I must disagree. No worries. :)
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: MZ-S users and the speculation on DSLRs
> On 7 Sep 2002 at 16:32, Brad Dobo wrote:
>
> > I don't think you unde
Uh..Actually, thinking back, this was taken with my Sigma A 70-210.
Cory
- Original Message -
From: "CBWaters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 11:25 PM
Subject: Car Shot
> For your review:
> http://community.webshots.com/photo/16822530/495
For your review:
http://community.webshots.com/photo/16822530/49520258YPzqAV
A photo I took in Petoskey Michigan while on my tour of family members
jokingly referred to as a "vacation".
Took it with my MZ-5n and the SMCF 35-135 F3.5-4.5 I bought to take on
vacation with me. I scanned it with a P
>I'm told it's still in production. B&H and others still advertising it
monthly,
too.
<
i bought my FA* 80-200 f2.8 this June. superb lens.
Herb...
My friend has gone digital, so has sold his Pro Darkroom equipment, paper
etc.
He has given me a Lunasix 3 for free, plus about 12 assorted rolls of 120
film (Tmax 100, Tmax 400, Ektachrome 400S and Provia 400S).
Can anyone help? I need instructions for the Lunasix 3, and Battery info,
or a lea
I'm going to guess that a Microsoft product is on one side of this
problem. Most likely the senders side, but also it's possible it's on
the readers side.
OR
It could be that the user is sending messages as BOTH plain text AND
HTML, and the HTML is being stripped off and send in TXT form?
I
ah Nope, not getting that.
-frank
tom wrote:
> No, I'm getting a text attachment with every message. The text is the
> same as what's in the email body.
>
> --
> Thomas Van Veen Photography
> www.bigdayphoto.com
> 301-758-3085
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: frank theriault [mai
Early in the movie Stewart uses a 4 x 5 Speed Graphic. Later on he switches
to a Exakta with a telephoto lens.
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "CBWaters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 7:10 PM
Subject: OT Probably, Rear Window
> We're w
No, I'm getting a text attachment with every message. The text is the
same as what's in the email body.
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 8:07 PM
> T
what, you mean those blurbs at the bottom about PUG and stuff? Nope.
-frank
tom wrote:
> Is anyone else getting text attachments from the list?
>
> --
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
Is anyone else getting text attachments from the list?
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 7:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT Probably,
Yeah, I've been getting posts out of order lately. One of mine from Thursday
just popped up. And one that I sent this morning, still hasn't. Of course, it
was just my usual drivel...
-frank
Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
> Wow! I received the answer to this message before I got the question...
>
Wow! I received the answer to this message before I got the question...
Now, that's fast! :)
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: CBWaters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 1:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT Probably, Rear Window
We're watching the classic H
Looks like an Exacta to me...
keith whaley
CBWaters wrote:
>
> We're watching the classic Hitchcock film "Rear Window" on Oxygen right now.
> Anyone know what camera he's peering at his neighbors with. Sure is a big
> lens...
>
> Cory Waters
We're watching the classic Hitchcock film "Rear Window" on Oxygen right now.
Anyone know what camera he's peering at his neighbors with. Sure is a big
lens...
Cory Waters
On 7 Sep 2002 at 16:32, Brad Dobo wrote:
> I don't think you understand. Oh well, no matter
Well read Keiths posts again as they are quite easy to digest and very truthful
too :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://m
Pål wrote:
> Is this impression in general or limited to the digital slr?
The lacking of a digital SLR is the best example of the critical situation.
However,
my idea about nothing REALLY new to be shown at Photokina is general.
> According to my Pentax sorces, they don't have the foggiest idea
A couple more items out of the closet:
Zing Neoprene standard SLR camera cover
http://www.saundersphoto.com/html/zing.htm
BlackCat. No. 501-101
Unused (but no packing) $14
MX/ME non-pentax form fit case, hardly any wear $5
ME-Super Pentax form fit case, ditto $12
Pentax M80-200 f4.5 lens case, b
They ARE just computers with digital eyes. Nothing more.
What we need to do is record reality in all its linear glory.
With continuous tonality.
Perhaps at a molecular level.
At 02:38 PM 9/7/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Subject: Re: MZ-S users and the speculation on DSLRs
>
>Anyhow, maybe I got off t
Ok, let's play: since I don't really believe in a flagship, MZ-3/5n is due for a
replacement model with fancy flash related features like high speed sync
and wireless control plus support for USM focusing and IS with new FAII
lens series. They might also add RGB metering or SAFOX VIII with cro
Pentax holds all it's international distributors by the ears, I think. That
phrase about disclosure could have been used by the Norwegian distributor as
well. I've heard it from them before.
However, it's usually evident from what they _don't_ say that there's
something that's worth telling...:-)
> >Would
> > the DSLR be the flagship?
>
> No.
Good.
> > I kind of like the way it is now.
>
> You don't want them to release anything else?
I'm not made of money, just a poor student, so no, I don't, can't afford it.
I could care less about marketing and profits with Pentax and 35mm,
competit
Keith,
I understand most of what you are saying, but generally, with computers,
once they cannot be upgraded, they DO become obsolete. Let me tell you why.
I could be using WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS on a 286 IBM computer (which I have
downstairs) yet I do not. Or the old Lotus 1-2-3. It was fin
>Sorry Chaps, forgot to post this yesterday but as I'm skint I hope
>you'll forgive me.
>
>A few things I'm looking to sell. All of the items are in absolutely
>tip-top condition, no blemishes or shortcomings unless noted. Prices
>in US$
>
>M24-50mm f3.5, pentax caps $185
Wendy, 24-50 f4 or 24
Ok..
I retract my earlier adamant stance on this topic :-)
My apologies as I was always under the impression that the item had been
yanked and was never heard of again.
Again.. my error.. and thanks to all for restoring some faith in Pentax :)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Cott
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Well, if you want something doing, do it yourself! I have transcribed the
> sketch as best I can. Have a good laugh, and a good weekend.
>
> http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/misc/hancock.html
So that's where you got your sig from!
G
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> You don't want them to release anything else?
>
Digital aside; the Number One on my wish list is a new 80-200/2.8.
Jostein
Brad wrote:
>Would
> the DSLR be the flagship?
No.
> I kind of like the way it is now.
You don't want them to release anything else?
Pål
Dario wrote:
> I'm already disappointed. According to recent info from Pentax, I'm quite
> convinced most of PDML'ers will be EXTREMELY disappointed with Photokina,
> and then somebody else will switch to Canon, Nikon, or maybe Fuji to get an
> excellent D-SLR without waiting Pentax forever. I on
Sorry Chaps, forgot to post this yesterday but as I'm skint I hope you'll
forgive me.
A few things I'm looking to sell. All of the items are in absolutely
tip-top condition, no blemishes or shortcomings unless noted. Prices in US$
M24-50mm f3.5, pentax caps $185
M28 f3.5, pentax caps and case
Don't be too hasty, David. Pentax has dissappointed us in the past, and there
is still no clear sign they will do differently this time. They seem far too
comfortable with small, cheap compacts, both film and digital.
David Chang-Sang wrote:.
> I retract my earlier adamant stance on this topic
Ok..
I retract my earlier adamant stance on this topic :-)
My apologies as I was always under the impression that the item had been
yanked and was never heard of again.
Again.. my error.. and thanks to all for restoring some faith in Pentax :)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Cott
Thanks Cotty!
I needed something like that today :)
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2002 3:52 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject: Weekend Treat
Many if you will not have heard of Tony Hancock, some will. He was a
British comedian
Many if you will not have heard of Tony Hancock, some will. He was a
British comedian in the middle part of the last century. You may have
seen him making an appearance in a 'Carry On' film or two, along with
people like the amazing Kenneth Williams ('.h! Matron!') One of
the many
Tuesday, September 3, 2002, 10:53:55 PM, Łukasz wrote:
ŁK> I haven't tried it, but I read that in order to fully benefit from the fine
ŁK> grain and smooth tones one has to process it very carefully and in a
ŁK> particular combination of the chemistry used. There was a test of this film
ŁK> in a
Tuesday, September 3, 2002, 12:29:47 AM, Łukasz wrote:
ŁK> Thanks Steve,
ŁK> I thought that, because often people claim that their 28mm hoods are usable
ŁK> with 24mm lenses, it could be the same here, but I guess it's a different
ŁK> story with zoom lenses.
I generally find that the rectangular
Have a look at www.f32.net , a large-format community, with a friendly
attitude like the PDML. It also has a lot of links to other sites, it
has a discussion list,d.board, ..., and a list of lenses with their
coverage and other technicalities!
Keep the LF going - buy film :)
Frantisek
Pål wrote:
> >Other
> > interesting patents (US 6370333, US 6393219) are for a multipoint
autofocus
> > system.
>
> Is this different from whats being used on the MZ-S? Cross sensors? Number
of points?
Go there: http://164.195.100.11/netahtml/srchnum.htm
Put the numbers you want in the query fie
Brad Dobo wrote:
>
> That was a long message, but I enjoyed it :)
>
> I feel exactly like you, and while I don't have an extensive lens
> collection, I get by, and I love the MZ-S (with grip, almost essential).
> You are SO correct about digital cameras, they do go completely obsolete,
> and I
39 matches
Mail list logo
