On 9/7/04, Jim Apilado, discombobulated, offered:
At least a majority of stereo photographers attending the National Stereo
Association convention in Portland, Oregon USA use film. We had lots of
film turned in for processing. All of the film was for E-6 processing.
IIRC there were a few film
On 9/7/04, Cliff Nietvelt, discombobulated, offered:
Howdy all
Just updated my website with a new photo (hoary
marmot), under Photo of the Month: July at the bottom
of the Home page.
www.cliffnietvelt.com
Taken with a SMC F-300mm F4.5 ED[IF] an MZ-S with
Provia 100F. Still using Pentax...
Another shot from the Catlins Coastline. I had a better pic of another
waterfall but I think I've shown that one before on PUG or something.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=10-Jul-2004
FWIW I don't like the branches on the left but there's not a lot I
could do about them.
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 18:58:15 -0400, Herb Chong wrote:
since OTF metering can possibly change the exposure time during exposure, it
can't be used faster than X synch speed. think about the position of the
shutter blades if the lighting changed a lot during exposure.
Iused to have a book describing
Yes, the coal net is used to provide light. The restaurant owner uses it for
special occasions, I think.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jim Apilado [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: PAW: At World's end
Interesting. Had this
I double checked and was wrong.
They both have Safox IV. But MZ-50 an 60 have Safox V (go figure... low-end and better
AF), MZ-S has SAFOX VII (but was out before the MZ-6) and *IST has SAFOX VIII.
A couple of weird things as usual by Pentax standards so evreything is normal I guess
;)
-
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
MZ-3!
John,
You got an extremely good deal on the -3. Normally it's significantly
more expensive than the -5n and only has faster shutter.
With respect to the original question: this was discussed last week,
have a look at
I have an MZ-5N and an MZ-7, which has controls very similar to the MZ-6. I
find that the classical style controls on the 5N make it much faster and
easier to change manual speeds and +/- EV. Also, after you get used to the
body, the 5N rotating tab switches for motor and metering, plus the
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They both have Safox IV. But MZ-50 an 60 have Safox V (go figure...
low-end and better AF), MZ-S has SAFOX VII (but was out before the
MZ-6) and *IST has SAFOX VIII.
The -50, -60 (and -30?) have a 2-sensor AF system.
I think Boz's site explains it
Thanks!
Couple of last dumb questions:
I like to shoot children, with/without their pets involved.
I assume the releases would have to come from the parent/pet owner.
Also what does one do in the case of Drive By candids?
Do you stop and try to find the person to get a release?
I always keep a
Well, is not that bad. Don't drop it and it will work just fine.
The MZ6 may have a slightly lower build quality than the MZ5n/3, but it's
much, much better than those plastic toys - you-know-what-brand (or even the
MZ-60 and *ist).
But I hate that viewfinder...
Alex Sarbu
- Original Message
I would concur w/Graywolf. Here's the answer from the latest issue of Pop
Photo to a similar question regarding images from street photography.
No release is necessary if you're shooting in public places such as
sidewalks for fine-art or gallery exhibitions, or for editorial use - even
if the
I shoot digital 90% of the time because it makes sense for most of what
I do. But I still shoot BW film as well and hope to continue doing so
for a long time to come. I do think that film will continue to be
available for many years and that BW may eventually outsell color neg.
I also expect
WHere is Nubble LIght?
Nubble is on an island off of York. There are 3 parts of York and I
can't remember which part it's near, but there's a road that goes down
to the viewing area. You can stand on the rocks and get splashed by the
waves. Just bring a good telephoto lens. :)
While I waited in vain at Nubble Light, Maine, for the skies to clear
last Tuesday, I noticed that many people there were carrying
cameras. I
did not notice a single film camera. No doubt there were
some, but what
I noticed was a large number of PS digital and EVF digital. 'Tis the
This statement somewhat confuses me.
A few days ago I asked about the high contrast abilities of digital versus
film.
The opinion seemed to be that digital was similar to slide film in these
situations.
This led me to believe that negative film would be superior to digital when
in high contrast
Thanks Paul, that helps.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Paul Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 8:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT:Model Release
I would concur w/Graywolf. Here's the answer from the latest issue of Pop
Photo to a similar
- Original Message -
From: Jostein
Subject: Re: Film Is Dead / A Contrary View
LOL. Hey, I do have an *istD, don't I? Let's just say that I don't
subscribe
to it unconditionally.
I've kinda gone from a rabid supporter of digital (once I got my
istD, anyway), to seeing some pretty
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Film Is Dead / A Contrary View
Most photographic labs use scans to produce prints, anyway. I guess
there's
not a big difference - the printing procedure should be pretty much
the
same.
Scanned film at minilabs produce a 2000x3000
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens
Subject: Re: Film Is Dead / A Contrary View
Maybe not. I would guess that at least 1/2 of the film we process
at work
is from one time use cameras. They will keep film alive for quite
some time
I think, at least consumer grade ISO 400 and 800.
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: Re: RE: OT:Model Release
Thanks!
Couple of last dumb questions:
I like to shoot children, with/without their pets involved.
I assume the releases would have to come from the parent/pet owner.
Also what does one do in the case of
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: RE: Film Is Dead / A Contrary View
This statement somewhat confuses me.
A few days ago I asked about the high contrast abilities of digital
versus
film.
The opinion seemed to be that digital was similar to slide film in
these
You got an extremely good deal on the -3. Normally it's significantly
more expensive than the -5n and only has faster shutter.
Hi Kostas
You were right, I liked the MZ-5 so much I went in search of the -5n but
found a -3 instead.
It would have to be surgically removed from me now, I just
I don't think you are missing anything.
Digital does not have the same exposure latitude as film, I think it is
slightly less than slide film - meaning you have to be more accurate
with your exposures. This is balanced by the easier workflow with
digital, whereby you can review a pic straight
I find that the classical style controls on the 5N make it
much faster and easier to change manual speeds and +/- EV. Also,
after you get used to the body, the 5N rotating tab switches for
motor and metering, plus the slider for spot/matrix focus allow you
set just about anything while
From a photographer's POV, the film is dead approach is a bit of
overcompensation/payback from the digital folks who have recent memories
of digital isn't serious photography. Of course there is good reason
for film to remain, just as photography itself didn't kill painting. As
for me, I find
Lowest common denominator always applies., A chain is only as strong as the
weakest link., etcetera. Seems like they knew all about digital hundreds, even
thousands of years ago (grin).
--
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Film Is Dead / A Contrary
No, it said 1/10 s:
Capture the image at a 1/10th of a second shutter speed, please (the
*istD
activates noise reduction, if you've enabled it in your camera, at
slower
speeds), with the eyepiece covered, make sure you capture a TIFF file
(JPEG
artifacts may give 'false positives), run the
That's a good point.
Some of my biggest brain cramps lately are from trying to decide whether the
*ist D, or perhaps whatever is next in the Pentax digicam line-up is for me.
As it will require the sale of several of my beloved Pentax film bodies,
it's a tough decision.
It's made even harder by my
Come on now Steve. You know that is not true either. I can understand how come
the everybody is using digital cant comes from people observing PS users. But
this everybody has Photo Shop comes only from computer gurus (or University
Professors).
The simple facts are not everyone is using
I made that statement in the context of members of the PDML. (The
paragraph begins, From the PDML POV . . .) In that context, I'll
stand by that statement, at to the extent that everyone means 97%+
Even those that use film scan their results and process with PS or some
equivalent product.
A model release is a legal contract. A minor can not be held to a contract, so
if the person is under 18 you need a parent or gardians signature too. Note the
too, I almost never see that mentioned, but once the party is 18, their parents
signature is no longer binding upon them. Get both
On 10 Jul 2004 at 7:50, graywolf wrote:
Yep, the author probably has not bought an istD yet. I noticed that everyone on
the list who has bought one is now rabidly pro-digital (Except Jostein, who does
not seem to quite get the idea that convience is more important than image
quality. GRIN!
I had better add here that I am not an attorney. I am not responsible if you get
sued. I am only reporting my own practices. Whew!
graywolf wrote:
A model release is a legal contract. A minor can not be held to a
contract, so if the person is under 18 you need a parent or gardians
On 10 Jul 2004 at 10:31, Steve Desjardins wrote:
No, it said 1/10 s:
Testing at 1/10th is next to useless unfortunately.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986,
Excellent idea Tom, thanks much!
I was wondering how people would react to the long form, I probably wouldn't
sign it.
Your index card idea is ideal.
Good idea about getting both signatures too, pretty hard to tell how old
(and honest about it) some kids are anymore.
Don
-Original
Consider yourself absolved of all responsibility for my sorry butt!
Don
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT:Model Release
I had better add here that I am not an attorney. I am not
On 10 Jul 2004 at 16:05, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Digital does not have the same exposure latitude as film, I think it is
slightly less than slide film - meaning you have to be more accurate
with your exposures.
I think you will find (using simple experimentation) that even older digicams
Thanks. I stand corrected Rob.
A.
On 10 Jul 2004, at 17:16, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 10 Jul 2004 at 16:05, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Digital does not have the same exposure latitude as film, I think it
is
slightly less than slide film - meaning you have to be more accurate
with your exposures.
I
OK. I did 10s. Now I have 2:
[DeadPixelText]
Version=1.0
Description=10 s test
FileType=TIFF
NumBadPixels=2
0=Hot,1893,242,96
1=Hot,1803,836,83
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/10/04 11:14AM
On 10 Jul 2004 at 10:31, Steve Desjardins wrote:
No, it said 1/10 s:
Testing at 1/10th is next to useless
Actually I am more worried about some lawyer reading the list turning me into
the bar association for practicing law without a license. I do hope everyone
understands I am not giving legal opinions, but only personal ones. And that the
suggested form below is not intended to protect you in
Amita Guha wrote:
WHere is Nubble LIght?
Nubble is on an island off of York. There are 3 parts of York and I
can't remember which part it's near, but there's a road that goes down
to the viewing area. You can stand on the rocks and get splashed by the
waves. Just bring a good telephoto
Thanks Shaun. I'll try to find it. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Shaun Canning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: PAW: At World's end
I think the image is sharp enough Jostein. However, if you want to try
An early image from last autumn with lots of little detail.
This is the sort of image I would love to blow up huge. A3 or larger.
What do you guys think? Would it be possible to get a good quality A3 print
from this one?
(PTAW = Picture Twice A Week...)
Jostein
With a link this time:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/wintermarsh.html
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 10:17 PM
Subject: Another *istD pic (PTAW?)
An early image from last autumn with lots of little detail.
This is
I should clarify my intent, yes it would be mostly for ebay usage
but I would also like to use for serious Macro work. That is one
case where the small sensor is an advantage over 35mm film because
it means better depth of field for the same angle of view (lower
magnifications).
JCO
-
How about the Fujifilm FinePix S602Z Pro? Anything else seems overkill
for ebay.
Antonio
On 10 Jul 2004, at 22:25, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I should clarify my intent, yes it would be mostly for ebay usage
but I would also like to use for serious Macro work. That is one
case where the small sensor
On 10/7/04, Jostein, discombobulated, offered:
An early image from last autumn with lots of little detail.
This is the sort of image I would love to blow up huge. A3 or larger.
What do you guys think? Would it be possible to get a good quality A3 print
from this one?
(PTAW = Picture Twice A
David wrote:
Again while I do not dispute the figures or what kind of image a minilab
puts out, I find there is something inherently wrong with the concept of a
machine as expensive as the minilabs use, consistently putting out far worse
quality then a $300 scanner plus a $150 printer. Ok, yep,
Quite an beautiful and amazing photo Jostein.
Very welcome at this moment as I just came in from mowing the lawn on what
has to be the most humid day I've seen in a long time.
The air is about as hazy as in your photo but it's a lot hotter!
Three things truly impressed me about this photo:
1.)
Seems to be heavily artifacted in the sky. Unless it's my monitor/video
card, which seems to be misbehaving (though not in this way, so far) at
the moment.
I seem to recognise the landscape - rather Lord of the Ringsish, I
think. Haven't a clue how big it would print, I'm afraid.
mike
Hi all,
Does anyone know if it is easy to remove the viewfinder of
an KX? Mine has a little scratch in it that bothers me
a bit. Would it be easy enough to swap it with another
from a beater? Does anyone have a KX parts camera?
Thanks
Dave
Seems to be heavily artifacted in the sky. Unless it's my monitor/video
card, which seems to be misbehaving (though not in this way, so far) at
the moment.
I seem to recognise the landscape - rather Lord of the Ringsish, I
think. Haven't a clue how big it would print, I'm afraid.
mike
Geez,
I don't go on list for like 2 or 3 days, and there are
over 650 messages to sift through!
So, while I do that (sift through messages), here's my
PAW:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2515148
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2515155
My friend Marlee is a
--- cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank, You must have been standing right outside my
bunk in PDML West at
GFM...you stole my Mantra!! snip
Cory,
Damn! I was trying to be quiet. You weren't supposed
to know I was there. g
-frank
=
The optimist thinks this is the best of all
On 10/7/04, Don Sanderson, discombobulated, offered:
An early image from last autumn with lots of little detail.
This is the sort of image I would love to blow up huge. A3 or larger.
What do you guys think? Would it be possible to get a good quality A3
print
from this one?
(PTAW =
With the proper tools and a little patience it's not too bad.
Should be able to use most K series viewfinders for replacement, assuming
you are talking about the glass eyepiece lens.
eBay has replacements for the K1000 quite often, should work.
If you're referring to the Focusing Screen and not
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive me for two in two days, but it may also be
another two weeks
before I do something else
I seem to spend a lot of time waiting for trains to
pass.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/IMGP3989.jpg
William Robb
Cool shot! (I have
Beautiful Jostein, that photo has feeling and mood.love it.
Norm
Jostein wrote:
With a link this time:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/wintermarsh.html
Don't have a basement. Have to splash in the bathroom.
But I found out today I need one of them there Digital SLR's. I put the red
filter on and plumb forgot to open up 3 stops. If I had a digital I would not
have made that mistake. Come to think of it, if I had a digital that mistake
would not
I just said for more than just ebay.
I want interchangable lenses.
jco
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cheapest USED DSLR on the market?
How about the Fujifilm FinePix S602Z
Nice shot, Jostein. I have yet to meet an *ist D image that couldn't
be blown up to Super B size, approximately 18x12, providing of course
that the original RAW is converted to a 72 megabyte 8-bit file or 144
meg 16 bit file at the time of conversion. This image is somewhat soft
due to fog
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, John Whittingham wrote:
You were right, I liked the MZ-5 so much I went in search of the -5n but
found a -3 instead.
It would have to be surgically removed from me now, I just wish it had MLU
and a metal body.
Well, you'd been warned :-)
Kostas
On Jul 10, 2004, at 5:19 PM, Cotty wrote:
Oops - scrolled down and saw the big file. I'll post you a big one ;-)
Hi Cotty,
You'd be better off starting with the RAW file. This file opens to only
17 meg in PhotoShop.
Get the RAW and convert it to a 72 meg file. I'll have a go at it as
well if
Graywolf wrapped up a recent post with:
Hobbies are supposed to waste time. Give you time to
relax. It is all about enjoyment. If you can not wait to get it over with, it
is
not a hobby!
One for the quote file!
ERN
--- Brian Dipert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey
Dude, you just don't get it, do you? We were here
long before you arrived.
We were, are, and will be perfectly happy to be
here. We're not going
anywhere. It's YOUR responsibility to adapt yourself
to the unique
personality and rules of
--- Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're damn right Antonio! What does vitriol mean?
Norm
Norm,
Isn't that the stuff that men used to put in their
hair to, you know, like slick it down? Back in the
50's and 60's, there was Brylcreem and Vitriol, IIRC
(I was only a kid then).
HTH,
On 10/7/04, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, offered:
On Jul 10, 2004, at 5:19 PM, Cotty wrote:
Oops - scrolled down and saw the big file. I'll post you a big one ;-)
Hi Cotty,
You'd be better off starting with the RAW file. This file opens to only
17 meg in PhotoShop.
Get the RAW and
--- Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Antonio Aparicio wrote:
That's right Antonio, how can they be sure, they
have only been running
this list a few years. Man, you are smart. What does
hubris mean?
Norm,
I believe it's a chickpea dip, popular in the Middle
East. Makes a nice dip
On 10/7/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, offered:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2515148
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2515155
My friend Marlee is a dancer/performance
artist/whatever, and these are photos of a piece she
calls Sex With Filing Cabinet.
Doesn't so
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 06:46:43 -0400, Herb Chong wrote:
That can happen with any camera you care to name, with OTF or not.
James
try it. aim a light at the camera and synch it to flash sometime during the
exposure when the speed is faster than X. it will give correct exposure
and not look right
OK, do the opposite. have a light on and turn it off for a portion of the
travel. same thing. IOW, it's useless except below X speed.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: OTF metering question
This flame war is over. Let's not go there again, Frank.
On Jul 10, 2004, at 5:56 PM, frank theriault wrote:
--- Brian Dipert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey
Dude, you just don't get it, do you? We were here
long before you arrived.
We were, are, and will be perfectly happy to be
here. We're not
--- Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now
Mr. Owens, are you suggesting that it would be
Antonio's fault? My
good man, I'm sure you don't really mean that.
Norm
Norm,
You sarcastic bastard. Do you have to turn everything
into a for or against scenario?
Why don't you just
LOL.
The artefacts are of the cold, wet crystalline kind.
First frozen downpour last winter, btw.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Another *istD pic (PTAW?)
Seems to
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This flame war is over. Let's not go there again,
Frank.
Sorry, Paul,
I'm just going through messages from the last week or
so that I've not been able to read until now.
I wasn't even thinking that this is old stuff that's
now water under the
pick a random lawyer and they will say always get a release because you
never know. in otherwords, they are no help. they also like a release that
says basically I allow my likeness to be used for any purpose.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
digital camera ownership has passed 30% in the US and is well over 80% in
Japan. in the future, the people who don't use digital will be because they
are unable to.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 10:39 AM
turn off noise reduction and shoot an in-camera TIFF.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: Real-life calibration assistance welcomed
OK. I did 10s. Now I have 2:
if you were shooting RAW, you could pull enough latitude out relatively
easily to make even color print film look low latitude. if you blend
exposures, you can stretch to 20 or more stops of latitude, but then things
start looking unrealistic.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
none of my friends are willing to be subject to a slide show. the only
reason i shot slides when i did was because magazines insisted.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: RE: Film Is Dead
Photoshop isn't the only game in town even if you pay, and if you are
shooting JPEG, there are huge numbers of perfectly adequate free programs.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hultman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 3:25 PM
Subject: Re:
I don't know what to say about the shots except... well... nice legs!
Christian
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2515148
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2515155
--- Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: I don't know what to say about the shots
except...
well... nice legs!
Hi, Christian,
Now ~that's~ a fair comment! vbg
I'll tell Marlee you think so (so do I, BTW).
cheers,
frank
=
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible
To attend to visiting old friends and gearing up
for the National Scrabble Tourney
in New ORleans at the end of the month --
Just when we were getting back to interesting
stuff, too --
I'll probably wait for a couple of hours to
actually unsubscribe in the
off chance I get time to read some of
There are a couple of interesting articles on Pentax in the July issues of
'Camera' magazine. In addition the magazine's editorial is all about Pentax'
plans for another SLR Revolution (we shall see.). An interesting
observation in the editorial relating to future digital SLRs is that much
Well Frank, without any context (which you just gave us) I'd say, nice
abstract shots that don't do anything for me. Taken within the context
and used as such, I rather like them.
Norm
P.S. I would have unsubed years ago but I can't figure out howI'm
stuck in PDML hell, paying for past
You nature photographers are always so good at capturing birds on the wing. I
like the composition.
--
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Angels sighted
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
*ist D, 600mm FA, 1/2000, f8.0
Comments likes/dislikes
Thanks in advance for
if your choices are reduced to a single BW and a single color print film,
you probably won't want to use film. anaother scenario, the price of film
and processing go up by a factor of 10.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
Just so you know that I DO take photos once in a while. ;-)
http://www.donsauction.com/PDML/Ellis.htm
These were my first sad attempt at digital, had no idea how to work the
darned thing.
Used a freeware program to process them, didn't know how to do that either.
Shot about 2 years ago in a
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/_IGP0717.jpg
In the garden behind the house.
ist-D, ISO 800, FA*80-200/2.8
Now I'm going to go and have a glass of wine before calling it a
night...
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My friend Marlee is a dancer/performance
artist/whatever, and these are photos of a piece she
calls Sex With Filing Cabinet.
You have interesting friends Frank.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 10 Jul 2004 at 22:07, Jim Colwell wrote:
frank,
I'm new to PDML, but I've been on the www since it was a DARPA project in
the 1970's. There are many sites with office sex pics, but I don't think
that PDML should be one, nor (I suspect) do about 51% of the potential PDML
audience.
Norm Baugher wrote:
Man, aren't we glad she left again, I was starting to wonder if she was
sticking around!
um beijo Ann, have a safe trip,
Norm
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
To attend to visiting old friends and gearing up
for the National Scrabble Tourney
in New ORleans at the end of the
On 10 Jul 2004 at 16:57, Brian Walters wrote:
One of the articles is a feature on 50 years of association between Pentax and
its Australian distributor C R Kennedy and it's mainly a short history of Pentax
over that period.
Thanks for posting the information, I'll have to get a copy. It's
Hi!
ft I don't go on list for like 2 or 3 days, and there are
ft over 650 messages to sift through!
It is average, trust me, the old backlog guy g...
ft http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2515148
ft http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2515155
ft My friend Marlee is a
Jim,
Thanks for looking and commenting.
The lens used was a Pentax 600mm/f4.0 SMC FA IFED on a Gitzo Mountaineer
tripod with a Kirk King Cobra gimbal head (the only way to fly with a lens
of this weight).
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jim Colwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: frank
theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My friend Marlee is a dancer/performance
artist/whatever, and these are photos of a piece
she
calls Sex With Filing Cabinet.
You have interesting friends Frank.
--
Mark Roberts
I consider you a
Don, nice captures. I'd say the light makes all the difference.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Don Sanderson
Subject: Couple of Pics
Just so you know that I DO take photos once in a while. ;-)
http://www.donsauction.com/PDML/Ellis.htm
These were my first sad attempt
Possibly. I took a not overly different scene and printed a 12x18 of it. I
did not have the fog however. You can just start to notice the loss of
detail in the grass but mine was only a 3.3MP camera.
Butch
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
