On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:26:59AM +1000, Anthony Farr wrote:
Apparently, DNG files are as not universal as commonly perceived. I have a
Fujifilm digicam that makes .RAF raw files, and the packaged raw converter
will only make 8 bit tiffs with no editing capability, IOW fairly pointless.
No
I can't get into it.
How do we load pix for August?
Hi Frank,
I used http://oksne.net/autopug/PUGform.asp. It was linked from the 'backup'
pug requirements page Adelheid mailed a link to a couple of days ago (see:
http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/general/autosubmit.html). It seemed up to date
and
Actually, a white hankerchief held in place with a rubberband is the
oldest one I know of. Kind of balloon it out so it defuses the light in
multiple directions.
And works like a charm. Best comment I got at a wedding was from someone who
asked whether I had a set, calibrated in stops :o)
I think the one stop difference is due to the way the multi-segment metering
works. Notice the person in the highlight area on the the right-hand side of
the lady. In the upper shot, the camera tries to compensate for the higher
contrast, and thus selects a shorter exposure time.
This is a
I saw that and thought that might have something to do with it. But look
at the left side of the subject where the lower shot has a much larger
bright area on the left than the upper shot. I guess the intelligent,
multi-segment meter decided that bright area was of no importance LOL
BTW, had I
Hi Rob - I was always of the impression that multi-segment metering was
smarter than that. I guess it's just some more marketing hype, or
perhaps the differences in the scene were such that it could fool the
meter. It's results like these that consistently keep me skeptical of
in-camera meters.
That's so reassuring, Bill.
This is my first time using multi-segment metering. Never again!
It's nice to know that the meter in these cameras can't be relied upon.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb
Pretty amazing ain't it?
I find it to be pretty common on the D if I shoot
On 19/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Buy a small can of my patented Photon Grease (TM). It'll increase the flow
of light through the lens, prevent premature aperture degeneration, lube
all light sensitive internal parts to prevent corrosion, and effectively
help maintain, and
On 20/7/05, Markus Maurer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi Cotty
Would you trust the integrated light meter here or underexpose a bit like -1
?
Like others have said, spot meter the faces. If you can't, definitely
underexpose a bit. You're shooting neg, so you'll have plenty of
latitude. Stage
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Herb Chong wrote:
the investment would be a mistake if you think you ever want to upgrade
camera bodies.
Now, you have to give us some facts as to why Pentax will go belly up
before the -D successor comes out (next spring, is the timeline?), or
the above is mere shite.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/20 Wed AM 08:02:31 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: The Nine Second Difference
I saw that and thought that might have something to do with it. But look
at the left side of the subject where the lower shot has a much
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Powell Hargrave wrote:
There is usually some change in the image which causes the difference. In
this image I would suggest the bright area to the right of her eyes caused
the first to cut back the exposure as the camera attempts to keep some
detail there. In the second
Herb,
Whilst a lot of what you say makes sense from a marketing perspective,
your financial analysis is much less convincing.
I have a small client with branches around the UK. The smallest branch,
in Scotland, lost £30,000 last year. (Not big money, but it's the
principle that
On 7/8/05, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are soccer fans, we have football, hockey, basketball and baseball
fans. Fan, as I'm sure you're aware, is simply short for fanatic.
Wow, there's something new to learn every day!!
Yes I didn't realize it before, thank you!!
beside this, I
very pretty girl. and a nice picture.
thanks,
mishka
On 7/19/05, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boris it very nearly is a terrific shot. I do love the close-up framing,
and your daughter gets more beautiful every day, but: the eyes need a
highlight to bring them to life, and the
It appears that a reflected background highlight was momentarily much
brighter in the upper shot. That changed the exposure. If I'm shooting
against a background like this, I frequently use spot metering. Of
course either of these exposures could be dialed in quite nicely if
they were shot
i think Pentax is going to have trouble delivering an upgrade. announcing it
at PMA next year isn't when they are going to deliver one. the 645D isn't
visible yet and i don't think they are going to make their schedule, which
is going to be around PMA next year. Mamiya isn't. i think next
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DNG Converter v3.1 preserves all the standard EXIF metadata tags,
Paul, as far as I can tell. It might not save the Pentax private
metadata, but the only application that uses that is the Pentax Lab
software which I don't use.
Part of the metadata
Pål Jensen wrote:
Tom wrote:
In any case, we all have the choice to acquire information and decide
whether what we think we're hearing is BS and ignore it, or find it to be
plausible and use it in futher decisions.
The point is how you interpret the facts. I can't see anything dramatic
Herb Chong wrote:
Pentax has not signaled in any way that it has a coherent, even if
hidden, picture of the future of its camera lineup. announcing the 645D
to me was representing a huge diversion of effort for a company not
making much money and knowing that developing such a system is not
A worthwhile alternative for those who are more interested in
photography than arguing about Pentax profit margins:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/picture_gallery/05/entertainment_the_photobloggers/html/1.stm
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I remember reading something very similar to this a few years ago when some
people tried to prove that Pentax would never make a dslr.
DagT
fra: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i think Pentax is going to have trouble delivering an upgrade. announcing it
at PMA next year isn't when they are
Nice pictures, but way to small. I understand your scanning problems, but I
would really like to have a closer look at
http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=114
... (?)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian.)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after
Just a few questions for those who have toured the UK recently and those
living there, as I will be spending August and most of September touring
through Scotland and England.
There are a variety of passes (e.g. National Trust) that give discounted
entry to various attractions. If you used one,
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/20 Wed AM 11:15:36 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
Pål Jensen wrote:
Tom wrote:
In any case, we all have the choice to acquire information and decide
whether what we think we're hearing is BS
In my experience the algorithms have never properly learned to handle situations
like this one in a consistent way. Most likely, the camera will have suggested
that you use fill-flash instead. Do you remember if there was a little blinking
zigzag icon in the viewfinder?
The way the multi-segment
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: The Nine Second Difference
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/2up.jpg
Just nine seconds separate these two pics. They are almost identical
shots. Both were made with the istDs,
Both images usable is a truth that probably only holds for posting on the web.
Remember that the shots are made at ISO3200. High ISO images from digital tend
to show a lot of colour noise when the shadows are lifted by post-processing,
so getting exposure the way you want it is important.
Jostein
On 20/7/05, Paul Ewins, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is the deal with booking a couple of tickets on the London Eye? I've
been told to book the day before, do I just turn up and queue or is there
somewhere else that it can be done.
Paul, of all the questions you asked, I'm afraid I can only
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 19/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's been said that the ... Linebaugh will penetrate deeply enough to take
any game animal on Earth.
Have you met my wife?
Well, to generalise from Mike's description of English Wife, maybe the
On 7/20/05 7:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember reading something very similar to this a few years ago when some
people tried to prove that Pentax would never make a dslr.
And now Pentax is the (distant) #3 maker of DSLRs next to N/C. Management
changed over the
From: Paul Ewins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are a variety of passes (e.g. National Trust) that give discounted
entry to various attractions. If you used one, which was it and how useful
was it?
If you plan on going to many NT properties, join it. £60 for a year for a
couple and you will be
It is sayd before, but don't use flash. Another thing. Since its a local
band, and their asking you to photograph, tell them not to wear anything
white. White shirts and black backgrounds ruined many of my shots at Førde
Folkemusikk Festival :-(
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian.)
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/20 Wed PM 12:01:30 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 19/7/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's been said that the ... Linebaugh will penetrate
On 7/20/05, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Frank,
I used http://oksne.net/autopug/PUGform.asp. It was linked from the 'backup'
pug requirements page Adelheid mailed a link to a couple of days ago (see:
http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/general/autosubmit.html). It seemed up to date
If high model turnover is a problem, then making a MedF digital may make the
best signal effect of dedication to serious digital with the least RD effort.
I bet Pentax will be careful not to repeat the mistakes that Mamiya has made
with their introduction. They've been through that already with
On 7/19/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
May I be so bold as to post to PAW images at once? This is a part of my
street shooting Project...
Your comments are appreciated.
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=203301
Wow! Great detail. I like the
Quoting Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
if you already have a raft of 645 lenses, there isn't much choice,
but there aren't going to be a lot of people like that left in another
year's time.
You mean, they're dying out and have their lenses buried with them, right?
C'mon, Herb! The lenses
On 7/19/05, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After shooting the Mittens at dusk, We were able to turn around and
look out of the valley at this last display of light. MV, by the way,
is Monument Valley.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, Handheld
ISO 800, 1/250 sec @ f/6.7
Converted from
Gosh, Shel, give the poor camera a break!
This is a very, very tough shot for a little
microchip. You've got background highlights, a very
bright background highlight on the left, a midtone
face, and a black hat.
This is what they put spot meters in cameras for.
Rick
--- Shel Belinkoff
Quoting mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
8-))
Justified today. She's got a job interview this afternoon and we pick up her
new car after over a week of (in my opinion) unjustifiable delays. I've been
sending her calm texts for the last three hours. If I don't, I suspect she
will just
On 7/19/05, Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5) non-Pentax DSLR owners who want a Pentax instead - sorry, but i think
Godfrey is probably the only such person that will ever exist.
Perhaps, but I'm not so certain. I talked to some good friends this
past weekend who currently only have a
Paul,
The various interesting properties that you might want to visit are owned
by a variety of different organisations. Grand country houses in England
are often the property of the National Trust, but not invariably. Many of
the most important buildings in Britain are government-owned
LOL.
Woe the ones to Manor Born.
Btw, anyone remember the TV series with Penelope Keith?
Jostein
Quoting Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
as one of a civilized gentiles (ie, goyim), i protest against
abusing language in this manor. and highly recommend a spell-checker
to a pissed native
On 7/19/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/2up.jpg
snip Is
this the kind of erratic results one can expect from high-tech cameras, or
is there some sort of failure to communicate or understand on my part? Why
would these pics be so far apart in
From: Paul Ewins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are a variety of passes (e.g. National Trust) that give discounted
entry to various attractions. If you used one, which was it and how useful
was it?
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, mike wilson wrote:
If you plan on going to many NT properties, join it.
Hi gang,
http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/?p=116#comments
Comments here and there welcome...
Albano Garcia
Photography Graphic Design
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
unless the light has changed. That you can't get repeatable results even
in manual mode is disheartening.
How can you not get repeatable results in manual mode?
Kostas
I agree with Paul here: archive the PEF files, for sure. They are the
original data.
Absolutely... no question of compatibility, everything is there,
etc. If storage space is an issue, one thing to consider would be a
lossless compression, though. Pentax's brain-dead, no-compression RAW
Rick Womer wrote:
Gosh, Shel, give the poor camera a break!
This is a very, very tough shot for a little
microchip. You've got background highlights, a very
bright background highlight on the left, a midtone
face, and a black hat.
This is what they put spot meters in cameras for.
I was
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/20 Wed PM 12:41:29 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
Quoting mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
8-))
Justified today. She's got a job interview this afternoon and we pick up
her
new car after
From a late afternoon walk around a nearby pond:
http://www.hemenway.com/HornPond-Summer2005/
Pentax isDS
Jim
--- Jon M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I meant that the harsh conditions would be
primarily jarring and shaking.
Another question that was posed in my original email
was how would you transport the equipment? I'll have
a
Camelbak, so no backpacks... I *could* add a cargo
rack to the
From a late afternoon walk around a nearby pond:
http://www.hemenway.com/HornPond-Summer2005/
Pentax isDS
Jim
I rely upon the multisegment metering a good bit of the time and it
does pretty well, and consistently, in 85th percentile lighting
situation. Just like learning to meter manually, you have to learn
how to use it to best effect. There are times when it is
inconsistent ... a backlit
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some nice shots here. I love the look on the dog's
face in 8341. It's
like, You want me to do what? Fun stuff, Bill.
Paul
You have no idea how much I yearn for a performance
like the aussie in 8341 :-s
Not a bad album, Bill. You could have upped
3) non-Pentax film SLR owners who are interested in going digital and have
no requirement to be compatible with their older equipment - Canon and
Nikon have mindshare and Pentax doesn't. it takes really knowledgeable
sales people and buyers with an open mind to move them to a Pentax DSLR.
On 20 Jul 2005 at 13:58, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
unless the light has changed. That you can't get repeatable results even in
manual mode is disheartening.
How can you not get repeatable results in manual mode?
Because the when the
I'm starting to think I missed the memo that said All Stage Photography
Must Be Done With Grainy B/W Film.
Rob Studdert wrote:
Do you really need to shoot BW at all? Are you going to be personally printing
the BW or will they be sent out for print? All my stage work I now shoot using
the
Yes, you did. g Since the band I'm photographing is a fairly loud
rock and roll outfit, I had planned on using grainy black and white
anyway. But I suppose it depends on the performance, venue, etc. If
I was photographing an orchestra, I might use something a bit more
refined.
On 7/20/05,
On 20 Jul 2005 at 1:12, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Rob - I was always of the impression that multi-segment metering was
smarter than that. I guess it's just some more marketing hype, or
perhaps the differences in the scene were such that it could fool the
meter. It's results like these that
On 20 Jul 2005 at 10:10, Doug Brewer wrote:
I'm starting to think I missed the memo that said All Stage Photography
Must Be Done With Grainy B/W Film.
That was back in the days that it was a virtual necessity because fast colour
film was such crap beyond ISO800 :-)
Rob Studdert
No, Rick, I'm not going to be easy on the camera, and I'll tell you why.
First, camera makers have been touting their technologies as a panacea for
all sorts of situations, which of course I know is just a pile of horse
pucky. Also, a bunch of people here over the years have been critical of
my
On 20 Jul 2005 at 10:15, Scott Loveless wrote:
Yes, you did. g Since the band I'm photographing is a fairly loud
rock and roll outfit, I had planned on using grainy black and white
anyway. But I suppose it depends on the performance, venue, etc. If
I was photographing an orchestra, I
Someone else said that and I was repeating it. Find out who said it and ask
them.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
unless the light has changed. That you can't get repeatable results
even
in manual mode is disheartening.
How can you not get repeatable results in
Hi Shel,
As Rod noted in another message, the multi-segment metering is most valuable
when shooting RAW. In that mode, it seems to be weighted toward avoiding
excessively bright highlights. In RAW conversion it's easy to brighten the
midtones, but you can't save a highlight that's out of range.
- Original Message -
From: wendy beard
Subject: Re: GESO
You have no idea how much I yearn for a performance
like the aussie in 8341 :-s
That one was really quick too.
Not a bad album, Bill. You could have upped the
shutter speed a bit on some of them, but you've gone
in nice
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Subject: Re: The Nine Second Difference
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
unless the light has changed. That you can't get repeatable results even
in manual mode is disheartening.
How can you not get repeatable results in
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens
Subject: Re: Pentax Profits Fall 42%
BTW, the latest issue of Consumer Reports magazine rates the Fui Aladdin
kiosk considerably better than the Kodak Picture Maker.
What criteria are they using for their rating of the two?
Is the Aladdin a
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: The Nine Second Difference
That's so reassuring, Bill.
This is my first time using multi-segment metering. Never again!
It's nice to know that the meter in these cameras can't be relied upon.
I tend to just use center
Well, when Bruce loaned me his istD for a day, we discussed the best way to
expose with the digi. However, this past weekend was a different
situation. The owner of the istDs was shooting JPEG for a couple of good
and understandable reasons (although I am on a small crusade to move her in
the
The 5n has mirror lock up? I don't think I saw that in the manual or on
the camera body.
Of all the features you've mentioned, the only one that I might use
consistently would be spot metering, and MLU when shooting certain
situations. I use a spot meter when using a hand held meter.
Doug Brewer wrote:
I'm starting to think I missed the memo that said All Stage
Photography Must Be Done With Grainy B/W Film.
Doug, it came out right after the memo that said All Street Photography
Must Be Done With Grainy BW Film and just before the one that said
Serious Photography Is
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Putting blind faith in a light meter guarantees non repeatable results.
Don't worry Cotty, I got it! ;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Actually Shel, the meter can be relied on, it proves that the
photographers brain is superior to the cameras brain, it the former is
engaged.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
That's so reassuring, Bill.
This is my first time using multi-segment metering. Never again!
It's nice to know that the
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The 5n has mirror lock up? I don't think I saw that in the manual or on
the camera body.
Not that I know of -- nor double exposure. I guess Tom Reese must've
been talking about features in general, not 5n features in particular.
(The *istD, for what it's worth, in
In my (P)Z-1 and (P)Z-1p,
Use a lot:
multisegment metering in HyperProgram mode
exposure compensation
spot meter with meter lock
Use less:
mirror lock-up
TTL flash (especially for fill)with compensation
auto-bracketing
continuous film advance with servo AF (not much sports
shooting)
Use rarely
Beautiful, Jim. They make me want to get onto Horn
Pond with my canoe, today (just this small problem
having a job...). Where is it?
Rick
--- Jim Hemenway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a late afternoon walk around a nearby pond:
http://www.hemenway.com/HornPond-Summer2005/
Pentax isDS
[Original Message]
From: Tom Reese
This might make for an interesting thread.
OK -- here's a new thread for it.
Features I use the most in
descending order:
used a lot:
spotmeter
mirror lock-up
ttl flash
less often:
double exposure
auto exposure lock
much less often:
Hi,
my wishes came true, although for a different camera than most of
PDML uses ;-)
Somebody (nikon) finally introduced an accessory that was due to be
released 5 years ago... 1.2x magnifier eyepiece for their DSLRs.
Exact ergonomics are yet to be seen (my local nikon rep doesn't
I have (ab)used my LX quite a lot, and it held well against everything I threw
at it (or vice versa g). The moisture and dust resistance is great.
I have had spilled beer and wine over it //usually at concerts, when
you photograph in the front row and rock fans start throwing beer at
the band,
In my case:
Focus
Shutter speed
Aperture adjustment
Shel
[Original Message]
From: E.R.N. Reed
My list:
Use a lot --
Multisegment metering and program (or Hyper Program, depending on the
camera) for grabbing shots quickly
Exposure compensation (especially with the digitals, to
Turned on the TV in Shanghi last night and scrolled thru the channels.
I found the Kung Fu equivalent of the WW Wrestling Federation,
Various soaps (w/good production values)
The shopping channel, and
Ads with advertising a breast enhancement cream.
...Just rub it on for graphic enlargement.
Hi Mark
I consider all of them high quality photos and indeed preferred watching
them instead of reading financial stuff about Pentax.
thanks for the link!
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 1:11 PM
To:
Used almost constantly (virtually every shoot):
Multisegment metering
Centerweighted metering
Exposure compensation
Depth-of-field preview
Hyper-program exposure mode
Manual exposure mode
Autofocus (single shot mode)
Often:
TTL flash
Mirror lock-up/pre-fire
Built-in (pop-up) flash
Rarely:
IR
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/20 Wed PM 02:10:19 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Stage photography
I'm starting to think I missed the memo that said All Stage Photography
Must Be Done With Grainy B/W Film.
I don't know of a source of 1000+ASA slide
Thanks for the comment Frank.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, July 20, 2005, 5:30:40 AM, you wrote:
ft On 7/19/05, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After shooting the Mittens at dusk, We were able to turn around and
look out of the valley at this last display of light. MV, by the
Jostein wrote:
LOL.
Woe the ones to Manor Born.
Btw, anyone remember the TV series with Penelope Keith?
Jostein
To The Manor Born, with Peter Bowles. ca 1979.
Keith Whaley
Herb wrote:
1) new SLR buyers who have never owned any SLR before - i think this market
is negligible, even though John recently bought one this way and found his
way here
I think you're wrong. Digital have recruited many more people into photography
that wasn't into in the film era. Many
lol ... Stick with an MX then. And leave the battery at home... ;-)
Or just set the DS into Manual exposure mode, turn off Image Review,
and use your hand held meter and your eye. Unless you actually want
to learn how to use the features provided, that is.
Godfrey
On Jul 20, 2005, at
Tom wrote:
I think the 645D could turn into something good for the company. Digital
medium format is a market with very little competition. They could make
a lot of money per unit. The trick will be to sell enough units.
Pentax have the potential to be the first affordable MF based
Dag wrote:
I remember reading something very similar to this a few years ago when some
people tried to prove that Pentax would never make a dslr.
Quote from 23/9-02:
I have no idea why anyone seriously thought, as opposed to wished, that Pentax
would sell a DSLR
Herb wrote:
it's a sign that either Pentax wanted terms that Sony didn't like, that Sony
found more willing support in KM, or that Sony was never interested in
Pentax.
...or most likely; Pentax wasn't interested in Sony.
Pål
Godfrey wrote:
That's the key. For me the bottom line is: Make products that are
compelling. If the cameras and lenses are compelling ... and to most
people interested in taking pictures rather than comparing feature
sets, the Pentax DSLRs are compelling ... there will be a market for
Hey gang.
I helped a student in our print room last week in regards to looking into and
aquiring an
inexpensive MF
camera and meter.
He won an auction for a Y-M and a Weston and something else light meters.
When i ran some plans into the print room this morning he gave me a roll of
Scala he
I agree with Bruce ... more details are needed to make the technique work.
BTW, it's kind of a shame to waste the 77's capabilities on this.
Perhaps a more typical portrait is coming soon ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boris Liberman
Interesting idea, Tom. Using a DSLR is quite different from using a
film camera, however, as you can use the facilities of the camera to
ensure that you have gotten what you want immediately, and don't have
to work into the unknown, as it were. I have spent so many years
with CW Averaging
Thanks Rick.
It's in Woburn Massachusetts.
http://www.winchestermass.org/hornpond.html
Jim
Rick Womer wrote:
Beautiful, Jim. They make me want to get onto Horn
Pond with my canoe, today (just this small problem
having a job...). Where is it?
Rick
--- Jim Hemenway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like it. Fun photo!
--
Bruce
Wednesday, July 20, 2005, 5:58:46 AM, you wrote:
AG Hi gang,
AG http://www.flaneur.albanogarcia.com.ar/?p=116#comments
AG Comments here and there welcome...
AG Albano Garcia
AG Photography Graphic Design
AG http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
AG
Don't know what you mean.
I use the Pentax 2x Magnifier FB, which provides a 2x magnification
of the central portion of the viewfinder on the DS for critical
focusing needs. It works very well. I can see the whole focusing
screen with it, although the periphery is a bit distorted and it's
1 - 100 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
