On Jan 4, 2007, at 2:48 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2007, at 11:13 PM, David Mann wrote:
>
>>> What's a MOSFET?
>>
>> A small explosive.
>
> Israeli secret service?
Not quite :) I was alluding to the dozens of times I've seen/heard
these things explode when something goes wrong in a proto
On Jan 5, 2007, at 3:10 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> Also, one PCB etching tank. Big enough to do your own motherboard,
> if you have the intestinal fortitude. Same deal as above.
I need one of those, but I suspect it'll be cheaper for me to buy one
locally.
Or I could use the Mrs' new fish ta
On Jan 4, 2007, at 12:01 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> I find it very convenient to have just plain stereo. Even with DVDs
> and all these multi channel sound tracks I get certain degree of
> reality. Of course 5+1 or 6+1 setup of similar quality would do
> better, but it will be real big PITA to ha
On Jan 4, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Bob W wrote:
> When you come over here, Frank, you can hire one. Obviously you won't
> be able to drive on the proper side of the road, so I will happily
> chauffeur you around the byways and villages of Olde Englande...
>
> http://www.theopenroad.co.uk/static_228.htm
On Jan 3, 2007, at 5:30 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Interesting. What scanner are you using?
Minolta Multi Pro. The time I gave was a bit of a guess as I don't
sit there with a stopwatch, but I do scan at 3200ppi using dICE and
4x oversampling. Without those it'd be an order of magnitude faster.
On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>
>> On 3/1/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>> Note, I am not trying to add anything useful to this discourse.
>>
>> Mark.
>
>> From the 2005 quotations list:
>
> "This comment is not designed to add useful discourse
On Jan 4, 2007, at 2:29 AM, Toine wrote:
> My latest enablement is a F135/2.8 unfortunately with lots of
> fungus inside.
> Has anyone hands-on experience with disassembling a F135/2.8 lens?
Use a hammer. Do it outside to prevent the fungus from spreading
into your other equipment.
- Dave
On 1/5/07, Peter Loveday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Check out this lens.
> > Wounder what the pics would be like?
> > http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Raytex-PL42-Pinhole-optic-lens-for-Pentax-screw-
> > mount_W0QQitemZ220067263758QQihZ012QQcategoryZ44751QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
>
> I've got one of these. K
> Check out this lens.
> Wounder what the pics would be like?
> http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Raytex-PL42-Pinhole-optic-lens-for-Pentax-screw-
> mount_W0QQitemZ220067263758QQihZ012QQcategoryZ44751QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
I've got one of these. Kind of fun... the pics look like a pinhole more
or less un
Hello everyone,
I'm looking for a set of Pentax Auto Bellows, or more specifically bits
of one to use in building a franken-lens for really close closeups (from
8 mm to 1mm filling the frame of a K10D). (Don't suggest I use a
microscope, I've tried several options along those lines and they all
I'm using W2K All the power of WinXP just as stable, No stupid Microsoft
tricks. (At least no more stupid Microsoft tricks than Win98). It
works well, with no muss or fuss. A rarity in the high tech world. Of
course Adobe no longer writes software that supports it.
William Robb wrote:
> ---
I've known Betty for many, many years. She is an absolute hoot.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/betty.html
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Happy Birthday Gift ;-).
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> I'll wait until the lens is
> released and see how it performs on the camera. Oh, foolish me
Egads! Empiricism rears its ugly head! :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
For my $.02, it would be stronger without the black thingy border on the
bottom.
YMMV
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Russell Kerstetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Jesus Rocks
>A guy at work wanted me to take a few pics of his Jeep for a video of
> his church's la
Check out this lens.
Wounder what the pics would be like?
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/Raytex-PL42-Pinhole-optic-lens-for-Pentax-screw-
mount_W0QQitemZ220067263758QQihZ012QQcategoryZ44751QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
mmm 2 liner, copy and paste twice :)
James
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
A guy at work wanted me to take a few pics of his Jeep for a video of
his church's last trip to Moab. I thought this one turned out to be
pretty neat, I like the lines and colors. You can see me, but I have
not decided yet if that is good or bad.
http://www.avocadohead.com/piclinks/IMGP2408.html
Well, I thought I had sold this before the holidays, but the highest
bidder was from a fraudulent account, and eBay cancelled my auction
after it ended. Too bad, also, because I was very happy with the $500
that was bid. Alas, it's up on the block again.
Probably more for interest than anything
On Jan 4, 2007, at 14:24, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> I don't get what you mean by the lens "always" being wide open.
>>
>> If you have a smaller aperture selected via the aperture ring, the
>> lens will stop down when the shutter trips - regardless of whether or
>> not you've metered for that possi
On 1/5/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Savage wrote:
>
> >At 11:31 AM 5/01/2007, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> >>
> >>Digital Image Studio wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 05/01/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> Holy Man!!!
> That lens has 18!! elements in 14 grou
David Savage wrote:
>At 11:31 AM 5/01/2007, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>>Digital Image Studio wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/01/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Holy Man!!!
That lens has 18!! elements in 14 groups.
Thats 28 air/glass interfaces, and 8 glass/glass interfaces.
Of course. But I'm quite confident that it will be a good one. When
was the last time Pentax released a premium lens that wasn't top
shelf? Yet, we're going to spiral into another list panic because of
a post on a chinese site of pics that allegedly came from a Tokina
lens. How absurd.
Paul
They've built some dogs as well ;-)) (I remember the infamous Bow-Wow
Takumar that, by some strange set of circumstances, produced a series of
great photos for me, some of which had been published). However, I'm
neither going to speculate nor judge, rather, I'll wait until the lens is
released and
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: Glimpse of DA*50-135? Tokina 50-135mm lens review
> Yes, We can be sure that a company that has built some of the world's
> greatest lenses has now gotten it completely wrong:-).
Well, let's withold judgement on that until we
Tom!(?)
J
--- Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those still shooting film of the slide variety, I received a note
> from
> Fuji advising that Velvia will again be made available.
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mail
Yes, We can be sure that a company that has built some of the world's
greatest lenses has now gotten it completely wrong:-).
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 05/01/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Holy Man!!!
>> That lens has 18!! elements in
You just failed theology 101. Stick to photography.
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 9:19 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>>
>> From:
>> Adam Maas
>> John Sessoms wrote:
From:
frank theriault On 1/3/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just one side point... neither purgatory or a burning hell are
I'm reserving my judgement until I see a side by side comparison with the
FA* 80-200mm f2.8.
Dave
At 11:31 AM 5/01/2007, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>Yes, We can be sure that a company that has built some of the world's
>greatest lenses has now gotten it completely wrong:-).
>Paul
>On Jan 4, 2007, at
I have one of these that I won in the same contest. This camera has a
Leica lens as well. The zoom has a 10X optical range. It will take
you from the 35mm fov equivelant of 30mm to 300mm. It's an excellent
camera. Here's a pic I shot with it:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=50976
>
> From:
> Adam Maas
> John Sessoms wrote:
>>> From:
>>> frank theriault On 1/3/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just one side point... neither purgatory or a burning hell are
taught by the
Bible. So yes a strange, in fact, false logic.
>>> Indeed!
>>>
>>> The concept of purga
I would up your sensitivity. ISO 100 is slow for on
camera flash. I would start at 200 and go up from
there.
-Brendan
--- J and K Messervy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use the bounce card but usually have my iso set to
> 100.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brendan MacRae" <[EMAIL PROT
Actually, Gentec is about 10 Km's from work.
All i need is a confirmation they can do the work.
Dave
Quoting Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe there was an earthquake in India?
> Norm
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
>> Arggg.
>>
>> Sorry, but i need to vent here.
>>
>> First it was Pentax
I know you'd call me back.
Eh?:-)
Dave
Quoting Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe there was an earthquake in India?
> Norm
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
>> Arggg.
>>
>> Sorry, but i need to vent here.
>>
>> First it was Pentax for poor returned phone calls, but i could always
>> reach so
Every report I've seen said that Tokina lenses would not share SMC
coatings
-
Since Pentax and Tokina manufacture separately, this is probably
correct. Tokina's lenses sometimes have weakness in flare control. But
for the 10-17, Tokina advertises a coating on the outside of the front
eleme
* I noticed the RTF flash can be used in 2nd-curtain sync. That's
pretty cool. I don't remember it was possible with the D.
* VERY obvious to know how to set a Flash exposure compensation. First
time I see Pentax "promoting" this feature.
Yes, it is good to have for the rtf flash. The PZ-1p also
On 05/01/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Holy Man!!!
> That lens has 18!! elements in 14 groups.
> Thats 28 air/glass interfaces, and 8 glass/glass interfaces.
> Consider that when you judge it's flare resistance in what can only be
> described as a torture test.
>
> OTOH, my old
Kenneth Waller wrote:
>> When in the Navy, as a Sr. corpsman,.
> Keith, thank you for all you did for our country.
>
> Kenneth Waller
Thank you, sir!
My pleasure indeed!
keith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: "J and K Messervy"
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
> Thanks for that reply mate.
>
> I find it annoying that it doesn't expose correctly in p-ttl and with the
> camera in auto mode. Surely that is the basic requirement for them to get
> right? Oh well, I'll
- Original Message -
From: "Lawrence Kwan" Subject: Re: Glimpse of DA*50-135? Tokina 50-135mm
lens review
>
> , has
> there been any previous SMC lenses with this poor flare control?
Holy Man!!!
That lens has 18!! elements in 14 groups.
Thats 28 air/glass interfaces, and 8 glass/g
On 1/04/07 8:22 PM, "Adam Maas", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There aren't K mount
> versions of any of the shared designs.
That makes sense :-).
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I like it. Can't say why exactly, but I do.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/5/07, Ralf R. Radermacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012
>
> As always, your comments and suggestions are welcome.
>
> Ralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
Kenneth Waller wrote:
> For those still shooting film of the slide variety, I received a note from
> Fuji advising that Velvia will again be made available.
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
Velvia II is something I look forward to, although 120 Velvia never
became unavailable here in Toronto (I never had
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 05/01/07, W. Guy Finley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You're still running Windows 98? Well, sooner or later I think
>> you're going to have to move on because more and more programs are
>> requiring Windows XP. Personally, buying a nice camera like a K100D
>>
I use the bounce card but usually have my iso set to 100.
- Original Message -
From: "Brendan MacRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
> Have you tried making sure that you're using the catch
> pan
K.Takeshita wrote:
> On 1/04/07 7:39 PM, "Lawrence Kwan", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If you are correct, and *if* this Tokina did have the SMC coating, has
>> there been any previous SMC lenses with this poor flare control? I almost
>> take it for granted that SMC = excellent flare control.
On 1/04/07 7:39 PM, "Lawrence Kwan", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are correct, and *if* this Tokina did have the SMC coating, has
> there been any previous SMC lenses with this poor flare control? I almost
> take it for granted that SMC = excellent flare control. Am I wrong?
One thing I
John (or anyone else) -
I have a brand new, never taken out of the box - Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ1
5mp, image stabilized P+S which I won in a local photo contest.
Includes camera, battery pack & charger, AV & USB cables, software
CD-Rom,lens cap,strap & operating instructions.
B+H gets $239.95 for
On 05/01/07, Lawrence Kwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are correct, and *if* this Tokina did have the SMC coating, has
> there been any previous SMC lenses with this poor flare control? I almost
> take it for granted that SMC = excellent flare control. Am I wrong?
Flare control isn't si
> When in the Navy, as a Sr. corpsman,.
Keith, thank you for all you did for our country.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "keith_w" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT: Occupations?
> Rick Womer wrote:
>> I haven't chimed in yet, largely because my chosen
>> occupation h
For those still shooting film of the slide variety, I received a note from
Fuji advising that Velvia will again be made available.
Kenneth Waller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Have you tried making sure that you're using the catch
panel when bouncing off the ceiling? I've found that
it works perfectly this way. It sends just enough
diffused light directly toward the subject (and adds a
nice catch light in the eyes).
I use it this way and have no need for compensation i
On 1/04/07 7:39 PM, "Lawrence Kwan", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are correct, and *if* this Tokina did have the SMC coating, has
> there been any previous SMC lenses with this poor flare control? I almost
> take it for granted that SMC = excellent flare control. Am I wrong?
I see two sa
The sky is falling! The sky is falling!
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, K.Takeshita wrote:
>>> Every report I've seen said that Tokina lenses would not share SMC
>>> coatings.
>> They share SMC coating. Trust me on this.
>
> If you are correct, and *if*
Seriously, you are right. All SMC lenses have excellent flare
control, and you can be sure that the DA* lenses will be superb in
this regard. It's a given.
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> The sky is falling! The sky is falling!
> Paul
> On Jan 4, 2007, at 7:39 PM, Lawr
Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
> I think that you refer to the Fuji F30, that it is supposed to be the best
> compact regarding high ISO performance.
>
> The Canon PowerShot A series are also a good value, with lots of manual
> settings (A710IS, A640...).
>
>
I've recently bought a Canon A630. Excelle
On 05/01/07, W. Guy Finley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're still running Windows 98? Well, sooner or later I think
> you're going to have to move on because more and more programs are
> requiring Windows XP. Personally, buying a nice camera like a K100D
> or K110D and then using a clunky pro
Bob W wrote:
>> >Some likes straps, some don't, and some adapt.
>>
>> Bob W like straps.
>
>actually I think it's a boy/girl thing. I've noticed, and if heard
>women comment, that men hate carrying stuff around. I know I do. But
>women often seem to feel insecure unless they're carrying a handba
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, K.Takeshita wrote:
>> Every report I've seen said that Tokina lenses would not share SMC
>> coatings.
> They share SMC coating. Trust me on this.
If you are correct, and *if* this Tokina did have the SMC coating, has
there been any previous SMC lenses with this poor flare con
What a great career that must be. Thanks for taking care of our kids.
Paul
> Rick Womer wrote:
>> I haven't chimed in yet, largely because my chosen
>> occupation has kept me really busy lately (there are
>> 570-odd unread PDML messages in my mailbox, too!).
>>
>> I'm a physician, specifically a p
I think that you refer to the Fuji F30, that it is supposed to be the best
compact regarding high ISO performance.
The Canon PowerShot A series are also a good value, with lots of manual
settings (A710IS, A640...).
- Mensaje original
De: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Pentax Li
Rick Womer wrote:
> I haven't chimed in yet, largely because my chosen
> occupation has kept me really busy lately (there are
> 570-odd unread PDML messages in my mailbox, too!).
>
> I'm a physician, specifically a pediatrician, and
> still more specifically a pediatric oncologist. Yeah,
> I know
On 1/04/07 7:19 PM, "Paul Stenquist", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can't understand everything, but the main criticism is the bad flare
>> control.
The reviewer made only a passing reference in one sentence that flare might
be a problem.
See other review.
http://www.tokina.co.jp/d_slr/index.h
You and the camera seem to get along.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug
Brewer
Sent: 4. januar 2007 20:03
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: K10D gallery
Hi Kids,
Been goofing around w
On 1/04/07 7:19 PM, "Paul Stenquist", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Every report I've seen said that Tokina lenses would not share SMC
> coatings.
They share SMC coating. Trust me on this.
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The Panasonic Lumix with 7.5 megapixels and a Leica lens is probably
the best P&S camera currently available.
Paul
>
>
>> a friend of mine is in the market for a new camera.
>> He doesn't need a DSLR, but will occasionally want
>> to print at A4 or larger.
>>
>> Money isn't a big factor in the d
Scott Loveless wrote:
> I'd like to offer another recommendation for the Domke F2. [...]
> You can access all of your gear from the top without having to remove
> anything.
That's why I love my F2 ... I just "flap" the top flap completely open
and down the back of the bag ... that plus it's take
Thanks for that reply mate.
I find it annoying that it doesn't expose correctly in p-ttl and with the
camera in auto mode. Surely that is the basic requirement for them to get
right? Oh well, I'll just keep dialling in flash compensation or exposure
compensation on the camera...at least it's
Okay:-)
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 7:25 PM, K.Takeshita wrote:
> On 1/04/07 7:19 PM, "Paul Stenquist", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Every report I've seen said that Tokina lenses would not share SMC
>> coatings.
>
> They share SMC coating. Trust me on this.
>
> Ken
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss
And you're an early adaptor?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: 4. januar 2007 23:43
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: style change
On 4/1/07, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Som
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "J and K Messervy" Subject: K10D with AF540FGZ
>
>
>> I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit
>> indoors and out.
>>
>> First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a
>> little disap
Every report I've seen said that Tokina lenses would not share SMC
coatings. In terms of flare control, I've never seen Pentax get it
wrong. Not to worry. By the way, most of these images show superb
sharpness and detail.
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 7:11 PM, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
> Here's a revie
- Original Message -
From: "J and K Messervy" Subject: K10D with AF540FGZ
>I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit
> indoors and out.
>
> First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a
> little disappointing. I'm finding that for a
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" Subject: Re: K100D and raw converters
> Two words, "WindowsXP Yuck".
Gee Peter, I'm happier with XP than I ever was with 98.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Maybe there was an earthquake in India?
Norm
David J Brooks wrote:
> Arggg.
>
> Sorry, but i need to vent here.
>
> First it was Pentax for poor returned phone calls, but i could always
> reach someone in service.
>
> Then, after getting into Nikon, they over a period of 5 years, only
> re
Here's a review of the DA* sister lens, the Tokina AT-X PRO 50-135mm
f/2.8 (Japanese):
Reviews with many samples:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/lens_review/2006/12/15/5255.html
On the field use report:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/review/2006/11/21/5079.html
Can't understand everything
On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This all sounds like upgrading to WinXP, which I am definitely not
> planning. I like RSE, and am accostumed to work with it, and which
> works
> fine for me. It was a question of editing one file once, to make it
> continue working for me,
I've had good luck with Sigma service in the US. But I bought the 500
and something Pentax flash anyway, because I had a job coming up
where I needed a compact P-TTL flash. I'm going to send my Sigma in
for service soon.
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 6:42 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Arggg.
>
>
Note your K100D shares the DL finder.
-Adam
Pancho Hasselbach wrote:
> This is free form, I sacrificed the DL entry, as I don't have one and
> don't like pentamirrors. If a copy is altered, the original file remains
> ready to use.
>
> P. J. Alling schrieb:
>> Better not expect to use the Ds
Mark
I've found both the 280T and 330FTZ both work well enough in TTL mode on the
DS. A bit of flash compensation dialed in might be needed occasionally.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Mark Dalal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> How
What, you expect maybe a dirty remark from not clean minds? Well I hate
to disappoint you Bucko but I won't say anything. (I don't have to).
Cotty wrote:
> On 4/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> Nice. You get it both ways. I like the heavy padding on the strap.
>>
Cotty escribió:
> On 4/1/07, Thibouille, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> I'm happy, my birthday being tomorrow the fifth january it is a quite
>> nice present I offer to myself :D
>
> Bon anniversaire.
I second that. It will be surely a great birthday with such a nice toy.
Pancho
--
PDML Pen
Once again w too much information.
Bob W wrote:
> http://photos.drivingtheflies.com/
>
All nice, but the first one absolutely knocked my socks off!
>>> So long as you keep the rest of your clothes on.
>>>
>> What? Doesn't *everyone* read th
Two words, "WindowsXP Yuck".
W. Guy Finley wrote:
> Two words: Adobe Lightroom. Public Beta, free for the next few
> months, supports Pentax PEF files natively with no conversion needed
> which is a far better way to edit the file anyway.
>
> Three more words: Adobe Photoshop CS3. Public Bet
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby" Subject: RE: A couple of PESOs
> Nice puppy shot. How old is it now?
Jester is 7 months now, that shot was taken a few weeks ago though.
>
> The moon shot is a, moon shot.
Worse, it is a technically poor moon shot.
Thanks for looking and commen
- Original Message -
From: "Gonz" Subject: Re: Let Me Bore You a Second Time
> They all look quite good Bill. First is the best though. I think they
> look much better than the one you posted yesterday. For example, look
> at the upper right part of the moon, in these new pics, you
Very impressive.
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> William Robb
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:30 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Let Me Bore You a Second Time
>
>
> While the fellas were out for their evening cons
Arggg.
Sorry, but i need to vent here.
First it was Pentax for poor returned phone calls, but i could always
reach someone in service.
Then, after getting into Nikon, they over a period of 5 years, only
returned one call to service, of approximatly 50.
Now, Gentec Int. which sells and s
Good thing we no longer have any Australian women on the list.
Paul
On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 4/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Nice. You get it both ways. I like the heavy padding on the strap.
>
> Let's face it, I need it with that weight. It's actua
This all sounds like upgrading to WinXP, which I am definitely not
planning. I like RSE, and am accostumed to work with it, and which works
fine for me. It was a question of editing one file once, to make it
continue working for me, no hassle.
Of course, valuable knowledge of pixmantec has been
Agreed, they are all good, but I really like the first two on page 2, the
feather and the cu of the flower.
There are several folks on this list who do some great BW work (whether
native or converted) and I really miss the darkroom days! Well, let me
rephrase that I like the good results I s
I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit
indoors and out.
First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a
little disappointing. I'm finding that for a shot indoors of my kids or
similar at quite close range, bouncing off the white ceiling, I
Congratulations and happy birthday.
Paul
> On 4/1/07, Thibouille,
>> I'm happy, my birthday being tomorrow the fifth january it is a quite
>> nice present I offer to myself :D
>
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML
Nice
Composition is very good
Dave
Quoting Mark Dalal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> My girlfriend and I were down in Austin to meet a college buddy. We stopped
> at Mount Bonnell to check out the view. I came across this couple sitting on
> the rock ledge.
>
> Pentax *istDS, Pentax SMC-F 24-50/4, Hand
Ploarizer works this photo well.
Good one.
Dave
Quoting Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I disappointed Ann by posting a technical shot last night. So I went out
> this afternoon to get her a nice Southwestern photo. The building is
> known locally (in Corrales, New Mexico) as the Perea Da
This is free form, I sacrificed the DL entry, as I don't have one and
don't like pentamirrors. If a copy is altered, the original file remains
ready to use.
P. J. Alling schrieb:
> Better not expect to use the Ds to continue to work, seems he used it's
> location for the K10d or K100D string.
>
Thanks Bertil !
2007/1/5, Bertil Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Congrats on your new baby, and happy birthday :-)
>
> Bertil
>
> > I'm happy, my birthday being tomorrow the fifth january it is a quite
> > nice present I offer to myself :D
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
>
I like this one.
Dave
Quoting "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Another shot taken between Christmas and New Years. I went out with a
> friend for a ramble in New Haven, CT. The Yale students, in fact the
> students from most of the local colleges had gone home for the
> holidays. We mos
>
> Let's face it, I need it with that weight. It's actually a
> strap from a
> Marmot fanny pack (easy now lads).
>
I'm going to the Alps this summer. If I see a lady marmot perhaps I'll
try and get one.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pd
I haven't chimed in yet, largely because my chosen
occupation has kept me really busy lately (there are
570-odd unread PDML messages in my mailbox, too!).
I'm a physician, specifically a pediatrician, and
still more specifically a pediatric oncologist. Yeah,
I know, what a drag--a friend and coll
I quit using neck straps when my belly got in the way .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree. I recall that when I was shooting a lot of motorsports, everyone
> hung their cameras around their neck. Most used more than one, and when
> loading film, a neck strap was essential. A good strap places
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
