On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:46:37PM -0700, Brendan MacRae wrote:
>
>
> --- Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > John Francis wrote:
> >
> > > These shots (which many here have seen before)
> > were taken using a monopod
> > > and the monster zoom. In fact a good number of my
> > motor
Hi all,
Has anyone had an istD CLA'd? Mine seems to need some attention. The
plastic display cover is cracked, and I suspect the focus is not as
accurate as if should be--probably because of my playing around with
the focusing screen.
How is the process of sending a camera to Colorado? What is
Sorry - I got the subject line wrong (forgot my glasses).
But neverthe less - a K1000D would be interesting too.
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. september 20
There's a world of difference.
The K1000 was a very basic camera. It had what is necassary - nothing more.
An excellent beginner/student camera. Basic and reliable.
Not even a DOF preview stop down (Well, I know it did - but
unintentionally).
The K10D is loaded with extraordenary features. Two new
Mark Roberts wrote:
> Adam Maas wrote:
>
>
>>I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
>>International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame from
>>the airshow
>>
>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/246978599/
>>
>>And larger for non-Flickrites:
>>
>>http:
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Well, while out looking for leaves that might be photogenic, which meant
> that part of the time at least I would be scanning the ground I saw
> this. It looked interesting so I took a few shots bracketing around
> it. While looking at it I decided it was worth at least a
My guy at the Blacks at Atrium on Bay will match Camera Canada, so
that's where I normally buy. Shocking to find a Black's with clueful
staff though.
-Adam
David J Brooks wrote:
> I bought a few high ticket items from Joe last year as well as this.
> That price of Canada Camera might come do
I'd consider it, but I can't see a potential crop here, other than
taking a bit off the top, and I wanted some sky in the shot.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I like the dynamics of the shot very much.
>
> I'm not so crazy about the burned out white circle of the sun...
> It might stand some
David Savage wrote:
> Adam Maas wrote:
>
>>>I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
>>>International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame from
>>>the airshow
>>>
>>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/246978599/
>>>
>>>And larger for non-Flickrites:
>>>
>>>h
Matt Kelch wrote:
>>
>>>I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
>>>International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame from
>>>the airshow
>>>
>>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/246978599/
>>>
>>>And larger for non-Flickrites:
>>>
>>>http://static.flick
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Very cool shot, in spite of the Nikon .
>
Thanks Bruce.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Doug Franklin wrote:
> Adam Maas wrote:
>
>
>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/246978599/
>>
>>And larger for non-Flickrites:
>>
>>http://static.flickr.com/98/246978599_8fcecda000_b.jpg
>
>
> Awesome shot, Adam.
>
>
>>'twas with my Nikon F3 though.
>
>
> I guess we'll forgive you.
>
Than
Thanks Paul.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Great shot. Just superb.
> Paul
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
>
>
>>I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
>>International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame
>>from
>>the airshow
>>
>>htt
Or 4fps, a steady hand and the willingness to burn film ;-)
Thanks
-Adam
Jack Davis wrote:
> Extremely well caught! Very eye watering type of shot. Takes experience
> enhanced skill.
>
> Jack
>
> --- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot
Scott Loveless wrote:
> On 9/17/06, Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On 9/17/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>I was winging the settings as there isnt one on the 220 for
>>>transparancies.
>>
>>Not related to your question, but how do you like the 220 for
>>general-purp
I like the dynamics of the shot very much.
I'm not so crazy about the burned out white circle of the sun...
It might stand some cropping to balance that a little better.
Godfrey
On Sep 18, 2006, at 5:21 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
> In
> 3. Train a squirrel to operate the shutter button
Nuts to that!
John Celio ;)
--
http://www.neovenator.com
AIM: Neopifex
"Hey, I'm an artist. I can do whatever I want and pretend I'm making a
statement."
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:25 PM, Ken Takeshita wrote:
> On 9/18/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Via DP Review discussion board...
>> http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2006/09/body-size-k10d-vs-k100d.html
>
> Hmm, that's a fair size and heavy (710g), although still relatively
> compact wit
Adam Maas wrote:
> >I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
> >International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame from
> >the airshow
> >
> >http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/246978599/
> >
> >And larger for non-Flickrites:
> >
> >http://static.flickr.com/9
That sounds right.
Paul
On Sep 18, 2006, at 11:04 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Thanks, again!
> Seems like Mark's went for $611.(?)
>
> Jack
>
> --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> No, I wasn't considering the grip. If you have the grip start at
>> $400, grip included. I put a first bid
Beautiful lighting. I like the placement within the frame, but would
the light angle have allowed you to move around to the left enough to
have just separated the large and small fungi? Would, also, have moved
A little weight toward the center.
Thanks for the look!
Jack
--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL
Thanks, again!
Seems like Mark's went for $611.(?)
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I wasn't considering the grip. If you have the grip start at
> $400, grip included. I put a first bid of $400 on my *ist D plus
> grip. Got plenty of bids, and it went for $666. I thin
--- Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Francis wrote:
>
> > These shots (which many here have seen before)
> were taken using a monopod
> > and the monster zoom. In fact a good number of my
> motorsports shots were
> > taken with the 300/f2.8 (with or without the 1.7x
> AF adapter
On 9/18/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
> >http://www.alphoto.com/gateway/page1.htm
>
>
> They're all good but 06021 stands out for me.
Agreed!
Mike
--
Remember to Breathe -- MichaelHamilton.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
P
Very cool shot, in spite of the Nikon .
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, September 18, 2006, 5:21:12 PM, you wrote:
AM> I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
AM> International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame from
AM> the airshow
AM> http://www.f
Adam Maas wrote:
>I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
>International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame from
>the airshow
>
>http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/246978599/
>
>And larger for non-Flickrites:
>
>http://static.flickr.com/98/246978599_8fc
On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> http://www.alphoto.com/gateway/page1.htm
>
> Beautiful, ListMeister. Good use of the lighting. :-)
>
> --
> Thanks,
> DougF (KG4LMZ)
Doug,
Thanks, Doug.
Doug
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
No, I wasn't considering the grip. If you have the grip start at
$400, grip included. I put a first bid of $400 on my *ist D plus
grip. Got plenty of bids, and it went for $666. I think Mark's MZ-S
brought a similar amount.
Paul
On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Good informati
I like it. Nice work.
Paul
On Sep 18, 2006, at 8:35 PM, Mitch Conant wrote:
> I reworked The Sentinel with some inspiration from Paul and 2 pints of
> Oatmeal Stout . I cropped the subject a little tighter in this shot
> (thanks for the suggestion Paul). I also increased the contrast
> slightly
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Just got back from taking the dog for his afternoon walk. Looking for
> something that would fit this month's PUG theme. Unfortunately fall
> photos seem to be out. we're far from Peak Leaf season here. However I
> saw this, which struck me as the Harley Davidson that Ro
Sez I: "Hey, here is a picture of my new camera!"
Sez she: "Oh, you bought a new camera!?!"
Sez I: "No, I haven't bought it yet. I asked Mitch a couple of months
ago to make sure he got one in for me as soon as it is available."
Sez she: "How much? $1500?"
Sez I: "No, it will be less than that. Mi
I bought a few high ticket items from Joe last year as well as this.
That price of Canada Camera might come down a tad, if you'v bought
before.
Save over 300$ on mt VR 70-200 over Henrys.
Dave
Quoting Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ooh, so we get the good pricing too.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> D Br
Well, while out looking for leaves that might be photogenic, which meant
that part of the time at least I would be scanning the ground I saw
this. It looked interesting so I took a few shots bracketing around
it. While looking at it I decided it was worth at least a PESO. So
here it is.
htt
Mitch Conant wrote:
> I Like it, but I always liked the stuff that borders on the ethereal
> (sp?)...
>
> Nice shot!
>
> Mitch
>
> Adam Maas wrote:
>
>
>> I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
>> International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame fro
Extremely well caught! Very eye watering type of shot. Takes experience
enhanced skill.
Jack
--- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
> International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame
> from
> the airshow
>
Dave,
One thing that goes a long way to making a good impression (at least for
me) is to not have spelling errors and typos in your listing description.
You only get one chance to make a good impression ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: David J Brooks
> Despite my spelling and otherwiz
Thanks Paul and Shel.
Despite my spelling and otherwize Santa Clause look, i am an honest guy.
I'm the typical Canadian who apologizes to the person who stepped on
my foot.:-)
Heck i sent out hats to people i never met before.LOL
Dave
Quoting Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's much
Good information, Paul.
Didn't know it was possible to set a minimum "first bid" by specifying
such to eBay? I, also, like that idea better than a "reserve".
Does your suggested price range include the BG10 Grip?
Thanks for help!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I generally
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.alphoto.com/gateway/page1.htm
Beautiful, ListMeister. Good use of the lighting. :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 9/17/06, Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/17/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was winging the settings as there isnt one on the 220 for
> > transparancies.
>
> Not related to your question, but how do you like the 220 for
> general-purpose photo printing? I'm think
Some people feel that they'd like to see some seller feedback. Depending
on circumstance I might prefer to see some seller feedback, but in truth,
you should be just fine.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: D Brooks
> I have 7 good feadbacks on Ebay, all for buying, none for selling. No
> on
John Francis wrote:
> These shots (which many here have seen before) were taken using a monopod
> and the monster zoom. In fact a good number of my motorsports shots were
> taken with the 300/f2.8 (with or without the 1.7x AF adapter) or the big
> zoom, and I almost always use a monopod with them
Adam Maas wrote:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/246978599/
>
> And larger for non-Flickrites:
>
> http://static.flickr.com/98/246978599_8fcecda000_b.jpg
Awesome shot, Adam.
> 'twas with my Nikon F3 though.
I guess we'll forgive you.
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma
It's much better if you have seller credentials, but you have to
start somewhere. Buyer feedback is better than nothing. I would buy
from a solid 7.
Paul
On Sep 18, 2006, at 7:50 PM, D Brooks wrote:
> I have 7 good feadbacks on Ebay, all for buying, none for selling. No
> one on the list seems
Doug Franklin wrote:
> Kenneth Waller wrote:
>
>
>>As I have posted here several times - I've had a Stylus Photo printer since
>>around 97, a 2000P for several years & for the last several months an R220.
>>I always use Epson inks, always turn off the printers @ the machine & have
>>gone for as
Great shot. Just superb.
Paul
On Sep 18, 2006, at 8:21 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
> International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame
> from
> the airshow
>
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/246978599/
>
> And large
Kenneth Waller wrote:
> As I have posted here several times - I've had a Stylus Photo printer since
> around 97, a 2000P for several years & for the last several months an R220.
> I always use Epson inks, always turn off the printers @ the machine & have
> gone for as long as several weeks witho
At 12:14 AM 19/09/2006, Charles Robinson wrote:
>On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17, David Savage wrote:
> > Seriously though, there are more important thing in life.
> >
>
>Oh, I know that.
>
>But I wt it! Isn't that a good enough reason?
LOL
Is for me. That's why I'll be getting one. ;
At 01:12 AM 19/09/2006, mike wilson wrote:
> >
> > From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > For those of you who insist that quantum mechanics apply at the real
> > world level, please send me a quart of quantum foam, I want to use it as
> > a battery. Reading too much SF lately .
>
>That would
At 12:16 AM 19/09/2006, you wrote:
>On 9/18/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/18/06, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Charles, we really have a lot of other things that we need to spend
> > > money on, and you have a perfectly good camera..."
>
> > Seriously tho
I Like it, but I always liked the stuff that borders on the ethereal
(sp?)...
Nice shot!
Mitch
Adam Maas wrote:
>I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
>International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame from
>the airshow
>
>http://www.flickr.com/ph
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 08:26:20PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> >I recommend finding a hobby that also involves large outlays, but
> >adds in the element of danger. Motorcycles, for example.
>
> In fact, it's good to take up an expensive, dangerous hobby in which
> you h
Ooh, so we get the good pricing too.
-Adam
D Brooks wrote:
> HAR.
>
> Camera Canada is taking orders for the K10D at $1049.00 Canadian.
> Henrys wants $1099.00
>
> Dave
>
> Quoting Cameron Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>Dynamic range!
>>
>> Or is it smooth gradations?
>>
>>At any rate,
I reworked The Sentinel with some inspiration from Paul and 2 pints of
Oatmeal Stout . I cropped the subject a little tighter in this shot
(thanks for the suggestion Paul). I also increased the contrast slightly
(thanks Oatmeal Stout).
I like the results, especially getting that distracting gre
Doug Brewer wrote:
>I recommend finding a hobby that also involves large outlays, but
>adds in the element of danger. Motorcycles, for example.
In fact, it's good to take up an expensive, dangerous hobby in which
you have no interest and no intention of pursuing. That way you can
"reluctantly
Quoting Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Cotty wrote:
>
>> On 18/9/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>> Cotty's on the right track, but we need to expand a bit on his logic.
>>> Buy stuff you'll never use. Heck, even buy stuff you don't want.
>>>
Quoting John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:08:34PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> Hmm.
>>
>> I don't have a spouse to try to wheedle for extending the budget. I
>> simply have to be responsible to myself and my bank account.
>>
>> My partner just shrugs and says, "As
I just got my film back from the 13 rolls I shot at the Canadian
International Air Show on Labour Day. This is by far the best frame from
the airshow
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/246978599/
And larger for non-Flickrites:
http://static.flickr.com/98/246978599_8fcecda000_b.jpg
'twas with m
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 04:08:34PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Hmm.
>
> I don't have a spouse to try to wheedle for extending the budget. I
> simply have to be responsible to myself and my bank account.
>
> My partner just shrugs and says, "As long as you can pay your share
> of the rent
On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 18/9/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Cotty's on the right track, but we need to expand a bit on his logic.
>> Buy stuff you'll never use. Heck, even buy stuff you don't want.
>> Hold on to it for a while and then sell it. Let's
Just got back from taking the dog for his afternoon walk. Looking for
something that would fit this month's PUG theme. Unfortunately fall
photos seem to be out. we're far from Peak Leaf season here. However I
saw this, which struck me as the Harley Davidson that Roy Rogers would
have ridden.
On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:11 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Nice lighting Doug.
>
> Dave
Thanks Dave. Credit for the lighting goes to the museum.
Doug
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
HAR.
Camera Canada is taking orders for the K10D at $1049.00 Canadian.
Henrys wants $1099.00
Dave
Quoting Cameron Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Dynamic range!
>
> Or is it smooth gradations?
>
> At any rate, congrats to Pentax for releasing what looks to be a simply
> splendid camera with the
On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Cotty wrote:
>
>
> They're all good but 06021 stands out for me.
Appreciate it, Cotster. That's probably my fave too.
Doug
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have 7 good feadbacks on Ebay, all for buying, none for selling. No
one on the list seems interested in my daughters istD, so i'm thinking
of ebay.
Is there a negative side if you only have buyer feedback as opposed to
buyer/seller feedback.
Just curious.
Dave
Quoting Paul Stenquist <[E
Thanks, Paul. You can get a Merc Indy Pace Car of your very own here:
http://www.rmauctions.com/FeatureCars.cfm?SaleCode=CC06&CarID=r134
Doug
On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nice work. I like the subtle lighting. I didn't know they had a '58
> Mercury Indy 500 pace car
I did a couple of adjustment layers with the Curves tool, left a
little vignetting in to give it some 3D feel.
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/4950837-lg-gdg.jpg
A quick job, not perfect, but illustrates the direction I'd likely go
with it.
If you'd like, I could put the Photoshop CS2 file
I generally avoid setting a reserve. Instead, I set a first bid that
reflects my absolute minimum. I get more bidders that way, and the
ebay charges are less. For an MZ-S I would probably set it at $300 to
$400, depending on how bad I wanted to sell it.
Paul
On Sep 18, 2006, at 7:24 PM, Jack
On 9/18/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Via DP Review discussion board...
> http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2006/09/body-size-k10d-vs-k100d.html
Hmm, that's a fair size and heavy (710g), although still relatively
compact with comparable competitions (not by much). Some weight may
fee
Thanks,
I've written the description and shot a couple 1.3 meg images (wife's
Canon A10) that will work, I suppose.
I find I always have my hand up asking for help. Think I now have an
experienced eBayer located.
Absolutely like new, both in appearance and operation, MZ-S and BG10
Grip. What do you
Hmm.
I don't have a spouse to try to wheedle for extending the budget. I
simply have to be responsible to myself and my bank account.
My partner just shrugs and says, "As long as you can pay your share
of the rent..." ;-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
Kostas,
This is another top posting, so you may not read it. :)
What means; "Yes, the q is still there"?
In my usual fog!
Thanks!
Jack
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > My initial message identified the LX, A*300 f/2.8 w/T/C and
On Sep 18, 2006, at 2:19 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Via DP Review discussion board...
> http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2006/09/body-size-k10d-vs-k100d.html
In other words, it's an altogether larger camera ... the grip makes
it bigger still ... but compared to an EOS 1D, it's still a
flyweight
It's not too difficult. I've bought and sold quite a few things via
Ebay. Lay out everything clearly, simply, use a decent photograph of
what you're selling, and be wary of suspect contacts.
Godfrey
On Sep 18, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> I'm thinking of putting my MZ-S on eBay. I'v
May be smart assed, but not urban.
(Actually I was referring to a private joke)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kenneth Waller
Sent: 18. september 2006 00:52
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subje
Mark Roberts wrote:
>Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> They did "put the solution in." Or rather, they took the cause out. They
>>> eliminated the aperture ring.
>>
>>Problem is the "solution" above does not apply to the lenses one
>>already own
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> They did "put the solution in." Or rather, they took the cause out. They
> eliminated the aperture ring.
Problem is the "solution" above does not apply to the lenses one
already owns.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http:/
Not in the least, Joe. I suspect it happens more than we know, but, who's
to say they've not been continually working on changes for months? I'm
sure the cameras will be released with a good working version of the
firmware, which is readily and easily upgraded should the need arise.
Pentax seems
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> They did "put the solution in." Or rather, they took the cause out. They
>> eliminated the aperture ring.
>
>Problem is the "solution" above does not apply to the lenses one
>already owns.
Why would you want to appl
Hi Joe,
Sounds like a nice trip.
You can send your 21mm to the Lens Spa here @ Casa Belinkoff, where it will
be pampered, given plenty of sunshine, and not used to make any difficult
photos.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Joseph Tainter
> My DA 21 is a tired little pup. I'll have to rest
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006, Jack Davis wrote:
> My initial message identified the LX, A*300 f/2.8 w/T/C and Provia
> 100F.
I had read that (despite the top-posting)
> J maybe I should have let you make up an answer for Kostas, huh?
Yes, the q is still there:
> --- Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTEC
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Hey, you can drink milk directly from the bottle, walk around in your
> underwear, and fart as much as you want ...
>
> Shel
Man! Now THAT's important!
Keeps the smile on your face on a cold Winter night, it does...
keith whaley
>> [Original Message]
>> From: David Sav
Ted Beilby wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion Godfrey. A little snap might help, curves not
> sure how to do it. Still learning PS.
>
> Mike, It is a replica of an american design from the Travel Air Company.
> Built to race. contemporary of the GeeBee, etc. The H1 was a later design.
Trav
Dynamic range!
Or is it smooth gradations?
At any rate, congrats to Pentax for releasing what looks to be a simply
splendid camera with the K10D - at an amazing price - let's hope it
lives up to the specs. And that the new 2.8 hyper-super-sonic zooms are
equally reasonable.
And is it just m
You are missing the fact that the holes in this case is not in
molecules but in crystals having energy gaps corresponding to certain
energy levels, so they can move around a bit and get excited by both
phonons (e.g, thermal) and photons. Now, lets all jump into
reciprocal space to look at
Charles Robinson wrote:
> "Charles, we really have a lot of other things that we need to spend
> money on, and you have a perfectly good camera..."
>
> :-(
>
> Looks like my "save up the moonlighting money for a K10D" plan just
> got shot full of holes. I'm bummed. Even though I know she's
This is an exceptionally useful thread.
I try to relate the kit to her grandchildren. Thus the 300m FA was
ideal for candid pics of them playing in the garden taken from the
house. The 12-24 was useful for close ups without them being aware
that they were in the frame.
The K10D is easy, the SR wi
Den 18. sep. 2006 kl. 22.27 skrev Cotty:
> On 18/9/06, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Cotty's on the right track, but we need to expand a bit on his logic.
>> Buy stuff you'll never use. Heck, even buy stuff you don't want.
>> Hold on to it for a while and then sell it. Let's s
I routinely make a DNG copy of my PEF's to CD, and I haven't been able to
detect any loss of quality as a result. The advantage of a 2030% reduction
in storage requirements seems significant to me!
The converter from Adobe will do the whole lot for you quite automatically,
but it is important t
Cotty wrote:
>You like birds.
>
>You want to shoot some wide angle shots up close with your *ist D / Ds /
>Dl / K100D / K10D right next to the nest with remote operation from your
>position up to 100 metres (330 feet) away.
>
>How do you do it?
1. Radio remote
2. Fabricate an extra-long cable rel
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:55 AM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
>
>>> Pentax is reportedly still finalizing the firmware as we speak
>>
>> Does anyone else find this worrisome? Since dealers have been given
>> availability dates, Pentax's engineeers and code writers will be
>>
Via DP Review discussion board...
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2006/09/body-size-k10d-vs-k100d.html
--
Mark Roberts Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Especially since they mis-read the specs for the AF assist beam,
and fitted a high-powered nose-mounted laser instead ...
I think Sarah Jane has the only remaining model, though.
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 01:54:18PM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> There was supposed to be a K9 as well, but tests s
All about DNG ... probably comments on every question you have about DNG
and some you've not even thought about. Barry is a proponent of the DNG
concept and, by coincidence, is also a Pentax user.
http://www.barry.pearson.name/articles/dng/
Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 18/9/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>http://members.shaw.ca/richardbhill/birds.html
LOL
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
Yeah, that caveat's been posted in a few venues. However, there are now
quite a few programs that allow processing or conversion to DNG files,
including Pentax's free program.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: skye
> I think it was the digital asset management book that said one reason
> you
On 9/18/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You like birds.
>
> You want to shoot some wide angle shots up close with your *ist D / Ds /
> Dl / K100D / K10D right next to the nest with remote operation from your
> position up to 100 metres (330 feet) away.
I'd build my own remote cable release.
The "Pétomane" factor
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bob W <
> all at the same time.
> > Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
> > Hey, you can drink milk directly from the bottle, walk
> > around in your underwear, and fart as much as you want ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.n
Damn. Who told you!
-- Original message --
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 18/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Once I even had to submit to a strip search.
>
> Come on Paul, you requested that ;-)
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
>
There was supposed to be a K9 as well, but tests showed it to be a dog
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: P. J. Alling
> > but some people want more advanced features
> >and more mpx's, so the K19D was introduced.
> >
> Seems Shel has special inside information.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
1 - 100 of 235 matches
Mail list logo
