Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread frank theriault
Hey, Keith, here's what I'm thinking. It's probably best that your current/last/present wife never know about the irreplaceable one. I think you'd want to ensure that. You should send me some insurance, just to make sure she doesn't find out, if you know what I mean. You must have some nice

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread frank theriault
I share your grief! In fact, as you said, it isn't a contest, but it sounds like your last week or so is worse than mine. I only have one bike frame to replace. And, well, let's not talk about the girlfriend, but, whatever. But a whole bag full of stuff? OUCH! You win. vbg regards, frank

*Ist D Delay in AP

2003-06-01 Thread Cotty
'A delay in delivery of parts has held back the launch of Pentax's digital SLR flagship - the Pentax *ist D - until late summer, 'The 6.1-megapixel interchangeable lens camera - first unveiled at PMA earlier this year - was expected out in July (see AP News 22 March). 'In a statement, Pentax

Re[2]: Who else has admired the eclipse?

2003-06-01 Thread Alin Flaider
Bob wrote: BW The first I knew about this eclipse was when I woke this morning to BW hear it being discussed on the radio. Oh, now I realize my yesterday post regarding the eclipse didn't make it. It happened to me quite a few times lately, and reading the list sparsely doesn't help

Re[3]: Who else has admired the eclipse?

2003-06-01 Thread Alin Flaider
David wrote: DD I too made the effort - here in Durham (N.E. England), we got a DD theoretical maximum of about 92% eclipsed at sun-rise. For once, it was DD beautifully cloud free, but heavy haze meant that the sun slowly DD appeared a few minutes after sunrise, as a deep red, thin crescent.

sorry for the idiot questions on the 15mm

2003-06-01 Thread KANGA
it became qute obvious after i posted how easy it is to tell sorry lol :-)

Re: pentax smc 15mm A

2003-06-01 Thread Bruce Dayton
That's illogical! Bruce Saturday, May 31, 2003, 1:18:24 AM, you wrote: Subject: pentax smc 15mm A After what serial number does it become the A version thanks NCC 1701 WW C It's a lens Jim, but not as we know it C Cheers, C Cotty C ___/\__ C || (O) |

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread Caveman
frank theriault wrote: Still can't figure out what she saw in me, but it was fun while it lasted. Must have been the bunny ears ;-) cheers, caveman

Re: sorry for the idiot questions on the 15mm

2003-06-01 Thread Fred
it became qute obvious after i posted how easy it is to tell sorry lol :-) Well, as long as you can lol, it's OK - g. Fred

Re: slow list?

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
frank theriault wrote: [...] OTOH, talked to a very pretty red head that I've been eyeing for a couple of months at the local cafe. And, most important, I have my kids here this weekend, which puts everything into perspective. Life is indeed good. Uhhh, what SORT of perspective does

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
That's almost word for word a decent description of the irreplaceable memory I carry around with me... It lasted over 3 years (and about $40,000) I figure... smile Back then, I had some money to spare. Today I have quite considerably less, but in truth, money can't buy memories like that. Oh,

Re: *Ist D Delay in AP

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
Cotty wrote: 'A delay in delivery of parts has held back the launch of Pentax's digital SLR flagship - the Pentax *ist D - until late summer, 'The 6.1-megapixel interchangeable lens camera - first unveiled at PMA earlier this year - was expected out in July (see AP News 22 March). 'In

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread Caveman
Keith Whaley wrote: That's almost word for word a decent description of the irreplaceable memory I carry around with me... It lasted over 3 years (and about $40,000) I figure... smile Some men never listen, Others never learn, But why this man did as he did Only he will ever know. He knew he was

Re: Who else has admired the eclipse?

2003-06-01 Thread Mark Cassino
At 01:04 PM 5/31/2003 +0300, Alin Flaider wrote: This is particularly addressed to our friends in the northern Europe who were in the position to see and photograph this annular sun eclipse in all its beauty. Ran into this earlier this morning: http://ejphoto.com/ Pretty stunning! -

Re: sorry for the idiot questions on the 15mm

2003-06-01 Thread Caveman
Since it was Friday evening. I suspect some Aussie wine was at fault ;-) Fred wrote: it became qute obvious after i posted how easy it is to tell sorry lol :-) Well, as long as you can lol, it's OK - g. Fred

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
Big grin... I never said I was all that wise. But, it is all perspective, isn't it... I was out for experiencing what I considered the fine life. I was lucky enough to have her to accompany me. A perfect companion for a short time. Nevertheless, a very good call, Caveman... good pickup. I'll

Re: Who else has admired the eclipse?

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
Absolutely right! Thanks for sharing that! keith whaley Mark Cassino wrote: At 01:04 PM 5/31/2003 +0300, Alin Flaider wrote: This is particularly addressed to our friends in the northern Europe who were in the position to see and photograph this annular sun eclipse in all its

pentax-discuss-d Digest V03 #362

2003-06-01 Thread EktarEd
-- Content-Type: text/plain pentax-discuss-d Digest Volume 03 : Issue 362 Today's Topics: Thanks and one question left (Was:Re [ =?iso-8859-2?Q?Artur_Led=F3chowski? ] Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good t [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] RE: 135

PUG June is open

2003-06-01 Thread Adelheid v. K.
Hi *, the June PUG is ready to go. Last Synchronicity month but with great pics. Cheers Adelheid URL: http://pug.komkon.org/ -- About resizing your pics: To make the procedure easier I am going to resize them without further notice - but if somebody is unhappy with

Re: PUG June is open

2003-06-01 Thread Caveman
Thank you Adelheid for the great work. And, hehe, I notice I have a fellow caveman ;-) Adelheid v. K. wrote: Hi *, the June PUG is ready to go. Last Synchronicity month but with great pics. Cheers Adelheid URL: http://pug.komkon.org/

OT: A couple of good Windows Scanning Tools

2003-06-01 Thread Mark Cassino
A couple of interesting scanning related utilities that resolved some Windows annoyances for me - This little utility refreshes SCSI connections, so if your scanner is not on when you boot, you can get at it without rebooting. It works with my older Adaptec card which would not refresh from

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread T Rittenhouse
Sorry to hear this, Glenn. Hopefully, your renters insurance will cover the lost. Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the sympathy, folks. (One thing I knew was that folks here would understand how I'm feeling.) Cotty wrote: Saddened to read of your loss. Nothing one can say except chin up old boy, it could have been worse. Really. Yes, it could've been. In a great many different ways. And

Re: pentax smc 15mm A

2003-06-01 Thread T Rittenhouse
I have always wondered why a interstellar warship in the far future would have a US Commercial Aircraft Registration number from the 1930's? Is it an inside joke, or something? Ciao, Graywolf http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto - Original Message - From: collinb [EMAIL PROTECTED]

OT: MacOS 9.1 X-server?

2003-06-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is way off topic, but I know there are other Mac users here, and I figured maybe somebody besides me isn't using MacOS X yet. Anyone know a halfway decent, cheap or free, X11 server for a PowerMac running MacOS 9.1? It's kind of hard to search the web for these days, 'cause any search with

Re: pentax smc 15mm A

2003-06-01 Thread Cotty
Subject: pentax smc 15mm A After what serial number does it become the A version thanks NCC 1701 WW C It's a lens Jim, but not as we know it That's illogical! Bruce I'm sure my warped sense of humour didn't phase him. The lens is the real McCoy. I'm sure I've seen one

Re: pentax smc 15mm A

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
Cotty asks: ...(you want more?) Only if you're up to it, Cot! keith Cotty wrote: Subject: pentax smc 15mm A After what serial number does it become the A version thanks NCC 1701 WW C It's a lens Jim, but not as we know it That's illogical! Bruce

Re: pentax smc 15mm A

2003-06-01 Thread Herb Chong
the excuse is that the letters pass for Naval Construction Contract. is it a good one? Herb - Original Message - From: T Rittenhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 13:57 Subject: Re: pentax smc 15mm A I have always wondered why a interstellar

Re: *Ist D Delay in AP

2003-06-01 Thread collinb
Talk about advance warning! :) CB Page 5, Amateur Photographer, 7 June 2003 Cheers, Cotty

Re: OT: MacOS 9.1 X-server?

2003-06-01 Thread T Rittenhouse
Well, lots o' luck! AFAIK, the graphical interface is integral to Mac OS (Mac OS X, is not a MAC product, but BSD with a MAC name), it is even more locked in than WINDOWS. If you want to use X11 on your MAC, methinks (used that word just for you, Glenn) you will have to use some form of Unix on

Re: AF400T flash and other 6x7 ??

2003-06-01 Thread Bruce Dayton
Brother Dave, I recently purchased 2 AF400T's on ebay. One had the bracket for the 67 and the other had a Quantum Battery 2. Each cost me about $100. in KEH bargain shape. Bruce Wednesday, May 28, 2003, 8:57:22 PM, you wrote: bcin

Re: OT: MacOS 9.1 X-server?

2003-06-01 Thread Nick Zentena
Okay I missed the first message and the last time I used a Mac Reagan was in office so take it easy on me. http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.1/Darwin1.html#1 That doesn't work for you? BTW my Mac with finder 0.9 [or was that 0.89] still likely works-))) Nick

Re: pentax smc 15mm A

2003-06-01 Thread T Rittenhouse
Well there have been a few exceptions. There have even been a couple where the planet was above the spaceship (from the crews point of view). There may have even been one where the spaceships could not stop on a dime, turn around, and go the other direction instantly ingoring the laws of motion,

OT: Barn Owl at 1000 ISO

2003-06-01 Thread Cotty
Gotta have something as an antidote to all this Star Trek nonesense ;-) It's been very hot here (UK) for a few days - temps hitting 30c and today was just such a day. This evening we were getting ready to stroll down to the river and I happened to glimpse a barn owl flying around the field next

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread jcoyle
Glenn, sorry to hear about your loss, and I really hope that you either get an insurance payout or that you are able to recover them. It's no consolation, but I have had camera gear stolen from both my car and my home, so you really can't leave it anywhere! John Coyle Brisbane, Australia

Re: pentax smc 15mm A

2003-06-01 Thread Peter Alling
Special orientation devices. At 03:24 PM 5/31/2003 -0400, you wrote: Of course, in a universe where everybody speaks English anything is possible. Oh, you noticed that, huh? g Even more astounding to me (and this is true not just of Star Trek but is true of any sci-fi show or movie that I

Re: pentax smc 15mm A

2003-06-01 Thread Peter Alling
What really bothers me about space battles is the close quarters they take place in. Imagine WWII battle ships trading broadsides at 17th century navel battle distances. Now take space ships armed with thermo-nuclear warheads lobbing them at that distance. Sheesh. At 04:05 PM 5/31/2003 -0400,

Re: OT: Barn Owl at 1000 ISO

2003-06-01 Thread jerome
Cotty, I'd say that was quite a deliberate kick in the shins after my possom story last week. You're simply no good, are you?! grunt - jerome Cotty (basically) wrote: I got a shot that jerome would've had no chance at with film Cheers, Cotty

Re: AF400T flash and other 6x7 ??

2003-06-01 Thread brooksdj
Thanks Brother Bruce. I was looking at one that just closed.It had the bracket and a battery,but the connection was to some sort of hot shoe adaptor and the seller was unsure if it offered a proper fit to the LS lens.As im just getting into the BH'd, i layed off for now.It went for about $250

Re: Household items to use as test subject for MACRO?

2003-06-01 Thread Mark Cassino
I'll second Frank's recommendation re paper money. The engraved details are very find and consistent so you can check for corner sharpness. There's also neat graphics hidden in the bills. - MCC At 04:11 PM 5/31/2003 -0400, you wrote: I just got a macro lens I'd like to test with flash

Re: Vivitar 135/2.3 lens ?

2003-06-01 Thread Fred
I use once and also the Pentax 135mm 2.5 lens to photo same subject on same film by changing lens on camera. The Vivitar is OK, but the colors produced by Pentax lens were more saturate less washed out. Cannot comment on the sharpness because didn't check that. Also, the Pentax handled

Re: AF400T flash and other 6x7 ??

2003-06-01 Thread Bruce Dayton
Dave, For future reference, the flash has a plug-in where you hook up the type of cord you want. There are three types: 1) Cord that hooks up to TTL for LX or 67II 2) Cord that hooks up to X synch terminal - 67 body or LS lens 3) Cord that has a hot shoe attachment to put on any camera

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread ernreed2
Sorry to hear it, Glenn.

OT: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc 15mm A turned into Star Trek Thread)

2003-06-01 Thread Butch Black
Given the Star trek thread am I the only one with reservations that mankind will ever find another space faring species? If you think about it. If in fact evolution is a random series of advancement of a species, what are the chances of developing to an intellectual scale at least as high as ours,

Re: OT: a very bad week!-was: good things come in threes

2003-06-01 Thread Peter Alling
Well I'm having a bad week too, but nothing compared to yours or Franks for that matter. Hope things get better, (and they catch the scum that desecrated your life, though that seems unlikely). At 12:46 AM 5/31/2003 -0400, you wrote: Bad weekend here -- last weekend. Bad enough that I've spent

Re: K135/2.5 vs FA 135/2.8 (was Re: Vivitar 135/2.3 lens ?)

2003-06-01 Thread Caveman
I just visited Boz's site and it mentions a 5-5 design for the K 200/4 (which is also a nice lens I'd say), so I suspect that Fred is reffering to the A 200/4 (which is one of the lenses that I don't hear much about, it's not very popular or rare or something). Fred wrote: The K 135/2.5 is

Re: CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS...

2003-06-01 Thread Caveman
We all win, Frank, every month we submit to PUG. Thanks for the kind comment ;-) BTW, I worked hard for that one, you must see the film roll ;-) in the beginning I had a new sixpack of Asahi beer, but on the last shots you may notice that all the bottles were empty ;-) it was a fun project ;-)

Re: OT: Barn Owl at 1000 ISO

2003-06-01 Thread Bruce Rubenstein
I'm impressed. BR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My son pointed out his location just as he took off from collecting a field mouse. The sun had set already and the camera was left on ISO 100, which clearly wouldn't be enough. I spun the dial around to 1000, and swung the lens about - just managed a

another 31 Limited question

2003-06-01 Thread Alan Chan
I have found the hood/front section (not the focus ring) of my 31 has a little bit of wobble (about 0.5-1mm), similar to the FA100/2.8. However, other samples that I have seen in a local shop were firm without wobble. Since I cannot peek inside the construction of my 31, I was wondering if

Re: another 31 Limited question

2003-06-01 Thread Rob Studdert
On 1 Jun 2003 at 0:31, Alan Chan wrote: I have found the hood/front section (not the focus ring) of my 31 has a little bit of wobble (about 0.5-1mm), similar to the FA100/2.8. However, other samples that I have seen in a local shop were firm without wobble. Since I cannot peek inside the

Re: OT: Barn Owl at 1000 ISO

2003-06-01 Thread Cotty
I'd say that was quite a deliberate kick in the shins after my possom story last week. You're simply no good, are you?! grunt Who needs IS ? ;-) Actually, a few nights ago, we were chatting to our neighbours over (yet another) drink and I had the same combo with me, hoping the owl would show

Re: Got a little pentax ^_^

2003-06-01 Thread Heiko Hamann
Hi Katrin, on 31 May 03 you wrote in pentax.list: I already wondered where to put it because the bags are all sooo expensice and most are too big... but there aren't any altoids tins in germany... You can get an Altoids tin in Germany, too. But they are quite seldom. But you can also use a

Re: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II

2003-06-01 Thread whickersworld
- Original Message - From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:07 AM Subject: RE: Opinions wanted: Sigma 24/2.8 super wide II I would second this. I researched this lens because I was seriously considering it second hand. The build of

Re: CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS...

2003-06-01 Thread Steve Larson
So, is Pentax beer any good? ;) Great shot BTW! Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California - Original Message - From: Caveman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 10:35 PM Subject: Re: CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS... We all win, Frank, every

Re: OT: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc 15mm A turned into Star Trek Thread)

2003-06-01 Thread Nick Zentena
On May 31, 2003 11:59 pm, Butch Black wrote: Given the Star trek thread am I the only one with reservations that mankind will ever find another space faring species? If you think about it. If in Somebody did a series of statiscal estimates on this years ago. Basically turns out that

Re: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc 15mm A turned into Star Trek Thread)

2003-06-01 Thread Steve Larson
I think we will at least develop warp drive before Pentax releases a DSLR. Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California - Original Message - From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 8:59 PM Subject: OT: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc

Re: CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS...

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
Hi Frank, I'll be brief... In case you mean the yellow umbrella shot, my French is poor, and I don't know PLEUT. ( I suppose I could say I don't know merde, but unfortunately I do! g ) Anyhow, I think 'PLEUT' might be idiomatic, and it's not in my very old F/E - E/F dictionary. Help? I could

Re: OT: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc 15mm A turned into Star Trek Thread)

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
Nick Zentena wrote: On May 31, 2003 11:59 pm, Butch Black wrote: Given the Star trek thread am I the only one with reservations that mankind will ever find another space faring species? If you think about it. If in Somebody did a series of statiscal estimates on this years ago.

Re:Household items to use as test subject for MACRO?

2003-06-01 Thread collinb
The last batch of flowers you gave your wife. Good for testing films and labs as well. Collin - Original Message - From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any ideas for some small ( 3-5 size ) objects that I might find around the house which would have extremely fine details suitable

Re: OT: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc 15mm A turned into Star Trek Thread)

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
I just did look it up. Thanks. http://www.activemind.com/Mysterious/Topics/SETI/drake_equation.html Redoing the existing formula's default parameters to some a bit less optimistic, I come up with 200 possible communicating life forms within OUR galaxy... The downloaded formula says 2400. I'm

Re: CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS...

2003-06-01 Thread frank theriault
Keith, Are you looking at June PUG? Wasn't Caveman's umbrella shot a month or two ago? If I recall, the umbrella (or as the French say, parapluie) you refer to says merde, ils pleut, which means sh**, it's raining. But, you're right, it was a good catch by Val. cheers, frank Keith Whaley

RE: the first pentax screwmount shot on digital??????

2003-06-01 Thread Paul Ewins
I'm looking forward to hanging the *ist-D off the end of my SMCT 500/4.5 and 300/4. Not that I have a choice, I can't justify the dollars for the k mount versions. Paul Ewins Melbourne, Australia -Original Message- From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It's nice to know

Re: CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS...

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
Yeah, I was looking at May. Woops! As I recall, Caveman's June shot was of the lens in the 6-pack of ASAHI? What lens WAS that, by the way? A 70-210 zoom maybe? I'm sure that has been discussed too, but I've dumped all those old messages by now... Nicely done, Caveman! keith frank theriault

Re: OT: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc 15mm A turned into Star Trek Thread)

2003-06-01 Thread Fred
If you think about it. If in fact evolution is a random series of advancement of a species, what are the chances of developing to an intellectual scale at least as high as ours, developing opposable thumbs necessary for tool use, create a society that develops and innovates new,complex tools

Re: K135/2.5 vs FA 135/2.8 (was Re: Vivitar 135/2.3 lens ?)

2003-06-01 Thread Fred
The K 135/2.5 is also one of only three Pentax lenses that have the same optical design (according to lens element diagrams) - the K 135/2.5, the K 200/2.5, and the A* 200/2.8. (Note that it's not just the 6 elements in 6 groups configuration that they share - it's also that their optical

Re: OT: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc 15mm A turned into Star Trek Thread)

2003-06-01 Thread frank theriault
I'm not a Sci Fi fan at all. I'm even less of a Star Trek fan (sorry, guys), so I haven't been following this thread at all. But, I did read your post, Butch, and you do pose some interesting questions, to which I have a few random thoughts. First, one of the things that pisses me off about

Re: OT: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc 15mm A turned into Star Trek Thread)

2003-06-01 Thread Herb Chong
the Drake equation has a lot of problems with estimating a few of its parameters. the last parameter is how long a time a civilization with the technology for interstellar communications is able to support the technology to actually send a message and to listen and hear one. Herb -

Re: OT: The problems of E.T. (was Re: pentax smc 15mm A turned into Star Trek Thread)

2003-06-01 Thread Keith Whaley
It seems the general feeling is one of the strangers' disposition being benign. I don't believe that. If they're anything like us, and why not, the chances are great for disaster... One of us would end up being destroyed or the planet seriously crippled. I don't trust our own government, why

RE: MPDML and Kodak HDC (was: Lens choices)

2003-06-01 Thread Bill Sawyer
Nice images, Mark. How about supplying details such as lens, film, and how you got so close... -Original Message- From: Mark Cassino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 30, 2003 10:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: MPDML and Kodak HDC (was: Lens

Re: CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS...

2003-06-01 Thread Fred
As I recall, Caveman's June shot was of the lens in the 6-pack of ASAHI? What lens WAS that, by the way? A 70-210 zoom maybe? That Asahi bottle looks maybe like the K 200/4 to me... (???) Fred

Re: CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS! CAVEMAN WINS...

2003-06-01 Thread frank theriault
I was gonna say M4.0 200, but you may be right. 4.0 200 of some sort, would be my guess... -frank Fred wrote: That Asahi bottle looks maybe like the K 200/4 to me... (???) Fred -- The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert

Re: AF400T flash and other 6x7 ??

2003-06-01 Thread brooksdj
Thanks Bruce. This one came wth choice #3 Duly noted and recorded.: ) Dave Dave, For future reference, the flash has a plug-in where you hook up the type of cord you want. There are three types: 1) Cord that hooks up to TTL for LX or 67II 2) Cord

A few PUG thoughts

2003-06-01 Thread frank theriault
This month I want to critique all images - being a small gallery, this would be the month to do it vbg. Before I do that, however, does anyone else find that this is a very odd month? Not a bad month at all, quite the contrary, the usual high quality of images is there. But there seems a far