On 6 Dec 2005 at 18:23, David Mann wrote:
> If you have the appropriate profile installed, and have colour
> management set up in Photoshop, you can activate the Gamut Warning
> which will highlight areas that will be clipped. How accurate that
> is, I don't know.
This method would give a
>>>Some prints will fade in dark storage. A densitometer is really the only
>>>way to measure with accuracy.
>>
>>
>> Sorry Powell, we live on different planets ;-)
On 5/12/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>Cotty's planet is through the looking glass.
>Dark storage fading is real
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 12/5/2005 1:38:56 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simple, really.
John
===
But it took a lot of time and effort to put that explanation together. And
all they did was laugh at one misspelled word.
Pleebians.
Marnie aka Doe
Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bob W"
Have you ever had a volcanic erudtion?
When I was a teenager, I was plagued with skin erudtions for a couple of
years.
The acne of your pulchritude, no doubt.
On Dec 6, 2005, at 7:30 PM, Jon Paul Schelter wrote:
http://forksandhope.com/Africa.html
I don't have the time to read the text or look at all of the bigger
photos, but there are some nice photos in there.
The kitty pics are fine art by definition. The others I really like
are (in no pa
Bob Shell wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2005, at 10:20 AM, graywolf wrote:
>
> > I think a pattern is beginning to appear (not addressed to you
> > specifically, Adam, but in general). Most of the folks who think
> > digital prints look better than optical, actually do not like
> > photographic prints. No
I like the look of premium glossy, but I'm
printing both sides of
the paper on this thing I'm working on so the
double-sided matte is what I'm using.
interesting that "BEST photo isn't
a
graywolf wrote:
>
> Ann, I found the same thing with my 820, and the R200 that replaced it.
> Except I use
As I just mentioned, I went to Kenya and Tanzania for a month...
The gear that I brought with me was:
Pentax *ist DS
2 1G SD cards
Many AA rechargeables, 2 sets of disposable CRV3s
A-50 f1.4
Tamron 70-300
18-55
30G iPod video
The iPod worked well enough, but it has 2 fatal flaws
1 - the battery
You are probably right, Rob.
>From the PDML postings I got the impression, that some lenses are prone to
consistantly causing the camera to (auto)focus behind the centre subject. I
seem to have got that wrong.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Rob Stu
Graywolf, You eyes are probably fine.
I just find it unsatisfying, if the focus is off even when I receive very
clear focus confirmation in the viewfinder.
You are right about the differences in the lighting situation - the first
and the next two shot are almost two weeks apart!
Lens testing is di
Hi everyone,
I've returned from my trip to East africa, I managed to do just about
everything I wanted to - safaris, climbing Kilimanjaro, diving in Zanzibar.
I'm trying to put together a bit of a web site, my hope is to use the
GPS track overlaid on top of a Google maps page, and linked to
Hi Rick,
I like the first two... both are very nice and I would hope that the
musician would ask you for prints of them. Well done!
The third composition, pardon me for saying, makes her look a little like a
caged animal... it feels like she's about to pick up that harp and jam it
down my t
Lovely composition Peter. Like Bruce, I'd wish it to be a little more
sharp. Did you do any unsharp masking at all?
Tom C.
From: Peter Lacus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PAW: Zion Canyon from Angels Landing
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 20
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Fred"
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
I blame this one on Cotty, Bob S, Fred Wasti and Rob Studdert.
You are evil men, the lot of you.
And you're not exactly an innocent babe in the woods, either, Bill
(even if
you are indeed
On Dec 6, 2005, at 5:48 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
FWIW, the files that I bring to the printer are usually a lot
larger than
6.5 mb. The last one was 59mb, and most are in that general range.
Bob's file was a jpeg - 5000x3000 pixels (as he mentioned) is a
pretty decent-sized file. That'd
On Dec 6, 2005, at 6:25 AM, William Robb wrote:
Just ordered my Merry Christmas to Me gift.
Santa will have an extra heavy bag this year, what with trying to
slip an Epson 4800 printer under the tree for me.
Now I just have to learn how to take pictures
I hate you.
Can I order 100 prin
On Dec 6, 2005, at 5:42 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
However, dpi is very commonly used to mean either.
Especially by the marketing departments of printer manufacturers.
- Dave
Hi!
I expect nothing but honesty from you, Boris. I don't think you were
brutal at all.
You simply said what you thought about the photo - I can ask for no
more, or less.
Now if you had said, "that's a bad photo, and I don't like you", I
might be upset...
Frank, if, purely hypothetically,
On Dec 6, 2005, at 4:42 AM, William Robb wrote:
If printing from a scanned 6x7 original, the chicken has to be
facing Pentax HQ in Japan.
With which end?
For 6x7 it'd be the head.
For a digital source, use the other end.
- Dave
In that first photo the bricks in the driveway give a pretty good idea
of the DOF which looks to be about 4 bricks to either side of the rear
bumper of the truck.in the first shot. Looks to me like your focus is
just about right in that shot. The other 80mm 2.8 shots seem to be
focused closer t
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Why I Haven't Yet Switched
Purple Haze, what province is that in?
Mind pollution.
It's universal, not provincial.
b..
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: Re: Why I Haven't Yet Switched
http://www.kenduncan.com/echristmas
I want to hear the Pogues version.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Language - Britian, England, or United Kingdom?
But it took a lot of time and effort to put that explanation together. And
all they did was laugh at one misspelled word.
Pleebians.
I pleeinsanity
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Fred"
Subject: Re: A better 70-200mm F. 2.8
An intersting, though mostly useless exercise is to take a picture of a
ruler that is at an angle to the camera, and see where the focus is in
relation to the chosen focus point.
Why "mostly useless", Bill?
- Original Message -
From: "Fred"
Subject: Re: Yet another enablement.
I blame this one on Cotty, Bob S, Fred Wasti and Rob Studdert.
You are evil men, the lot of you.
And you're not exactly an innocent babe in the woods, either, Bill (even
if
you are indeed "out in the boonies")
In a message dated 12/5/2005 1:38:56 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simple, really.
John
===
But it took a lot of time and effort to put that explanation together. And
all they did was laugh at one misspelled word.
Pleebians.
Marnie aka Doe
I agree most of those scenes are grossly oversaturated. I wonder though if
they are neutral renditions from the film or if they haven't been enhanced
with filters or further manipulated digitally.
Tom C.
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax
Went to a good friends 50th anniversay party last night.
The piper is the son and the couple is, well, Norm and Audrey.
Raw files converted by PSCS ACR2.4. Using the ibook screen so they may be not
100%.
Just friend photos, but comments welcome
Dave
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b
If you have to ask you can't get there...
Tom C wrote:
Velvia always reminds me of the way things looked on Purple Haze trips.
It's a form of reality I quite enjoyed.
William Robb
Purple Haze, what province is that in?
Tom C.
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (sc
> I blame this one on Cotty, Bob S, Fred Wasti and Rob Studdert.
> You are evil men, the lot of you.
And you're not exactly an innocent babe in the woods, either, Bill (even if
you are indeed "out in the boonies").
Fred
> An intersting, though mostly useless exercise is to take a picture of a
> ruler that is at an angle to the camera, and see where the focus is in
> relation to the chosen focus point.
Why "mostly useless", Bill?
Fred
On 5 Dec 2005 at 18:19, Tom C wrote:
> For once I agree with Pal...
>
> It's always been my contention that Velvia looks closer to the way I
> remember the scene than other films (I'm talking about nature/landscape).
> It's
> not a good skin-tone film from what I've experienced. People seem t
Thanks Shel!
Had a lot of fun working with the LX1...
The image stabilization makes long exposures like this a bit easier. :-)
Godfrey
On Dec 5, 2005, at 5:23 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This is a good one from that genre. I like it quite a bit. Good work!
Coincidentally, Marnie aka Doe and
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>William Robb wrote:
>
>> - Original Message - From: "Bob W"
>>
>>> Have you ever had a volcanic erudtion?
>>
>> When I was a teenager, I was plagued with skin erudtions for a couple of
>> years.
>
>The acne of your pulchritude, no doubt.
What zit
I've been working furiously on the movie I'm producing for my digital
video class, so I haven't posted anything of significance lately (so
what else is new?)
But I still read most of what's going on, so don't get any funny ideas!
...or at least not anything weirder than usual.
Anyway, for your ent
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
He flew back to Norway tonight. Took us hours to find a rubber band
big
enough for his propeller.
The worst part was to wind up the helmet with it, really.
Jostein
(still dizzy)
Velvia always reminds me of the way things looked on Purple Haze trips.
It's a form of reality I quite enjoyed.
William Robb
Purple Haze, what province is that in?
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Why I Haven't Yet Switched
For once I agree with Pal...
It's always been my contention that Velvia looks closer to the way I
remember the scene than other films (I'm talking about nature/landscape).
It's not a good skin-tone film fro
Hi,
This is a good one from that genre. I like it quite a bit. Good work!
Coincidentally, Marnie aka Doe and I were recently discussing how to make
such photographs ...
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
> [Original Message]
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
>http://homepage.mac.
For once I agree with Pal...
It's always been my contention that Velvia looks closer to the way I
remember the scene than other films (I'm talking about nature/landscape).
It's not a good skin-tone film from what I've experienced. People seem to
universally comment 'but the picture doesn't d
Mark Roberts wrote:
"P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 5/12/05, Powell Hargrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
Some prints will fade in dark storage. A densitometer is really the only
way to measure with accuracy.
Sorry Powell, we live on diff
Back from NY and processing about 250 or so pictures made with the
LX1 as well as Pentax DS ... takes time! Some of these photos are
proving to be a lot of fun. Hope you like this one...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/47.htm
Comments, critique, flames all appreciated.
enjoy
G
"P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Cotty wrote:
>
>>On 5/12/05, Powell Hargrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>>Some prints will fade in dark storage. A densitometer is really the only
>>>way to measure with accuracy.
>>
>>Sorry Powell, we live on different planets ;-)
>
>Mark!
Sorry,
So far I've counted six of these messages, all time-stamped the same.
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
> [Original Message]
> From: Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 12/5/2005 3:59:13 PM
> Subject: Re: Emailing PUG entries
>
> Hey,
> You beat me to it, Adelheid. :-)
>
>
Thanks Frank ...
Blue was on my lap at such an angle that I couldn't see well to focus and
compose. I had to sort of twist around and get into pretzel-mode to catch
this one. It was as much luck as anything else.
I never expected as many comments, especially positive comments, as has
been gener
Hey,
You beat me to it, Adelheid. :-)
Thanks.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Adelheid v. K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 5:01 PM
Subject: RE: Emailing PUG entries
Themes are in, you can start submitting.
Cheers
Adelheid
PS: please do so
: --
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: Language - Britian, England, or United Kingdom?
Have you ever had a volcanic erudtion?
When I was a teenager, I was plagued with skin erudtions for a couple of
years.
William Robb
The acne of your pulchritude
This list is very bad.
You are all bad people.
Anyway, based on comments I have read, the A* 85/1.4 is a pretty decent
lens.
I managed to snag what appears to be a nice one off eBay. I had thought,
right up until the last moment that I would get it for a nice price too, but
it was not to be.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 5, 2005, at 1:20 PM, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/25November2005/
Canonet_TriX400_14.jpg
Leica?
Canonet, surely?
Whatever. "Rangefinder camera" does just as well.
That it would.
When I was a teenager, I was plagued with skin erudtions for a couple of
years.
William Robb
Most persons' erudition is surpassed by their ignorance. Myself included.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton"
Subject: Re: A better 70-200mm F. 2.8
Hello Jens,
My personal feeling is that the sensor area is larger than we would
like to think. Achieving AF within the sensor bounderies (not visible
to us) is all the system is going to do.
An inters
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: Language - Britian, England, or United Kingdom?
Have you ever had a volcanic erudtion?
When I was a teenager, I was plagued with skin erudtions for a couple of
years.
William Robb
You're right Bill, an effective 600mm with ISO 1600 will be a nice addition.
I hope he is nearby.
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/5/05, Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It appears our son my have a job as a high school band director for next
> school. This makes the *istD a good camera to have. Be
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: 360 dpi
On 5/12/05, Powell Hargrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
Some prints will fade in dark storage. A densitometer is really the only
way to measure with accuracy.
Sorry Powell, we live on different planets ;-)
Cotty's plane
- Original Message -
From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis"
Subject: Re: On-site printing
They need to run an alignment service on it.
This is a technical service call. What has happened is the scanner lens
is slightly off axis, and you are seeing a chromatic aberration.
Are you using black
Hello Jens,
My personal feeling is that the sensor area is larger than we would
like to think. Achieving AF within the sensor bounderies (not visible
to us) is all the system is going to do. Classic problem is when the
sensor area covers something like eyes, nose and ear. One of them
will be in
On 5/12/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Have you ever had a volcanic erudtion?
No but I did have some sismic activity when I was 14 :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 12/4/05, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index5/05_12_bw/index.htm
Great stuff!
The second one (with the "white" tree) has an IR look to it. Is it
some sort of "digital IR" thing? It's very cool.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."
Have you ever had a volcanic erudtion?
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 December 2005 22:54
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: Language - Britian, England, or United Kingdom?
>
> On 5/12/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >E
At 02:48 PM 05/12/2005 , Cotty wrote:
>Sorry Powell, we live on different planets ;-)
Well at least different sides of the same one. :)
Powell
On 12/5/05, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must say I really like this one, frank. I like the slightly OOF bike seat
> and the angle the bike is resting.
A general thanks to everyone who liked this one and made nice comments.
To those who suggested a crop, I kind of like the bike off-c
On 5/12/05, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Erudtion?
I once eruded. Oh how we larfed!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Cotty wrote:
On 5/12/05, Powell Hargrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
Some prints will fade in dark storage. A densitometer is really the only
way to measure with accuracy.
Sorry Powell, we live on different planets ;-)
Mark!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | Peopl
On 12/4/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good shot, although the title had me expecting something different.
> That's not necessarily a negative. But that (apparently empty?)
> styrofoam cup doesn't really say cappuccino to me. The shot stands on
> it's own however. I like it.
Thank
On 12/4/05, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> love this one, Frank :)
>
> looks dangerous!
>
Thanks, Ann. He doesn't ride like that. He was just using his basket
to hold his stuff for a few moments while he was chatting with
friends...
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois conce
On 12/4/05, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice, Frank--nice bit of whimsy and incongruity.
>
> Cropping out the right 1/4 would improve it, methinks.
>
Thanks for the nice words, Rick.
But, surely you mean the left 1/4? I wouldn't want to crop out any of the bike.
cheers,
frank
--
"S
On 5 Dec 2005 at 23:31, Jens Bladt wrote:
> Paul
> >"Back focus" is a term used to describe autofocus that misses the mark
> and locks in behind the subject. I think that it's most often the
> result of operator error. Or at least a product of using autofocus in a
> situation where one should b
On 5/12/05, Powell Hargrave, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Some prints will fade in dark storage. A densitometer is really the only
>way to measure with accuracy.
Sorry Powell, we live on different planets ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|htt
Erudtion?
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: John Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 December 2005 21:37
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Language - Britian, England, or United Kingdom?
>
> Coming late to this, but as Bob W's normal erudtion seems to
> h
Jostein wrote:
a function of how "contrasty" a lens is at open aperture.
I second that.
I have notuiced, that if a quite contrasty part of the image is located near
but not "in" the fucusing point - the camera (*ist D) tends to focus at the
contrasty part in stead of a rather dull object in the ex
On 12/5/05, Michael Spivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank, it's my wife that getting a haircut LOL and i'm the one with
> the camera standing :)
Uh-oh - I'm in deep doo-doo now! Sorry, Michael. With her hair all
matted down with hairdressing stuff like that, who can tell? Now that
I look cl
Paul
>"Back focus" is a term used to describe autofocus that misses the mark
and locks in behind the subject. I think that it's most often the
result of operator error. Or at least a product of using autofocus in a
situation where one should be focusing manually.
This is exactly my perception/
Small? 2104 x 1468 can easily fill you screen!
And yoyu're right - it's probably not the lens (although I had great
problems getting sharpness at all at F 2.8 - F3.5:
It may very well be the AF system.
Yes, I use the term when the lens/camera is focusing further away than it
should - that is behin
I'll be interested to see what you get from it, Juan.
I bought a Panasonic LX1 and took it to NY over the Thanksgiving
holidays, along with the Pentax DS kit. I made a lot of photographs
with the LX1 and find it quite a handy, pocket sized camera. I like
that it has full manual controllabil
Frank,
Thanks for your comments!
Yes, it was Tmax P3200. The scan from Neopan looks so
nice that I'll have to give it a try.
Rick
--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/5/05, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Last year, I posted a photo of a harpist friend
> along
> > w
Thanks for the answers (not too many though--I guess people here have
SLRs, plus the 60 and S60 are quite new)
I ordered an Optio 60 yesterday from buydig.com. The only sample
images I saw from the S60 seemed like they were from a defective
camera. The quality from the 60 seemed quite good for a $
>sometimes, AF is not
the right answer to focusing operations.
True - I'm beginning to realise that - after having used autofocus since my
first PZ-1 days (1992) :-)
Better late than never!
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[
On Dec 5, 2005, at 1:20 PM, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/25November2005/
Canonet_TriX400_14.jpg
Leica?
Canonet, surely?
Whatever. "Rangefinder camera" does just as well.
Godfrey
On 5 Dec 2005 at 15:28, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> LS2000 is very fine scanner for colour slides (E-6). But it is not so good
> for b&w material though - no matter if C-41 or classic. Especially in case
> of classic, silver based b&w materials there's a problem with LED's light,
> which is direct
Someone's in trouble now...
(I'm not sure if it's Frank or not...), oh well, he'll probably never
meet Michael's wife.
Michael Spivak wrote:
Frank, it's my wife that getting a haircut LOL and i'm the one with
the camera standing :)
she didn't like the fact i'm taking the shot and that explain
Thanks Frank. 'Twas just an experiment.
Now if Canon or someone could produce some IS digital binoculars.
Tom C.
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Two from the Concert
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 16:01:4
Frank, it's my wife that getting a haircut LOL and i'm the one with
the camera standing :)
she didn't like the fact i'm taking the shot and that explains the
look in her face :)
On 12/5/05, Albano Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I agree, it's some sort of "David Lynch Moment". I
> like it to
On 12/5/05, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coming late to this, but as Bob W's normal erudtion seems to have taken a
> holiday:
Bob may take vacations, but his erudition never does.
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Thanks much people :)
Yes, it's a Canonet 17 :-)
On 12/5/05, E.R.N. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> >
> > On Dec 5, 2005, at 1:09 AM, Michael Spivak wrote:
> >
> >> http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/25November2005/
> >> Canonet_TriX400_14.jpg
> >
> >
> > It's a
Not sure which one you purchased Bill. The Tamron 28-300 AF used by my
wife, and myself when I can sneak it off her camera, gives generally very
good results. It's a nicer lens than my Pentax 28-200.
Tom C.
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
S
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, the footprints on the carpet are apparently a problem. I fixed them,
straightened out the bedspread, cloned the light out of the mirror and corrected
the barrel distortion. Thanks to all who have helped with this. It's important
to me that I get
thanks for the feedback. Trust me, it would not have been easier to reshoot
:-). It might have been difficult to make the carpet look right under any
circumstances. it's one of those deep pile carpet that shows light in different
ways depending on its crush. Cloning was undoubtedly the best choi
Coming late to this, but as Bob W's normal erudtion seems to have taken a
holiday:
British Isles (n) - a small archipelago off the North West coast of Europe.
Great Britain (GB) (n) - an island, the largest (hence the word "great")
of the British Isles. It contains the nations of England, S
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At least this time, they may have a point.
>http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1000&message=16139935
The point being that they're too cheap to put in overvoltage protection.
Seriously, these days with chip-size switching regulators it's tri
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, William Robb wrote:
They need to run an alignment service on it.
This is a technical service call. What has happened is the scanner lens is
slightly off axis, and you are seeing a chromatic aberration.
Are you using black and white film or monochromatic film?
Tri-X @ +1
On 12/5/05, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last year, I posted a photo of a harpist friend along
> with some other shots from a musical soiree. This
> year I tried a few more, with a bit more light on the
> subject.
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=549685
>
> PZ-1p, FA 24
- Original Message -
From: "Kostas Kavoussanakis"
Subject: Re: On-site printing
Well, the lab I send my B&W to has a Noritsu (must learn the model number)
that I don't like. Although it does very dense blacks, which I really
like, on high contrast edges (eg white hanging line aga
Don spoke:
> Raw Shooter can do a hell of a lot.
But can it rotate an image further than 45 degrees? If it can, would
someone mind enlightening me as to how? It even seems to ingore any
in-camera rotation.
Ciao,
Peter in Sydney
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 5, 2005, at 1:09 AM, Michael Spivak wrote:
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/albums/25November2005/
Canonet_TriX400_14.jpg
It's a photo with a number of strange incongruities in it. The
expressions, the fact that the person taking picture is there with a
L
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Kevin Waterson"
Subject: On-site printing
I have looked at a few printers from Fuji for on-site printing
but none have really grabbed me. Has anybody had any experience
with printers able to print 5x7 and 8x12 that a
Just ordered a Tamron 28-300 for total of 133.50 US. Looking forward to
going out with only 1 lens, and I'm willing to accept a small loss in
quality.
Bill
On 12/1/05, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here Today
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3920286
Kinda cool. Looks eerie, almost spectral...
I like it.
> and
>
> For Frank
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3920324
I have no idea what you're talking about. I
It appears our son my have a job as a high school band director for next
school. This makes the *istD a good camera to have. Between the 1600-3200
ISO and the lens magnification factor I should get some good results. I
well remember when he was in high school and how 400mm wasn't quite enough
Thats alot of work Paul, but the pic looks better. It might be easier
to retake the shot though, rake the carpet first. ;)
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, the footprints on the carpet are apparently a problem. I fixed them,
straightened out the bedspread, cloned the light out of the mirro
On 12/5/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just ordered my Merry Christmas to Me gift.
> Santa will have an extra heavy bag this year, what with trying to slip an
> Epson 4800 printer under the tree for me.
> Now I just have to learn how to take pictures
>
> William Robb
Woo-hoo!
I
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
