In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cotty)
wrote:
try this site for inks and paper:
http://www.7dayshop.com/catalog/default.php?cPath=777_2_203_20302
Looks promising! However, it doesn't list any ink as being compatible with
the iP6000. Some poking in the manual which says it
Christian wrote on 02.06.05 5:15:
I wonder if Pentax could make a K to 4/3 adapter. :-)
There's already one among others :-)
http://www.cameraquest.com/adapt_olyE1.htm
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Don Sanderson wrote on 02.06.05 1:56:
Just found a Nikon compatibility chart:
http://www.nikonlinks.com/unklbil/bodylens.htm
It's a bit complicated for sure.
Glad I bought an FM though. ;-)
But not too complicated :-) One thing is certain - you can mount AI and AIS
lenses (majority of used
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:53:15PM -0400, Christian wrote:
Once again, Pentax has not even thrown us a bone. Hey check it out guys!
a new DSLR! (oh yeah, not the one our loyal, salivating customers
have been
begging for, it's another downgrade. even LOWER spec-ed than the previous
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Christian wrote:
But I'm wondering what it offers that the others do not.
It is newer and will compete in price. Until the next offering from
the competition. This is the point of this model. A new buyer now has
again three choices, and like DagT, I can now tell whoever asks
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Today, it seems, flash and image sells more than quality and practicality.
What do you mean today, people and most living things have always
felt safety in numbers, and that's what image gets you. If I hadn't
done my homework and decided to shell out
On Jun 2, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
It's not about being original, it's about being associated with or
linked to
the best. Using your car analogy some people also buy their new car
with all
the factory options and just leave it at that, just like buying a
top line
camera.
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
Actually I think it was the ME variants that sold in record numbers that
made the LX possible, though the K1000 sales certainly helped keep it alive.
Difficult. Only the ME and the (was it cheap? did it sell in
bucket-loads) MX predate the LX, according
Quoting Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's interesting :-) So it seems that if you want to have the same
brand of camera and decent WA zoom, you just can't go with Canon ;-)
BTW - which third-party zoom has used your friend? That would be
valuable information for us :-)
IIRC,
I knew I was provoking you, and I got what I expected .-)
I make a living by selling my time and my knowledge in a certain field.
Sometimes I have the chance to sell something the client doesn't need. Why
shouldn't I do that? Because in the long run he will be dissatified, so they
don't
I am looking for a free piece of software running on Solaris or XP
that will make it fast and easy for me to create galleries and upload
them to my website. I am, looking for thumbnails index with simple
webpages coming off them. I came across Web Album Generator
Kostas, I use jalbum, see http://jalbum.net/
It is easy to learn and there are plenty of lay-outs to choose from.
I have no experience with Web Album Generator.
My gallery is at http://www.dewindvanvoorne.nl/fotoalbum/
Henk
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL
Off to North Carolina and GFM.
Back on Tuesday.
William Robb
Here are my two favorites:
Jalbumn
http://jalbum.net/
Gallery Constructor
http://www.through-the-lens.net/
Don
-Original Message-
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 5:11 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Looking for Photo
Very nice. The blacks are rich, the detail in the colored portion is
good. I like the simple geometry of the shot. I am left wishing for a
tiny bit of perspective correction and perhaps slightly more uniform
lighting. I don't think totally uniform light would be desirable, but
the luminosity
Kostas,
When I see this question in forums, people frequently
point to jalbum.
http://jalbum.net/
No personal experience with it though.
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am looking for a free piece of software running on
Solaris or XP
that will make it fast and easy for
Again, nice. But again, I think this could benefit from perspective
correction.
Paul
On Jun 2, 2005, at 12:08 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/wall2f.html
Another interpretation of the same wall at the SFMOMA
This is one is good but the first one is
--- Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
28/3.5, 35/3.5, 135/3.5, 200/4, 50/1.7, just to name a few.
All inexpensive, all very good to excellent.
For all 5 of the above I paid less than $150.00, I'm very
pleased with all of them.
I suppose how one is looking at the Pentax situation. There
Then move on. I've decided to wait for now. I passed up a very good
deal on a little used 1D Mark II last week. But I gave it some thought.
I think waiting makes sense at the moment.
Paul
On Jun 2, 2005, at 12:34 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Nor do I wish to have to wait
until the MF Digital is
And I'm wondering how Pentax expect to out-compete...
I thought they stop doing that after the failure of LX? Perhaps the LX was the
biggest mistake ever to Pentax because Pentax fans have had such unrealistic
expectation since. Pentax 135 has never meant to be truely professional like
C/N,
the
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My original hypothetical was for a new consumer who didn't have any previous
lenses. BU, sorry! Previous brand ownership is a no-brainer in making
the decision. I bought the D (a great camera, thankfully) because I already
had bags-o-gear. Your
William Robb escribi:
Any idea how many K1000s they sold to make the LX possible?
I don't know if the K1000 made the LX possible, but it was a huge
seller. More than 2.500.000 in fact, in 20 years.
Carlos
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe will see a new OP camera Olympus-Pentax. :)
[-ve + -ve = +ve] I suppose? :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if Pentax could make a K to 4/3 adapter. :-)
There is an adaptor to mount K lenses on E system.
http://www.kindai-inc.co.jp/mount_fosa.htm
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do You
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My new experience with Canon in the realm of backwards compatability is
almost non-existent. I still own some nice SMC Taks that work on the 20D
just as well as on the D or Ds.
It is interesting to see EOS bodies can mount many other lenses such as
Jostein wrote on 02.06.05 10:21:
IIRC, it wasn't even a zoom, but a prime. I will check it out next time I talk
to him.
OK, let us now :-) But still, from technical point of view there should be a
visible vignetting with WA lenses used on FF DSLR, because less light
strikes at angle photo
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see what they are attempting to do, I don't know if it will work for
them
but I can tell you it's not the camera I want. Nor do I wish to have to wait
until the MF Digital is brought to market and fails miserably before being
told
that
Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 10:55:42 PM, Bill wrote:
BL Shel, I have a possible answer. Try my Ernst Leitz Wetzlar VAROO 50/3.5
BL uncoated enlarging lens with T-Stops. It came with an early Focomat enlarger
BL ca 1937. It had plenty of glow. When using the original Leitz enlarging
BL light bulb
It's about a 8/10 revolution from closest focus to infinity, and it is
one of the stiffest focusing rings on any lens I own.
Time to relube the lens. Believe me, it works.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of
On 2/6/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
- Replace those red meter LEDs with blue ones
- Add a fat chrome film advance
- Lower the prism
- Add an intercooler for the turbo-winder
- any other ideas?
Sure.
Air spoiler on the hotshoe?
Go-faster stripes?
A few extra KC Daylighter
If Pal is correct and Pentax is working on an EOS-killer,...
Okay, so we now know the upcoming Pentax semi-pro body will be named
EOS-killer.
What else?
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the
On 2/6/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've decided to wait for now. I passed up a very good
deal on a little used 1D Mark II last week. But I gave it some thought.
I think waiting makes sense at the moment.
This is called getting older - admit it, 20 years ago you would have
--- Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the odds, considering the information strategy the mother
company has?
Pentax Japan tells the distributors less than nothing! That's the case
in Europe, at least.
Applies to all actual products too. They just let us Pentax users to discover
the
If me, 20 years ago I could not even give it a thought, for 2 excellent
reasons:
1) It did not exist (this is also a good reason for Paul ;-)
2) I couldn't afford such a cost (even a good deal on such a beast)
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list
Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 5:50:12 PM, Jostein wrote:
J I think Bjørn's experiment should be read with considerable caution.
J It is inadvertently staged to be in favour of Nikon. In the vignetting
J example, they chose a WA-zoom from Canon which certainly isn't top
J notch. It was selected simply
Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 4:47:13 PM, Cotty wrote:
C On 1/6/05, Toralf Lund, discombobulated, unleashed:
don't you think the Nikon
sold more than the Kodak just because the Nikon is a Nikon and the Kodak
is, well, not a Nikon, or a Canon, or even a Pentax.
C Mark!
I think it sold less because
SP That's interesting :-) So it seems that if you want to have the same
SP brand of camera and decent WA zoom, you just can't go with Canon ;-)
SP BTW - which third-party zoom has used your friend? That would be
SP valuable information for us :-)
I bet it was Leitz :)
Good light!
Rob wrote:
The fact that Pentax don't have a visible upper level body doesn't help their
position in the market.
True, but the issue is when is the right time for releasing an upper level
body. According to Pentax they will but only after the Pentax DSLR user base is
sufficiently large. 66
Christian wrote:
But I'm wondering what it offers that
the others do not.
What it offers is that it isn't a Canon. This about as sensible aswer to the
question as you can get. There are as many reasons as there are people.
Pål
Bruce wrote:
The sad thing about this is, that Pentax has to be WAY better than
Canon or Nikon to be able to get any attention. There is no way for
any other manufacturer to be WAY better than Canon. They can be a
little bit better all the way around, but it won't matter much.
My original
Alan wrote:
I thought they stop doing that after the failure of LX? Perhaps the LX was the
biggest mistake ever to Pentax because Pentax fans have had such unrealistic
expectation since.
The LX a failure? Certainly not saleswise. Considering that the camera was
among the most expensive
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 1:36 AM
Subject: Re: Rumors About Pentax's Future
the Leica with a 10MP sensor and less components lists for $9K. since Kodak
also makes the 645D sensor, there no chance
Herb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: Predictable Pentax
expanding the base works only if you are not losing a lot of money while
doing it. if you do, there's no money left
John wrote:
Anyone who finds this news in any way astonishing just hasn't been
paying attention. Pentax stated their future path, loud and clear,
in the interview given at about the time the *ist-DS was released.
First the DL, then the MF digital, and then the *ist-D follow-on.
But the
If Pal is correct and Pentax is working on an EOS-killer,...
I think I said they would make a camera that outperforms what Canon can offer
in image quality...
Pål
The upgrade path is an interesting question. If you buy an entry DSLR
($700) and a few comparable lenses, you will probably be investing less
than $1500. To access those high end Canon lenses and bodies you'll
have to spend this much on a new body (20D) and probably a $1000 a lens.
For most
From color
Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:15:29 -0700
speaking of cars. people do all kinds of things to make their
cars UNIQUE. they put 27 rims on them, custom paint jobs,
crate engines, lowered or raised suspension, etc. etc.
and then they buy all those rebels and 300D's.
it's kind of like everybody
fra: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
.
.
They should switch to Canon and not look back.
(Stay on the PDML however; it just makes it more fung).
I don't know. We've got enough people who have switched to Canon and are
regretting it because they find that it didn't really make a
Scott Loveless wrote:
Luben,
I like the composition and exposure except for the window. I think if
it weren't quite so blown out this would be a really wonderful
photograph. Otherwise, great!
On 6/1/05, luben karavelov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello to all,
Last I was participating in a
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: luben karavelov
Subject: PESO: Lights shadows
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id=1481msg_id=00COZcphoto_id=3415443photo_sel_index=0
I would like to hear all your comments, critics and advices.
I like it.
It looks like a
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/02 Thu AM 08:39:04 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Good things about *istDL
On Jun 2, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
It's not about being original, it's about being associated with or
linked to
the best. Using
Christian wrote:
- Original Message -
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, who cares about the answers to your question?
If Pentax want to be a niche player, great! But their niche should be
advanced amateurs such as myself who are willing to pay for a steady stream
of
Anyone travelling through Ohio on the way to GFM
feel free to call me. I'm in the phone book.
Lunch/dinner on me.
Sincerely,
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
I guess it depends on whether you think the dog wags the tail or the tail wags the dog. Nikon sells lots of
cheap cameras because its a Nikon. Pentax sells lots of cheap cameras because they're
cheap. When the sales-droid says, I can sell you a Nikon or Canon for only $5 more, Pentax
loses a
Dave Brooks and I managed to get across the border (go figure...), met
Ann in Buffalo, then off to Pittsburgh to meet Mark.
Driving in tandem, we made a little detour to Winston-Salem NC to drop
off a bike (don't ask). At 10pm it's pissing rain, so heading to GFM
seemed silly. A night
Funny how people buy old beat up lenses that who knows what their history is
and figure all of them are junk based upon that experience. Even worse when it
has an obvious minor problem that almost any tech could fix for little money.
RULE: almost every piece of photographic gear ought to have
4 modern 8x10 film holders $30 each
2 wood 8x10 film holders $25 each.
-- all in excellent condition
8x10 film that I'll list later.
Sincerely,
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
The economy is on an upswing now too, at least outside the US.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Mishka
Subject: Re: Why choose *ist DL over Nikon or Canon competitors?
Frantisek wrote on 02.06.05 13:58:
I bet it was Leitz :)
Why Leitz don't use then L designation for their lenses is mystery -
they'd sell much better ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Perhaps. Although twenty years ago I couldn't afford it. By the time we earn
enough to live somewhat decadently, we no longer have the energy or
inclination. That's nature's way of making us older folk behave :-).
Paul
On 2/6/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've decided to
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
The question is: What will be done next to simplify it even further?
1. Remove all unnecessary hardware (if there is any left to remove) and
modify the firmware so that it will only work with digital or FA lenses.
2. Remove the manual
I've heard that said. However, except for the LX which I understand continued
to be available in Japan Pentax has not offered a high end camera since about
1990. The MZ/S was a step in the right direction, but too little too late.
Except for the unfortunate name the *istD was also a step in
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: Why choose *ist DL over Nikon or Canon competitors?
Theres a lot of Pentax mystique going around at present and considering
that other mythical brands
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Why choose *ist DL over Nikon or Canon competitors?
fra: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
.
.
They should switch to Canon and not look back.
Henk,
I really like your gallery. I esp like Italian contrasts in the people
folder. It is a fantastic photograph that would benefit greatly from a
tight crop.
rg
Henk Terhell wrote:
Kostas, I use jalbum, see http://jalbum.net/
It is easy to learn and there are plenty of lay-outs to
Hi Paul,
I thought about perspective correction and decided against it. Now that
the final is complete, I may try it just to see how it looks. However,
as with the lighting, I was really looking for something that wasn't too
flat, where tones and shapes were a bit uneven. The color range on
Padded snakeskin, Cesar has shown you the way...
David Mann wrote:
On Jun 2, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
It's not about being original, it's about being associated with or
linked to
the best. Using your car analogy some people also buy their new car
with all
the factory options
Try Coppermine http://coppermine.sourceforge.net/ it's open source.
I like it and it makes uploading, gallery creation and thumbnailing super
easy.
My website is all Coppermine: http://www.skofteland.net running on Linux.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
There are a great many people using their Leica R lenses on the Canon
bodies. Over on the Leica list it seems that most everyone has at least
one Canon body for their R lenses, and some have even sold off their Leica
gear. These were the same folks who, a couple of years ago, were waving
the
You'll have to excuse me, color.
I drive a Toyota (91 Camry, 289K+ miles),
currently work for Toyota's biggest competitor,
but would rather be driving a 300SD.
:)
I owned a corolla, I know what i'm talking about.
Let's just say I was not 100% serious when I was writing my previous
message...
What about a golden LX with snake skin case?
Is it any different?
color
Cotty wrote:
Thu, 02 Jun 2005 04:20:48 -0700
On 2/6/05, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
- Replace those red meter LEDs with blue ones
- Add a fat chrome film advance
- Lower the prism
- Add an intercooler for
Kostas Kavoussanakis
Thu, 02 Jun 2005 06:55:48 -0700
And how well did the MZ-60 sell? And what was the feature set of its
successor in the line-up (film *ist)?
Kostas
My point is Pentax' tradition for 3 decades.
Start with the K2 and build a line off the basic design.
Start with the ME and
I'm still holding out for the *ist-DLX...
Alan Chan wrote:
If Pal is correct and Pentax is working on an EOS-killer,...
Okay, so we now know the upcoming Pentax semi-pro body will be named
EOS-killer.
What else?
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Many thanks for all the answers. Jalbum it is.
Kostas
Gonz, thanks.
I did submit Ïtalian contrasts to PUG some years ago.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 June, 2005 4:49 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Looking for Photo Publishing Software
Henk,
I really like your gallery. I esp
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My original dissapointment over the *istD was that it wasn't funky enough
and didn't offer the design flair in order to get attention. I think Pentax
need to design DSLR that looks less me too.
I don't buy cameras as fashion
Certainly not. Making a high-emd body for Pentax makes no sense at present as
virtually no one would buy one. Sure, they could make a body somewhat higher
than the *istD but thats about it at present. The only high-end Pentax have
any hope to be a player is in digital MF. Pentax didn't even see
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
.
.
They should switch to Canon and not look back.
(Stay on the PDML however; it just makes it more fung).
I don't know. We've got enough people who have switched to Canon and are
regretting it because they
I didn't mention it was new in a box when I bought it, probably about
15years after it had been discontinued. The only other M lens I got new
in a box was the 50 f1.7 with my first MX. The feel was similar but
both have been getting silkier as I've been using them. The 50 has a
huge head
If it weren't on the upswing in most places in the US it wouldn't be on
the upswing outside. We are China's market...
Graywolf wrote:
The economy is on an upswing now too, at least outside the US.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
I'm happy now :)
--
Thibouille
--
Z1,SuperA,KX,MX,P30t and KR-10x ...
Thibouille wrote:
I'm happy now :)
--
Thibouille
--
Z1,SuperA,KX,MX,P30t and KR-10x ...
You forgot to change your sig :-)
S
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis
Thu, 02 Jun 2005 06:55:48 -0700
And how well did the MZ-60 sell? And what was the feature set of its
successor in the line-up (film *ist)?
Kostas
My point is Pentax' tradition for 3 decades.
Start with the K2 and build a line off the
On 2 Jun 2005 at 10:08, color wrote:
What about a golden LX with snake skin case?
Is it any different?
It's also known as the shock and awe cringe cam, not good for close in
apple-pie portraits :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JAlbum looks like a great program - certainly worth a download and a test
drive. I've a question for JAlbum users using Win XP: The JAlbum site
allows the option of downloading the program using an installer or
downloading JAlbum without an installer as a zip archive. Is there any
benefit to one
P. J. Alling wrote:
I don't think anyone actually read the new EU constitution, it's the
size of the New York phone book.
One of the reasons I would automatically vote against it, given the
option. I've not been given the option. It's important enough for
everyone to be bound by law to
På 2. jun. 2005 kl. 16.33 skrev Christian:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fra: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
.
.
They should switch to Canon and not look back.
(Stay on the PDML however; it just makes it more fung).
I don't know. We've got enough people
I'm off to GFM, kids. Don't break the list while I'm gone.
On 2/6/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Dave Brooks and I managed to get across the border (go figure...), met
Ann in Buffalo, then off to Pittsburgh to meet Mark.
Driving in tandem, we made a little detour to Winston-Salem NC to drop
off a bike (don't ask). At 10pm it's pissing
Damn, Doug, you're no fun...
Doug Brewer wrote:
I'm off to GFM, kids. Don't break the list while I'm gone.
--
A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
--Groucho Marx
On 2/6/05, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm off to GFM, kids. Don't break the list while I'm gone.
Shhh. Okay, wait til they're all gone, and meet back here Friday night
for a
PARTY!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
.zip = faster download.
.exe = no unzipping needed.
Don
-Original message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 10:59:39 -0500
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Looking for Photo Publishing Software
JAlbum looks like a great program - certainly worth a
On 2 Jun 2005 at 8:10, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I'm OK with the high end
Pentax being the 20D equivalent, which will always lag behind Canon's
release by a few years.
I appreciate that the Pentax offerings will likely lag behind Canons line-up
however it's pretty sad when the two bottom end
Well another old line camera store is almost gone, Kingston Camera of
Kingston RI is holding it's going out of business sale this weekend.
They've been in pretty much the same location for over 50 years. I saw
and fondled a LX for the first time there. It's a sad day, they were
probably one
On 2/6/05, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
If me, 20 years ago I could not even give it a thought, for 2 excellent
reasons:
1) It did not exist (this is also a good reason for Paul ;-)
2) I couldn't afford such a cost (even a good deal on such a beast)
Dario
The point I was making
On 2 Jun 2005 at 8:02, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's sad to see the Canon juggernaut rolling
over the photographic landscape as it is, but clearly Canon has the product
that
many people want when it comes to digital.
The thing is that they got there by listening to their customers, so well
Maybe in Australia the bottom line camera in the Canon line is the TX
but the Rebel D is still being sold in the US.
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 2 Jun 2005 at 8:10, Steve Desjardins wrote:
I'm OK with the high end
Pentax being the 20D equivalent, which will always lag behind Canon's
release
On 2/6/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
I don't know. We've got enough people who have switched to Canon and
are regretting it because they find that it didn't really make a
difference to their photographs, but in stead of admitting it they stay
around criticising Pentax for
On 2/6/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Perhaps. Although twenty years ago I couldn't afford it. By the time we
earn enough to live somewhat decadently, we no longer have the energy or
inclination. That's nature's way of making us older folk behave :-).
Ain't *that* the truth!
On 2/6/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
And then we have Dr. Friedrich Cotty Frankenstein...
Thanks for the vote of confidence Peter...I think.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
1 - 100 of 263 matches
Mail list logo
