I think I paid $14.00 plus tax for the flash, it's major purpose in life
is to keep me from destroying a more expensive piece of equipment, sort
of the purpose the ZX-M originally had. Now that I no longer own the
ZX-M...
graywolf wrote:
Um...? If the trigger voltage was much too high, and
I don't know, I think they're still using Sony. OTOH, Pentax has teamed
up with Samsung...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: graywolf
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
Which actually seems to be the problem. The istD successor was
supposed to hit the
No.
Barry Rice wrote:
Hey Folks,
I just found an old pentax M 50/2 lens. I've already got a Pentax M50/1.4
and an F 50/2.8 macro.
This 50/2 lens is in good shape, but would need a CLA before it would be
even sellable. Is there any compelling reason to keep this lens? Any secrets
about it,
Thought y'all might like this...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42r.htm
Godfrey
Or perhaps I'm just crazy.
I think you hit the thumb squarely with the hammer there...
Peter Jordan wrote:
There is something strangely satisfying in spending more than the cost
of a replacement on a CLA.
A psychologist would be able to explain better, but it's something to
do with the
On 29 Oct 2005 at 0:38, graywolf wrote:
Back in the 80's when I was trying to make a living with my cameras, I
expected to get 1 great shot out of 12 and that all 12 would be salable
(Which is why I hated weddings there were always duds that were not the
photographer's fault, often of
They're old. Lubricants dry out. It's a very good lens, if you can find
someone to do an inexpensive CLA it's worth it.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Hello all,
Today, I've received my 'new' M2.8/35 mm and the aperture closes
extremely slow. I had just discarded another lens of this type for
On 28 Oct 2005 at 23:32, graywolf wrote:
I bought my first Pentax in 1961 or 62. Pentax has always seemed behind
the times. Yes they actually invented a lot of the neat stuff that made
SLR's better for general photography, but they often licensed those
inventions to competitors rather than
On 29 Oct 2005 at 1:21, P. J. Alling wrote:
I expect that the sensor cover is exceedingly thin, while blue tack
sounds like it would be wonderful for cleaning relatively thick glass, I
may look into it for lenses, I would be afraid of putting too much
pressure on the sensor cover and
On 28 Oct 2005 at 22:31, Patrick Schork wrote:
Here are some test shots from my modification of a SMC-A 50/2
http://istds.blogspot.com/2005/10/modified-smc-502.html
Very cool. :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From what I've seen 3. is also optional...
graywolf wrote:
Well, from my experience to be a financially successful professional
photographer you need three things.
1. A really tough ego.
2. Relentless self promotion.
3. An eye for an image.
All else is optional.
graywolf
Another pic from my trip. I shot a whole heap of these but over a very short
time, I was a bit rushed, now looking back at them there's so much more I could
have done and I'm having great difficulty editing what I did shoot down. Pity
it's the other side of the country :-(
Here's one that I call Too Much Cheesecake Will Shrink Your Head
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/2muchcheesecake.html
The pix that G posted were of my first successful attempt with trap focus.
A very neat feature!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Thought y'all
What lens did you mounted on your DS Shel? (I recognized the hood).
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thought y'all might like this...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42r.htm
Godfrey
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
How did I KNOW you were going to post that one? :-)
Godfrey
On Oct 28, 2005, at 11:53 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Here's one that I call Too Much Cheesecake Will Shrink Your Head
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/2muchcheesecake.html
Thought y'all might like this...
I took a bus into San Francisco today and met Satan incarnate. He was
getting off at the next stop ;-))
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/satan1.html
Comments welcome ...
Shel
Hi ...yes, it was a fine day ;-)) I just finished looking through one of
the SD cards - still have another to view and edit - and I'm a very happy
DS owner tonite. G gave me some exposure advice which ran counter to what
I'd been doing with the camera, and the results were great - much better
Hi Peter,
That was the K135/2.5 ... great lens on the DS, btw ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: P. J. Alling
What lens did you mounted on your DS Shel? (I recognized the hood).
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thought y'all might like this...
That rules. I want to do this too. I have an M50/2 that is a dust
collector.
From Boris' description...
http://boris.isra-shop.com/monocle.htm
and numbering the elements from 1 to 5 left to right...
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/_optics/50f2.gif
...am I removing elements 1, 2,
Next week-end is reserved in the calendar, but I don't think I can
take any week-nights off. :-(
We need to organise at least a meeting point and -time. The rest can
be improvised from there.
Vigelandsparken has been mentioned. I suggest we meet at the parking
lot beside Frognerbadet on
Where did you get so much beer?
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 9:53 AM
Subject: PESO The land of coke
Yes, it must be frustrating - but you can prevent the focal length change by
taping or gluing the focusing ring so that it will not move.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL
Nice stuff Rob. Love the colour of the water. Somewhere down south I imagine!?
When I read the title I had visions of illicit drugs, and I was think
What do you do with cocaine honey? LOL.
Dave
On 10/29/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another pic from my trip. I shot a whole heap
Hi Rob ... good to see you posting pix again. I like this one because of
the way you caught the water. Too many times we see longer exposures which
smooth out the running water and make it look unreal. It's become trite.
I like that you caught the water more like the way it actually looks.
P. J. Alling wrote:
The tokina looks like a pretty good lens. The only gripe I've got
about the photo is that the green leaf below the flower looks to be in
better focus than the flower itself.
Thanks. The tokina was a replacement for the Sigma 28-80 that came with
my old MZ-M - that
Hi Shel,
I must admit I was disappointed when I saw this photo. I was looking forward
to seeing someone dressed as Satan riding a bus. Although there are some bus
clues in the photo they are not prominent enough. There's too much Satan and
not enough bus. Also, I don't like that he's posing for
Thanks a lot, Boris.
Rob Studdart has pointed out the same thing about the missing obtion to
up-size the image. It's very wierd. Even when I do not log in to
www.Flickr.com the different size button is there - on my computer. But
not for all, for some odd reason. Either there's different Flickr
On 29/10/05, graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
Beat you to it, Cotty. HAR!
Mnft, I was asleep (quite literally).
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
...my swan image is available here as well - in two sizes:
http://images5.fotopic.net/?iid=y9ui4moutx=600noresize=1nostamp=1
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Boris Liberman
Christian wrote:
- Original Message - From: graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I deliberately composted it
I've composted many a film image.. ;-)
Christian
One of the advantages of gelatin. Those days are long gone, afaik. 8-)
Did I not already say that there would
be no residue? Try it yourself Rob and
get back to us. Unless you can't get
real blue tack down there in fly heaven.
Is this the time for funny smiling
faces? I never use them.
Don
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 29 Oct 2005 at 1:21, P. J. Alling wrote:
I
I'm sure Microsoft must be building a digital compost heap as we speak...
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I deliberately composted it
I've composted many a film image.. ;-)
Christian
One of the
It doesn't matter any more. I have the
card and the camera has already taken
some incredibly good micrographs. But I
can say for sure that the *ist D I have
here -- serial number 5501200 -- will
not allow changes via the menu unless
there's a card in the slot.
I'll post a picture (or two)
Great!
There are two interesting concerts at Saturday. The first is Anouar Brahem
Trio, a Tunisian Oud playing jazz man, at Kulturkirken at 20:00. There is
also a cool Malian act at Cosmopolite, Amadou Mariam who has collaborated
with Manu Chao (that name may ring a bell for somebody on the
After a night sleep I'm back to zero. The dust is gone, and my self esteem
is too.
I'll do some shooting, and se how it performs.
Now I'm off to Oslo for a week on vacation :-)
Behave while I'm away, folks ;-)
And one more time. Thank you for all constructive suggestions.
Tim
Mostly harmless
I'd sure like to have £300 000 in pocket
change. *And* I'm starting to understand
why some people need these funny smiling
faces on messages.
Those scams are major business and there
seems to be nothing eBay can do about
it. The unwary get caught by the
thousand -- just like the Nigerian
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 29 Oct 2005 at 1:21, P. J. Alling wrote:
I expect that the sensor cover is exceedingly thin, while blue tack
sounds like it would be wonderful for cleaning relatively thick glass, I
may look into it for lenses, I would be afraid of putting too much
pressure on the
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thought y'all might like this...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42r.htm
Godfrey
I do!
I especially like the one where he's pretending one can see anything on
the LCD with it's face pointed at the bright sky!
Unless the DS is different from most, I'd
Rob Studdert wrote:
Another pic from my trip. I shot a whole heap of these but over a very short
time, I was a bit rushed, now looking back at them there's so much more I could
have done and I'm having great difficulty editing what I did shoot down. Pity
it's the other side of the country :-(
On 10/29/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another pic from my trip. I shot a whole heap of these but over a very short
time, I was a bit rushed, now looking back at them there's so much more I
could
have done and I'm having great difficulty editing what I did shoot down. Pity
it's
On 10/29/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thought y'all might like this...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42r.htm
nice hat, shel!
g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 10/29/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took a bus into San Francisco today and met Satan incarnate. He was
getting off at the next stop ;-))
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/satan1.html
Comments welcome ...
i like the smiley face on the lens of his goggle. what a larf!
On 10/28/05, Peter McIntosh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
From my mum's garden. Camera shop scanned negative for me, and the
resultant jpeg left a bit to be desired. I quite like the end result,
though. Gave me a good introduction to Power Shop Pro...
All comments most welcome: I've
On 10/29/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ...yes, it was a fine day ;-)) I just finished looking through one of
the SD cards - still have another to view and edit - and I'm a very happy
DS owner tonite. G gave me some exposure advice which ran counter to what
I'd been doing
On 10/29/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's one that I call Too Much Cheesecake Will Shrink Your Head
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/2muchcheesecake.html
The pix that G posted were of my first successful attempt with trap focus.
A very neat feature!
LOL
a fun shot,
a guy on the Minolta mailing list uses Scotch Magic Transparent Tape. no
thanks.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: Cleaning Sensors
I agree. Never stick *anything*
Hello learned brotherhood,
I'm looking for some detailed instructions on chromatic aberration
correction. Are there any web pages anyone might recommend. Not Ken
Rockwell's pages, please :)
Here's a dull but useful pic I'm working on to teach myself the basics
On 10/29/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the days of film capture image quality pivoted around film and lenses.
Given
that the same film was available to all brands absolute image quality between
brands wasn't a significant issue, the best were all bear equivalent image
makers,
Hi!
That rules. I want to do this too. I have an M50/2 that is a dust
collector.
From Boris' description...
http://boris.isra-shop.com/monocle.htm
and numbering the elements from 1 to 5 left to right...
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/_optics/50f2.gif
...am I removing elements 1,
On 10/28/05, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These were shot at the GBR with my old optio 330 and the matching Pentax
housing OW-P1 or something (good for 130ft - recreational limits)
http://photography.skofteland.net/thumbnails.php?album=6
cool!
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
En kölsche Jong in de PDML, hallo!
I remember that there was a special issue about this lens although I
don't own one, compare
http://stans-photography.info/LongComments.html#35%20mm%20f/2.8%20M
It's not always the aperture blades. I had a slow SMC-K 35/3.5 which I
opened from rear, there
On 10/29/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't know what moved me, but I decided to work with an exposure I
made last fall when I returned home from San Francisco this evening.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42q.htm
Comments, critique, always appreciated.
the
Hi!
...my swan image is available here as well - in two sizes:
http://images5.fotopic.net/?iid=y9ui4moutx=600noresize=1nostamp=1
Jens, sorry to disappoint you, but the birds are how to put it, somewhat
over sized...
Boris
Hi!
Shel, I have a suggestion which is related to your question only
indirectly. When you switch lenses I (humbly) suggest you turn off the
camera... I started doing it about a month ago. I should say that it
does indeed reduce the amount of dust your sensor may be collecting. It
did for
On 29 Oct 2005 at 11:57, Don Williams wrote:
Did I not already say that there would
be no residue? Try it yourself Rob and
get back to us. Unless you can't get
real blue tack down there in fly heaven.
Yes it's Bostik, It had never ever crossed my mind to try the stuff on a lens,
I don't
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:52:59 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gang.
Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the cover
of: Local
paper called
Farm and Rural Life.
I like this as well. Poignant imagery, well executed. Didn't you post a
similar shot several years ago? Was it from the same day? I don't think
it was the same shot, although my memory frequently fails me.
Paul
On Oct 28, 2005, at 11:25 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Bob ...
Why Bob, don't you
On 29 Oct 2005 at 21:58, Derby Chang wrote:
Hello learned brotherhood,
I'm looking for some detailed instructions on chromatic aberration
correction. Are there any web pages anyone might recommend. Not Ken
Rockwell's pages, please :)
Here's a dull but useful pic I'm working on to teach
I haven't really got any pearls of wisdom to share, but if the CA
correction tools in PS aren't working it may be sensor bloom induced
purple fringing.
Here's an extract from a tip Godfrey made about Sept. 21 in a thread
titled Purple Fringing
On Sep 21, 2005, at 3:48 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
On 29 Oct 2005 at 14:13, Boris Liberman wrote:
Could be... I try to keep my mind away from the dust so that it does not
bother me all too much ;-).
The chrome is steadily wearing off my mount to reveal brass so I suspect that a
lot of my sensor dust is actually ground up lens mount.
Rob
I've seen where digital has in some ways raised the bar. To get the
exposure latitude with digital that is inherent in color negative film,
you have to shoot RAW and you have to know what you're doing. For the
time being at least, that means doing it yourself. A few of the
lightweight pros
Cool, a non-flexible SMC lensbaby...
...or is this the Hamilton hack?
nice, anyway!
Pancho
Patrick Schork schrieb:
Here are some test shots from my modification of a SMC-A 50/2
http://istds.blogspot.com/2005/10/modified-smc-502.html
Duct Tape g.
On Oct 29, 2005, at 12:48 AM, graywolf wrote:
Back when I was in the Air Force (60-63) I had a friend that did a lot
of weddings on the side. He had a stereo camera mounted on top of his
Graphic. He used the stereo shots as a dollar builder, back in those
days everyone sold 12 BW
Thanks. So it seems. I too the the same place and with the same lens that
same morning - only they were flying to the right hand side of the scenery.
I wonder why everybody think they are to big. I already made them smaller.
But I can make the even smaller :-)
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
Nice pics. Now we know why soft focus lenses are so inexpensive.
Paul
On Oct 29, 2005, at 1:31 AM, Patrick Schork wrote:
Here are some test shots from my modification of a SMC-A 50/2
http://istds.blogspot.com/2005/10/modified-smc-502.html
On 10/28/05, Barry Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
quite lovely. the blosson almost seems to have some facial features.
my only criticism is that the bokeh (especially the highlights in the
background) seems a bit harsh.
overall, very well done.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Good shots. Love that old Takumar hood on the lens. That's definitely a
Shel hood.
Paul
On Oct 29, 2005, at 2:20 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thought y'all might like this...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42r.htm
Godfrey
It has been suggested that the FA 28-200/3.8-5.6 is actually a Tamron lens.
However, there seem to be several Tamron 28-200/3.8-5.6 models. Does
anyone know if the Pentax lens is indeed a Tamron lens? And, if so, which
specific Tamron 28-200/3.8-5.6 is its sibling? Thanks.
Fred
On 29 Oct 2005 at 14:44, Jens Bladt wrote:
Thanks. So it seems. I too the the same place and with the same lens that
same morning - only they were flying to the right hand side of the scenery. I
wonder why everybody think they are to big. I already made them smaller. But I
can make the even
Not if you want to earn a decent living. Inferior work with a
fashionable twist can get you fifteen minutes of fame, but to earn a
good living as a pro, you have to produce consistently excellent
photography. And that comes from someone who could never earn a good
living as a pro.
Paul
On Oct
HAR!
On Oct 29, 2005, at 2:53 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Here's one that I call Too Much Cheesecake Will Shrink Your Head
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/2muchcheesecake.html
The pix that G posted were of my first successful attempt with trap
focus.
A very neat feature!
Shel
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, skye wrote:
Beautiful photo of the hills, but all the leaves look so uniformly brown.
That's the trouble with leaf flights... difficult to get close
enough to see individual colors. I've got a few at eye-level. They
either had technical issues:
On Oct 29, 2005, at 7:24 AM, frank theriault wrote:
i guess it's only a matter of time before i join the club... g
-frank
Pigs in space.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Toralf Lund Subject: Re: What's
wrong with this picture?
In any case, I've now also done a quick scan of the entire negative
strip. Not a very good one as I used a plain A4 document scanner, but
I think it illustrates the problem
Rick Womer wrote:
Was this roll of film in checked luggage on an
airplane?
Not while it was in my possession, no. But I'm quite sure the film
wasn't manufactured anywhere near the place I bought it, if you know
what I mean. And in this case I also used a shop that will send off the
film
Wel after much self debate over the FA 80-200 or the DA 50-200, i decided on
the latter
and it was
delivered last night.
Small thing. Very light. Hopefully i'll give it a work out today. The sun is
actually
peaking out.
First time this week.
So far the DA 16-45 and now the DA50-200.
I hate this
...now with smaller, flying swans:
http://images5.fotopic.net/?iid=yd5zltoutx=600noresize=1nostamp=1
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. oktober 2005 14:12
Til:
This looks very much like somone opende the camera or the canister
before the film was developed.
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 28. oktober 2005 11:07
Til: Pentax Discuss
I hate this list.vbg
Yeah - vbg.
Fred
On 29 Oct 2005 at 15:17, Toralf Lund wrote:
You mean, of the kind that they tell you is harmless to film?
No X-rays are harmess to film, not according to Kodak documentation anyway.
Did you look at
http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/bilde.php?navn=neg
I didn't really have a clue what the
Rob,
Nice placement of the curve of the falls. Sun angle adds interest by
lighting up every current and eddy. I like the coke color of back lit
water which gives it sort of a 'candy' look.
I, also, agree with those who often prefer your chosen shutter speed
for flowing water.
Jack
--- Rob
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
G gave me some exposure advice which ran counter to what
I'd been doing with the camera, and the results were great - much better
than expected.
Care to share? Compensatory coffee available in London upon
application... ;-)
S
If the AF Unt is cut down as reported (Single cross sensor, new layout
with less frame coverage), it should not exceed the 20d in either
respect. The 20d is a 5fps body with good AF, although the AF unit is
not a match for a full-on Multi-CAM2000.
-Adam
Herb Chong wrote:
i posted earlier
Another quick and dirty pano using 3 disparate files captured using my
old Oly E-10 from a few years back. Again these images weren't shot with the
intention of stitching, I didn't trim this one so that the original but
contorted frames are visible.
I predict that you will like it very much.
Paul
On Oct 29, 2005, at 9:31 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wel after much self debate over the FA 80-200 or the DA 50-200, i
decided on the latter
and it was
delivered last night.
Small thing. Very light. Hopefully i'll give it a work out today. The
Very cool. The shape of the frames complements the shape of the image.
Nice pic.
Paul
On Oct 29, 2005, at 10:17 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Another quick and dirty pano using 3 disparate files captured using my
old Oly E-10 from a few years back. Again these images weren't shot
with the
intention
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Skills - was Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
I guess you should also consider how many shots were expected in an
average
wedding portfolio back then vs what's expected for the average wedding
these
days?
When I was
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
Every DSLRs imposes its own absolute limit
WRT image quality, this has created a significant change in the philosophy
camera body purchase.
Didn't you figure the istD was good for about 45 lppm
Fun. Good to see the man in action!
--
Bruce
Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:20:33 PM, you wrote:
GD Thought y'all might like this...
GDhttp://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42r.htm
GD Godfrey
I think so too. I don't use mine enough.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Peter,
That was the K135/2.5 ... great lens on the DS, btw ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: P. J. Alling
What lens did you mounted on your DS Shel? (I recognized the hood).
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
There's one in both lenses...
frank theriault wrote:
On 10/29/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took a bus into San Francisco today and met Satan incarnate. He was
getting off at the next stop ;-))
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/satan1.html
Comments welcome ...
i
At 01:54 PM 10/28/2005, Boris Liberman wrote:
After some frustrating moments with Photoshop Elements' web gallery
creator (not enough layout options), I have now placed a gallery of
images online from my recent trip to Bridge Day. Here is the link to the
gallery:
That looks more like bloom than CA to me.
Derby Chang wrote:
Hello learned brotherhood,
I'm looking for some detailed instructions on chromatic aberration
correction. Are there any web pages anyone might recommend. Not Ken
Rockwell's pages, please :)
Here's a dull but useful pic I'm
Supposedly it's the second version.
Fred wrote:
It has been suggested that the FA 28-200/3.8-5.6 is actually a Tamron lens.
However, there seem to be several Tamron 28-200/3.8-5.6 models. Does
anyone know if the Pentax lens is indeed a Tamron lens? And, if so, which
specific Tamron
Supposedly it's the second version. However from most accounts the only
reason to get the Pentax over the Tamron is the SMC. OTOH, the later
versions of the Tamron are more compact and are supposed to be somewhat
sharper.
Fred wrote:
It has been suggested that the FA 28-200/3.8-5.6 is
On Oct 29, 2005, at 3:24 AM, keith_w wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42r.htm
I do!
I especially like the one where he's pretending one can see
anything on the LCD with it's face pointed at the bright sky!
Unless the DS is different from most, I'd expect a total
Not bad. I can see how you would have liked to really work this
particular scene. There looks to be many possibilities. Such a
unique coloration. Looks like you had a great trip.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:53:22 PM, you wrote:
RS Another pic from my trip. I shot a
grin And a very appropriate use of a 14mm, says I!
--
Bruce
Friday, October 28, 2005, 11:53:34 PM, you wrote:
SB Here's one that I call Too Much Cheesecake Will Shrink Your Head
SB http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/2muchcheesecake.html
SB The pix that G posted were of my first successful
Good thing he had the name tag. I never would have recognized him.
--
Bruce
Saturday, October 29, 2005, 12:41:09 AM, you wrote:
SB I took a bus into San Francisco today and met Satan incarnate. He was
SB getting off at the next stop ;-))
SB http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/satan1.html
David Savage wrote:
knarF does nature with an urban twist (bad pun intended g).
I likes it.
Dave
On 10/27/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
everyone who's been to gfm will remember this favourite switchback curve:
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
