why do you delete any files? i have not intentionally deleted any digital
image i have ever taken, even completely blank ones.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: The problem
Another tail fin shot:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/images/nyd.html
frank theriault wrote:
> A couple of weeks ago, in the thread "one piece of advice to budding
> photogs" (or something like that), Paul Stenquist suggested "fill the
> frame", or words to that effect:
>
> http://www.ph
Hi!
As I mentioned some time ago, I have a friend who's a member of one of
local (remote from the though) camera clubs. Started with Pentax and
now he's shooting 6x6 (cm) medium format. He even has this foldable
Agfa camera...
Anyway, fair part of club members has gone digital. The shoot real
hug
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: SMC 1.4/50mm FA
> I think you missed my point. yes the absolute lpmm would be lower but
there
> would be more than twice as much area covered so the real amount of
detail
> would
> be greater especially with lenses that arent ab
- Original Message -
From: "tom"
Subject: RE: The problem with digital
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Well sure, but I just wasted an hour looking at what turned
> > out to be 2/3s crap, and plucked 34 images out of the mire
> > t
I think you missed my point. yes the absolute lpmm would be lower but there
would be more than twice as much area covered so the real amount of detail
would
be greater especially with lenses that arent absolutely top notch and
reality is most of
them are not.
JCO
-
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Well sure, but I just wasted an hour looking at what turned
> out to be 2/3s crap, and plucked 34 images out of the mire
> that may be worth looking at.
What are you using to edit? 150 shots shouldn't take an hour,
Hi ...
We spent a somewhat similar weekend, Bill ...
I know this has been brought up before, but, for me, it's always been more of an
academic issue than a real issue. This weekend it became real, but from another
perspective.
I'm now going through about 30 years worth of negatives, proof print
I'll ditto that comment, Nick.
I got mine some time ago. I went in for a Pentqx W/A. The old camera
shop owner told me he didn't have one, but to try this Vivitar, and see
what I think. He discounted it handsomely and said he'd take it back if
I didn't like it.
He'll NEVER get it back!
That is a
We had a dog show this weekend.
An obedience trial.
Rather than showing how wonderful my dogs are, I took pictures instead.
A lot of them, in fact.
Close to 300 on the istD.
Had I been shooting film, I would probably have shot perhaps 1/3 that
number, maybe less.
So, what's the problem with this?
On 25 Jan 2004 at 12:14, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> This brings up the question, wouldn't a full frame 6Mp camera yield better
> results than a 6Mp APS camera assuming top quality lenses for two reasons:
> 1. More image details to record.
> 2. Lower pixel density means larger pixels, hence less nois
I concur. The most funnest lens I have, that's for sure:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1956319
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1161430&size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1161442&size=lg
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1906218
(my apologie
On 26 Jan 2004 at 10:56, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> Just a note on this, I initially used a solution such as this and found I needed
> more than 2 cards. I was using my iBook to download the images to and found I
> was filling a 512 card faster than I could download it to the iBook. This made
> for s
Mark,
15 miles is a good run in that cold. That's about the equivalent of a 60
mile ride. A good balaclava is indespensible. I wear one with a toque over
it, and it makes a world of difference. Keeps the cheeks and chin warm.
I just wish I could keep my feet dry when the salt on the roads t
"Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 25 Jan 2004 at 19:13, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>> BTW: Have you seen the new review of the Contax N Digital on Luminous
>> Landscape?
>> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/contax-n-digital.shtml
>> Fascinating stuff. Apparently the image q
Checked my local camera shop, they didn't have the part you needed. sorry.
R
On 25 Jan 2004 at 19:13, Mark Roberts wrote:
> BTW: Have you seen the new review of the Contax N Digital on Luminous
> Landscape?
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/contax-n-digital.shtml
> Fascinating stuff. Apparently the image quality is better than APS-size
> 6 megapixel digi
On 23 Jan 2004 at 9:52, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> The fastest cards on *istD are undeniably Sandisk Ultra II and Extreme. So I
> bought Sandisk Ultra II 512 as the one having good price/performance ratio.
> Lexars despite having utilised by *istD Write Acceleration feature, are much
> slower and
And I usually draw the line at 40o. Gee, I feel like such a whimp...
The warmer the better,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 4:39 PM
--
-- "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
I did my first shots with this film this afternoon.
Some snow shots in the woods.
Developed in HC-110(b) for 6 minutes.
Description: The base & emulsion are very, very thin.
As compared to TMax it feels like tissue paper.
Results: Nice and contrasty. I expect a lot of grain if enlarged.
Fixes re
great! very helpful. I'll make a direct comparison later on.
Christian Skofteland wrote:
> Ok, Shel, here's my test of the D. .
>
> http://home.mindspring.com/~skofteland/id11.html
>
I'll ditto that comment, Nick.
I got mine some time ago. I went in for a Pentqx W/A. The old camera
shop owner told me he didn't have one, but to try this Vivitar, and see
what I think. He discounted it handsomely and said he'd take it back if
I didn't like it.
He'll NEVER get it back!
That is a
Ok, Shel, here's my test of the D. These are 100% crops from a full sized
in-camera JPEG. No sharpening etc. (all settings default). They were made
with my Vivitar S1 105/2.5 macro. F11 @ 5sec. ISO 200
Warning, each image is >500kb.
http://home.mindspring.com/~skofteland/id11.html
Christian
I assume you mean f2.5? I bought one a couple of weeks ago and it's now
in the post from Russia - I'll post some comments and photos to the list
when it arrives. :-)
http://ratx.narod.ru/tests/mir47k/ # this is the page that persuaded me
to buy it. (No knowledge of Russian required...)
WRT y
This one time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] issued forth:
> Sounds good to me... Bob S.
Sounds a good idea to me also.
How about a nice print, enlarged and framed.
Something worthy of hanging in a foyer?
A little message of thanks attached
Would need to be MF or larger if the print was to
be really large, e
Thanks Herb
Bill
Just 1324$ in such a fantastic set... It's a steal!
http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?op=details&sku=IPXISTDK
--
Best regards
Sylwek
Body alone is more expensive. Must be an error. If I buy it at
that price, will they honor their price? I'll try... But too nice
to be true...
Andre
It was an
I use the excellent Vivitar 19mm f3.8. A bit slower but a superb lens that's rarely
out of my camera bag.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "Ian bromehead"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 25/01/04 20:36:41
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: MIR-47K 20mm f2.8 lens te
"Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 25 Jan 2004 at 12:14, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
>> This brings up the question, wouldnt a full frame 6Mp camera yield better
>> results than a 6Mp APS camera assuming top quality lenses for two reasons:
>> 1. More image details to record.
>> 2. Lower pi
Yes, that's often the case... My uncle though, he has a camera with some
kind of memory function. It can record continously, saving a buffer of
images some seconds long, and when you just missed a shot you can step back
through the buffer and pull it out from there. You still have to see the
m
yes - maybe a cash contribution, as discussed before?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Adelheid v. K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 12:40 AM
Subject: KOMKON server should be back by tomorrow
> Good news!
>
> I got a
This one time, at band camp, "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure that I understand your need. The X Drive is a stand alone battery
> powered hard drive and card reader with integrated copy facilities and USB2
> I/O. If you run two 512MB cards you could work so that one was d
On 26 Jan 2004 at 0:32, Frits Wüthrich wrote:
> Yes, thanks for that. I need the bigger CF card for surviving the day,
> before I can save it on something like you suggest. I want to put a
> CD-R/W in my laptop, so that should take care of that part.
> With my current 512MB card I only get 34 RAW
My guess since it is from Enschede: it is probably from the same brewery
where Grolsch comes from as well.
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 00:18, graywolf wrote:
> Has a blue bottle Label that says, "Mariner of Holland". "Imported from
> Holland". And, "Since 1602" On the back it says, "Brewed and Bottled
Yes, thanks for that. I need the bigger CF card for surviving the day,
before I can save it on something like you suggest. I want to put a
CD-R/W in my laptop, so that should take care of that part.
With my current 512MB card I only get 34 RAW images.
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 01:17, Rob Studdert wro
I'd be up for that. PayPal would be best, but I can mail cash if
necessary.
chris
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Adelheid v. K. wrote:
> Good news!
>
> I got a mail from the Frontex VP telling me that the server should be back
> within the next day(s).
> He was very grateful that we offered to help.
>
On 25 Jan 2004 at 12:14, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> This brings up the question, wouldnt a full frame 6Mp camera yield better
> results than a 6Mp APS camera assuming top quality lenses for two reasons:
> 1. More image details to record.
> 2. Lower pixel desity means larger pixels, hence less noise
Yeah, maybe did.
This guy - Marcello Fiori - had an *ist D on ebay. As it reached a few
hundred Euros - suddenly a message came from ebay to all the bidders: Item
no longer for sale. No explanation.
After a couple of house this guy emails me, wanting to sell it to me for 720
USD - body only. I got
Jens Bladt escribió:
Hi Guys
Some guy in Spain want to sell me a Pentax *ist D for 800$!!! I will need to
get it checked, somehow!!
All the best
Jens, Denmark
I am in Spain, Jens. I find the price suspiciously low, anyway. If I can
help you in this matter, let me know.
-
Fellow pentaxphiles
There seems to be a growing number of russian lenses arriving on the scenes,
and some notable specialists such as Herbert Keppler, seem to suggest they
can be great value.
I'm taking my time searching for reasonably priced wide angle/fisheye,
clearly this type of glass means lo
Some of you may remember I was looking for contributions for a photo club I
was starting for high school students that I am sponsoring where I teach.
I have 3 Spots, regular, a II and an F. I loaned out the regular and the
II and couldn't find my F.
I found my F, and first time I cocked it,the
It ok.
But I don't have paypal. If another member (in germany or netherlands) will
send an amount via paypal, I would appreciate to send my share to him/her,
for getting it transferred in summation. Would you be so kind, Jan? Please
let me know, when the time is there.
Regards, Bernd
---original
I wish I had experiences like that. When I wanted an enlarger, I just
wrote a check for an Omega D2VXL.
The creative experiences that come out of having to improvise are a real
asset in the long term. There's a story about how Elliott Erwitt would
wash his film in the toilet, making a succession
Jostein:
Anders,
I have a small digital P&S too. Like you I carry it with me most of the
time.
But since my motifs are nature and landscapes, shooting "interesting stuff I
see in the streets" is a tough exercise in _seeing_. :-)
"Interesting stuff I see in the streets" just happens to be what I've
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:59:42 +0100, Frantisek Vlcek wrote:
>Hi,
> now that JCO used his old Raptar for taking pictures, I would like
> to do the other thing - use some of my best taking lenses for
> enlarging. Just to try them out, out of curiosity. I have a pretty
> good Meopta enlarging
Anders,
I have a small digital P&S too. Like you I carry it with me most of the
time.
But since my motifs are nature and landscapes, shooting "interesting stuff I
see in the streets" is a tough exercise in _seeing_. :-)
When it comes to people photography, I can only subscribe to Cotty's wisdom;
"
On 25/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I have just one, little problem, Frank. You keep offering to buy everybody
>drinks at Grand Father Mountain. The problem is where do you think you
>are going
>to buy them? GFM is in one of those strange southern places called a dry
>county.
>That means
Fred et al,
I got a chance to use my modified (flange removed) 90-180 FF zoom
on the *ist D on my recent trip to MI. I used it on a monopod to take
some pictures. I posted 80% compression 800 x 600 jpgs on my website.
If anyone is interested in examining full size pictures, please let me
On 25/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>AFAIK, they didn't give any. However, my "unofficial" sources tell me it as
>liability issues. You guys made suggestions (like modifining flashes,
>Cotty )
>to users that scared Pentax's lawyers .
LOL. If they saw the K50 1.2 on an EOS body, they'd be j
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Boris Liberman wrote:
> ft> I went back and looked at the pics again, and I ~really~ like the second one
> ft> a lot. The guy's face has a great deal of character. He has a sort of
> ft> self-satisfied smile; he seems a very confident and friendly person, very
> ft> outgoin
test
don't do what the subject says
??
I don't know exactly what does this means.
Ist*D costs here aprox. 2000 EUR (including the 18-35
lens).
Did I miss anything?
Regards from Barcelona,
Jaume.
--- Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys
> Some guy in Spain want to sell me a Pentax *ist D
> for 800$!!! I will nee
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 18:30:02 +0300, Boris Liberman wrote:
>>Just post the account number, Adelheid!
>>Jostein
>
>And/or an e-mail address for PayPal transfers for beyond the pond
>people...
You can count me in if PayPal is an option!
Regards, JvW
---
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:08:10 -0500, Bill Sawyer wrote:
>
> > I'm up for that.
> >
> > From: Adelheid v. K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Perhaps we could do something for them as a sign of our
> >> gratitude for their service throughout the years.
> >> What do you think?
>
> I'm in.
>
Hi!
ft> I went back and looked at the pics again, and I ~really~ like the second one
ft> a lot. The guy's face has a great deal of character. He has a sort of
ft> self-satisfied smile; he seems a very confident and friendly person, very
ft> outgoing. I think you captured a great deal of his
Hi!
SB> Tom's not joking ... it takes a bit of practice to hand hold at low shutter speeds,
SB> but it's very doable. Numerous techniques to aid in such a practice have been
SB> mentioned here in the past few days. Leave your tripod or monopod at home, and
SB> practice, practice, practice.
The
Hi!
RS> I got some very sharp shots the other night at a concert shooting 125mm @
RS> 1/15th & f2.4 ISO800, I was sitting but had no arm rests to lean on. Of course
RS> I made more soft and medium sharpness shots than really sharp ones but most
RS> were still quite usable and I'm not sure but I
no such settings in Win 2K nor XP.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Win XP, Starts File Explorer When CF Inserted
> In Win98:
>
> 1) Put a flash card in the reader.
>
Hi
True enough, I suppose. But I still own 5 nice analog 35mm Pentax bodies -
and I might still get me a MZ-S.
I can use these as long as I can buy film (probably for annother 10-20
ears - like they still make Super-8 moovie film and 35mm moovie film, not
to forget!).
I don't know about APS and "
I tend to agree with Capa's comment. Having seen the Requiem show, and looked at
the photos in the book, it became clear that those pics that were less than
perfect technically - OOF, showing camera movement - had, in general, a far
greater impact than the nicely exposed, sharp pics.
Can't speak
Tom,
Frank already knew this, why else do you think he keeps offering to buy
drinks? :-)
Don't let the ears fool you,
Cesar
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:01 PM
--
-- I have just one, little pr
You just have to love a guy who is stocking up and traveling in a camper :-P
Taking a break before tackling the shots from yesterday,
César
Panama City, Florida
-- -Original Message-
-- From: Bill Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:11 PM
--
-- Frank & I
Tom's not joking ... it takes a bit of practice to hand hold at low shutter speeds,
but it's very doable. Numerous techniques to aid in such a practice have been
mentioned here in the past few days. Leave your tripod or monopod at home, and
practice, practice, practice.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrot
Too bad you will only be capturing less than half of the image/resolution
of the lens with the istD's aps sensor.
This brings up the question, wouldnt a full frame 6Mp camera yield better
results than a 6Mp APS camera assuming top quality lenses for two reasons:
1. More image details to record.
2.
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: AMENDMENT TO: OT: Official Invitation to TOPDML Members!
> I have just one, little problem, Frank. You keep offering to buy everybody
> drinks at Grand
Frank & I will be coming from Gastonia, so we can stock up before we leave.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: AMENDMENT TO: OT: Official Invitation to TOPDML Members!
> I have just
OUTSTANDING optical quality.
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bla
Only macro taking lenses will be good for enlarging. Do not reverse them
unless you are making "enlargments" smaller than the negative.
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
I have just one, little problem, Frank. You keep offering to buy everybody
drinks at Grand Father Mountain. The problem is where do you think you are going
to buy them? GFM is in one of those strange southern places called a dry county.
That means they do not sell alcoholic beverages there. Now
I'm in. I would prefer to paypal.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, January 25, 2004, 8:53:24 AM, you wrote:
DF> On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:08:10 -0500, Bill Sawyer wrote:
>> I'm up for that.
>>
>> From:Adelheid v. K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Perhaps we could do something for them a
Quite cheap is a good price for this hunk o'glass.
I've got one and have not been too pleased with it.
First, it's soft at the wide ends - from about 90mm - 120mm it's nice.
It has a lot of barrel and pincushion distortion once you've moved from the
middle focal lengths. Not a good lens at all
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 09:32:21 -0500, tom wrote:
> Small annoyance...when I insert a CF card into my reader,
> XP automatically pops up a new file explorer window.
>
> How can I turn this off?
In Win98:
1) Put a flash card in the reader.
2) Open the "System" icon in the Control Panel.
3) Doub
On Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:08:10 -0500, Bill Sawyer wrote:
> I'm up for that.
>
> From: Adelheid v. K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Perhaps we could do something for them as a sign of our
>> gratitude for their service throughout the years.
>> What do you think?
I'm in.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
On 25/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>> Oh, I think you're excused, Dub-dubya. Can I send in a newer version
>> seeing as I now have a better inkjet?
>>
>>
>Not until I have some semblance of order in my life again.
>And don't ever call me that again .
>
>William Robb
You got it Bill.
Ch
AFAIK, they didn't give any. However, my "unofficial" sources tell me it as
liability issues. You guys made suggestions (like modifining flashes, Cotty )
to users that scared Pentax's lawyers .
--
Lon Williamson wrote:
I only know what Doug put on the PDML home page.
Look around a bit there.
I'
On 25/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>> I'll tell you what, Brendan:
>>
>> You fly here for Friday, I buy your drinks.
>>
If you buy my air ticket, I'll by you a drink.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
someone checked the box that says never ask again. insert a card. close the
Explorer window. go to My Computer and open to see the drive letters. right
click on the card drive and choose Properties. click on the Autoplay tab and
make your changes. if you need to make more sophisticated changes, you
I will be happy to contribute.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2004, at 9:40 AM, Adelheid v. K. wrote:
Good news!
I got a mail from the Frontex VP telling me that the server should be
back
within the next day(s).
He was very grateful that we offered to help.
Perhaps we could do something for them as a sign of ou
Mind emailing me that, Malcom?
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Lon Williamson wrote:
I only know what Doug put on the PDML home page.
Look around a bit there.
I've only known PDML in the capable hands of Doug Brewer. What were
the reasons Pentax gave for discontinuing the list?
Within moments I was e-
Small annoyance...when I insert a CF card into my reader, XP automatically
pops up a new file explorer window.
How can I turn this off?
Thanks,
tv
--
Thomas Van Veen Photography
www.bigdayphoto.com
301-758-3085
Seriously, Abso-freaking-lutley, Bill! Hell, it's the least I can do.
Especially since it doesn't look like Brendan is going to take me up on my
offer. So, yes, in May, drinks are on me (let's see, May is still 5 months
away - what's the chance of Bill actually remembering this? ).
-frank
"
no
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT: Official Invitation to TOPDML Members!
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004
Comments interspersed:
From: Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
> Talk of HCB - I know I told the list about seeing the Magnum at 50 Years
> retrospective with the print of the grinning kid with the wine bottles
("Rue
> Muffon" or something like that).
rue Mouffetard.
Yes, well, I was close. 1 out
Does this mean that if I fly up there in May, you buy? :-)
Bill
> I'll tell you what, Brendan:
>
> You fly here for Friday, I buy your drinks.
>
:p
Funny :D
--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: > I'll tell you what, Brendan:
>
> You fly here for Friday, I buy your drinks.
>
> Everyone else has to pay for their drinks, except
> you. How's that for fair?
> Good deal for you, I say!
>
> (see, there's another example of my m
I'll tell you what, Brendan:
You fly here for Friday, I buy your drinks.
Everyone else has to pay for their drinks, except you. How's that for fair?
Good deal for you, I say!
(see, there's another example of my magnanimous generosity when I know I'll
never have to live up to the offer ).
-f
Paul, that's gorgeous. Good luck with your project. When you get it
running, you'll have to do a full spread of photos for us ;)
Cory
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Ewins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 8:04 AM
Subject: OT: Sportscar- was DI
Hi, Dave,
Got the foamcore at Loomis, right around the corner from my place, Danforth
and Woodbine. Where was I the other day, and I saw it black with white
core? That looked pretty cool. But I thought it might be finicky to work
with, so got black/black. There's lots of other colours avail
I think Paul summed it up pretty well, but basically working with available
light involves seeing the light that you're given, working with flash
involves working with light that you create. You have to see it before it's
there, and know how to put it there.
I used to be a strict available light g
AAARRRGGGHHH!!
Attention, attention, amendment to previous post:
Did I say "open bar"? Apparently I did.
What was I thinking? It should be:
CASH BAR!
I wrote the first post at about 1:00 or 2:00 am last night. I clearly
wasn't in my right mind.
You wanna drink, bring money. You want free
Oh Invite everyone else while I'm gone eh!
--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote: > I'll be writing to all of you individually
off-list,
> but just in case there
> are any new lurkers in the Toronto area who haven't
> come out of the closet,
> here's the scoop:
>
> Friday, January 30,
Well, you know, I'm just joking around, Cesar.
I mean, the temps were/are accurate (-22C this morning), but it really
doesn't bother me that much. You get used to it. I mean, if they bothered
me that much, I could move, right?
Actually, this weekend the sun has been out, and it's really been
Hi
Just got me a used autofocus 1.4/50mm. It will be a great portrait lens
(75mm) on my *ist D, when I get one...
According to Photodo it's one of the sharpest Pentax lenses ever made - or
tested by Photodo (Grade 4.6) - only matched by the SMC F 1.4/50mm and SMC A
1.4/85mm (as well as maybee some
Lon Williamson wrote:
> I only know what Doug put on the PDML home page.
> Look around a bit there.
>
> >
> > I've only known PDML in the capable hands of Doug Brewer. What were
> > the reasons Pentax gave for discontinuing the list?
Within moments I was e-mailed the definitive posting off l
M.
M.
M.
M.
M.
That was me trying to shut up :-P
I just stated the only 64º so that everyone would be aware that not all of
Florida was like the south...
I still have to cull through the over 200 digital shots from the race. I
wanted to test how I would even try to handl
> Well, I have to have what I've decided will
be 11 photos
ready for the show
> which I want to hang on Thursday. Turns out there'll be an opening
> reception on Friday, so I can't procrastinate much. 6 8x10's are now
> printed up, and on Friday, I dro
Hi!
You can find a rudimentary form of aggregating images per
photographer in the PUG directory link. Displaying them as a
mini-gallery with thumbnails, as well as searching by equipment /
content requires a dynamic site - no question about it. There
already is a database of photographer
Hi!
For my part, I strongly oppose that the PUG should be a host for
personal
galleries. There are already loads of places offering that service
for free,
and I don't see why the PDML should take on the effort of providing
yet
another.
I think I agree with you, Jostein. PUG is unique and I t
I don't think the "user interface" should change one iota.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it, my Daddy always told me.
-Lon
Jostein wrote, in part:
For my part, I strongly oppose that the PUG should be a host for personal
galleries. There are already loads of places offering that service for free,
I only know what Doug put on the PDML home page.
Look around a bit there.
I've only known PDML in the capable hands of Doug Brewer. What were the
reasons Pentax gave for discontinuing the list?
Malcolm
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
