, which is the
'Railowsky' man jumping a puddle. He doesn't allow his printer to crop
them and his prints are sent out with specific instructions to editors
not to crop them.
Hello everybody from Mark W. in Silverton, OR. USA I got a question and a
need I have bought a Pentax angle finder of about the spotmatic generation it
works great but I can't figure out the focus? My eyes seem to compensate for
where ever I turn it. If any body on the list knows of a site with
Alan Chan wrote:
Glad to know that I am not alone on the list. As a chinese who have the
chance to read both English and Japanese magazines, I have found the printed
photos were very different. In Japanese photo magazines, there is always the
"smoothness" quality which is rare in US and UK
Great photographs Mark. Really impressive. Although I
really admired yor macro work this was the one that
caught my attention
http://www.markcassino.com/01010702pandora_e1.jpg
Really cool.
I noticed that your scans look clear and crisp. Would
you care to share a little of your technique in
Mark,
Nice macro shots, you are the standard by which all others should
be judged. Excellent work!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Cassino" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2001 7:31 PM
Subject: Website Update
I
dosk wrote:
Can't decide yet between buying a brand new ZX5n or a used "excellent" PZ1.
Both are about the same price... 5n seems to be winning as I don't need
the extra zoom features the PZ1 has, and its hyper modes with the fancy
wheels don't really do anything that the 5n can't do
bc wrote:
Three rolls of 3200 Delta in DD-X, and the negatives look good.
I have a question for DD-X regulars. Actually, questions.
Have you found any films that it is unfriendly with? I mean that no
matter what you do you can't get a particularly good result out of it?
What films do you
Hi Team,
It seems this set of Nikon lenses were designed as rivals to the Pentax
Limited series, what do you think?
http://www.ave.nikon.co.jp/nti/nti_e/index.htm
Cheers,
Rob Studdert (eBay ID: distudio)
PO Box 701
HURSTVILLE BC NSW 1481
AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
Fax +61-2-9554-9259
Kids and flowers in a light rain.
Evan
Dan Scott wrote:
Hi All,
Subject says it all.
What passes for winter here is on the run and the weeds/wildflowers are
starting to get in a reproductive mood. :-) I've got some Supra, Superia,
my fa 100/2.8, fa 35/2, my tripod, some ziplock
Alan Chan wrote:
I really cannot help here, but if you want your friend to buy Pentax (are
you prepared to share your lenses with him?), I think the best way is to
show the differences between flare control. There are only 2 choices - SMC
and T*. You know which he would choose. 8-)
Yeah,
Mafud wrote:
What I do remember is he was in no way obsessed with a scene as Ansel Adams,
whose own dragon was Yellowstone
Dear me. Yosemite, my friend, Yosemite, not Yellowstone! (Ansel is spinning
in his grave about now g).
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
Philippe Trottier wrote:
Hello,
I'd need someone that would like to make some photo of a girl in
Iceland, a freind of mine. I would do them but I can't travel up there. at
this very moment.
Are you paying for airfare from Toronto to Iceland? I could use a
holiday. :)
-Aaron
p.s.
The coverage angle stated for the 17mm f/4 (180) is measured across the
diagonal of the frame. Your finding of 110 is correct for measuring across
the frame. Asahi presumably gave the 180 rating as a way of exaggerating
(with qualifiers) the angle of view. I have no suggestion for a wider lens
I spent this weekend in taking pictures
of my children and flowers. Everything
was going wonderfully when I fired the
shutter on my spotmatic and I quickly
noticed the mirror had locked up. Now I
have had problems in the past with the
mirror locking up at very slow shutter
speeds but it always
Hi Yoshihiko,
# It seems most LX owners in Japan rushed into the
# new screens.
I did!!g Just waiting for the reply from a shop. They
told me about a month!!
Sincerely,
Take Ueda, Osaka, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.tripod.co.jp/hayatama/photo/
-
So what then is the body of a PZ1 made of?
(It sure looks like plastic to me in its pictures, no?)
Also, the MZ/ZX bodies are not a light "plastic", but some kind of heavy
polycarbonate fusion material. Having owned older metal cameras, (such as
the tank-like 1970's Canon TX,) I believe an MZ/ZX
The following is from my brother who works in a high end photography store
in the San Fancisco Bay area.
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 23:12:21 -0800
From: "William D. Graham" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MZ-S
To: Ricahrd Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent:
Pentax clover wrote:
PC I am very surprise that many members of PDML consider that tests of Chasseur
PC d'Images is not are inreliable !
Just watch closely the relationship between advertising volume and
the test results... it's unfortunate as I like otherwise ChdI.
PC ...
PC The store
Hi all,
Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi Team, It seems this set of Nikon lenses were designed
as rivals to the Pentax Limited series, what do you
think?
http://www.ave.nikon.co.jp/nti/nti_e/index.htm
Cheers,
Rob Studdert (eBay ID: distudio)
They'll also have a "Pentax killer" camera. See
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
" Whooosh! " by Bill Peifer, USA
Now that looks like some fun.
Yes indeed! Thanks for the kind words. Actually, this is from one of the
first couple of rolls I shot through my MZ-50, from almost three years ago.
As a consequence of making this one a PUG
On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:24:53 -0600, Todd Stanley wrote:
Looks like you got a good deal. I should get one of those, but I'd rather
have an MX :)
No, Todd, you need an LX. Everyone needs the LX. Repeat after me: I
will buy an LX...I WILL buy an LX...I MUST buy an LX...I MUST buy a Mac
I shot:
- macro close-ups of 1968 factory prototype Hot Wheels for my upcoming Toy
Shop column,
- undercarriage shots of my Jeep following extensive modification for
off-road use,
- outdoor shots of the Jeep, off-road,
- photos of my kids playing,
- trains.
Paul M. Provencher
(ppro)
On 5 Mar 2001, at 8:15, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Have you found any films that it is unfriendly with? I mean that no
matter what you do you can't get a particularly good result out of it?
What films do you find it best with, and what do you usually run through it?
The only films I've tried
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
bc wrote:
Three rolls of 3200 Delta in DD-X, and the negatives look good.
I have a question for DD-X regulars. Actually, questions.
Have you found any films that it is unfriendly with? I mean that no
matter what you do you can't get a particularly good result
I don't think so. From the site:
"
Note: This lens has no aperture control function -- be sure to set the
camera's exposure mode to manual or aperture-priority auto. Also, the
lens construction differs from that of Nikkor lenses and in certain
shooting situations it may not be as well suited for
My guess, probably cheaper to replace then repair!
At 09:28 AM 3/5/01 -0500, you wrote:
I spent this weekend in taking pictures
of my children and flowers. Everything
was going wonderfully when I fired the
shutter on my spotmatic and I quickly
noticed the mirror had locked up. Now I
have had
Last night I used VC paper for the first time, Ilford's MGIV RC
Deluxe. I wasn't making final prints, but, rather, proof prints on
5x7 paper. The paper was a joy to work with, and perfect for the
task. It's quick to develop, stop, and fix, and washing is fast and
easy also. The Cooltone would
I own a PZ-1p and a ZX-5n.
I like the feel of shooting the PZ-1p, once I got the grip strap for it.
The ZX-5n, I rarely ever shoot it without the battery adapter, again because
I like the grip.
If there is not a significant feature the PZ-1 has that you'll be taking
advantage of on a regualr
Hi Mafud,
You of course are right. I can't tell what lens I took it with unless I
already know. In general though, when I look back over my accumulated work,
I seem to have an affinity for the shots taken with primes. Possibly it's
just my imagination.
I agree - either cropping with a zoom
William,
No need to apologize for the long post. It is exactly the
information I am looking for.
If you can send along the names for used equipment I would
appreciate it. It is not that I am looking for anything, but it never hurts
and I may come across a lens case or two...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I used the Beseler 23C-II with a Dichro head, and chose the "single
filter" method of adjusting contrast, both for speed and simplicity,
and because I'm not at all familiar with the "two filter" method.
Could someone explain what the reason is to use the two filter
Tiger don't break my heart I love that
camera.
Evan
Tiger Moses wrote:
My guess, probably cheaper to replace then repair!
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Did Bresson crop?
I don't know if Bresson did it, but all you have to do is look at his
photos on the web to see that someone seems to have cropped a few of them.
It would be interesting to see, those of you who have some of his more
famous prints in your possession, if the images you have match
Right, I was just using it as an example because I know I shot it with a
50/1.4. The proof would really be in the slide or print, but even then a
1-to-1 comparison of the same subject, same composition, same focal length,
same aperture would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Don't get me
Love a copy
Illinois Bill
Mike Johnston wrote:
If anyone still wants a copy of the Pop Quiz, please send me a private
e-mail. I won't be able to keep up if I have to fulfill requests posted here
on the List.
Thanks!
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
By using two filters, you increase the contrast of the print without
blowing out the highlights. The high contrast filter allows for you to get
the blacks black, then the low contrast filter allows for getting details
into the highlights that you would otherwise not get with a high contrast
CLA probably less than $100 if you don't need parts. You might find it will
free itself if you put one hand out and "bump" the base of the camera on
your hand. This will not fix the problem that cause it but might free it
up.
Paul M. Provencher
(ppro)
-Original Message-
From: Evan
Dick Graham forwarded this from his brother:
Hi Dick,
Our Pentax rep brought an MZ-S in last week. The one thing that
overshadows all else about the camera is it's price.
With a street price of $850 to $900, it will not sell very well.
We figure, based on feel and features, it should be
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Andy Harbin wrote:
"...not ... well suited for shooting finer images." I think is the
exact opposite to the limited range. Also, no aperture control? What's
up with that?
I think Rob was kidding about the Limited competition, Andy. :) Pentax
is putting out ultra
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Tiger Moses wrote:
I guess it's time for a CLA
along with the repair any idea on how
much I can count on spending?
My guess, probably cheaper to replace then repair!
Hmmm... that's a yes and no situation. Where I live, you can buy a
Spotmatic in used condition for
Kids and flowers in a light rain.
Evan
Shh. Keep it down Evan, Mike might be reading. ;-)
Dan Scott (great name, btw, my son is really proud of it)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
I'm not quite sure about the fun part. Who's fun, ours? Definitely.
Owners fun? Come to think about it... that's even funnier.
Servus, Alin :o)
( http://www.ave.nikon.co.jp/nti/nti_e/index.htm )
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Dick wrote:
The interface is cumbersome. Focus point sellection is very cumbersome.
This one of my concerns; the manual focus point selection doesn't seem well
implemented...
The
top left dial, which controls exposure compensation and auto bracketing, is
not designed so you can move the
Hello
you are a lucky guy, you know ?
Have lots of enjoyments with this LX
See you
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Yoshihiko Takinami" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Pentax Duscuss Mailing List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: lundi 5 mars 2001 14:52
Subject: Have got a new LX !!
Hi
Ralf Engelmann wrote:
So we have to live
with the situation that Pentax has released a camera targeted
direct at the Pentax fan, a camera that makes sense in the special
situation of an advanced Pentax system user, while being not the big
draft for the overall market.
IMO, what Pentax
I'm going to visit London for a holiday trip with my family.
I'd like to know some adresses of camera shops (second hand PK-stuff) and
labs (E-6)... so..you guys living in the UK..I'm counting on you..
PS. I have some pics of my son ( three months old now) here:
They've put a blurb up:
http://www.ilford.com/html/us_english/latestnews/latestnews5.html
Just a press release, really...
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
I did not check the eyepiece to see if it was glass or plastic, but it's
dished like the ZX5N, and so similar, that I would bet it's the same.
Thanks,
Ed
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 7:29 PM
Subject: Re:
Steve my daughter and I did a pinhole
project a few years ago. However we
couldn't find any 126 so we made a
pinhole camera from a shoe box loaded it
with Ilford 4X5 paper and made paper
negatives and then contact prints it
worked really well.
Evan
Steve Larson wrote:
Hi,
I signed up my
are there any ghost towns that easy to find and get to?
Hi César,
Glad to hear that you are coming to Utah! I'll try to
help with some suggestions the best that I can. Ken
mentioned the Maddox Steak house. It is still there
in Perry (next to Brigham City) probably about 20
minutes north
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Are we not talking about using two
dials at a time on a colour head for
contrast control as opposed to one?
That's what I thought Shel was
talking about.
That's exactly what I was asking about, not split filter printing.
"Two Filter" printing is when one uses both
CLA prices seem to depend on cost of living of the area you live in. Here
in the Seattle area, which has housing prices approaching southern
California prices, a Spotmatic CLA with meter calibration and diode to
accept non-mercury batteries runs about $120 with tax. For me, it is well
worth it.
The two filter method (as Ilford calls it) is using the M and Y channels
in a color head to vary contrast without varying exposure times. The
method is outlined in the datasheet of every pack of Ilford paper sold,
and probably other manufacturers as well.
I've played with it a bit...it doesn't
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Are we not talking about using two
dials at a time on a colour head for
contrast control as opposed to one?
That's what I thought Shel was
talking about.
That's exactly what I was asking about, not split filter printing.
"Two Filter"
What is amazing, is it that is not even an SMC!
But, I always like gooeyduck's auctions. He has a nice picture at the
bottom of this particular auction.
- Original Message -
From: "Provencher, Paul M." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:38 AM
Tiger Moses wrote:
I used ot have tow ro three links to pages with info on how to paint your
own, then someone ask me how and now I cant find anything
You went to a keg party and didn't invite us?
Thanks a lot.
tv
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Hi Dan
I sure like the sound of this. (What took you so slong?) Thanks!
Jens
Something I try to keep in mind, when listening to someone speak of
something they love to do and feel strongly about, is that their comments
are as likely to come from the heart as from the head. It's passion, and
I have the FA 20-35/4, and my gf has the EF USM 20-35/3.5-4.5 with hood and
case for her EOS-5. There is a significant size difference between the two
(Pentax being smaller, of course). Both are recent acquisitions, so we
haven't sat down to do any serious comparisons, but at first glance, they
tom wrote:
Like I said, this hasn't worked
very well for me. The supposed
benefit is that you can change
filtration without changing exposure
time, but I found that I still
had to tweak the time a bit.
Besides, exposures were too long
(your lamp isn't really suited to
that much
I used ot have tow ro three links to pages with info on how to paint your
own, then someone ask me how and now I cant find anything
Anyone have a good bookmark or two for the web?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
Hello,
I have
1 SP1000
1 Spotmatic SP II
1 ES
4 KX
2 MX
You have not counted me before.
Thanks,
Martin Albrecht
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at
Tom C. here with my Mafud-hat on. :-)
Except when focusing on the differences broadens our perspective while
looking for the commonality makes us smuggly complacent.
We'd all be a lot better off looking for the commonality of our
mutual obsession, than focusing on the differences in the ways
Is there anyway to number the messages in the digest?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Does anybody know if Pentax is working on any kind of IS or VR technology? I am a big
tripod user, but when traveling with my family I can't be carrying a heavy tripod
about. A VR lens in the range of 25-135 more or less, would be a big help.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
Ralf wrote:
Besides the fact that Bill didn't understand the
exposure mode
interface of the camera (somehow a bad thing in case
this happens to
dealers), I think this is how the non Pentax fans
will see the
camera.
The dealer did not even understand the philosophy
behind this camera. As
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, Martin Albrecht wrote:
I have
[snip]
2 MX
Hey, Aaron, it's about time for you to get another few LX's, isn't it?
:)
chris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
This is a joke, correct?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Bob Walkden wrote:
What people do to unauthorised
copies of the photos on the web is
presumably beyond the reasonable
control of Magnum. Unfortunately I
don't own any of HCBs prints yet,
but I do have a number of books. It
is a simple enough matter to look at
the black border around
Tom wrote:
But that can't be for the camera's specs right? It's more like plain and
simple bigotry.
Certainly it is. I do believe that Dynaxx9 is designed to prevent Minolta users to go
Canon or Nikon. Although the MZ-S has a similar function it does provide a real
alternative; it dares
Is it too early to ask how does the ZENITAR behaves on the 2nd hand market ?
Perhaps after 1 year and a couple of shoots the lens gets trouble ?
I've had my Zenitar about nine months now. I bought it to have some
inexpensive fun with, but find that I use it often. It is a sturdy lens,
and
Bob W. wrote:
But this mystique of visual purity gathered around HCB, is growing, in direct
proportion to the cacophony of his admirers, who will, on some future date,
tell us HCB walked on water.
He had no need to walk on water. The waves always parted before him.
HCB was a
Comments mixed in.
At 05:24 PM 3/5/01 EST, you wrote:
In a message dated 3/5/2001 11:41:00 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree - either cropping with a zoom or copping by proximity works for
me.
Hi Tom!
We often forget, when shooting primes, that composition has a
Bob wrote:
And why should he not always see and shoot full-frame? Many people do.
I can think of fewer than 5 of my own photos from the last 20 years
that I crop, and I'm no HCB.
"Mon semblable, mon frere!"
s
--Mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 5, 2001 4:24 PM
Subject: Primes Vs. Zooms: was: Re: More on croppng (Was: An
important step)
What we don't ever factor into the discussion is this: what
would HCB, Adams
and the other "prime only" greats
She is the first to point it out anyway.
Sorry, no prize on that one.
Thanks for liking the picture. Just to relate it to another
thread, the original was cropped extensively to get what is on
the PUG.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "aimcompute" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Pentax Discuss"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Johnston
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 6:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[4]: More on cropping (Was: An important step)
Bob wrote:
And why should he not always see and shoot
Cyril MARION [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the feeling from the list is good towards this Russian stuff, my choice
is difficult to make...
- 2650FF for a 2nd hand genuine PENTAX 17mm f/4.0 or
- 1300FF for a new ZENITAR 16mm f/2.8
Is it too early to ask how does the ZENITAR behaves on the 2nd
- Original Message -
From: Mafud
Subject: Re: More on croppng (Was: An important step)
Bill,
I was trying to quench a growing fire, this "zooms as inferior
photographic
tools" thread abuilding in our midst.
I don't know where this started. I originally stated my
thoughts, which was
So what then is the body of a PZ1 made of?
(It sure looks like plastic to me in its pictures, no?)
The outer shell is plastic, but the major structure inside is metal. For
MZ/ZX bodies, the whole thing is plastic.
Also, the MZ/ZX bodies are not a light "plastic", but some kind of heavy
Might as well entitle this one "apples and oranges".
They each have their strengths and weaknesses for
given situations and are BOTH valid tools for
photography. Arguing that one or the other is
"absolutley" better is pointless. It all depends
on the photographic task/situation at hand.
JCO
-
There is always a gap between the pure technical chatting and the enjoyment
you have when you use your lens. But if fact, it is 2 side of a same coin !
Some people enjoy one more than the orther, and some people enjoy both .
I think I have been misunderstood a bit. What I tried to say was no
I'm telling... I'm telling. Looking up the number for the cropper-coppers
this minute. Don't be surprised if you get a knock on your door in the
wee-hours. g
BTW, my wife was curious if you ever used her castle painting as the basis
for a wine label. If you didn't that's fine. Just curious.
William Robb wrote:
snip
I also think that the budding photographer should skip 35mm completely
and move straight to medium format.
That will, I am sure, open another can of worms.
Bill, why didn't someone tell me this 10 years ago? :-) You are a fine
friend.
Tom C.
-
This message is
Sorry PDML - just made the classic mistake of thinking I was responding just
to Bill
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "aimcompute" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: Woops
I'm telling... I'm telling. Looking up the number for
I have a headache and am not sure how coherent this is going to
wind up being, but here goes anyhow. I need to wrap this up
and get back to work, so I'm going to be a bit more lazy with my
text-editing than I'd usually allow myself... How, ah, ironically
_a_propos_. Didn't plan it that way,
Rob Studdert's fisheye pictures and the rectilinear derivations from them at
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/fisheye_to_rectilinear.html
are interesting, but is there a better algorithm? If you look at "eddie" in
the plane, the rectilinear version seems even more distorted and less
pleasing
Geese, I had forgotten where I got that from. I owe you a bottle
of Merlot.
It made a lovely label.
Send me your address, and the wine is on it's way, providing
your government will allow importation of it (check on it from
your end please). We just had a couple of instances here in
Canada where
Hello everybody from Mark W. in Silverton, OR. USA I got a question and a
need I have bought a Pentax angle finder of about the spotmatic generation
it
works great but I can't figure out the focus? My eyes seem to compensate
for
where ever I turn it. If any body on the list knows of a site with
I did not check the eyepiece to see if it was glass or plastic, but it's
dished like the ZX5N, and so similar, that I would bet it's the same.
8-(
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
- Original Message -
From: "aimcompute" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 5, 2001 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: Woops
Sorry PDML - just made the classic mistake of thinking I was
responding just
to Bill
Tom C.
Whoops, me too.
Bill
-
This message is from the
Of course we believe you and Paal. And that is a major cause for
concern, as FA* lenses are not particularly cheap. I have 2 FA* and a F*
and have not found problems, but it seems that the probability of
getting a defective focusing scale window is very high.
I also have to say that those
Hi all,
I found an article in a newspaper for the above new lens.
This also adopts aspherical lens (uncertain about the
number) and inner focusing. The price is JP\48,000, will
hit the market on 10th March. Monthly production will be
3000.
Sincerely,
Take Ueda,
Does anyone else think it strange that Pentax introduces a 28-105 and
24-90 at about the same time?
tv
Takehiko Ueda wrote:
Hi all,
I found an article in a newspaper for the above new lens.
This also adopts aspherical lens (uncertain about the
number) and inner focusing. The price is
Way to go, Collin. Proud of ya.
Doug
At 5:59 PM -05003/5/01, Collin Brendemuehl caused thus to appear:
One kind comment to me about my gallery shot was to send info
on to the Madison CofC. So I did. They like is and asked about
my pricing! How thrilling. Now all I need is a new pricing
Good looking boy, Timo.
Can't help you on the London shops. Camera stores were off-limits when I was there
last.
Doug
At 10:06 PM +02003/5/01, Timo Hartikainen caused thus to appear:
I'm going to visit London for a holiday trip with my family.
I'd like to know some adresses of camera
Way to go Collin!
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Brendemuehl" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 2:59 PM
Subject: Madison Skyline
One kind comment to me about my gallery shot was to send info
on to the
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
