I'll second the leaf shutter. When I was shooting the 67, I started
with a 165/2.8 for shooting portraits. I eventually bought the 165/4
leaf shutter as I found that to be more useful. Fill flash can make a
very major difference in outdoor work.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, January 11, 200
Bong Manayon wrote:
> Took this for my son's school which had an educational field trip to a
> historical site, so appropriately titled "Looking Back" (the kids are
> sitting in a horse drawn carriage). Am torn between keeping the
> original color or converting to B&W. Except for applying a yello
Thanks, Bob. The whole building has a curve to it. I'm actually
starting to like it.
PA requires anyone under 12 to wear a helmet and I really don't remember
ever letting her ride without one, but apparently I did. Were it not
for you mentioning it I never would have noticed.
Bob Sullivan w
Bong,
I like the color version better, but I usually do.
The picture becomes too simple without it.
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 11, 2008 10:47 PM, Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Took this for my son's school which had an educational field trip to a
> historical site, so appropriately titled
Took this for my son's school which had an educational field trip to a
historical site, so appropriately titled "Looking Back" (the kids are
sitting in a horse drawn carriage). Am torn between keeping the
original color or converting to B&W. Except for applying a yellow
filter nothing else has be
A magnificent shot !
One of the most moving times I've experienced in my life was
visiting/viewing the wall several years ago.
I recommend it to all Americans.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Walter Hamler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Pat
Scott,
Cute photo, utterly transparent as to what it is - your daughter at
her school's play ground.
It's a great slice of life. School on the right is a bit fuzzy and leaning.
Have her put the helmet on.
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 11, 2008 7:27 PM, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This i
Has a totally unreal look to it. Not sure if that's good or bad.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO Well, they ain't the Canadian Rookies . . .
> or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not majes
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: Re: 135LS or 150 for 645
>>
> Thanks, Paul. It's still a consideration, but I really don't use flash
> that often (though I probably should). I think if I ever set up a
> studio I may start out with hot lights anyway.
I shot a b
Yeah, I can see it, but it doesn't bother me. It is the sort of
distortion that could quickly and easily be corrected in PS. :-)
Walt
On 1/11/08, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Walt. Much appreciated. If you look at the roof of the
> building in the background, it's got a
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Hmmm. A leaf shutter is great on a portrait lens because you can use
> fill flash on outdoor portraits. The 165 leaf shutter lens was my
> portrait lens of choice on the 6x7.
> Paul
>
> A 6x7, 165/4 leaf-shutter lens outdoor portrait with flash and
> reflector providi
Looks like I'm on a roll tonight. Sorry folks. Found a long lost roll
from GFM 2006. Aptly named Waters and Brooks.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/GrandfatherMountainNPW2006/photo#5154415050187761858
Please direct criticism at the subjects.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.co
god how i hate children. Well the shot evokes a reaction... makes me want to
stomp that crotch dropling till its eyes shoot out.
> This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
> apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
> photograph. Anyway, P64
Thanks, Walt. Much appreciated. If you look at the roof of the
building in the background, it's got a curve to it.
Walter Hamler wrote:
> Gee Scott, looks pretty good to me as far as composition. I don't see
> any distortions that jump out at me making the lens choice obvious.
> I had a 35mm fo
Hmmm. A leaf shutter is great on a portrait lens because you can use
fill flash on outdoor portraits. The 165 leaf shutter lens was my
portrait lens of choice on the 6x7.
Paul
A 6x7, 165/4 leaf-shutter lens outdoor portrait with flash and
reflector providing fill: http://photo.net/photodb/ph
Walter Hamler wrote:
> Ran across this the other day.
>
> I shot it back in the early to mid 80's. Patrick O. Ford was a Navy
> Gunners Mate who was killed in action in Vietnam. His heroic actions
> won him the Navy Cross.
>
> In the early 80's the Navy was building FFG's, a fast destroyer type
>
Walter Hamler wrote:
> Scott, I used a 645 outfit back when I was actively doing portraits
> and weddings.
> Because of the size constraints of my studio, I chose the 120 macro as
> my portrait lens. It would allow full lengths at the max distance
> available to me and yet still work for head shots
Yes, you are obviously in your element when shooting sports! I like
the last one, "last hope last strike" the best, but I am a baseball
fan.
Walt
On 1/11/08, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe,
>
> I've always enjoyed your sports shots. They seem to almost tell a
> story of the situa
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Denney"
Subject: Re: 645D vs Canon vs Nikon vs Hassy
> I agree, and for a couple of reasons. One is that workaday commercial
> photographers often have a bunch of 645 stuff still in the cupboard.
> Another is that the same number of pixels in a 36x48 se
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
Subject: Re: 645D vs Canon vs Nikon vs Hassy
> John,
> There is a new Calumet Photo opening near me.
> They sent a catalogue before Xmas.
> They advertised 2 used Hasselblad digitals ($21K each).
> Buy them now at discount as the new rental mode
Gee Scott, looks pretty good to me as far as composition. I don't see
any distortions that jump out at me making the lens choice obvious.
I had a 35mm for mine as well and it was my favorite lens for other
than weddings/portraits. It really is a great lens for wide coverage
when you need it, and a
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: PESO Well, they ain't the Canadian Rookies . . .
> or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not majestic lighthouses, but--
> (you'll have to supply your own bird)
>
> small
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6826229
>
> la
Doug, it is two shots, a double exposure actually.
The first exposure was of the western wall of the memorial, I believe,
with the Washington Monument in the background. The lens was a 35mm. I
remember the exposure being something like 50 sec on a tripod,
probably at f/11 or so with iso 100 color n
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: 645D vs Canon vs Nikon vs Hassy
> That is the Big Black Camera syndrome. I have mentioned it
> here on several occasions, but you seem to be the first who
> agreed with me on that.
HAR!!!
On Tuesday, September 28, 1999 5:23 PM, I w
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue what the
exposure was.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/photo#515439419812153
Just in case anyone who just had to see this had a problem opening the
page, (I used an apostrophe in the file name and my e-mail client
screwed up the link so maybe other people's did as well), I created a
tinyurl link. Here it is.
http://tinyurl.com/ysrs4b
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Not much mor
Doug Franklin wrote:
>Christine Aguila wrote:
>
>
>>or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not majestic lighthouses, but--
>>(you'll have to supply your own bird)
>>
>>small
>>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6826229
>>
>>large
>>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6827702
>>
Walter Hamler wrote:
> For the commissioning ceremony the ship needed a pic of the Vietnam
> Memorial. The criteria was a single pic that depicted the memorial,
> Washington DC, and his name.
> I scanned the neg and made a print. It actually looks better than the
> origonal "C" prints I made back
Walter Hamler wrote:
> Also, the lighting on the Washington Monument was usually turned off
> at 2:00 AM. After I had the shots I left before 2:00 AM, so I don't
> know if the lights actually were turned off or not. :-)
So is that one shot with reflections, or three shots composited together?
--
Christine Aguila wrote:
> or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not majestic lighthouses, but--
> (you'll have to supply your own bird)
>
> small
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6826229
>
> large
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6827702
It looks like a photo of a model ma
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Not much more than just a snapshot. But what the heck.
>
> Marvin got a new blanky, he's not sure he approves.
> http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20%20marvin'schristmas.html
Happy kitty! :-)
I tried getting the cat his own blanky, but it didn't keep hi
Patrick Genovese wrote:
> This is the spiral staircase at the Vatican museums.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2moj6q
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id=1481&msg_id=00NyWZ&photo_id=6827086&photo_sel_index=0
Nice execution of a classic shot, Patrick. And an excellent BW
conversion, too.
--
Thank
You'd be surprised who knows about Speed Graphics, I know at least two
regular users under 30. They're something of a cult camera these days,
the higher-brow version of the Diana.
-Adam
On 1/11/08, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is the Big Black Camera syndrome. I have mentioned it
>
Great shot! He exudes the typical "aloofness" of a truly spoilled cat!
Good job! (with the shot and the cat!)
Walt
On 1/11/08, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not much more than just a snapshot. But what the heck.
>
> Marvin got a new blanky, he's not sure he approves.
>
> http://www.m
Not much more than just a snapshot. But what the heck.
Marvin got a new blanky, he's not sure he approves.
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20%20marvin'schristmas.html
Equipment: Pentax *ist-Ds/smc Pentax M 85mm f2.0
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignore
Add a Lumiquest light box for a bit more size...
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I use to shoot Pentax 67ii's at weddings. They are quite big and
> black and very noticed. I agree with what you are saying.
>
> One interesting thing to note, though, is now I am shooting with a
> K10D at the weddings, but I
very nice! Is there any frame at the bottom that you cropped out or
is this the edge of the frame? I'm not sure that including a little
more at the bottom would have been an improvement but if there was
more there it would nice to see whether it is. Anyway I do like it is
as it is.
Was this a r
Scott Loveless writes...
> Hey, gang. I'm contemplating a "portrait" lens for the 645.
If you don't mind being silly, there is a non-Pentax option that is
interesting and inexpensive. For many years, Carl Zeiss Jena built a
variation of the famed Olympia Sonnar for the Pentacon Six mount. It
is
Yep!
My 645 on a stroboframe bracket with Sunpak 120J flash readily
identified me a "the wedding photographer", not the father of the
bride as I sometimes was accused of being if I didn't have my camera
in tow! ;-)
Walt
On 1/11/08, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is the Big Black Camer
I use to shoot Pentax 67ii's at weddings. They are quite big and
black and very noticed. I agree with what you are saying.
One interesting thing to note, though, is now I am shooting with a
K10D at the weddings, but I continue to use a Stoboframe Pro RL
bracket with flash and Lumiquest big bounc
Scott, I used a 645 outfit back when I was actively doing portraits
and weddings.
Because of the size constraints of my studio, I chose the 120 macro as
my portrait lens. It would allow full lengths at the max distance
available to me and yet still work for head shots. Occasionally I
would use the
Very well done - I like how you composed it.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, January 11, 2008, 1:12:13 PM, you wrote:
CA> or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not majestic lighthouses, but--
CA> (you'll have to supply your own bird)
CA> small
CA> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=68
Graywolf,
I suppose I never gave you an Amen! on the Big Black Camera, but AMEN!
If it's big enough, it must be professional!
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 11, 2008 5:01 PM, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is the Big Black Camera syndrome. I have mentioned it
> here on several occasions, but
Excellent work. You managed to convey exactly whey they were looking
for. I like it.
--
Bruce
Friday, January 11, 2008, 1:02:58 PM, you wrote:
WH> Ran across this the other day.
WH> I shot it back in the early to mid 80's. Patrick O. Ford was a Navy
WH> Gunners Mate who was killed in action
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Nice shot of my hometown. Excellent composition. I was going to say the crane
>in the foreground is a bit unfortunate, but that's Chicago, isn't it? Good one.
>Paul
>
Christine, that's not only my home town, but as a child before and
partly during WW2 I lived at what
Hey, gang. I'm contemplating a "portrait" lens for the 645. I have no
foreseeable need for the leaf shutter on the 135, and both focal lengths
are acceptable. Plus, the 150 is a bit faster, so I'm leaning towards
that one. Anybody have any insight to share about the quality of these
lenses
Don't take this too negatively, but it looks like something
out of Sim City.
Graywolf (Tom Rittenhouse)
Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Blog:http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/
---
Christine Aguila wrote:
> or a Sout
Since I almost always use the shortest or longesst focal
length on my P&S, it does not seem imprecise, but it does
seem slow. However most point and shooters I know are using
their celphone can could not care less about a "real" camera.
Graywolf (Tom Rittenhouse)
Website: http://www.graywolfpho
Personally, I dislike the look of Photo.net's portfolio display and
navigation. I would not choose to use that to show my work.
It's so easy to use Lightroom or Photoshop and come up with a better
set of display pages, never mind hand-coding ... that is what I do.
I'm in the middle of a majo
That is the Big Black Camera syndrome. I have mentioned it
here on several occasions, but you seem to be the first who
agreed with me on that. I used to use a Mamiya Universal
Press. It was "BIG". It was "BLACK". And it did not look
anything like Uncle Harry's camera. People would actually
sto
Hi Walter,
Beautiful shot... Just beautiful.
Regards
Patrick
On Jan 11, 2008 10:02 PM, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ran across this the other day.
>
> I shot it back in the early to mid 80's. Patrick O. Ford was a Navy
> Gunners Mate who was killed in action in Vietnam. His heroic
Very well done. A minor nit is the distracting background in the URH corner.
Gaussian blur in CS2?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Alastair Robertson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Iceplant (or pigface to the aussies!)
> http://www.pbase.c
What Cotty said. Great work. Congratulations!
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 11/01/08, Walter Hamler, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >For the commissioning ceremony the ship needed a pic of the Vietnam
> >Memorial. The criteria wa
Thanks Cotty! It is a shot I am proud of, but mostly because of what
it really represents!
I get choked up when I think about all the very close friends I lost
over there. Although I never spent any time in country, I have a lot
of time aboard ships and squadrons deployed over there and heavily
inv
Heh, wow, it makes me feel ill, I LOVE IT!
> This is the spiral staircase at the Vatican museums.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2moj6q
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id=1481&msg_id=00NyWZ&photo_id=6827086&photo_sel_index=0
>
> Your comments/ciritique are welcome!
>
> Regards
>
> Patrick G
On 11/01/08, Walter Hamler, discombobulated, unleashed:
>For the commissioning ceremony the ship needed a pic of the Vietnam
>Memorial. The criteria was a single pic that depicted the memorial,
>Washington DC, and his name.
>I scanned the neg and made a print. It actually looks better than the
>or
I asked Carolyn about the "how/where" use of the screensaver and
received the following today:
"Hi, Jack,
We hope to have the screensaver available for downloading in 2 weeks. I
will keep you posted".
"Thanks,
Carolyn Pitcavage"
I thought I recalled a comment in their blurb about the whole worl
My "Photos" landing page, the page you land on from www.pnstenquist.com, has
only a small banner ad at the bottom. I had to look to see if there was
anything there. I couldn't recall. I pay the $25/year dues. That may make a
difference in regard to how much advertising one gets. I think a singl
Nice shot of my hometown. Excellent composition. I was going to say the crane
in the foreground is a bit unfortunate, but that's Chicago, isn't it? Good one.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "Christine Aguila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> or a South Pacific sunset, and
Beautiful!
Jack
--- Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ran across this the other day.
>
> I shot it back in the early to mid 80's. Patrick O. Ford was a Navy
> Gunners Mate who was killed in action in Vietnam. His heroic actions
> won him the Navy Cross.
>
> In the early 80's the Navy w
Thanks Bob and P.J.
I too remembered the emotions when I came across the folder with the
negs and prints. I don't remember why I had it seperated from all my
other pics from that era.
Had almost forgotten about the shoot and everything that led up to it
and following.
I actually met the family a fe
Thanks Christine.
The shot was taken around 1:45 in the AM. I could not believe how many
people were down on the mall that evening. The problem I was running
up against was finding a period when there were no people in the shot.
Also, the lighting on the Washington Monument was usually turned off
a
Walt,
That's a wonderful photo. I'm sure anybody who suffered a loss in
Vietman would be proud to have such a photo.
The Wall at night with the Washington Monument in back establishes the
place for us who have been there.
The second exposure of the names seals the deal.
Wow! Powerful emotions swi
Christine,
Nice picture of one of my favorite places (especially the condo
building with the curved walls).
Nice job of holding the verticals on the buildings...
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 11, 2008 3:12 PM, Christine Aguila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not ma
You seem to have nailed all of the requirements.
Walter Hamler wrote:
> Ran across this the other day.
>
> I shot it back in the early to mid 80's. Patrick O. Ford was a Navy
> Gunners Mate who was killed in action in Vietnam. His heroic actions
> won him the Navy Cross.
>
> In the early 80's the
Power Zoom is quite useful on big, heavy lenses such as the FA* 80-200
(and even more so on the 250-600); you can zoom over the full zoom range
with only a very small hand movement.
It's certainly not an essential feature, but it does have some uses.
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:48:53PM -0500, A
It would make a nice magazine cover. Good negative space.
Christine Aguila wrote:
> or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not majestic lighthouses, but--
> (you'll have to supply your own bird)
>
> small
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6826229
>
> large
>
> http://photo.net/photo
Not to mention it adds significant mechanical and electronic
complexity with little benefit.
-Adam
On 1/11/08, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The computing power for Power Zoom to work as promised with any
> reliability, wasn't available in the size package Pentax tried to put it
> in
Is that close to the old Meggs Field that "hizzhonor the Lord Mayor"
had destroyed for a rose garden for his wife? ;-)
Nice shot! Skyscrapers are great subjects, especially when you can
gain a decent location for pics!
Walt
On 1/11/08, Christine Aguila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> or a South Pac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes...
> I think there's a market for the Pentax 645D. If it's anywhere close
> to the Canon full frame in price, it will be very successful. It has
> to have better noise characteristics, given the relative pixel
> density.
I agree, and for a couple of reasons. One is that w
Patrick Genovese wrote:
> This is the spiral staircase at the Vatican museums.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2moj6q
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id=1481&msg_id=00NyWZ&photo_id=6827086&photo_sel_index=0
>
> Your comments/ciritique are welcome!
>
> Regards
>
> Patrick Genovese
>
Nice shot
The computing power for Power Zoom to work as promised with any
reliability, wasn't available in the size package Pentax tried to put it
in for any reasonable price at the time. I'm not sure it's available
now at a reasonable price.
Adam Maas wrote:
> And smoking the same crack. Neither were e
Walt: My husband lost his younger brother in Vietnam, so we've been to the
wall, and your photo brings stately and dignified tribute to Patrick O.
Ford, the Memorial itself, and all the other men. Lovely, lovely work.
Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Walter Hamler" <[EMAIL PROT
or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not majestic lighthouses, but--
(you'll have to supply your own bird)
small
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6826229
large
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6827702
Comments/Critique welcome.
Cheers, Christine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Hey - I just saw that one when I was voting in the pentax gallery!
I gave it a thumbs up :-)
Wendy
On Jan 11, 2008 10:27 AM, Patrick Genovese
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the spiral staircase at the Vatican museums.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2moj6q
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id
If most P&S users love power zoom then why is Manual Zoom a selling
feature of higher-end P&S's. Most P&S shooters I know actively hate
Power Zoom and it's imprecise control.
-Adam
On 1/11/08, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know some people who like it and btw P&S users love it !!
>
>
You could install gallery then you could add photos whenever you wanted
http://gallery.menalto.com/
I don't like the look of photo.net
I can never work out how to navigate through photos in folders without
using the 'back" button and all the photo.net sites have banner ads
on. Can you get rid of t
Ran across this the other day.
I shot it back in the early to mid 80's. Patrick O. Ford was a Navy
Gunners Mate who was killed in action in Vietnam. His heroic actions
won him the Navy Cross.
In the early 80's the Navy was building FFG's, a fast destroyer type
with a bunch of weapon capabilities.
I know some people who like it and btw P&S users love it !!
On Jan 11, 2008 9:48 PM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And smoking the same crack. Neither were exactly good ideas, and power
> zoom was actively bad.
>
> -Adam
>
>
> On 1/11/08, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pentax a
And smoking the same crack. Neither were exactly good ideas, and power
zoom was actively bad.
-Adam
On 1/11/08, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pentax and Minolta shared a few other ideas, such as
> power zoom lenses and pop-up flashes. Their engineers
> must have been very friendly...
>
John,
There is a new Calumet Photo opening near me.
They sent a catalogue before Xmas.
They advertised 2 used Hasselblad digitals ($21K each).
Buy them now at discount as the new rental models were arriving.
Somebody is buying them...
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 11, 2008 2:19 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This comparison has come up before. Rarely do I hear anyone compare the
> potential market viability of the 645D to whatever Hassy is selling.
> Does anyone actually buy those damn things?
A friend of mine religiously watches America's Next Top Model, and says that
nearly every time they hav
I don't poke around a lot of studios these days, but a couple of the local pros
I know shoot with the Hassy digital, and they own their cameras. These guys
aren't megabuck car shooters, just upper quadrant commercial photographers,
probably grossing around 100K a year. I think there's a market f
Together...
Ken Waller wrote:
>> Their engineers must have been very friendly...
>>
>
> No. They just slept @ a Holiday Inn Express!
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: K10D flash question
Very well done. Wouldn't change a thing.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Genovese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO! Comments & Critique Welcome
> This is the spiral staircase at the Vatican museums.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2moj6q
>
> ht
> Together...
They went to different schools together.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: K10D flash question
> Together...
>
> Ken Waller wrote:
>>> Their engineers must have been very friendly...
>>
I should think that Canada would have come up with a Snow based version
of Basketball by now...
David J Brooks wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6826942
>
> >From my drive around Jan 2. The local parks BB court
>
> K10D, AF 100 2.8, CS1 and fotofusion green filter, levels
>
> Dave
>Their engineers must have been very friendly...
No. They just slept @ a Holiday Inn Express!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Womer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: K10D flash question
> Pentax and Minolta shared a few other ideas, such a
That's very nice.
Alastair Robertson wrote:
> http://www.pbase.com/kiwibiologist/image/91518150&exif=N
> Another shot from the spider beach - this South African plant is one
> of the world's great invaders. Does especially well on New Zealand
> and Australian beaches where for some reason they ca
That's really a classic shot. I can't decided if the spiral resting on
the bottom of the frame disturbs me or not.
Patrick Genovese wrote:
> This is the spiral staircase at the Vatican museums.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2moj6q
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?topic_id=1481&msg_id=00NyWZ&photo_id=
It would depend on the cost of rental, and how often you expect to need
the capability. But that's an individual choice. I don't trust market
research. It's really done two ways. Looking at what's selling and
asking questions with surveys. One is unreliable because it can only
predict what
Patrick,
I especially like the oval nature of the composition and the way the
arms fling outward.
I suspect it would be better with less people, but that is
problematic, no doubt.
B&W works well here.
Nice choices and composition.
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 11, 2008 9:27 AM, Patrick Genovese <[EMAIL
Adam,
Yes, it is possible. However, that doesn't change anything.
What does this "2008 Hot One Award" mean?
- That the lens is great (who knows what the production lens will be..
Besides, it would be award for the lenses of 2007, not 2008.)
- That the lens will be in demand (Are they self-proclai
It was originally announced last year and said magazine may have
acquired a pre-release copy to test.
-Adam
On 1/11/08, Igor Roshchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It has not been out yet, 2008 just started, but this lens
> already has a seal of "Hot one winner 2008" from "Professional
> photogr
I agree with you there... otoh i;m not too interested in the awards
but more in what its real world performance is like.
I've been waiting for a good 70-200 f2.8 --- would go for a genuine
pentax offering if it was available and was considering the sigma
offering but it is soft wide open at the lo
It has not been out yet, 2008 just started, but this lens
already has a seal of "Hot one winner 2008" from "Professional
photographer"...
(it tied with smc Pentax-DA* 50-135mm f/2.8
http://www.ppmag.com/web-exclusives/2008/01/2008-hot-one-award-winners.html
)
A combination of these facts devalu
Thanks Dave. Yep. There's a "Photos" link for everyone's photo.net site. You'll
see it at the top of the page even when viewing a single shot. When you click
on the "Photos" link, you get a page that displays at least a portion of each
folder. So I set up my domain name to link to my "Photos" di
Pentax and Minolta shared a few other ideas, such as
power zoom lenses and pop-up flashes. Their engineers
must have been very friendly...
Rick
--- Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pentax got the idea from Minolta, who introduced
> their wireless flash
> system, complete with moronic chann
Te 27-75 is also dubbed as macro and its a great lens at amazing value.
Rgds
Patrick
On Jan 11, 2008 7:17 PM, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pentax forums is already whinning about it, as it is macro.
> Can't be good if its a macro, they say.:-)
>
> My Sigma 300 f4 is "macro" i it g
Pentax forums is already whinning about it, as it is macro.
Can't be good if its a macro, they say.:-)
My Sigma 300 f4 is "macro" i it gives me great pictures. I'm sure this
one will to.
Dave
On Jan 11, 2008 12:24 PM, Patrick Genovese
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 70-200 f/2.8 from Tamron see
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
