> So Tom's photo finisher has the "Portra" talk with him,
Could someone please recap the "portra talk" for me? Because I missed
that thread, and I recently got some Portra developed, and half of the
film was ruined! In random parts of the film, it looks like the
chemicals got congealed and harden
unsubscribe pentax-discuss-digest
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
unsubscribe pentax-discuss-digest
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Hi,
Sometime ago I bought a very old Spotmatic for cheap with some problems. I
had the problems fixed and it works perfectly now.
I'm intrigued by some of it's details and wonder if someone could help me
determine the age of the camera.
I guess it's an early one (product nº231). But I couldn't fi
At 04:02 PM 2/28/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >> What is the difference between a dental macro and macro lens ?
>
> > The dental version has markings on the barrel that tell you the
> > magnification ratios when the lens is used in combination with one of
> > the two close-up lenses tat make up the Dent
I have one.
Regards,
Bob...
"Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us
from the former, for the sake of the latter.
The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls
for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fort
On 1 Mar 2002 at 0:27, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> >
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1333698770
> > But this speedy lens is the perfect companion for you Pentax
> > camera. It is compact for easy wielding, yet is of the utmost
> > quality.
> >
> > tv
> Yes, but is it b
I've got one you can have for a hundred bucks. Heck, I let you have it for
$75. I've got another with a damaged, but still usable filter ring I will
let you have for half that.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David A. Mann
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: 6x7 Brotherhood: It's arrived!
>
>
> Yes, my nice "new" 6x7 Takumar 300mm f/4 lens arrived from Auckland
> to
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 50mm F1.7 - M
>
>
> On 1 Mar 2002 at 0:05, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> > is this absurd or what?
> > http://cgi.ebay.
Actually, it is an excellent lens.
Regards,
Bob...
"Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity,
and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us
from the former, for the sake of the latter.
The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls
for our utmost circumspect
Yes, my nice "new" 6x7 Takumar 300mm f/4 lens arrived from Auckland
today. The courier, showing a serious lack of intelligence, simply
left the NZ$1600 (US$670) package in the mailbox, visible to any
passerby, despite someone being home all day. At least they got the
address right.
This l
Wow! Great sharpness and definition on those field lights. Looks like
you've landed a real winner. Do you mind my asking what you paid?
Paul
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
> Got the SMC Takumar Zoom 135-600 6.7 from
> Japan this week. I bought it mostly
> to fill out my screwmount lens collection
> bu
The K1000 was, to a large degree, a Spotmatic with a bayonet mount. It was made
for over 20 years, very reliable, cheap and a favorite with photography
instructors. It was a great "first camera". This is why so many were sold. If
anything, it was too sucessful, because it gave Pentax the reputatio
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1336187925
This seller is not the same one selling the Peleng 8/3.5 in K mount
http://cgi.ebay.de/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1335775939
Again I must ask: Do you think it (the Mir) is a real K mount? I don't
expect autoaperture, but
Got the SMC Takumar Zoom 135-600 6.7 from
Japan this week. I bought it mostly
to fill out my screwmount lens collection
but couldnt wait to try it out.
First of all the F6.7 aperture makes it
tough to focus at 135mm but its easy enough
to focus at 600 and then just zoom out
if needed.
Best featu
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 05:51:10PM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Our religion is Pentecostal;
might need a pentaxis of evil then. Maybe need to appoint a pope penta X
as well since the population of Patican is similar :)
> Unit of weight is Pentagrams;
> Pentangle is the favorite folk group;
>
Do I sense some pent up frustrations? What do we call it when it all ends? Pentagon?
ppro
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: How shall
I had a similar problem with a roll of film from my wife's (Pentax) P&S -
showed as small flecks on the negatives in just two or three frames. Initially
I blamed the lab, but we eventually agreed it couldn't be them.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
On Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:15 PM, Ed
See the note at the end of every message you have recieved from this,
including the one you posted and this oneonly you can unsubscribe
yourself
- Original Message -
From: "fsylee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:30 PM
Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Darkroom operational!
>
>
> Oh ... when you said "for all my darkroom use" I thought you meant for
> A
The K1000 is a great camera, but a) not as good as the KX and
K2(*), and b) gets more press than the other two. Whether it is
under-rated or not (and I don't think it is), it cannot be the
_most_ under-rated because of the comparison to the KX at least.
I'm reconsidering my comments on the H1a,
Our religion is Pentecostal;
Unit of weight is Pentagrams;
Pentangle is the favorite folk group;
Volvo Penta marine engines power our boats
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> And of course, I work for Pentamark. (Pentamark Worldwide, an Omnicom
> company)
>
> Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>
> > Our l
Hi, Tom,
Were you thinking of coming? I didn't know that. Oh well, too bad. Maybe next
time...
regards,
frank
tom wrote:
>
>
> BTW, I can't make it to Toronto Saturday, I have to help a friend move.
>
> Damn, that would have been fun.
>
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all poss
And of course, I work for Pentamark. (Pentamark Worldwide, an Omnicom
company)
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> Our land: Pentaxia
> Our selves: Pentaxians
>(or Pentaxer for the Teutonic membership)
> Our language:
See below.
On 1 Mar 2002 at 9:30, fsylee wrote:
> Hi
>
> How to unsubscribe from [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Please advise.
> ==
> ·s®öSMSµu°T¡Ghttp://sms.sina.com.hk µ¹»·¤è¿Ë¤Í¶Ç¤WµLÅå³ß 50MB
> ¹q¤l¶l¥ó ¡Ghttp://sinamail.sina.com.hk - Th
On 28 Feb 2002 at 11:55, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> The 645n, too deserves more respect than it gets, but I'd say that the
> 67 gets less respect than the 645n.
I don't know...the medFo folks dis it cuz it's not as big as a 67, the 35mm guys dis
it cuz the AF isn't as slick as a 35mm.
Plus ther
On 28 Feb 2002 at 16:42, JamesRel wrote:
>
> 2.
> I use a stroboframe quick-flip bracket attached to a ballhead which is
> attached to the flash, this allows the flash to be rotated in (almost)
> any direction.
>
> Method 1 is very clumsy, while method 2 is better but its kind of
> large to lug
I use the 40/2.8 as a street lens with an MX, when I have to put my camera in
my pocket. I also use it in social situations where I want to be inconspicuous.
I took it to a dinner at a friends house a couple of weeks ago, along with a
roll of T-Max 400. (That happened to be the fastest film I had
Our land: Pentaxia
Our selves: Pentaxians
(or Pentaxer for the Teutonic membership)
Our language: Penta
Our disease: Pentaxitis
Our men: Pentamen
Our women
Hi
How to unsubscribe from [EMAIL PROTECTED]? Please advise.
==
·s®öSMSµu°T¡Ghttp://sms.sina.com.hk
µ¹»·¤è¿Ë¤Í¶Ç¤WµLÅå³ß
50MB ¹q¤l¶l¥ó ¡Ghttp://sinamail.sina.com.hk
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscri
Congratulations Bill. It's hard to pass up a great deal on one of these
cameras. And since some of them are available at truly remarkable prices,
our numbers will continue to grow. Ironically, I just came up from the
darkroom after developing my first roll of 35mm in quite a few weeks. The
big cam
>No, the K1000 is the most over rated camera Pentax ever made. You got it
>backwards, Dave.
K1000 is a simple and reliable camera, that's it! It's the bottom of the
line model. What made it so famous was the fact it was the last Pentax
mechanical body ever produced in the AF era. If K1000 was c
You can't.
We all look alike. :)
Collin
At 08:16 PM 2/28/02 -0500, you wrote:
>From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Uh-Oh :^D
>
>I thought you guys shaved your heads. Now you are claiming long hair. Just
>how am I supposed to tell a 6x7 fanatic from the other Pentaxians?
>
T Rittenhouse wrote regarding the 40mm:
> It is about the right focal length, and its compact profile
> ought to make a non-threatening package to walk around snapping pics
> of the uptown yuppies (being poor, I take pics of people with money,
> it is all a matter of viewpoint).
You're a funny
Oh ... when you said "for all my darkroom use" I thought you meant for
ALL your darkroom use.
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
> No, I develop FILM in room light (my kitchen). I use the radioshack
> timer for that. I like the countdown timer mode because it beeps
> if your not paying attention when time
>Its overpriced.
When compared to ZX/MZ-5n.
regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:07:48 -0500, Peter Alling wrote:
> Being perfectly proportioned doesn't preclude your being large.
I'm in shape ... round is a shape, isn't it?
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow th
Either way, you will need to buy 3 expensive items:
1) Pentax Hot Shoe Adaptor FG
2) Pentax Extension Cord F5P (or F5PL which is much longer)
3) Pentax Off Camera Adaptor F (tripod mountable)
Eventually, you might spend more than you planned. IMO, it would be easier
if you just sold your 330FTZ
> Subject: Re: Darkroom operational!
>
>
> Safelight? You develop your film under a safelight?
No, I develop FILM in room light (my kitchen). I use the radioshack
timer for that. I like the countdown timer mode because it beeps
if your not paying attention when time runs out.
> Does the enlarge
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> ...chanting esoteric, lydian incantations ...
"Lydia, oh Lydia,
That Encyclopedia..."
dave "the hook! the hook!"y
--
dave o'brien - http://www.diaspoir.net
We'll try to cooperate fully with the IRS, because, as citizens, we feel
a strong patriotic
Hi Peter,
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:37:31 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> UK tax law demands we keep our paperwork for 7 years - when it comes to
> disposal I guess we will incinerate, or convert to papier mache.
If you get a cross-cut shredder, the output is strips that are about
30mm long an
Did you get any idea for how long it's been unchanged? Anything on how
and when PX has changed?
Bob Poe wrote:
> I knew that I had heard something about a Kodak
> changing B&W film so I called their tec and Todd said
> that TX is unchanged, but Plus X has changed slightly.
--
Shel Belinkoff
m
I think you are right, but keep it to yourself, we don't want the prices to
go up.
Ciao,
Graywolf
- Original Message -
From: Bill Gekas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:39 PM
Dear Robert,
Congratulations! You must be so proud (and tired?)
The reason I got back into photography, and Pentax, is that my wife is
expecting - due in 4-5 days now.
Any hints or tips on how an inexperienced, tired, and excited father can
also take good photo's would be appreciated!
I hope you a
KX - solid, no batteries required for shutter, dof, mlu, timer, viewfinder
aperture/shutter display, shutter button lock.
Regards,
Bill
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax User
Safelight? You develop your film under a safelight? Does the enlarger
plug into the timer too, allowing you to use the timer to turn the
enlarging light on/off in repeatable fashion? What's the timing range?
Does the LCD display turn off when you're exposing paper?
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
Maciek, that was great!!!
But speaking of translations pl-eng and eng-pl as a "simple" ones I'd
disagree...
To make it brighter, check out pl.rec.foto, there was something more about
it, concerning an old article by Staszek Stawowy. Follow the links, yu'll
first find the original article, and
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 12:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Darkroom operational!
>
>
> I agree that there's no need for fancy timing equipment, but that the
> i
Shel,
If you're worried about ONE email sent at a random time being
intercepted, then you should also be worried about THREE or THREE
HUNDRED emails sent at seperate times being intercepted.
Basically, there is a remote chance that someone can intercept an
email . . . if they bother to t
Shel wrote:
> I hope you don't succumb to growing your hair long, wearing purple
> robes, and chanting esoteric, lydian incantations in the darkroom when
> sitting in a candle-lit circle on your bathroom floor while developing
> the negatives, and signing your email Brother "Oregon" Bill.
On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 04:55 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> I hope you don't succumb to growing your hair long, wearing purple
> robes, and chanting esoteric, lydian incantations in the darkroom when
> sitting in a candle-lit circle on your bathroom floor while developing
> the negative
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:58:29PM -0500, Brendan wrote:
>> Here the MZ-3 is almost the same asthe MZ-5n, just
>> rare, I actually got mine for less than a MZ-5n.
Nitin Garg
> wow. So is the 5n more expensive or 3 is cheaper?
I haven't been able to find an MZ-3 in the states. From what I have
Hi,
from my experience and from what articles and data I have read,
developer exhaustion is not a big problem, Shel, you are not
dealing with exhaustion (after all, even the homeopathical amount
of developer - 10ml or less, which sticks to film in 2-bath
development, is sufficient t
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> It's crackers to slip a rozer the dropsy in snide ... IIRC
Yeah, that too!
Stephen
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.ko
I hope you don't succumb to growing your hair long, wearing purple
robes, and chanting esoteric, lydian incantations in the darkroom when
sitting in a candle-lit circle on your bathroom floor while developing
the negatives, and signing your email Brother "Oregon" Bill.
"Bill D. Casselberry" wrot
> The Super Program, in every magazine review that I have seen which
> showed shutter speed details, has shown a significant jump in
> shutter speed (only) at 1/125 second. It would seem that your two
> Super Programs are "normal" in this regard.
I just dug a few "road tests" out of the archives
Hi!
While thinking over M80-200 ore F70-210 Zoom I looked for an article from
'photomagazin' 04/99 in the library two days ago.
The dates in that test may not show how it is in daily life but I decided that
I wouldn't like it because it seems to have evident light-fall-off to the
edges and will su
I'd just like to thank everyone for all the good advice they gave in
response to my trade-in question!
I've decided that for now, I'll just be keeping my trusty MZ-7 and flash.
However I do have another question, since the AF330FTZ is basically "fixed"
to the camera hotshoe is there any way to ri
Firstly, allow me to attempt to quelch the ensuing Rah-Rahs
sure to commence, as I have been after one of these for a
long time - since way before discovering the PDML;^)
I had dropped in to the local mini-lab to pick up some b&w
paper for a project and
On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 04:11 PM, Fred wrote:
> The Super Program, in every magazine review that I have seen which
> showed shutter speed details, has shown a significant jump in
> shutter speed (only) at 1/125 second. It would seem that your two
> Super Programs are "normal" in this
It's crackers to slip a rozer the dropsy in snide ... IIRC
Stephen Moore wrote:
> > Okresl Swoje potrzeby - my znajdziemy oferte za Ciebie!
> To anyone who misspent their youth reading MAD magazine,
> that 3rd word might look terribly familiar. :-)
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No ... but the microwave comes in very handy for raising the temperature
of water for mixing and diluting chemicals. For example, I keep
distilled water in convenient jugs, and the temp is usually around 65-
to 70-degrees, depending on ambient temperature. 104-degrees or so is
required to mix ID
On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 12:52 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Yeah ... especially the Rodney Dangerfield Ltd. Edition Commemorative.
That poor Rodney...the more famous he becomes, the less respect he gets
(or so it would appear from his act).
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Di
What ... you've never had a PB & TX sammich!
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 02:12 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>
> > Sounds practical.
> > So, do you process film & eat at the same time?
> > :)
>
> Now THAT is a bad idea.
>
> Unless you're developing in X-Tol,
To all:
For years, I've been using a Pentax 50mm 1:2 coupled to a Vivitar 2x macro
focusing teleconverter for detailed close-up photography of broken gear,
aluminum castings and serial number documentation. Results have been pretty
good so far.
Any suggestions for improvement? I have seen a
Artur Ledóchowski wrote:
> Okresl Swoje potrzeby - my znajdziemy oferte za Ciebie!
Would you translate, please, sir?
To anyone who misspent their youth reading MAD magazine,
that 3rd word might look terribly familiar. :-)
Cheers,
Stephen
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. T
1. fine wine is supposed to improve in its performance (taste, punch
whatever) with age. I dont think k1000 does that.
2. That they run ~300 can$ only goes to show its are not under-rated.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:44:38PM -0500, David Brooks wrote:
> Like fine wine,expensive with age.They run
On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 03:18 PM, David Brooks wrote:
> Hope he does not throw any thing at me
> Saturday
You're lucky I treasure my 67 so much, or you might have had a 67-shaped
dent in yer head. :P
-Aaron
p.s. you all knew I was going to say that because you're learning.
We'll
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:58:29PM -0500, Brendan wrote:
> Here the MZ-3 is almost the same asthe MZ-5n, just
> rare, I actually got mine for less than a MZ-5n.
wow. So is the 5n more expensive or 3 is cheaper?
>
> --- Artur Ledóchowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ---Original Message
A bicycle is also a symbol of youth, simplicity and dependability. And
it isnt too bad to move around on either. Want to trade your motorbike
(if you have one) for my bicycle ?
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:53:36PM -0500, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Perhaps people know value when they see it. The K1000 m
Evan wrote: And it doesn't take bad pictures either.
I've always wanted a camera that wont take a bad picture! Sign me up! I
assume it's using some form of AI / pattern matching against know good
pictures? ;o)
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscr
On Thursday, February 28, 2002, at 02:12 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> Sounds practical.
> So, do you process film & eat at the same time?
> :)
Now THAT is a bad idea.
Unless you're developing in X-Tol, which I hear is comparatively safe if
ingested. It'll still make you sick like a dog, t
> One SP is way off on its 1/2000 shutter speed; this is apparently
> NOT fixable unless suitable electronics can be found. That same
> SP is off ALMOST a half stop at 1/125th.
> Shutter Deviation from ideal speed expressed in stops (see other table below)
> SpeedSP1SP2 KX1
Today I sent one of my LXs off to Pentax Colorado for CLA, mods, repairs
etc. I included the $40 fee for expidited service on the body, and an LX
motor drive for normal repair (camera can't be tripped electronically when
this drive is attached).
I will keep the group informed as to the progress o
>> What is the difference between a dental macro and macro lens ?
> The dental version has markings on the barrel that tell you the
> magnification ratios when the lens is used in combination with one of
> the two close-up lenses tat make up the Dental closeup set.
I'm tempted to add that dental
Connally is such a fine and strong name. When she
gets too strong, there's the darkroom. (grin)
Anyway, it sounds like your life is full with new
beginnings. When I was just getting started in
photography, I tried a lot of different materials. I
was never very satisfied with the results. I fi
KEH and Charlotte Camera are two well respected places that sell used
gear and stand behind what they sell.
David Spaulding wrote:
>
> I know B&H is good with used,
> [...] Does anyone have a place they
> trust and have esperience buying
> used equipment?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
> I take no responsibility for bad experiences dealing with
> Pentax USA repair.
Oooh, don't say that - I finally got up the nerve to send a couple
of my LX's with sticky mirror syndrome off to Pentax USA for (I
hope) repair, just this morning. :-(
Fred
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
Here the MZ-3 is almost the same asthe MZ-5n, just
rare, I actually got mine for less than a MZ-5n.
--- Artur Ledóchowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ---Original Message---
> Subject: Re: The most under-rated Pentax body
>
> >Must be the MZ3. A very nice camera together with
> the limit
Perhaps people know value when they see it. The K1000 more than a camera it
is a symbol of youth, simplicity and dependability. And it doesn't take bad
pictures either.
Evan
From: "Nitin Garg"
> I havent seen any good condition k1000 go on ebay for less than $80.
> one can get lesser known (u
Thanks. I'll take a look at KEH.com.
--
David Spaulding
Photographer
http://d.spaulding.tripod.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org
---Original Message---
Subject: Re: The most under-rated Pentax body
>Must be the MZ3. A very nice camera together with the limited lenses.
>Seldom mentioned even on this list.
>Peter Smekal
Isn't it because of the fact that the MZ-3 is too much similar to the MZ-5n,
yet pretty much more
The other day, someone on the list mentioned a 2.5/135 SMC lens that was for
sale. If it is still available, could that person shout at me off-list.
Thanks.
-Jim Rupprecht
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. D
Like fine wine,expensive with age.They run
(with prime)about $275-325 Can in these parts.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Nitin Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:24:19 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The most under-rated Pentax body
I havent seen any goo
> I just looked at my AF280T manual and it does not list any of the
> ME cameras,might just work as "full tilt boogie"
Yes, different editions seem to vary. My edition of the AF280T
manual does mention the use of the MEF and ME Super (and the PDF
file version that was made available by Frits an
After a long search I found they have ( had ) them in
stock, I'm waiting for confirmation but I already
placed my order :-) BH, adorama, camera world, henrys,
mcbain and focuscamera could not get them.
http://www.smilephotovideo.com/details.cfm?store=photo&category=Filters&itemno=SG58CUL
___
> All those who new that Aaron would say that raise their hands
>
Fred
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Well...it's rated as in "C" condition...
That probably has something to do with it...
Still, 187US for that lens is good deal even if it's a tab beat up...
Brendan MacRae
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
I havent seen any good condition k1000 go on ebay for less than $80.
one can get lesser known (under-rated) bodies sometimes with lenses for
that. If you still think thats not overpriced, I have a k1000 to sell :)
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 03:03:19PM -0500, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Poppycock! : )
>
Hope he does not throw any thing at me
Saturday
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:10:24 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: The most under-rated Pentax
body
***Raises hand***
--- David Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'd say,more holding its value.
Dave(has 2 of em)Brooks
Begin Original Message
From: "Evan Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:03:19 -0500
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: The most under-rated Pentax body
Poppycock! : )
Evan
From: "Nitin Garg"
> Its over
I re-shot yesterday and developed the two rolls this morning - with the
correct amount of developer this time. So I'm happy to say things have
indeed gone better...
Cheers -
MCC
At 06:42 AM 2/28/02 -0800, you wrote:
>I can certainly sympathize with you. I almost did the same thing, but
>caug
***Raises hand***
--- David Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All those who new that Aaron would say that
> raise their hands
>
> Dave
>
> Begin Original Message
>
> From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:45:53 -0500
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
Thanks for the info.
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Brendan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:15:09 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Halogen lighting again
After seeing Pats pictures with the halogen
lighting
and some research I found home depot has
severa
Poppycock! : )
Evan
From: "Nitin Garg"
> Its overpriced.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 02:01:42PM -0500, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Ubiquitous yes, overrated, Never!
Its overpriced.
>
> Evan
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I agree with most of what you've said here -- to the point that I'd say
> almost all 35mm Pentax SLRs are the most under-rated. IMO, the o
I am starting my own pro photo business. In the interest of cost I am
looking at used equipment as much as possible. I know B&H is good with used,
but I also know there have to be more places...I just don't want to get a
bad deal. Does anyone have a place they trust and have esperience buying
used
http://www.igorcamera.com/pentax.htm
Some interesting Pentax goodies out there.
Collin
--
---
"Get over it."
Dr. Laura
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit th
>That would be the only reason to replace the diaphragm ring, to save money.
>I doubt very much the Nikon is removing them from their lenses because
>their user base demanded it.
Pentax would kill herself if they dump the aperture ring. At least tons of
loyal Pentax users need it (for current ca
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
