s/n ratio (was Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!)

2003-04-05 Thread Mishka
see luminous landscape: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dq.shtml > Which brings me to a question. Has anyone tried to express film graininess as a s/n ratio. > > cheers, > caveman

Re: s/n ratio

2003-04-05 Thread Caveman
For an uniform exposure, you have the average film density Da, on the full frame. This is the "reference". An ideal film should have Da in each and every point. In the real case, you move the detector and get a Dmax and Dmin along a track. The peak noise would be the higher value between (Dmax-

Re: s/n ratio

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
Lets assume a detector with an electrical out put is being measured (viewed) with an oscilloscope. You will see an irregular wave form that corresponds to the p-p value of the noise (you can derive the RMS value from this). This is the same as looking at the noise floor for a circuit. The S/N r

Re: Trolls, the list and linguistics (Was: Moving on!)

2003-04-05 Thread Dr E D F Williams
Dan, I added that individual to my shit list a couple of weeks ago. Its the easiest way to deal with the problem. Don ___ Dr E D F Williams http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: March 30, 2002 clipped all ..

RE: OT: Photography

2003-04-05 Thread tom
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Bruce R posted: > > Did you know James Natchway had a camera taken away, and > thrown off the > > roof of his hotel in Baghdad by Iraqi soldiers? > > It's in here: > http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0304/sco

Re: s/n ratio

2003-04-05 Thread Caveman
Signal = ideal (image) noise = difference between ideal and what's actually recorded Now let's try an experiment. We expose the film to a uniform source of light. As an average on the whole frame, the "signal" is good, i.e. we got an average level of gray that corresponds to the exposure. Now let

Re: s/n ratio (was Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!)

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Alling
I think it's been done. Can't remember where I read about it though. At 11:30 PM 4/5/2003 -0500, you wrote: William Robb wrote: Bruce brings a lot of knowledge to the table. About once every 10 flame wars and 50 insults. A signal/noise ratio much worse than Edison's phonograph. Which brings me

Re: OT: Photography

2003-04-05 Thread John Munro
Bruce, thanks for posting the photojournalism links.

Re: OT: Photography

2003-04-05 Thread Caveman
Let me guess. It's all about your P***s Minusculus Syndrome. I promise I won't tell anyone. Shhh our secret... ;-) cheers, caveman Bruce Rubenstein wrote: About the time it turned into a PMS list. BR

Re: s/n ratio (was Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!)

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
Squeaky would like to know what value of "no noise" you are using, since S/N is a ratio. I would like to know why you are using a ratio for something that is constant? The grain for a given film doesn't vary from one part of the film to another. S/N ratio is useful for quantifying a dynamic ran

Re: OT: Photography

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
About the time it turned into a PMS list. BR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oh, yes, definitely, and therefore quite relevant to discussions on a *PJ* list. Since when has the PDML been a PJ list? and when did Nachtwey and Turnley switch to Pentax equipment?

s/n ratio (was Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!)

2003-04-05 Thread Caveman
William Robb wrote: Bruce brings a lot of knowledge to the table. About once every 10 flame wars and 50 insults. A signal/noise ratio much worse than Edison's phonograph. Which brings me to a question. Has anyone tried to express film graininess as a s/n ratio. cheers, caveman

Re: OT: Photography

2003-04-05 Thread ernreed2
Bruce R posted: > Did you know James Natchway had a camera taken away, and thrown off the > roof of his hotel in Baghdad by Iraqi soldiers? > It's in here: http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0304/sconlan.html > > Along with a piece by David Turnley and the issue of being an > independent vs e

Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Bob Walkden
Hi, Sunday, April 6, 2003, 2:39:49 AM, you wrote: >> Maybe I should teach our cat Squeaky every thing I know and sign her up >> for the list. > Squeaky? > WW it's the noise they make when you try to use them to sharpen pencils... -- Cheers, Bobmailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
You like Bootsie better? I don't have much to do with picking cat names around here. If I did they would be called Cat, or Chuck. BR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: "Bruce Rubenstein" Subject: Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on! Maybe I should teach our cat Squeaky every th

OT: Photography

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
Did you know James Natchway had a camera taken away, and thrown off the roof of his hotel in Baghdad by Iraqi soldiers? It's in here: http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0304/sconlan.html Along with a piece by David Turnley and the issue of being an independent vs embedded PJ. http://www.digit

Re: Trolls, the list and linguistics (Was: Moving on!)

2003-04-05 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Lasse: There are two ways to respond to people, like BR, who make offensive remarks on this list: 1. Ignore them 2. Tell them that you do not condone such rude behavior, and request that they stop. You did neither. Instead, you countered with a rude remark of your own, about BR's nationality

Re: MZ3 vs MZ5n

2003-04-05 Thread Brendan
plastic --- Caveman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brendan wrote: > > The MZ-3 also has that nicer prism coating. > > Does it have a glass eypiece or is it still plastic > ? > > cheers, > caveman > __ Post your free ad now! h

Re: Trolls, the list and linguistics (Was: Moving on!)

2003-04-05 Thread Caveman
Lasse Karlsson wrote: From: "Daniel J. Matyola": Bruce is a troll, Lasse. You are right, Daniel. No, he ain't. Look at his self-portrait: http://pug.komkon.org/00july/JulyOO/4th_july_1999.html cheers, caveman

Re: MZ3 vs MZ5n

2003-04-05 Thread Caveman
Brendan wrote: The MZ-3 also has that nicer prism coating. Does it have a glass eypiece or is it still plastic ? cheers, caveman

Re: lens repair/replacement ?

2003-04-05 Thread Caveman
Dave Evans wrote: Any notions on either a place that can repair the lens (choice 1), or a suitable replacement lens (or even two) (choice 2)? For choice 2 try www.ebay.com cheers, caveman

Re: MZ3 vs MZ5n

2003-04-05 Thread Brendan
The MZ-3 also has that nicer prism coating. --- "Gary L. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Caveman wrote: > > > Since in its infinite wisdom Pentax has pulled out > the MZ3 info from > > their web site here is my question: what are > the main differences > > between the two ? > > > T

lens repair/replacement ?

2003-04-05 Thread Dave Evans
I have owned a Tamron 70-210 F3.5-4 (adaptall) for several years, and have used it extensively. Good optics, and will go to 1:2 without attachments. Unfortunately, a tripod leg collapsed, and the outcome was a lens with the adaptall cocked about 10 degrees off-axis. I could not easily disengage the

Trolls, the list and linguistics (Was: Moving on!)

2003-04-05 Thread Lasse Karlsson
From: "Daniel J. Matyola": > Bruce is a troll, Lasse. You are right, Daniel. To what extent however, I only realised yesterday when he jumped at Roland and then started attacking the French. Earlier, when making fun of Norwegians/Scandinavians I though he mostly did it tongue in cheek. I didn't mi

Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Ed Matthew
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bruce, could you pass the Matzah Balls please? WW Shouldn't that be Matzo Balls? Ed _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredem

Re: M-20/4 vs. K-24/2.8 ?

2003-04-05 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "whickersworld" Subject: Re: M-20/4 vs. K-24/2.8 ? > Hi Arnold, > > The 24mm f/2.8 Nikkors are effectively distortion-free. Theres distortion, then their is that weird wide angle effect that looks like distortion. My A 24mm f/2.8 is as distortion free as my Ni

Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Rubenstein" Subject: Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on! > Equating a Jewish house of worship with a fast food restaurant is. Bruce, could you pass the Matzah Balls please? WW

Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Keith Whaley
Of all the B.S. I've heard you spout up to now, this really tops the list. keith whaley Bruce Rubenstein wrote: > > Equating a Jewish house of worship with a fast food restaurant is. > > BR > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > If someone does not like you that does not mean that he/she is anti-

Re: M-20/4 vs. K-24/2.8 ?

2003-04-05 Thread Levente -Levi- Littvay
> The 24mm f/2.8 Nikkors are effectively distortion-free. And... how will that help me out? :)) L, a Pentax user...

Re: Moronism

2003-04-05 Thread John Mustarde
On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 11:37:02 -0500, you wrote: >Irrespective of nationality a moron is a moron! > ..but if you type "More Ron" into Google, you get phonetically almost-funny hits: "Go Peds, Aquascooters, Pocket Karts, and More - Ron's" "Sign the More Ron Weasley Merchandise Petition" "No more Ro

Re: Moronism and more OT crap

2003-04-05 Thread Paul Stenquist
Good point, Fritz. It's one on one contact that enables understanding. I always try to deal with business clients face to face, even if they're halfway around the globe. Across the table dialogue is a huge advantage. By the way, I spent last week in Amsterdam. What a lovely city, populated by lo

Re: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread John Mustarde
On Sat, 05 Apr 2003 11:08:33 -0500, you wrote: >Cut straight to the chase! none of that nice-nice BS. > >BR > The art of diplomacy is being able to say "nice doggie" until you find a rock. If you already have the rock... or if the doggie is behind a fence... save the breath. -- John Mustarde w

Re: M-20/4 vs. K-24/2.8 ?

2003-04-05 Thread whickersworld
Arnold Stark wrote: > > The K or A24/f2.8 as well as the A or FA20/f2.8 are not free from > distortion, either (which super-wide-angle lens is?) Hi Arnold, The 24mm f/2.8 Nikkors are effectively distortion-free. John

Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Alling
Hey, you can't know about everything. Now you know. I think your apology is unnecessary since we're all guilty of this from time to time. At 09:18 PM 4/5/2003 +0200, you wrote: Thank you very much for this clarification - I was not aware of this. I apologise for everything my ignorance has cause

Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
Equating a Jewish house of worship with a fast food restaurant is. BR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If someone does not like you that does not mean that he/she is anti-Semitic.

Re: 300mm f4: M* or A*

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Alling
The M*300 should be the best value, you'll pay a premium for A*. About compatibility? Who knows, but you'll be more assured of full aperture compatibility by staying with the A* version. At 11:15 PM 4/4/2003 +0100, you wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a telephoto to use for wildlife (mainly garden bir

Re: Moronism

2003-04-05 Thread Bill Owens
> Ya, but the Renaults I was familiar with in the 70s were, let's say, less than > desirable vehicles. (Though I'm told the current ones are pretty good.) How true this is. Anyone else ever own a LeCar? Bill

Re: Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
It's happened more than once in the 21st century. Your personal ignorance doesn't negate the existence of something. BR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do not know of any burning of synagogues during the 20th century in France - another country cones to mind - but I may be mistaken.

Re: Moronism

2003-04-05 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
That's a great joke. I used it several years ago when I wrote a speech for my bank CEO on the importance of learning languages. collinb wrote: > An old missionary joke: > > What do you call a person who speaks 3 languages? > Trilingual. > What do you call a person who speaks 2 languages? > Bilin

Re: Moronism

2003-04-05 Thread collinb
An old missionary joke: What do you call a person who speaks 3 languages? Trilingual. What do you call a person who speaks 2 languages? Bilingual. What do you call a person who speaks 1 language? American. I had a citroen 2v for some time ...great !The DS convertible and the SM have to be

DC photographs

2003-04-05 Thread Rfsindg
Just returned from 3 days in lovely Washington, D.C. where my daughter plans to spend all my money on college. Some comments follow. The weather was beautiful Wednesday and Thursday, sunny and 70 degrees, and the Cherry Blossoms were in full bloom. It was quite a sight. The trees are planted

Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Raimo Korhonen
Do not jump into conclusions. If someone does not like you that does not mean that he/she is anti-Semitic. But if you go on like this, it can happen... BTW the French guy who advocated destroying McDonalds´s was duly arrested and brought to trial and convicted. I do not know of any burning of syn

Vs: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Raimo Korhonen
Thank you very much for this clarification - I was not aware of this. I apologise for everything my ignorance has caused. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaj

Re: M-20/4 vs. K-24/2.8 ?

2003-04-05 Thread Rfsindg
> What about the image quality of the M-20/4, Bob? I remember some quotations > on Stan's site were not so favourable regarding this lense. I have never had notable problems or reason to be unhappy over image quality, but I've never run any side by side tests. I've been using an A20/2.8 lately

Re: Moronism and more OT crap

2003-04-05 Thread Frits Wüthrich
On Saturday 05 April 2003 18:16, Ed Matthew wrote: > Indeed. Many Americans, like many other nationalities, and some > expatriates, seem to have all the answers. > Ed > Indianapolis > Indiana Nothing broadens the mind more then spending some years abroad. As one of these expats, I have spent 3 ye

Re: Moronism and more OT crap

2003-04-05 Thread Ed Matthew
From: Clive evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Irrespective of nationality a moron is a moron Agreed. Interestingly enough, as a Brit living in France for over ten years , I have discovered that many French, like Americans, do not travel well, Shouldn't you have said 'many Americans' rather than implying

Re: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
When I was in Pais, the French was crowding into McDonald's. Raimo Korhonen wrote: > Synagogues? The French are destroying McDonalds's - perhaps they are analogous to > synagogues to you?

Re: Friday - reading suggestion

2003-04-05 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
It looks like it's even a Honeywell Spotmatic! That goes way back. Caveman wrote: > http://www.photo.net/equipment/beaters/ > > The good old faithful Pentax seems to be in good company there. > > cheers, > caveman ;-) -- Daniel J. Matyola mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Stanley, Power

Re: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Bruce is a troll, Lasse. Responding only encourages him. I thought you were better than that, but perhaps I was mistaken. I am very interested in politics, foreign affairs, and the war, and I have strong opinions on these subjects. I belong to lists devoted to these topics, where we have lively

Re: M-20/4 vs. K-24/2.8 ?

2003-04-05 Thread Arnold Stark
The K or A24/f2.8 as well as the A or FA20/f2.8 are not free from distortion, either (which super-wide-angle lens is?), but the distortion of these lenses is much smaller as that of the M20/f4. The perspective of the 20mm lenses really is W -- I -- D -- E, I think too wide for a general wide an

Re: M-20/4 vs. K-24/2.8 ?

2003-04-05 Thread Levente -Levi- Littvay
> Bothe lenses are quite sharp, however, the M20/f4 is not the best choice > for architecture or when there are straight lines near the borders of > the image as it features rather big distortion. However, the lens is > really incredbily small, just right for the MX What other lenses do > y

Moronism

2003-04-05 Thread Clive evans
Irrespective of nationality a moron is a moron! Interestingly enough, as a Brit living in France for over ten years , I have discovered that many French, like Americans, do not travel well, if at all , in fact only around 10% have passports [a statistic shared with the USA, ] which produces a cer

Re: MZ3 vs MZ5n

2003-04-05 Thread Gary L. Murphy
Caveman wrote: Since in its infinite wisdom Pentax has pulled out the MZ3 info from their web site here is my question: what are the main differences between the two ? The MZ-3 has a top shutter speed of 1/4000 and flash sync of 1/125. The 5n has shutter speed of 1/2000 and flash sync of

Re: M-20/4 vs. K-24/2.8 ?

2003-04-05 Thread Arnold Stark
Bothe lenses are quite sharp, however, the M20/f4 is not the best choice for architecture or when there are straight lines near the borders of the image as it features rather big distortion. However, the lens is really incredbily small, just right for the MX What other lenses do you have? I

Re: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
Cut straight to the chase! none of that nice-nice BS. BR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hell Bruce starts out with name calling so we get there immediately.

Re: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Alling
Alright, I am going to get into this they burn both. http://www.washtimes.com/world/20020422-41009042.htm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1904547.stm http://www.indianexpress.com/ie/daily/20001015/iin15023.html At 10:25 AM 4/5/2003 +0200, you wrote: Synagogues? The French are destroying

Re: Cheer up !

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Alling
Someone was very lucky, and someone else was very foolish. At 10:51 PM 4/4/2003 -0500, you wrote: > Happy Friday ! Gee, that's about a buck per frame, give or take (depending on whether you're using a roll of 24 or 36). Fred Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's

MZ3 vs MZ5n

2003-04-05 Thread Caveman
Since in its infinite wisdom Pentax has pulled out the MZ3 info from their web site here is my question: what are the main differences between the two ? thanks, caveman

Re: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Alling
Three reasons green olives soaked in alcohol. Yum, Yum. At 05:22 PM 4/4/2003 -0500, you wrote: On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, William Robb wrote: > Bruce, it was the Germans who were doing that. > The French were putting ox blood in theirs. One more reason to stick to gin martinis. Well, two more reasons...

Re: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Alling
I'll have to agree with that, you must be tired. At 03:56 PM 4/4/2003 -0600, you wrote: - Original Message - From: "Cycad" Subject: Re: Moving on! > Oh, come on. Something as big as a war intrudes on all aspects of your life. It only has to intrude on the PDML because shit for brains don'

Re: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Alling
The problem is that war, especially this one, is so polarizing and it devolves into name calling in no time. Hell Bruce starts out with name calling so we get there immediately. At 10:42 PM 4/4/2003 +0100, you wrote: Oh, come on. Something as big as a war intrudes on all aspects of your life. Y

Re: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Peter Alling
There's more than one kind of moronism on this list. I've been staying out of this. Can't people learn the one important rule. Don't poke the bear! At 12:40 AM 4/5/2003 +0200, you wrote: - Original Message - From: "Bruce Rubenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Frid

Re: Vs: Moving on!

2003-04-05 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
I doubt that there's any confusion. Europeans have been doing this long before McDonalds existed. It is apparent that anti-Semitism is alive and well in Finland too. BR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Synagogues? The French are destroying McDonalds's - perhaps they are analogous to synagogues to you?