Verily,
yclepst thou:
> Go to the chat room on http://www.pentax-digitalworld.de/ and you will
> notice:
> "here take place regelmabig live chats approximately around the digital
> photography. To professional photographer the Thomas' haltner betrayal
> tipps & cheat, tricks and small secrets,
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 10:03 PM, William Kane wrote:
> My major problem with this idea is that making a SMALLER camera would
> hurt my hands. I already need to add a grip to my SLR's to make them
> fit comfortably, and sometimes it still hurts . . . Smaller is not
> necessaral
Quite a clever idea... http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/product/digibino/top.html
Antti-Pekka
---
* Antti-Pekka Virjonen * Fiskarsinkatu 7 D * GSM: +358 500 789 753 *
* Computec Oy Turku* FIN-20750 Turku Finland * Fax: +358 10 264 0777 *
Hi,
With function 15 set to 1, there is no discernable imprint on
Kodachrome 25, although it prints perfectly clearly on 64.
And WR is right - it does sound like a hamster sneezing.
mike
Hi Chris!
Looks like it's been six months at least since the last list of
listmember's locations lodged itself in my lonely email box. Is it dead,
or have I been excommunicated ?
Dan Scott
I see the same problem in the digests.
Galen Swint
-
Galen S. Swint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte213x
Alan Chan wrote:
> What about a digital LX which is every bit the same as the original LX,
> except with a "Digital Back LX"? You must wind the film (of
> course there is
> no film, but Pentax keep the winding mechanism anyway for the purists) to
> take the next picture. What happened when the ne
Michel Carrère-Gée a écrit:
> Tim Preston a écrit:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:10:30PM +0100, Kristian Walsh wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the answers.
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>> On a slightly different tack, does anyone know if the IR remote for the
>> BG-10 actually exists. This was a surprise featur
... here is some more info on the new technologies in the Icon camera:
- GPAS (global positioning and aiming system); the camera includes a GPS
receiver and an array of magnetic and gravitational field sensors that
allow for the exact determination of the camera's position and aiming at
the momen
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 05:18 PM, Alan Chan wrote:
> Btw, has anyone noticed those silver coloured MZ/ZX bodies had some
> sort of
> silver powder coming off when you rubbed them? I remember my fingers had
> some silver powder after using my new MZ-M for awhile. I think their
> s
Mishka, you enjoy seeing or recieving insults? Try not to take the words so
literally. But let's set the record straight, no one does like to be
insulted. I would be worried for you if you did. If you are friends with
Bruce, and thus replied to my email, you should include that.
Brad Dobo
---
Tim Preston a écrit:
>On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:10:30PM +0100, Kristian Walsh wrote:
>
>Thanks for the answers.
>
>
>.
>
>On a slightly different tack, does anyone know if the IR remote for the
>BG-10 actually exists. This was a surprise feature to me and seems like
>a good idea, but I've
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 01:05 PM, Tom Sapienza wrote:
>
> Again, sorry about my loss of decorum there. :}
>
> Tom
>
Hmm? Did I miss something?
Dan Scott (dysfunctional families are normal families)
On 25 Sep 2002 at 23:08, Dan Scott wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 11:08 PM, Fred wrote:
>
> >> How about making manual focus only versions? I heard they make
> >> them in Leica mount, why not KA?
> >
> > I would love that concept, Mishka, bit I wouldn't expect it, of
> > course.
At 23:36 25-9-2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Did I read you wrong when you said 'the vile Fugi 400 stuff'? Do you mean
>the older versions or did you mistype Fugi and meant Kodak or something?
>
>Regards,
>
>Brad Dobo
No, I meant Fuji (superia) 400.
200 is fine, 800 is fine. I just don't know what the
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 11:08 PM, Fred wrote:
>> How about making manual focus only versions? I heard they make
>> them in Leica mount, why not KA?
>
> I would love that concept, Mishka, bit I wouldn't expect it, of
> course. Sort of a Limited-Limited lens line (Limited-squared?)...
On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, at 08:34 PM, William Robb wrote:
> The problem is with the build quality. The MZ series cameras are
> not up to the build standard of the limited lenses.
> The MZ-S most certainly is, but they are not marketing them in a
> complementary finish.
>
> William Robb
>
don't speak for everyone
mishka
From: Brad Dobo
Subject: Re: Pentax AutoFocus / Consumer Fast Film
<...>
> don't make flippant remarks, no one really appreciates them.
- Original Message -
From: Gannet
Subject: Re: OT: Another story about The Man (tm) coming down on
photogs..
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 11:00:44 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>
> >
> >http://www.capitalismmagazine.com/2002/september/rwt_art.htm
> >
>
> And to think this used to be America.
It wor
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: Re: Pentax AutoFocus / Consumer Fast Film
> I've been experimenting a lot with different films for this
sort of thing
> and the Fuji Superia 800 has been the best by far (and I
believe that
> Black's own brand is the same film too)
You w
- Original Message -
From: Brad Dobo
Subject: Re: Pentax AutoFocus / Consumer Fast Film
> Bruce,
>, don't make flippant remarks, no one really appreciates them.
Well, not quite no one, but I hate to quibble.
William Robb
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
unsubscr
Welcome back Valentin!
We desperately need some news from the caves,
especially about your manufacturing progress and
new product releases.
Things are not too much different from 2 years ago
when your operations became very secret. Many
of the same cast of characters are defending and damning
At 20:39 25-9-2002 -0400, Jerome wrote:
>OH! BTW, the photos from the weekend can be seen here if you're interested
>in such things:
>
>http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~jerome/gallery5.htm
p.s.
My attempt from two weekends ago, uncropped and unaltered from the scan
Blacks did to CD
http://members.rog
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600
> What about a digital LX which is every bit the same as the original LX,
> except with a "Digital Back LX"? You
In a message dated 9/25/02 10:31:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< HmmmI posted two pieces about this, and only the 2nd one has made it to
the board. You should read them Vic. I was wrong for blasting in that
language, but you and Bruce both used insulting words that were just not
nec
That should have read, you won't see me do that again.
>You won't seem to do that again
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 11:17 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax AutoFocus / Consumer Fast Film
I fly almost every week and I can't tell if the scanners are any more
powerful but I haven't noticed any effect on the 400 speed film that I
always carry. My experience with requesting hand checking of film is that
the screeners really don't want to, but if you insist they will give you the
full
In a message dated 9/25/02 6:50:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< I'm going to go out on a limb here and talk about equipment that actually
already exists! And I'm going to stretch even further and talk about
TAKING PICTURES with these cameras (do I have the right discussion
group?! Should I l
> No it's better than a super program, it has dials instead of those stupid
> buttons. Some things we, (as in people), got right the first time like
> changing shutter speeds
> and changing radio stations.
I don't know about the radio, but I sure like the shutter speed dial a lot
more than any
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> Look @ Pentax' growing list of digital units.
> There's 8 different options now.
How do you figure? They currently make the 330RS (3MP), 430RS (4MP), and
have just announced the 330GS (3MP update of the 2MP 230). That's three
cameras. If you wa
> How many rolls did you shot?
6 rolls of 24-exposure. However, not all of it was action (trophy shots,
crowd shots, etc. were included). As for the action shots (maybe about 4
rolls total) the downfall of most of the shots were the backgrounds. I
didn't have much to work with as each sideline
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[entire original message snipped]
> I am personally insulted by YOUR language on the PDML. GROW UP.
Then why quote it entirely in your reply? You just did the same thing
Brad did.
chris
Amen to this.
Jim A.
> From: "Robert Soames Wetmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:45:43 -0400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: What about a film flagship?
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 17:47:50 -0400
>
> I'm
> I looked at the pics -- great action, and on
> top of that, they seem quite
> focussed.
Thank God for manual focus!
> What did you exactly mean by
> "it failed just about everytime"?
Hmmm... good question. Well, for one, subjects were moving too fast for me
to focus on them on AF mode. The t
Oh Dan - I blush with embarrassment! The funny thing is, it was really
just a grab shot, taken when photography wasn't really even on the
agenda for the night. I was simply on our roof with some friends
watching the sun go down over the city, while partaking of a cool glass
of crisp white!
I looked at the pics -- great action, and on top of that, they seem quite
focussed. What did you exactly mean by "it failed just about everytime"?
Mishka
- Original Message -
From: "Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 200
Great pics!! Never seen so much fun... and action...
How many rolls did you shot?
Btw,i had good experience with Fuji Press 800. Grain is not visible in
10x15 cm prints.
Gasha
Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes wrote:
> Hello all -
>
>
...
> http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~jerome/gallery5.htm
>
...
- Original Message -
From: Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes
Subject: Pentax AutoFocus / Consumer Fast Film
>
> OH! BTW, the photos from the weekend can be seen here if
you're interested
> in such things:
>
> http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~jerome/gallery5.htm
Flying dawgs. Thats fun stuff.
Will
Hi all
The WA Quokka has a few interesting items in it this morning.
One ad is for an AF500FTZ @ very expensive
Another ad has "Pentax Pro Series lenses" 24/2 @ $970, 43/1.9 @ $915,
28-70/2.8 @ $2300.
If anyone wants the phone numbers, drop me a line.
Cheers
--
Jon,
Relax! Take life as i
Hello all -
I'm going to go out on a limb here and talk about equipment that actually
already exists! And I'm going to stretch even further and talk about
TAKING PICTURES with these cameras (do I have the right discussion
group?! Should I list this as OT?)
Anyhow, I was out shooting with my ZX-
Current, published, reference, or you're just blowing more smoke.
BR
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Photo division is 50% of Pentax. I remember reading years back that only
10% of Olympus was photo related. For Canon the number is in the 10-20%
region; probably simi
Hi Deb,
- Original Message -
From: "Debra Wilborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: TOPDML Airshow August 31,02
> Looks pretty good. I have been looking at wide zooms
> and the Vivitar has been
A few months and only 2000 messages? No way. I haven't been reading PDML
messages for the last few DAYS and only now (after a few hours spent in
front of the monitor)I've managed to read/delete 500 messages or so. You
must've been lucky :)
Regards,
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: Debra W
ROTFL!
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Walkden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mike Ignatiev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 5:48 PM
Subject: Re[3]: another round - OT
> Hi,
>
> Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 7:03:02 PM, you wrote:
>
> > asking nicely goes a long way.
Only according to you. Cite a published reference.
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Photo division? Didn't they just have record losses?
No, no, no, or I shall start responding to every peanut gallery post.
BTW, there is nothing to discuss about film cameras above the ZX-5n/7/L
level, because Pentax isn't working on any. The MZ-S is the body that
everyone and Pentax will take to the grave.
From: "Robert Soames Wetmore" <[EMAIL P
- Original Message -
From: Alan Chan
Subject: Re: Sorry
> > Hey, where's Mafud these days, anyway?
>
> Perhaps he's still with us. We just don't know. :)
You are kidding, right? If he was stil here, we'd know. The one
thing that was gauranteed, was that the word digital would
always
- Original Message -
From: dick graham
Subject: Re: Sorry
> And what about the Caveman, or Caveperson. Been a couple
years since we
> got news from the Cave! That was always more interesting than
what was
> reality.
I got a missive from the cave not long ago. Apparently Valentin
is e
We probably all know someone that fits the last description. At least
most of us do. :-)
Len
---
> > This page of his is worth a read:
> > http://gemma.geo.uaic.ro/~vdonisa/photnet.html
>
It's interesting indeed. Not sure, but I think Valentin started the list and
others chipped in contributions.
Regards,
Bob...
From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Mark Roberts wrote:
> >
> > Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> = snip =
>
> > Yes, I miss Valentin. Thanks for post
That's probably it. In the post-graduation,
post-layoff, post-ohmygod-I-need-a-job whirlwind of
the past few months I seem to have neglected to check
for PDML messages. When I finally did a few weeks
ago, I had over 2000 PDML messages!
--- Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps it had t
£ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
> For a few days now more often than not I've been receiving messages in the
> wrong order e.g. I get a response to a post that reaches me two hours later.
> Is it only me
nope
> , or does anyone else also noticed this?
yup
regards,
frank
--
"The optimist thinks t
I could have sworn I saw Valentin's name on a post here in the last month
here. Maybe it's my ever advancing age.
BR
From: dick graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
And what about the Caveman, or Caveperson. Been a couple years since we
got news from the Cave! That was always more interesting than what
>if I am wearing my hat, one specific hat,
OK, I'll bite, what sort of hat is it?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 September 2002 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Looking Pro
I can go out with tripod, macro, bellows, whate
For a few days now more often than not I've been receiving messages in the
wrong order e.g. I get a response to a post that reaches me two hours later.
Is it only me, or does anyone else also noticed this?
Łukasz
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:08 PM
Subject: Re: TOPDML?
> Hi, Jeff,
>
> Maybe you missed it, but Dave C-S was talking about some big camera swap
> thingie on or about Oct 20th up in Woodb
Also:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/photokina2002_index.html
And
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/new/photokina2002.shtml
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 25 September 2002 22:45
> To: Pentax List
> Subject: Watch here for Photokina news
>
>
Perhaps it had to do with your Yahoo account. I had so much touble to stay
on the list with my Hotmail, now I am using my other email address. :(
regards,
Alan Chan
> Somehow I got myself unsubscribed from the list. Did
> I offend? Or do I just stink?
>
> Anyhow, for better or worse, I'm back
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 14:19, gfen wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Can't wait to shoot a circumcism! ;-) (sp?)
>
> Which is the ideal macro lens for that, then? :)
I think whichever gives you the most working distance How about a
SMCP-FA 200mm f/4.0 ED IF Mac
Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
= snip =
> Yes, I miss Valentin. Thanks for posting his URL.
>
> This page of his is worth a read: http://gemma.geo.uaic.ro/~vdonisa/photnet.html
Oh God! I think I fit at least three of them!
keith whaley
> --
> Mark Roberts
This is coming late, but do you still have the 1.4x
converter? It is K-mount, right?
Thanks
Deb
--- wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Chaps, forgot to post this yesterday but as
> I'm skint I hope you'll
> forgive me.
>
> A few things I'm looking to sell. All of the items
> are i
Somehow I got myself unsubscribed from the list. Did
I offend? Or do I just stink?
Anyhow, for better or worse, I'm back!
Deb in TX
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
Bruce wrote:
> Before folks get creative about analyzing overall profit/loss numbers keep
> in mind that they are for the overall company and not the photographic
> division. This company had a loss - where? This company added staff - where?
> Doesn't say. One company that has remained positive o
Rüdiger wrote:
> where can I find a PDF for the Limited lenses which is not in Japanese (I
> can't read Japanese)
No idea. I got them translated!
Pål
Robert wrote:
> I'm getting bored of all this digital SLR talk; can we go back to
> speculating about either:
>
> 1. a film flagship that outclasses the Maxxum 7 (which was claimed as a
> minimum benchmark for specification of a possible future Pentax SLR)
>
> or
>
> 2. a Limited film flags
Bob Walkden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 7:03:02 PM, you wrote:
>
>> asking nicely goes a long way. this summer, passing heathrow (afaik notorious for
>refusing this),
>> all my film was hand inspected.
>
>For those of you who may not have English as their first lan
> 2. a Limited film flagship of lower specification but matching the Limited
> lens finishes (which was hinted at an an LXII, or as the camera we would
> "take to our graves")?
Just order a silver MZ-S from Japan.
regards,
Alan Chan
> The new 28-105 comes in black?
> Where can I get it in black (in North America)?
Btw, has anyone noticed those silver coloured MZ/ZX bodies had some sort of
silver powder coming off when you rubbed them? I remember my fingers had
some silver powder after using my new MZ-M for awhile. I think th
> Hey, where's Mafud these days, anyway?
Perhaps he's still with us. We just don't know. :)
regards,
Alan Chan
dick graham wrote (quoting from Keppler's article):
> ...16 million SLRs are also
> operational [in the US].
Now ~that's~ an amazing stat, if it's true! (not that I'm doubting it - I just
don't know it's source)
Consider that many slr owners have multiple bodies (geez, I own 5...), and that
> You might think a chrome Limited lens on your LX or MZ-S has no eye
appeal, but I was in Cord Camera the other day, and on their shelf was the
ugliest combination: FM3a with the new 45mm in chrome.
> Really gross looking.
I think the hood looks really ugly although it might be effective in
pra
What a coincidence. I was just watching this one on the Dutch
television. I found it very impressive. Please make every effort to see
this.
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 13:59, Bob Walkden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just learned that Channel 4 will be showing Christian Frei's
> highly-regarded docu
Hi,
Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 7:03:02 PM, you wrote:
> asking nicely goes a long way. this summer, passing heathrow (afaik notorious for
>refusing this),
> all my film was hand inspected.
For those of you who may not have English as their first language, the
correct way to ask for this is
>Heh, funny, after all the excitement and speculation on Photokina and Pentax
>(be it a DSLR, or USM, IS, etc) that Pentax is going to torture us and keep
>us in the dark until the dying minutes :)
Absolutely hilarious.
Oh swipe me! He paints with light!
http
I'm getting bored of all this digital SLR talk; can we go back to
speculating about either:
1. a film flagship that outclasses the Maxxum 7 (which was claimed as a
minimum benchmark for specification of a possible future Pentax SLR)
or
2. a Limited film flagship of lower specification but mat
Check www.luminous-landscape.com
Nothing from Pentax yet.
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: dick graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 10:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Photokina and Bruce's Humble Pie
Speaking of Bruce's dessert, there hasn't been
<<..who are the insulted beloved public
figures?
Bruce Rubenstein.
WW >>
:))
Lukasz
And what about the Caveman, or Caveperson. Been a couple years since we
got news from the Cave! That was always more interesting than what was
reality.
DG
At 03:58 PM 9/25/02 -0400, you wrote:
>Nope, wasn't me. Always use my real name. Could never, even in jest, suggest
>that Cosina made t
When I went to London, I just sent my film (ISO 400) through the machine
in my hand luggage. No effects that I can see
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perhaps it might help if some of us keep in mind that the list readership
occasionally includes some rather young photo enthusiasts -- Cotty's young
son, or Bruce Dayton's young daughters, for example, and there are quite
likely some other youngsters.
'Nuff said
Bill Peifer
Rochester, NY
Gentlemen (and Ladies):
Your thoughts please on the Pentax 100mm/f4 macro.
How close does it focus? The quality of images?
Bokeh? etc.
Thank you.
Francis
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com
Speaking of Bruce's dessert, there hasn't been one message today concerning
news out of the opening day of Photokina! Someone must have been there and
can share with us the news or non news.
DG
I guess somebody had to Pentax certainly sold a lot of them.
At 03:53 PM 9/25/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > it has dials instead of those stupid buttons
>
>...but I ~love~ the little shutter speed buttons on the ME Super,
>MEF, Program Plus/A, and Super Program/A...
>
>Fred
Nope, wasn't me. Always use my real name. Could never, even in jest, suggest
that Cosina made the best cameras/lenses in the world.
BTW, the stuff I'm getting here now is tame compared to some gems I got from
Suda Mafud off line, like: "...this *old* Paratrooper would kick *your*
white, pasty Rub
The British "royals."
Brad Dobo wrote:
> Since I didn't do most of those things (but I did some, don't get me wrong)
> I'll assume the good doctor is referring to posts that I guess I haven't
> read. I'm curious now...who are the insulted beloved public figures?
If you object to that language, as you should, why repeat it in your message?
Dr E D F Williams wrote:
> Can't handle 300+ messages a day; don't wish to handle messages where people
> call each other 'Pencil dick' or 'Shit for Brains' and write 'fuck you!'; or
> where they insult beloved public
> it has dials instead of those stupid buttons
...but I ~love~ the little shutter speed buttons on the ME Super,
MEF, Program Plus/A, and Super Program/A...
Fred
When did he become beloved?
At 01:45 PM 9/25/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: Brad Dobo
>Subject: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 and Bye bye
>
>
> > Since I didn't do most of those things (but I did some, don't
>get me wrong)
> > I'll assume the good doctor is refe
I was just reading that site when Outlook beeped with this message... I've
pretty well decided on trying to do an 8x10 monorail - just trying to figure
out a reasonable complexity level so as not to burnout...
Thanks for the info - be sure to post some picts when it's all done...
Mike Y
-
- Original Message -
From: Brad Dobo
Subject: Re: SMC Pentax F* Zoom 5,6/250-600 and Bye bye
> Since I didn't do most of those things (but I did some, don't
get me wrong)
> I'll assume the good doctor is referring to posts that I guess
I haven't
> read. I'm curious now...who are the in
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: Pentax digital slr (WAS: Re: SMC Pentax F*
Zoom5,6/250-600)
> Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >You should look again. Kodak hybridized a Nikon F4 into a
6mp
> digital camera in 1992.
>
> William Robb<
>
> not at $2K
Brad,
The Pope for one.
Bruce
Wednesday, September 25, 2002, 12:06:32 PM, you wrote:
BD> Since I didn't do most of those things (but I did some, don't get me wrong)
BD> I'll assume the good doctor is referring to posts that I guess I haven't
BD> read. I'm curious now...who are the insulted
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Kristian Walsh wrote:
> Babelfish certainly sucks! The translation should read:
I've used it many times, but unfortuantly, its translation wasn't really
helpful for me...Then again, I've got a killer headache. I'll blame my
poor reading comprehension on that!
> Hope this he
>> We all know the great Pentax bokeh, but I've never seen it on any
>> promotional brochure or pdf.
>
>
Pål Jensen > Huh? Have you seen the PDF for the Limited lenses?
Hallo Pal,
where can I find a PDF for the Limited lenses which is not in Japanese (I
can't read Japanese)
regards
Rüdiger
1.Check your shutter speed and exposure mode first !
2.When flash is ready , does the green flash-sign lights up in
viewfinder?
3.Are you using dedicated flash for PENTAX ?
4.Maybe bad contact..?
Z- cameras uses digital protocol for changing info with flash and you
can´t change it .
R
Before folks get creative about analyzing overall profit/loss numbers keep
in mind that they are for the overall company and not the photographic
division. This company had a loss - where? This company added staff - where?
Doesn't say. One company that has remained positive over the past few years
I was just reading that site when Outlook beeped with this message... I've
pretty well decided on trying to do an 8x10 monorail - just trying to figure
out a reasonable complexity level so as not to burnout...
- Original Message -
From: "Evan Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PRO
Since I didn't do most of those things (but I did some, don't get me wrong)
I'll assume the good doctor is referring to posts that I guess I haven't
read. I'm curious now...who are the insulted beloved public figures?
- Original Message -
From: "Dr E D F Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Babelfish certainly sucks! The translation should read:
"Regular live chats on the subject of digital photography take place
here.
Professional photographer Thomas Haltner shares his tips and tricks,
cheats and little secrets, so you can get better pictures"
Chat with us, meet other Pentax
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TV wrote:
>>If you have high speed film and ask for a hand check, they're
>>obligated to do so in the U.S.
>
>Maybe the trick here is to pre-load all your Kodachrome 25 into
>cannisters marked 1600!
HAR! Next round's on me for that suggestion!
Come to think of
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
