I like the new one a little better. It doesn't seem quite as
contrasty, but provides a little more detail. Looking at the crop
issue, I'm thinking it is about right where it is. Any more and you
start to create a different picture. This shot really grows on you.
I find I'm liking it more and
Hello Vic,
The fox is very striking. I'm curious if you did some work on the
background to soften or blur it. It seems just a bit different
looking than the foreground.
The grass is nice, too. I have to agree that many older lenses do
quite well with the digital bodies. I've got a K200/2.5
I'm not sure how many of you watch TV series from the perspective of
photography, but I'd noticed that CSI NY has very photographic approach
to the camera work. All closeups are portrait-like shots.
http://www.cbs.com/primetime/csi_ny/bios/index.php?cast_member=gary
Just my 2cents...
Roman.
On 29/6/06, Debra Wilborn, discombobulated, unleashed:
Help me clean my shelf!
Depends if you'll walk up and down my back in stilettos while I dust.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 30/6/06, Vic MacBournie, discombobulated, unleashed:
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to digital. The grass was taken this
week with the istD and the Kiron 105 2.5 macro. Interesting to see what
those old lenses can do
Op Thu, 29 Jun 2006 23:15:21 +0200 schreef Pedro [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Pedro,
snip
With digital photography taking over the market, is the MX a complete
dead end? If anything goes wrong, will it still possible to get service
and replacement parts in Europe? If I buy extra lenses, will they
The MX is a great camera, probably y favorite Pentax of all times.
Also, the 50mm 1.7 lens you have is not only an excellent lens, but it
is definitely suited for street photography. It's actually my
preferred focal length for that, but don't take my word for it: HCB is
said to have used 50mm
Igor Roshchin wrote:
When they were removing my wisdom teeth some 1.5 years ago, I
was pleasantly surprised that the surgeon was using X-ray system
that produces digital images. (Not to mention that I got a copy of the
images for myself.) At about the same time, the regular large
X-ray
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/29 Thu PM 07:36:22 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: maybe FS Friday
mike wilson wrote:
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/29 Thu PM 05:27:45 GMT
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject:
At 04:20 PM 30/06/2006, Vid Strpic wrote:
Earlier this year, I was in hospital for some time. They also took some
X-rays. I was fascinated to see that they use ortho film for that...
and when I was back home, i looked the images on my lightbox. Oh my.
It was wonderful. But maybe I'm just an
Dave continuing to ignore
On 6/30/06, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Pedro wrote:
Hi,
[ ... ]
Anyway, I am mostly interested in trying street photography and macro.
Currently I have a basic 50mm lens (f1.7), which is not especially
suited for neither...
I happen to have a 2X Macro Focusing Teleconverter that I intend to
sell (but I haven't tried very
On 6/30/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/6/06, Vic MacBournie, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://homepage.mac.com/sonpix/Vicspics/PhotoAlbum61.html
That fox is a stunning shot Vic. Absolutely gorgeous.
What he said.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
At any rate, perhaps a comparison with Canon or Nikon would be more
relevant. I've noticed that both these producers offer 50s that are
considerably less expensive than the FA50/1.4.
Canon and Nikon both produce very low cost 50mm lenses in the f/1.8
and f/2 range. While they're not
Vic MacBournie wrote:
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to digital. The grass was taken this
week with the istD and the Kiron 105 2.5 macro. Interesting to see what
those old lenses can do on film and digital...
I am not sure if this has been discussed, sorry if it
has, but I found it really interesting:
The other day I discovered this site that lets you
publish a photo book and share the benefits with them:
http://www.lulu.com
BTW, I discovered it looking to our Juan Buhlers
blog:
Boy Pedro, have you come to the right place...
If it makes you feel any better, I have the *ist D so I'm well into the
digital world but I also recently bought an MX for very little. I've since
bought a couple Pentax M-series lenses on Ebay or this list (28,3550MM).
So, You're not alone on
On Jun 30, 2006, at 4:20 AM, Vid Strpic wrote:
Well, maybe it would be better for me to shuddup now. But I won't.
Earlier this year, I was in hospital for some time. They also took
some
X-rays. I was fascinated to see that they use ortho film for that...
and when I was back home, i
At 01:35 AM 6/30/2006, you wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:44:42 -0700
From: Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list - Just wanted to say that lurking on this list recently was a
big factor in my decision to stick with Pentax and get a *ist DL for
my first dSLR. (And to go for the
Great photo of the fox.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Vic MacBournie
http://homepage.mac.com/sonpix/Vicspics/PhotoAlbum61.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I tend to try and make things somewhere around the 800x600 size since there
are probably still some of you out there who are running that monitor
setting...
Remember though, nobody likes to scroll
CW
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent:
Hello and welcome.
Have you seen the FAQ and the Frapper map? http://www.frappr.com/pdml
Cory
Atlanta, GA
- Original Message -
From: Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:44 PM
Subject: Hi, list
Hi list - Just wanted to say that
Jack,
I think the original is perfect the way is is.
I wouldn't worry about adjusting it at all.
Great picture.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/29/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm now forced to confess that the focus is several inches short.
I'm, also, now free!
OKAY, there is one more
Stan,
Reduce the picture's dimensions with re-size.
Apply some un-sharp mask correction.
Make sure the size is small enough.
The picture is never as good as what you have a home,
but it's what you can share!
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/29/06, Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joining this
Vic MacBournie wrote:
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to digital. The grass was taken this
week with the istD and the Kiron 105 2.5 macro. Interesting to see what
those old lenses can do on film and digital...
Comments
Hi Roman,
I've watched a lot of movies to see how the DP and the cinematographer
frame their shots, and also pay attention to lighting.
Your subject references movies, but your message is about TV ... generally,
lighting and framing are less creative and interesting with TV images, imo.
Interesting observation, Bruce. Looking again, it seems the transition
from focused to OOF is a bit abrupt and rough.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
The fox is very striking. I'm curious if you did some work on the
background to soften or blur it. It seems just a bit
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/30 Fri PM 12:13:21 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Portraits in movies
Hi Roman,
I've watched a lot of movies to see how the DP and the cinematographer
frame their shots, and also pay attention to
Toralf Lund wrote:
At any rate, perhaps a comparison with Canon or Nikon would be more
relevant. I've noticed that both these producers offer 50s that are
considerably less expensive than the FA50/1.4.
Canon and Nikon both produce very low cost 50mm lenses in the f/1.8
and f/2
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Bob Sullivan wrote:
On 6/29/06, Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joining this discussion late, but...
Back when, I posted a few shots to the PUG. What stopped me from doing
more is how bad my photos looked, to me, on the PUG compared to the way
they looked in their
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
[Original Message]
From: Bruce Dayton
The fox is very striking. I'm curious if you did some work on the
background to soften or blur it. It seems just a bit different
looking than the foreground.
VM
But my rent is under $500 for 4 rooms and it isn't going up
becuse i'm old
so hey, I'm pretty happy here.
WOW - that's one hell of a deal for your location!
Glad you solved your camera dilemma. :)
Amita
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
My guess is that the initial prairie cross roads location was in a S.D.
like location.
Cornfield could have been any number of places.
Jack
--- Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Exactly what I thought of! Great shot.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Did
Bob,
Not really much chance I'll 'adjust' it. While I'm keeping track of it
in storage, any further use is open to events.
Comments much appreciated.
Jack
--- Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack,
I think the original is perfect the way is is.
I wouldn't worry about adjusting it at
Nor do I!
Thank you.
Jack
--- cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tend to try and make things somewhere around the 800x600 size since
there
are probably still some of you out there who are running that monitor
setting...
Remember though, nobody likes to scroll
CW
- Original
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This'll enhance your software:
http://www.enzyte.com/
Thank goodness for the PDML. But don't be hard-on Mike, Shel.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
This'll enhance your software:
http://www.enzyte.com/
Shel
[Original Message]
From: mike wilson
Never mind the lighting and framing, I want some of
the enhancing software your CSI labs have.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yes, great shot of a beautiful animal. I like the grass as well, but might have
liked it better as a vertical.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great photo of the fox.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Vic MacBournie
It's in Spanish, but still there are some samples
('muestras'), showing the SR on and off:
preview:
http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/pentax-k100d,1_2561
samples:
http://images.quesabesde.com/camaras_digitales/noticias/pentax_k100d_estab_off_1-20seg.jpg
Amita Guha wrote:
But my rent is under $500 for 4 rooms and it isn't going up
becuse i'm old
so hey, I'm pretty happy here.
WOW - that's one hell of a deal for your location!
Glad you solved your camera dilemma. :)
Amita
--
Amita - two words: rent control
(Moved in here with
Myself, I find the CSI shows have the cartoon effect going on. I
really don't like the way they look and as a result don't watch them.
DaVinci's Inquest (and later, DaVinci's City Hall) look fantastic.
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/30 Fri PM 01:38:03 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Portraits in movies
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This'll enhance your software:
http://www.enzyte.com/
Thank goodness for the
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/30 Fri PM 01:32:28 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Portraits in movies
This'll enhance your software:
http://www.enzyte.com/
Shel
8-) If it makes me look like the guy at the top, I'll pass.
WRT CSI,
A small problem:
My Flash Trax only accepts CF cards.
In order to use it with my *ist DL, I need an adapter, so I can download my
SD card into the Flash Trax using the CF card connection.
Are there adapters made for this, please?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
--
No virus found in
samples:
http://images.quesabesde.com/camaras_digitales/noticias/pentax_k100d_estab_off_1-20seg.jpg
http://images.quesabesde.com/camaras_digitales/noticias/pentax_k100d_estab_on_1-20seg.jpg
Impressive.
a video of the preview, curious al least:
From: Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/30 Fri PM 02:02:59 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: K100D preview with samples
It's in Spanish, but still there are some samples
('muestras'), showing the SR on and off:
preview:
The 50 f1.2 preforms way better than the 50 f.1.4 and 50 f1.7 at f1.2.
The same can be said for the f1.4 vs. the f1.7 at f1.4.
Toralf Lund wrote:
At any rate, perhaps a comparison with Canon or Nikon would be more
relevant. I've noticed that both these producers offer 50s that are
considerably
The page runs Javascript and has no default URL for those with
Javascript turned off, or more likely a bogus page as a placeholder.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Vic MacBournie wrote:
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken a few years ago
with an LX and my 200 f2.5 scanned to
Wouldn't replacing a floppy with a harddrive be hardware enhancement?
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This'll enhance your software:
http://www.enzyte.com/
Shel
[Original Message]
From: mike wilson
Never mind the lighting and framing, I want some of
the enhancing software your CSI
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/30 Fri PM 02:41:46 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT:SD-CF adapter
A small problem:
My Flash Trax only accepts CF cards.
In order to use it with my *ist DL, I need an adapter, so I can download my
SD card into
Indeed there are. Not sure where to find them though.
-Adam
Jens Bladt wrote:
A small problem:
My Flash Trax only accepts CF cards.
In order to use it with my *ist DL, I need an adapter, so I can download my
SD card into the Flash Trax using the CF card connection.
Are there adapters made
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
I don't think that anyone would argue that the tonal range of a digital
X-ray is as good as a film X-ray -- but they're meant to be functional,
not to be pretty.
At my wife's office they still use film X-rays, but the office is
paperless, and at the back they have a
David Savage wrote:
At 04:20 PM 30/06/2006, Vid Strpic wrote:
Earlier this year, I was in hospital for some time. They also took some
X-rays. I was fascinated to see that they use ortho film for that...
and when I was back home, i looked the images on my lightbox. Oh my.
It was
yeah, like fractal design image resampling/resizing, enchancing... patented
legally unavailable as a freeware...
mike wilson wrote:
Never mind the lighting and framing, I want some of the enhancing software
your CSI labs have.
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
I've bought this one a few days ago (not yet received).
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7631434709rd=1sspagename=STRK%3AMEWN%3AITrd=1
Dario
Jens Bladt wrote:
A small problem:
My Flash Trax only accepts CF cards.
In order to use it with my *ist DL, I need an adapter, so I
Very interesting, thanks for posting it.
Though looking at the menu interface, I'm crossing my toe's, fingers,
arms etc.. that the K10D has dedicated buttons/dials for white balance
drive mode as per the *istD. But I guess I could get used to it if
worse came to worst :-)
Dave
On 6/30/06,
On 6/30/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never mind the lighting and framing, I want some of the enhancing software
your CSI labs have.
My absolute favorite CSI moment is when they enhanced a 6x4 print to
determine who took the photo from the the reflection in the subjects
eyeball.
I
In a message dated 6/29/2006 11:00:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I put a link at the bottom of both pics so you can click between the two
for easy comparison. This one is closer to my original vision, and was
made when I wasn't tired and more of a mind to take my time
In a message dated 6/23/2006 10:47:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/taxi1.html
Something a little more conventional
Leica M2, 35mm Summicron (4th Version), some kind of med speed Fuji film.
Comments, crits welcome ...
Shel
Thanks for the welcome - I just added myself. I'm surprised how few
people there are listed in southern California... I didn't expect to
be the only one in San Diego.
Cheers,
-mike
On 6/30/06, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello and welcome.
Have you seen the FAQ and the Frapper map?
In a message dated 6/29/2006 9:48:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello pdml,
Pentax *istD, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 180mm, Monopod
ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/nationals_0176.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
===
Great action shot. Right
Fri Jun 30 06:15:05 EST 2006
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Jun 30, 2006, at 4:20 AM, Vid Strpic wrote:
Well, maybe it would be better for me to shuddup now. But I won't.
Earlier this year, I was in hospital for some time. They also took
some
X-rays. I was fascinated to see that they
In a message dated 6/29/2006 9:46:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello pdml,
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/6.7
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3175.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
Very nice, Bruce. The lightening is great. I wish
In a message dated 6/29/2006 5:09:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You seem to be trying to invent a genre unto yourself it seems.
I'm finding these pictures to be a little repetitive, and a little too
minimalist.
Technically, they look fine, but the aesthetic leaves me
Adam Maas wrote:
Ran across one of these today. Anybody know what camera it fits?
Bojidar's page doesn't list it, but it mostly fits the BG-10 description.
It fits the *ist film SLR. It isn't as well made as the BG-20, made for
the MZ-S
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Ran across one of these today. Anybody know what camera it fits?
Bojidar's page doesn't list it, but it mostly fits the BG-10 description.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The patents will have expired by now.
I was at SIGGraph when Michael Barnsley earned the emnity of
the computer graphics community by turning his technical
presentation into a content-free commercial pitch for his
new company. Since then I have refused to have anything
to do with any software
I think you won't get used to it as much as realize how much faster and
easier it is to use.
Compare --
-You never have to move the camera so that you can see the top
-You never have to change your hand positions
-You use one control to perform the operation instead of two
-You barely even
It fits the *ist film SLR. It isn't as well made as the BG-20, made for the
MZ-S
Carlos
I made another typo, how typical of me. What I wanted to say is that it
isn't as well made as the BG-10, made for the MZ-S
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Last night, while walking among the shining colorful shop windows of Milano
Marittima and its summer night life, I've been hit by this view
http://www.dariobonazza.com/misc/misc14i.htm
Uncropped.
Comments welcome,
Dario
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Sorry, here is the English version of that page:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/misc/misc14e.htm
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 7:22 PM
Subject: PESO: A strong one (maybe)
Last
Shel,
Missed your orig post.
I believe I prefer the second. Margenially brighter, especially in the
sky. Power lines virtually gone.
I personally think the scale of the children in the setting is a major
reason it works so well. Even sought the comfort of some shade.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dario,
Powerful depiction. Very flat, however, and slightly lacking in detail.
IMO, mother exposure is just right, but sign message might be made
more available to those able to read it.
Individuals in background facing away add to the lonesome sorrow.
Jack
--- Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
I am not sure if this has been discussed, sorry if it
has, but I found it really interesting:
The other day I discovered this site that let’s you
publish a photo book and share the benefits with them:
http://www.lulu.com
BTW, I discovered it looking to ‘our’ Juan
Adam Maas wrote:
Ran across one of these today. Anybody know what camera it fits?
Bojidar's page doesn't list it, but it mostly fits the BG-10 description.
GIYF :)
(Google is your friend)
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=detailskw=PEBG20is=REGQ=O=productlistsku=277622
It's for
Carlos Royo wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
Ran across one of these today. Anybody know what camera it fits?
Bojidar's page doesn't list it, but it mostly fits the BG-10 description.
It fits the *ist film SLR. It isn't as well made as the BG-20, made for
the MZ-S
Carlos
Thanks!
-Adam
This was taken a couple of days ago. I have cropped it in some, but
liked the surroundings around it to give it a sense of place.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/6.7
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3173a.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
It's the grip for the *ist film camera.
Adam Maas wrote:
Ran across one of these today. Anybody know what camera it fits?
Bojidar's page doesn't list it, but it mostly fits the BG-10 description.
-Adam
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
Looks good even on my crappy monitor. Even though the bird is not dead
center I might somehow crop so it was not AS close to center.
Heron of some kind?
Tom C.
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - A bird
That's a nice shot. No twigs. No catchlights...
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Dayton
Sent: 30 June 2006 19:31
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - A bird
This was taken a couple of days ago. I have cropped
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Juan Buhler
Sent: 30 June 2006 08:50
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: bought an MX - need some advice
The MX is a great camera, probably y favorite Pentax of all times.
Also, the 50mm
David Savage wrote:
On 6/30/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never mind the lighting and framing, I want some of the enhancing software
your CSI labs have.
My absolute favorite CSI moment is when they enhanced a 6x4 print to
determine who took the photo from the the reflection in
For sale (I have reduced the prices of several items since my last For
sale message):
SMC Pentax-A 15 mm. 3.5, , an excellent ultra wide lens, compatible in
all exposure modes with Pentax DSLRs, LN- 550 euros.
SMC Pentax-A 50 mm. 1.2, the fastest lens Pentax has ever made, in A
version
Jens Bladt wrote:
A small problem:
My Flash Trax only accepts CF cards.
In order to use it with my *ist DL, I need an adapter, so I can download my
SD card into the Flash Trax using the CF card connection.
Are there adapters made for this, please?
Regards
I have seen such adapters in
On Jun 30, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
Yep. Prices around here are higher, as usual, but in relative terms
the
situation is not that different. I think the Nikon may be bit
closer to
the Pentax (and further away from the Canon) in price than indicated
here, though...
I took
On Jun 30, 2006, at 10:46 AM, Carlos Royo wrote:
Jens Bladt wrote:
A small problem:
My Flash Trax only accepts CF cards.
In order to use it with my *ist DL, I need an adapter, so I can
download my
SD card into the Flash Trax using the CF card connection.
Are there adapters made for this,
Vic -
Exquisite fox (great light - love the slight backlight, composition,
exposure), wonderful grass (composition, exposure)
Well done!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Vic MacBournie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Two pics
Here are two very different images. The fox was taken
My wife I have noticed that all 3 CSI shows - N.Y.,Miami Las Vegas -
pay alot of attention to the photography. They all have their unique style.
I seem to recall a press piece a while ago talking about the specific
efforts the producer (?) went to, to give each show a unique photographic
Bruce Dayton wrote:
This was taken a couple of days ago. I have cropped it in some, but
liked the surroundings around it to give it a sense of place.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/6.7
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3173a.htm
Comments welcome
Any film camera is not a future purchase at this point in time. The
MX is a wonderful camera, reminds me a lot of the Nikon FM I used for
20 years, but it's not something for which to consider a future.
That said, if you enjoy working with film, stock up on your favorite
emulsions and go
On Jun 29, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I wish one could shuffle the items in a menu so that the
one's you are apt to use
are near the top...
At least in the Pentax, if you know the items you need to use are
near the bottom you just press the up arrow after the menu button...
I did a quick Giggle search on sd cf card adapter and 5,400,635 hits came
up.
Shel
[Original Message]
My Flash Trax only accepts CF cards.
In order to use it with my *ist DL, I need an adapter, so I can
download my SD card into the Flash Trax using the CF card
connection.
Are there
A pro friend of mine just advised he has around 150 rolls of 35mm Velvia for
sale @ $4.00 each.
Contact me if interested and I'll supply details
Kenneth Waller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
For sale (I have reduced the prices of several items since my last For
sale message):
SMC Pentax-A 15 mm. 3.5, , an excellent ultra wide lens, compatible in
all exposure modes with Pentax DSLRs, LN- 550 euros.
SMC Pentax-A 50 mm. 1.2, the fastest lens Pentax has ever made, in A
version
On Jun 29, 2006, at 8:56 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I wish one could shuffle the items in a menu so that the
one's you are apt to use
are near the top...
At least in the Pentax, if you know the items you need to use are
near the bottom you
I have some cropping room, I play around a little more as both you and
Tom have mentioned it. Thanks for the comment.
--
Bruce
Friday, June 30, 2006, 12:44:41 PM, you wrote:
C Bruce Dayton wrote:
This was taken a couple of days ago. I have cropped it in some, but
liked the surroundings
Vic. You have a great backyard.:-)
Both are great shots and i like them both, but the fox is my fav.
Well lit and the pose is nice.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Vic MacBournie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Two pics
Here are two very
A pro friend of mine just advised he has around 150 rolls of 35mm Velvia
for
sale @ $4.00 each.
Contact me if interested and I'll supply details
Kenneth Waller
Ken, this is Jack Davis. E-mail me offlist.
JD
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Very nice shots, Vic. The fox is amazing.
The .Mac slideshow requires javascript. If you just want to see the
photos without javascript, the following URLs should work.
http://homepage.mac.com/sonpix/.Pictures/Vicspics/Foxweb.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/sonpix/.Pictures/Vicspics/grass.jpg
Igor Roshchin wrote:
Talking about aesthetic side of the question, -
back in 40s-70s, in the Soviet Union and probably other east-european
countries, X-ray films were used to record western music smuggled in.
Hi Igor, can you point me to a reference about this? I'd be interested
in knowing
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
