Thanks for the information. If it's a common problem I will recheck
the voltage and happily reconnect the metz flash.
On 2/9/06, Leon Altoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Toine,
>
> This is actually a common problem with the *istD. They brought out a
> revised board which should stop the problem h
Dynamic shot, Frank - I really like it. In the tradition of PAW
commentators, I would have cropped the part-person on the left out if it
were mine.
And how come you're avoiding puns, after some of the shockers people have
published recently? :-)
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original
Hi Boris,
I've have the *ist D correction set right to
the end. If my eyes don't change I'll be
okay. But you're quite right; it should go a
bit further, perhaps by another 1.5 diopters?
That might be difficult to achieve from the
design point of view. My problem is now the
other way round.
On Feb 10, 2006, at 6:32 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
interesting, but I may have to report the photographer for
Exclamation Point Abuse.
I! don't! think! you'd! get! far! as! Flickr! are! owned! by! Yahoo!
now!.
- Dave
Hi!
I first heard this from Graywolf a couple of years ago. I think that's
what I have been doing wrong lately, too much touch-up and faff. Sure,
it could be the camera or it could be the lens but I doubt it. Thanks
for the reminder.
Boris, 16-45?
Kostas, that is sensible suggestion. For n
Hi!
I have crappy eyes too. Good contrast when wide open is a big help.
I've not had a K24/2.8 to try. The A24/2.8 is fairly easy to focus for
me, but the FA20-35/4 is actually easier: it's got more contrast wide
open than the A24. The FA35/2 is the easiest ... it's wide-open contrast
is the
I do, sometimes. In my first Petnax years it was my one and only lens.
It is not one of the sharpest primes Pentax have made.
F.2.8: http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p11912811.html
F.4: http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p11912816.html
F.5.6: http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p11912821.html
F.8: http://
Hi!
Get a diopter correction for your viewfinder.
*istD has sufficient diopter correction.
BTW, I have poor eyesight as well, and cannot use the finder in the istDS
and some other cameras while wearing my glasses. But by adjusting the
built-in diopter correction, I can use the camera very w
Tamron SP AF 24-135mm f/3.5-5.6 autofocus lens for
Pentax in excellent condition. It comes with case,
box, manual, hood, front and rear caps. Asking $200
plus shipping.
Tokina AT-X 270 AF Pro II 28-70mm f/2.6-2.8 autofocus
lens for Pentax in excellent condition. It comes with
case, hood, front
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Erickson"
Subject: RE: 31 Ltd and FA* 24 size and weight
All,
Thanks for the comparison info. The dimensions and weights on Boz' site
and
elsewhere only go so far when it comes to comparisons, so the personal
input
is valuable. I have the 24 and
interesting, but I may have to report the photographer for
Exclamation Point Abuse.
On Feb 10, 2006, at 12:04 AM, Juan Buhler wrote:
Via the streetphoto list-- this one is for Frank:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/umdiaumafoto/24763474/in/photostream/
HCB in 1981 (allegedly.) Holding a Mino
Via the streetphoto list-- this one is for Frank:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/umdiaumafoto/24763474/in/photostream/
HCB in 1981 (allegedly.) Holding a Minolta CLE. Frank, isn't that
what you shoot with?
j
--
Juan Buhler
Water Molotov: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
Slippery Slope: http://color.
Excellent shot, Frank. Nothing much to add to that, except that I'd
like to have taken it myself :)
Cheers,
j
On 2/9/06, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or, I could have called it "En Masse Transit", but that might have
> been going too far.
>
> Hope you like it:
>
> http://www.phot
All,
Thanks for the comparison info. The dimensions and weights on Boz' site and
elsewhere only go so far when it comes to comparisons, so the personal input
is valuable. I have the 24 and it's my standard "moderate wide" lens on my
*ist-Ds. I'm pondering how I might use the 31. I'm doing a lot
Hi Juan ...
I had two which were used on film bodies. They were OK. I liked the
size/weight, but image quality is better (sharper, more contrast) with many
other lenses. It's a middle-of-the-road piece of glass. Might be nice on
the digi, though.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Juan Buhl
Especially striking background! Must have used spot meter on blossoms?
As you know, I'm enjoying the same "false spring", in nearby area.
Let's gloat. ;-))
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Paul. I am in the Sacramento, CA region. We have had
> several
> days now in
Ya see, I'm not yet old enough to be proud of it. (Actually I could be
but am too modist)
Jack
--- Fernando Terrazzino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >You could have at least asked off list. :-/
>
> I could, although this way is more fun :oD
>
>
>
> >From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Rep
I think weights are similar (Boz knows). The 31mm limited is solid
and compact, but longer than you would expect. The 24mm is shorter
and wider without the hood. Once you put the hood on, the 24mm gets
kind of big. The real difference is in diameter..the 31mm is 49mm(?)
and the 24mm is 67mm.
Re
Thanks for all the comments everyone!!
It is especially helpful the way you say which ones are the best
(although I must say I was surprised by results), because that helps me
narrow down my collection.
Thanks again!
Bye bye,
Francis
P.S.
I feel kinda silly keeping on posting stuff because I
I got mine from Don, and like it quite a bit. I don't have any photos
from it scanned in at the moment, or I would post one for you. This
lens has replaced both my 50/1.7 and 28/3.5 as my primary in all but
low light situations and those times when I just have to have
something a bit wider. It's
I just got this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7589135445
It seemed at the right price for $50.
Stan's site doesn't have too many comments on it. Anyone using it?
Bojidar's site seems to think it is roughly as common as the M50/2,
but I have never seen one before...
j
--
Good shot, Frank. Love the tonal range and the captured moment. I might
crop out the far left if it were mine. Good stuff.
Paul
On Feb 9, 2006, at 8:01 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Or, I could have called it "En Masse Transit", but that might have
been going too far.
Hope you like it:
http://ww
On 9 Feb 2006 at 18:46, Mark Erickson wrote:
> All,
>
> Can anyone here who has handled both the 31mm Limited and the FA* 24mm
> lenses comment on how they compare in size and weight? I was surprised when
> I saw a photograph of them side by side--they look almost the same size! Is
> that the c
Sold my FA 24, so I don't have it here to compare.Boz's site
will have weights and dimensions. The 24 is broad and slightly
short, the 31 long and narrower.
Joe
You could have at least asked off list. :-/
I could, although this way is more fun :oD
From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Survey Results: How do you do exposure?
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:17:08 -0800 (PST)
Fernando,
All,
Can anyone here who has handled both the 31mm Limited and the FA* 24mm
lenses comment on how they compare in size and weight? I was surprised when
I saw a photograph of them side by side--they look almost the same size! Is
that the case in person?
Thanks,
Mark
Depends. Are you gonna let Cotty drive?
On 2/9/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Loveless"
> Subject: Re: Two high-end Pentax DSLR this year
>
>
> > Uranus?
>
> Lets not go there...
> But if we do, we can go in my Titan.
> WW
>
>
--
Scot
In a message dated 2/9/2006 5:02:42 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or, I could have called it "En Masse Transit", but that might have
been going too far.
Hope you like it:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4107177&size=lg
Comments are always appreciated!
thanks,
In a message dated 2/9/2006 4:43:20 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Taken just outside my home office a few minutes ago. We have had a
couple of spring-like days here and seems to have convinced the
daffodils that winter is over. I rather think not.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-
Bruce, nicely done, except for the proximity of the petal to the top edge &
the two leaf nubs @ the bottom edge - looks like a mistake. I'd probably
crop out about half of the blank space to the left of the flower
Good exposure, focus & nice subject & placement.
Kenneth Waller
- Original M
Good shot, Frank. Love the tonal range and the captured moment. I might
crop out the far left if it were mine. Good stuff.
Paul
On Feb 9, 2006, at 8:01 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Or, I could have called it "En Masse Transit", but that might have
been going too far.
Hope you like it:
http://ww
Ah, that makes sense. I'm used to seeing Daffodils in LA in early
february. And while Sacramento is colder, it's still California. I
somehow thought you were in the midwest. The earliest I've ever seen
Daffodils in Michigan is the very end of March. In New Jersey we used
to get them by St. Patr
Much obliged, Jim. Hopefully it will brighten everyone's day just a
little.
--
Bruce
Thursday, February 9, 2006, 5:06:35 PM, you wrote:
jpc> I enjoy this photo.
jpc> Jim A.
>> Taken just outside my home office a few minutes ago. We have had a
>> couple of spring-like days here and seems
I do rather like it. Certainly gives one a feeling of the hassle of
dealing with a family on mass transit. Nice work!
--
Bruce
Thursday, February 9, 2006, 5:01:01 PM, you wrote:
ft> Or, I could have called it "En Masse Transit", but that might have
ft> been going too far.
ft> Hope you like
Thanks, Paul. I am in the Sacramento, CA region. We have had several
days now in the low 70's - nice and sunny and very spring-like.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, February 9, 2006, 4:51:07 PM, you wrote:
PS> Nice pic. Where are you, Bruce? We're a LONG WAY from daffodils up here
PS> in Mi
I enjoy this photo.
Jim A.
> Taken just outside my home office a few minutes ago. We have had a
> couple of spring-like days here and seems to have convinced the
> daffodils that winter is over. I rather think not.
>
>
> Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X SD AF 400/5.6, Handheld
> ISO 200, 1/500 sec @
I enjoy this photo.
Jim A.
> Taken just outside my home office a few minutes ago. We have had a
> couple of spring-like days here and seems to have convinced the
> daffodils that winter is over. I rather think not.
>
>
> Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X SD AF 400/5.6, Handheld
> ISO 200, 1/500 sec @
I enjoy this photo.
Jim A.
> Taken just outside my home office a few minutes ago. We have had a
> couple of spring-like days here and seems to have convinced the
> daffodils that winter is over. I rather think not.
>
>
> Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X SD AF 400/5.6, Handheld
> ISO 200, 1/500 sec @
I drive a Saturn. An earlier car was a Mercury. That puppy was ~hot~ !
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: William Robb
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Loveless"
> Subject: Re: Two high-end Pentax DSLR this year
>
>
> > Uranus?
>
> Lets not go there...
> But if we do, we can go
Or, I could have called it "En Masse Transit", but that might have
been going too far.
Hope you like it:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4107177&size=lg
Comments are always appreciated!
thanks,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Your shot certainly has a presence. I think it would be quite
wonderful shown really big. Almost like being there. It is simple
and clean.
I have a soft spot in my heart for the Agfa films - OptimaII, Portrait
and Ultra. Were I still shooting film, I probably would have tried to
hoard some bef
Nice pic. Where are you, Bruce? We're a LONG WAY from daffodils up here
in Michigan.
Paul
On Feb 9, 2006, at 7:41 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Taken just outside my home office a few minutes ago. We have had a
couple of spring-like days here and seems to have convinced the
daffodils that winter is
I'm not a Bush basher, but this is VERY FUNNY. I especially like the
suggestion that we sell Canada. It has absolutely nothing to do with
photography or Pentax. Not for dialup. It takes a lot of bandwidth.
http://www.wimp.com/bushcomedy/
Has anyone tested the new D FA 50 f2.8 against the F or FA 50
f2.8 lenses?
Joe
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: Re: Two high-end Pentax DSLR this year
Uranus?
Lets not go there...
But if we do, we can go in my Titan.
WW
On 9 Feb 2006 at 14:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Of the 24 mainly digital responders, 14 said no, they had not changed the way
> they did exposure since switching to digital.
>
> HOWEVER -- this is where I am going to throw in my own conclusions :-) --
> many qualified their nos.
>
> How?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I wonder which body concept they finally settled on for the 645D.
It is a cross between all of them. I suggested such a cross in detail in a
post on PDML at that time. When we finally see the final body I'll dig out
my post and how cl
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_1587.htm
--
This is nice, Bruce. I was wondering if you still had that lens,
since you hadn't posted anything with it for a while.
I'm with the others about the right side, but I would both crop
and clone out stems/leaves.
Joe
I wonder which body concept they finally settled on for the 645D. Initially, I
thought the droopy one looked odd, and prefered the more classical looking ones.
But the back-sloping LCD would be useful (I seriously considered getting the
MZ-S just for this feature, back in my film-only days).
http
Reminds me of the summer I spent in Alaska. My home base was Haines.
During the time I was up there., my driver's license was about to expire.
I went to the Haines branch of the Dept of Motor vehicles and asked about
getting an Alaskan license. No problem - I got one on the spot. No test
was r
I would be very surprised if it's only 8 megapixel. I would guess 10 to
12. But write speed is even more important to me. Big buffer, high
speed write: that's what I want, and I expect to get it.
Paul
On Feb 9, 2006, at 6:20 PM, Cotty wrote:
From what I understand, the 645D will be quite a hit
Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
puh-leeze!
I just joined this list a couple of days ago, which may not enable me to
give a valuable opinion on many matters, but I certainly didn't expect
to be expectator of a soap opera.
Can you guys please let this one go and move on...
Some people think that
Gloater.
Tom C.
>From what I understand, the 645D will be quite a hit. There's a little
market right there, if the price is right. Forget the 6K nonesense.
Street price will be 4300. Bucks or quid, you call. If it doesn't fall
apart, should be a nice piece of kit. That's the high-end DSLR, by th
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:38:59PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Holly Hegeman"
> Subject: Re: OT: Helmut Newton
>
>
> >
> >
> >As a cab driver said to me last year in Phoenix, "I'd rather have a
> >president who lies about getting a blowjob in the Oval O
On 9/2/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Uranus?
Har!
Anyone who likes Arnold Newman is a friend of mine. If we were Klingons,
I'd head-butt you.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Tom C wrote:
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well, we really don't know whether there is or not ... because they
aren't pre-announcing their upcoming products specifically so that
others cannot take advantage of that information.
I understand that rationale, but I'm not too
>From what I understand, the 645D will be quite a hit. There's a little
market right there, if the price is right. Forget the 6K nonesense.
Street price will be 4300. Bucks or quid, you call. If it doesn't fall
apart, should be a nice piece of kit. That's the high-end DSLR, by the
way. Meanwhile, t
Uranus?
On 2/9/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >No mention of a new film body. Bummer.
>
> Scott, I love you dearly but come on, you're from a different planet
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__
> || (O) | Pe
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:01:16PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Tom C"
> >> > Just for the record, anytime I've had a photo published, with the
> > > exception of the small newsletter that gets sent to around 250 homes
> > > where
> > > I live,
I think Scott got the reaction he expected. Point well made.
Jack
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/2/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >No mention of a new film body. Bummer.
>
> Scott, I love you dearly but come on, you're from a different
> planet
>
>
Fernando,
You could have at least asked off list. :-/
I'm somewhat younger than my powder flash.
Jack
--- Fernando Terrazzino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >When I first started shooting, it was with a "Baby Brownie" when I
> was
> >7 or 8 years old. Used full program on that one. ;-)
>
> Kodak
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Technique is what matters. Learn to manual focus by watching the in and out
of focus transitions as you turn the focusing ring, rather than trying to
judge a static image with small, slow movements of the focusing ring. With a
bit of practice, you ca
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 01:24:29PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
> On a somewhat different topic, with the exception of the 3 people on list
> who actually earn a living doing photography, any issues revolving around
> copyright is little more than arrogant bullshit . . .
I'd have to take excep
On 2/9/06 1:38 PM, "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> As a cab driver said to me last year in Phoenix, "I'd rather have a
>> president who lies about getting a blowjob in the Oval Office than a
>> President who lies about the reasons we're fighting in Iraq."
>>
>> It was a memor
On 8/2/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>No mention of a new film body. Bummer.
Scott, I love you dearly but come on, you're from a different planet
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
__
On 9/2/06, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What pisses me is that as a member of the PDML I'm being bundled in with all
>this BS too.
You could do what I did and buy into Canon. At least there, nobody gives
a fart.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastich
Blessed are the feeble-minded. :-)
Tom C.
I've read this entire thread from start to finish and I still haven't
got a clue what it's all about.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I've read this entire thread from start to finish and I still haven't
got a clue what it's all about.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: "E.R.N. Reed"
Subject: Re: Survey Results: How do you do exposure?
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
PRIVATE:
Rats!!
Probably just a bad mouse.
WW
On 9 Feb 2006 at 22:13, John Whittingham wrote:
> > The only problem with that scenario is that the relatively
> > substantial increase in body size required to implement in-camera 2D
> > sensor shifting would run counter to their interest in producing the
> > most compact DSLR bodies in the ma
That's probably not all wrong, Pål - but perhaps it's wishful thinking.
I basically want better image quality (more MP and lower noise) and of
course faster everything (AF, FPS, Write-Speed).
And perhaps flash compensation for external flash (for fill-in purposes). I
am quite happy with the D, but
Shel,
I'll just consider the source on this one... :-)
Tom C.
Gee, Tom, based on your posts in another thread, seems like you've got the
whine market monopolized
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Tom C
> Sorry Bill. You bring the wine and I'll bring the whiskey.
On 8/2/06, Collin R Brendemuehl, discombobulated, unleashed:
>On it's way: A*85/1.4 from Canada. \
Congrats! Welcome to the *real* club ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Paul,
I didn't *insist* on anything in this instance. Not sure why you chose that
word.
I *asked* questions in a very polite and business-like manner and received
answers, in a like fashion, as earlier e-mails suggested we could do. I did
not *insist*. In fact, as we all know, their was no
E.R.N. Reed wrote:
PRIVATE:
Rats!!
Toine,
This is actually a common problem with the *istD. They brought out a
revised board which should stop the problem happening again.
If you want to be sure about the Metz get a volt meter and measure the
voltage across the terminals when the flash is charged. If it is around
6volts tha
They promise serial production in over a year. That means they have
nothing *now*. That is, after 2 years of introducing istD, their R&D came
up with nada, although they had plenty of time.
That's *very* disappointing.
I hope they do better with D645.
best,
mishka
On 2/9/06, Pål Jensen <[EMAIL
> The only problem with that scenario is that the relatively
> substantial increase in body size required to implement in-camera 2D
> sensor shifting would run counter to their interest in producing the
> most compact DSLR bodies in the market.
Who gives a toss, I'd be happy with something the
On 8/2/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>A link somebody sent me to some very good photos:
>
>http://www.paulmellorphotography.co.uk/pmpimage3.htm
>
>Bob
You're not kidding.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
___
Gee, Tom, based on your posts in another thread, seems like you've got the
whine market monopolized
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Tom C
> Sorry Bill. You bring the wine and I'll bring the whiskey.
Sorry Bill. You bring the wine and I'll bring the whiskey.
Tom C.
Rob Studdert wrote:
They aren't cooking a spit roast they are more likely toasting
marsh-mallows
around a camp fire. :-)
I'll bring the graham crackers. William can you bring the chocolate bars?
Smors.
I'm in.
Awful fl
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom C"
>> > Just for the record, anytime I've had a photo published, with the
> > exception of the small newsletter that gets sent to around 250 homes where
> > I live, I have received and been asked to sign what is essentially a usage
> > agreement for
Tom C wrote:
Just for the record, anytime I've had a photo published, with the
exception of the small newsletter that gets sent to around 250 homes
where I live, I have received and been asked to sign what is
essentially a usage agreement for my work, that clearly states
ownership and limitat
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Just for the record, anytime I've had a photo published, with the
exception of the small newsletter that gets sent to around 250 homes where
I live, I have received and been asked to sign what is essential
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Two high-end Pentax DSLR this year
Rob Studdert wrote:
They aren't cooking a spit roast they are more likely toasting
marsh-mallows
around a camp fire. :-)
I'll bring the graham crackers. William can you bring the chocolate bars?
On 9 Feb 2006 at 14:52, dick graham wrote:
> Let the speculation start now. This site thrives on second guessing
> upcoming Pentax products. It seems very likely that it will be an 8 meg
> camera with image stabilization, seeing that the new point & shoot A-10
> offers these specs.
The only
PRIVATE:
First -- thanks. I'd forgotten all about the survey (I did participate,
though, didn't I?) but it makes interesting reading.
Also,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thread went off to discuss Hyperprogram (and differences between it and
Hypermanual) and how Pentax is/was great for coming u
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well, we really don't know whether there is or not ... because they aren't
pre-announcing their upcoming products specifically so that others cannot
take advantage of that information.
I understand that rationale, but I'm not too sure their compe
Rob Studdert wrote:
They aren't cooking a spit roast they are more likely toasting
marsh-mallows
around a camp fire. :-)
I'll bring the graham crackers. William can you bring the chocolate bars?
Tom C.
On Feb 9, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I want to use my K 24/2.8 but my poor eyesight stops me from being
able to focus it properly... I have even harder time with Sigma 18/3.5
but that's beside this story.
I have crappy eyes too. Good contrast when wide open is a big help.
I've
Well, we really don't know whether there is or not ... because they
aren't pre-announcing their upcoming products specifically so that
others cannot take advantage of that information.
Godfrey
On Feb 9, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Tom C wrote:
Uhh... there's a fire? :-)
On 9 Feb 2006 at 14:46, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tom C"
> Subject: Re: Two high-end Pentax DSLR this year
>
>
> > I'm happy to hear they are planning something. It would be nice if *some*
> > details were given, starting with how many mega-pixels the new
Just for the record, anytime I've had a photo published, with the exception
of the small newsletter that gets sent to around 250 homes where I live, I
have received and been asked to sign what is essentially a usage agreement
for my work, that clearly states ownership and limitations on usage of
I agree. Pentax's most recent innovation is the backward-sloping top plate.
It didn't exactly set the world alight, did it? They could have given the
world its first ttl spot metering camera back in the Sixties but backed off
(while confusingly naming it the Spotmatic). If they produce a ful
At 03:03 PM 2/9/2006 -0600, you wrote:
- Original Message - From: "dick graham"
Subject: New High End DSLR Speculation
Or lack thereof.
DG
Let the speculation start now. This site thrives on second guessing
upcoming Pentax products.
Now we also thrive on second guessing
Get a diopter correction for your viewfinder.
BTW, I have poor eyesight as well, and cannot use the finder in the istDS
and some other cameras while wearing my glasses. But by adjusting the
built-in diopter correction, I can use the camera very well without my
glasses. Go figure ...
What's the
- Original Message -
From: "dick graham"
Subject: New High End DSLR Speculation
Let the speculation start now. This site thrives on second guessing
upcoming Pentax products.
Now we also thrive on second guessing Pentax's business practices and
ethics.
William Robb
Uhh... there's a fire? :-)
Tom C. (apologetic)
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: Re: Two high-end Pentax DSLR this year
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 14:46:08 -0600
- Original Message - From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: Two high-end Pentax DSLR
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell"
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
I don't know if I'm one of your three, but regardless of whether one
makes a living from photography or not, copyright is important.
I'm not sure if I follow.
Why is copyright an important issue if
- Original Message -
From: "dick graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Let the speculation start now. This site thrives on second guessing
upcoming Pentax products. It seems very likely that it will be an 8 meg
camera with image stabilization, seeing that the new point & shoot A-10
offers t
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
