On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:46 PM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax Photo Lab processed shots may look less noisy, but they lose detail
as well. If you saw the 1600 ISO shots I posted, I think you'd have to agree
At the SF Zoo on Saturday, it was all about children it seemed.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/sets/72157604091189728/
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mar 11, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Steel touring bike, interesting mix of modern (disc brakes) and
old-fashioned (steel frame, barcons).
http://www.konaworld.com/08_sutra_c.htm
I think the disc brakes would come in rather handy when it's loaded
up with panniers, especially in
I have been nagging my friend and colleague for years to get a DSLR for
travel photos. She'll take 500-700 pictures in a week with a PS.
After borrowing my DS (and seeing better results), she's giving in. She
wants to get a K10D and a Pentax 18-250. I'm not thrilled about the
superzoom, but
I enjoy it when I have the time. I'm learning when looking at everyone's
photos. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: Exercising the K85/1.8
Godfrey,
that's a really good little photo essay - very effective, and some
great compositions. I also like the black white conversion you've
done.
Regards
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 11 March 2008
From: Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/11 Tue AM 12:36:05 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Pentax Interview with John Carlson
FYI:
http://www.letsgodigital.org:80/en/18496/pentax-interview/
Bizarre. It reads as if it has been translated back into English from
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 16:52:57 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote
Trying some of my manual lenses with the K20D. I shot this with the
K85/1.8. ISO 1600, f2.8, 1/125th. Love this lens. I use it with a
metal hood from the Super Tak 200/4 on a step up ring. Makes a nice
unit, and of course even that
Thanks to everyone who gave me information and advice, you have helped
me to make a decision. As the K20D is still a bit expensive for me, I
have ordered a lightly used K10D Grand Prix Edition and I am looking
forward to its arrival.
It comes with a DA 18-55 mm. which I don't need, as I
Of course it refused to open PEFs. None of the third party software
works with new camera until the format has been communicated and the
software updated. I'm using ACR with all my K20D images with no
problem. I've posted more than a dozen here, including at least half
a dozen color pics,
Well it's appreciated. We all learn a lot here.
Paul
On Mar 10, 2008, at 9:43 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
I enjoy it when I have the time. I'm learning when looking at
everyone's
photos. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:07:11 -0400, Adam Maas wrote
Nice shot.
The Tamron's an excellent lens. Superior to the Tokina IMHO (I've
owned both).
-Adam
I'd second that, I've had one for a few years now. I even bought a 70-300 LD
Di to go with it after seeing how well a friends lens
You are a brave man. I particularly like the shot of the Asian boy
with the finger in his mouth.
Paul
On Mar 11, 2008, at 2:13 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
At the SF Zoo on Saturday, it was all about children it seemed.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/sets/72157604091189728/
Hello.
I have recently bought a new K200D. I did photograph a lot until about
15 years ago, but have only used p+s cameras since then. So I figured
the K200D would be more than sufficient to get back into photography.
I am actually very satisfied with the camera.
But the bundled
The kit lens is marginal and is obviously too slow for many things.
Your choice of the DA* zooms is a good one. While the DA21 is
undoubtedly a good lens it's not nearly as wide as the DA* 16-50 not
quite as fast, and it doesn't have the motor-in-lens autofocus. The
DA* 50-135 is also
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 11:42 PM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like it tight like that.
bites tongue
Dave The Juvenile
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Marcus: I'm not the best one to talk equipment, but I did want to throw a
vote for the DA* 50 - 135, which I own, and I like the lens quite a bit.
It's quiet, smooth, 2.8 across the zoom range is very nice to have. It is
a bit heavy, but with practice, I'll get better at hand-holding.
Godfrey: These are really lovely. Very, very nice. cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DUG [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PDML List PDML@pdml.net;
PAW [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SeePhoto Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11,
Thanks for the recommendation, Christine. Weight is indeed not an
issue. I also found some positive reviews meanwhile, so I think I'll
go and pick one up this afternoon.
Marcus
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 12:42 schrieb Christine Aguila:
Marcus: I'm not the best one to talk equipment, but I did
A version, but different usage, typically f5.6-8 at moderate distance,
ambient light.
The 18-55 is quite decent close up btw.
-Adam
On 3/10/08, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you have the A version or the F version? I have had both and my A
version
is better than the F which
Thank you very much for your opinon, Paul.
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 12:03 schrieb Paul Stenquist:
The kit lens is marginal and is obviously too slow for many things.
Your choice of the DA* zooms is a good one. While the DA21 is
undoubtedly a good lens it's not nearly as wide as the DA* 16-50 not
I would get a good 28mm prime. The sma-A F2.8 is
nice if you like manual focus, the later F and FA
versions would do if you want AF. But in any case
a 28mm prime is very useful/high quality on DSLR.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
These two young ladies didn't let the recent snowstorm stop them from
heading out for dinner at one of Toronto Chinatown's many restaurants.
http://tinyurl.com/3aste3
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9Z-xRWq0SI/Brk/p-tT3b-rmzU/s1600-h/mar_10_08+005.jpg
I like the smile peeking out
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:45 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank actually would probably enjoy the show, it's mostly BW street
work, at Gorilla Monsoon this month ;-)
He was a wrestler at one time, was
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the SF Zoo on Saturday, it was all about children it seemed.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/sets/72157604091189728/
Comments and critique always appreciated.
Outstanding essay!!
cheers,
frank
--
The smile is good. The tone of that entire photo would lean toward dark
and gloomy and that little smile flips the entire mood.
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/11/2008 8:56 AM
These two young ladies didn't let the recent snowstorm stop them from
heading out for dinner at one of Toronto
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying some of my manual lenses with the K20D. I shot this with the
K85/1.8. ISO 1600, f2.8, 1/125th. Love this lens. I use it with a
metal hood from the Super Tak 200/4 on a step up ring. Makes a nice
unit, and of
Rick Womer wrote:
Rabbit ears? A disciple of Knarf? Gosh, I didn't
even know he had a following!
The first pic is very grainy and the angle is awkward.
I like the second one mostly for its context.
Thanks, Rick. Dektol does that. :)
P.S. - I thought there was a brand new bottle of
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Neither of these pictures do much for me, sorry.
Not a problem at all. I appreciate you taking the time to look.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Couple of kid pics. Expired Tri-X in Dektol. I shot these well over a
year ago, probably with the MX and either the M 50/1.7 or 35/2.8. I think.
Christine Aguila wrote:
Scott, nice photos of some nice guys on the list. Mark, you know, you look
a little like Ron Howard in this photo. Cheers, Christine
Thanks! I won't tell Mark you said that. ;)
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Oh, I can take a bad photo of anyone. But I don't show them here:-)).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying some of my manual lenses with the K20D. I
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few days ago I found a box of unprocessed black and white. Plus, I
had a few rolls recently exposed. So I've been doing a lot of donkey
work the past two days trying to get it all souped and
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 9:45 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When did Mark lose his hair?
He never lost it.
In fact he's saved every strand of it. It's in a plastic bag up in a
closet somewhere...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the SF Zoo on Saturday, it was all about children it seemed.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/sets/72157604091189728/
Comments and critique always appreciated.
Outstanding essay!!
Or maturing, like a fine Burgundy, in the PDML
cellar...
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gawd. I sent that message at least a week ago. It's
been gestating in
the PDML cesspool.
Paul
On Mar 8, 2008, at 6:00 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Ok i admit. I had a set of green swede
I've calibrated our G5 iMac (PowerPC version), 13 in
MacBook, HP nc8230, and a Dell 24 in LCD monitor with
mine, and it has worked very well on all of them.
Are you sure you loaded the right software? The
original Huey came with software not compatible with
Intel-powered Macs. The Huey Pro
I really like the first 3 photos in that gallery.
The fourth you might try cropping vertically right
down the middle, preserving the left half. The fifth
brings back bad parental memories of melt-down time.
The sixth has a distracting lump of unidentifiable
flesh that the adult's hand is on.
The smile makes it work. To niggle a bit, it would be
nice if three of their four feet hadn't been
amputated.
Rick
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These two young ladies didn't let the recent
snowstorm stop them from
heading out for dinner at one of Toronto Chinatown's
many
Well caught, Frank! The smile makes all the difference.
Appears to me that she is protecting her purse from that shady looking
person with the camera.(?) ;)
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These two young ladies didn't let the recent snowstorm stop them from
heading out for
Tim Bray wrote:
To be precise, a Tamron SP, 70-210mm 3.5, and it worked perfectly with
the *ist-D. It's not perhaps the creme de la creme of telephoto
zooms, but it's taken some good pictures for me:
http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/05/07/Sports-Photog
This one is excellent.
On 3/11/08, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:45 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank actually would probably enjoy the show, it's mostly BW street
work, at Gorilla
On Mar 11, 2008, at 9:00, Rick Womer wrote:
I've calibrated our G5 iMac (PowerPC version), 13 in
MacBook, HP nc8230, and a Dell 24 in LCD monitor with
mine, and it has worked very well on all of them.
Are you sure you loaded the right software? The
original Huey came with software not
On Mar 11, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
I've calibrated our G5 iMac (PowerPC version), 13 in
MacBook, HP nc8230, and a Dell 24 in LCD monitor with
mine, and it has worked very well on all of them.
Are you sure you loaded the right software? The
original Huey came with
Thanks for all the comments!
... When did you start using Flickr?
About a month or so back, my local photo group moderator opened an
account on flickr.com for photo sharing. I started using it then.
While I'm not totally delighted with it as a presentation vehicle, as
a photo-sharing site
Minolta lenses cannot be used on Pentax mount.
I have both the DA* zooms. They are both excellent quality performers.
I tend to use primes for the shorter focal lengths, however, because I
prefer their more compact size and better handling. I use the DA21 and
FA43, supplemented occasionaly
Just did a quick Google search. Apparently the Huey
Pro plays nicely with some MacBook screens and not
others--not clear what the difference is.
Charles, I suggest you contact Pantone customer
support at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or, you
can read this on their web site:
http://tinyurl.com/2vd4u7
Good
Who's planning on going?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Trying something different. Have a look at this:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare4.html
R-D1 + 28mm lens (same angle of view as 42mm lens on full frame 35mm)
Then take this simple test:
1. What is noticeable about the picture?
2. How do you think it was achieved?
Ta.
--
yes
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who's planning on going?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:34 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://listoftheday.blogspot.com/2007/09/great-olan-mills-photos.html
This is too funny for words.
William Robb
Luckily, there are not photos left of me with my mullet and too-tight
Yes
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Marcus A. Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the bundled 18-55mm/3.5-5.8 lens is kind of dissapointing,
especially when compared to the 40mm/f2.8 limited that I also bought
with the camera (mainly beacuse it was so cute), which produces
beautifully sharp
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:34 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://listoftheday.blogspot.com/2007/09/great-olan-mills-photos.html
This is too funny for words.
William Robb
Luckily, there are not photos left of me with my mullet and too-tight
Yes t-shirt...
cheers,
frank
--
I tried the A version on K10D this summer. I´ve had it since the mid
80s and it has been great with film, but compared to my primes in that
range it wasn´t not sharp enough for my use on K10D. My DA*16-50 is
much better.
DagT
Den 11. mars. 2008 kl. 04.22 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
Did you
Newbies wonder what GFM2008 is... Google turns up only pointers into PDML. -T
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who's planning on going?
--
Scott Loveless
On 11/3/08, Tim Bray, discombobulated, unleashed:
Newbies wonder what GFM2008 is... Google turns up only pointers into PDML.
Here you go:
http://www.grandfather-mountain.com/planning_your_visit/events/nphoto.php
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
So you say :-)
Seriously, though - that's a great little lens. Shel had one in
his kit when he tried out my *ist D, and it came very close to
overturning my FA or later resolution for new accquisitions.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 01:42:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, I can take a bad
Tim Bray wrote:
Newbies wonder what GFM2008 is... Google turns up only pointers into PDML.
-T
GFM refers to Grandfather Mountain in general, and with this crowd, the
Grandfather Mountain Nature Photography Weekend specifically.
http://grandfather.com/planning_your_visit/events/nphoto.php
I always plan on going and never make it. But I will try again.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yes
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who's planning on going?
--
Scott Loveless
Thanks, Godfrey.
I was thinking along the same lines. I am really satisfied with the
images the DA 40 produces, and if the DA 21 comes close, I'd rather
save the extra cash on the DA* 16-50, since I already have the DA 40.
Marcus
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 16:14 schrieb Godfrey DiGiorgi:
Minolta
Did you burn them or did they simply sink into the ooze...
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:34 PM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://listoftheday.blogspot.com/2007/09/great-olan-mills-photos.html
This is too funny for words.
William Robb
Luckily,
No, there's a fair difference between those two lenses. The 28 would
perform on the K200D like the 40 would on a 35mm body, not like the
40mm does on the K200D. The crop factor always applies as focal length
is focal length. The only difference between a 40mm FF lens and 40mm
DA lens is the latter
We can't tell you until you learn the secret hand shake.
Tim Bray wrote:
Newbies wonder what GFM2008 is... Google turns up only pointers into PDML.
-T
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 2:03 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you burn them or did they simply sink into the ooze...
In old yearbooks somewhere (mine are long-since lost). I suppose
there may be some old classmates who still have their copy, but I
haven't been in contact with old
On Mar 11, 2008, at 5:56 AM, frank theriault wrote:
These two young ladies didn't let the recent snowstorm stop them from
heading out for dinner at one of Toronto Chinatown's many restaurants.
http://tinyurl.com/3aste3
http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/R9Z-xRWq0SI/Brk/p-tT3b-
Alas, no. I'll be in Chicago on business that
weekend.
Rick
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who's planning on going?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hey, we haven't taught him the secret hand shake yet.
Cotty wrote:
On 11/3/08, Tim Bray, discombobulated, unleashed:
Newbies wonder what GFM2008 is... Google turns up only pointers into PDML.
Here you go:
http://www.grandfather-mountain.com/planning_your_visit/events/nphoto.php
On Sunday, I rode BART into SF for a visit to the Coit Tower. This
father and his son had great faces ... we talked for a bit, then
junior got all excited about something on the wall ...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/25-dadnson.jpg
Dad And Son - BART 2008
Panasonic L1 + ZD 11-22/2.8-3.5
ISO
P. J. Alling wrote:
Hey, we haven't taught him the secret hand shake yet.
There's a secret handshake? I want my money back for the last two GFMs.
Cotty wrote:
On 11/3/08, Tim Bray, discombobulated, unleashed:
Newbies wonder what GFM2008 is... Google turns up only pointers into PDML.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday, I rode BART into SF for a visit to the Coit Tower. This
father and his son had great faces ... we talked for a bit, then
junior got all excited about something on the wall ...
I really like this one. Interesting composition, and it tells a story.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday, I rode BART into SF for a visit to the Coit Tower. This
father and his son had great faces ... we talked for a
that's good to know but are you talking much sharper
at F11-F22? I cant see how there would be a big
difference in that range, the A24-50 is really good
in that range on digital size sensor. The A24-50 is
also much smaller and lighter tha the 16-50
isnt it? That matters to me when the camera is
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who's planning on going?
I still don't know.
I wanted to. In fact, I still want to, but I'm becoming more involved
in this thing:
http://cmwc2008.com/
Which is like two weeks after GFM. Looks like I'll be curating at
At f13 and smaller you're hitting the diffraction limits of the
sensor/lens combo and giving up quality. Unless DoF is an issue,
there's no good reason to stop down past f11 on 1.5x crop digital. The
16-50 will outperform the 24-50 at apertures where diffraction limits
are not an issue.
-Adam
On
Hey you'll have two whole weeks to rest up before hand, and you should
get back in plenty of time unless homeland security decides to detain
you as an undesirable lawyer...
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who's planning on
http://www.piclens.com/site/firefox/win/
Try it out at a supported site. It's rather nifty.
--
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Hey, gang. I have stacks upon stacks of handwritten and typed pages
that I'd like to digitize. My scanner came with some OCR software,
Omnipage SE, I think, but I've lost the CD. Do any of you use OCR
software and can you recommend something? Thanks!
--
Scott Loveless
One from a walk today.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic47.html
R-D1 + 28mm Ultron 2.8
handheld ISO400 1/15th at f8
PS CS with Power Retouche mono conv.
Comments and corpses welcome.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Been doing a lot of work, the posting backlog is deep, but I'll stop
here for a bit. :-)
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/26-stick.jpg
Stick - Ground Signs 2008
Panasonic L1 + ZD 11-22/2.8-3.5
ISO 100 @ f/5.6 @ 1/30 sec, fl=11
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML
http://www.pbase.com/timbercode/image/94028814
This was made handheld with the f1.2 Porst. Did I told you I love this
lens? :D
.timber
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On Mar 11, 2008, at 11:50 AM, Cotty wrote:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic47.html
Very elegant and sensual tones. Nicely done.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Adam Maas wrote:
http://www.piclens.com/site/firefox/win/
Try it out at a supported site. It's rather nifty.
This is a very cool plug-in. It is especially useful with large Flickr
photostreams.
Thanks for posting the link.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
Excellent shot.
-Adam
On 3/11/08, Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/timbercode/image/94028814
This was made handheld with the f1.2 Porst. Did I told you I love this
lens? :D
.timber
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
knarF - I get a cannot find
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GFM 2008
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Who's planning on going?
I still don't know.
Nice image. I like the replication of the 2 trees 2 crosses.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Churchyard
One from a walk today.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic47.html
R-D1 +
DOF is ALWAYS an issue with product photography which is
what I really meant to say instead of general purpose.
I just find the 24-50 in the F11toF22 range with product
photography to be ideal and I know how good good is I also
have the A50/2.8 Macro which is stunningly good but you
only can see
Not this year.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GFM 2008
Who's planning on going?
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Very nice capture. Great exposure.
Technical details ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Handheld around midnight
http://www.pbase.com/timbercode/image/94028814
This was made handheld with the f1.2 Porst. Did
Oooh, tasty. Wonderful. -T
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice capture. Great exposure.
Technical details ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Handheld
All is there in the EXIF :D
K10D, Porst MC Color Reflex f1.2 55mm @f1.2 1/15sec ISO320
From RAW and I think the sky is noisy because the fill light.
Cheers,
Timber
Ken Waller wrote:
Very nice capture. Great exposure.
Technical details ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
-
Thanks a lot, Paul, Ken, Adam and John.
I'm glad I seem to have made a good choise.
Also the Tamron is lighter and smaller, but of cource doesn't go with my
MZ-S, which I very rarely use :-)
Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
On Mar 11, 2008, at 14:27, Timber wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/timbercode/image/94028814
This was made handheld with the f1.2 Porst. Did I told you I love this
lens? :D
That looks quite cool.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
Love it. Amazing shot.
It's almost perfectly symmetrical. You could make it just that by cropping some
of the left, although you might also have to clone out part of that first lamp
on the left. Perhaps that wouldn't be a plus. Then again, maybe it would.
-- Original message
On Mar 11, 2008, at 12:27 PM, Timber wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/timbercode/image/94028814
Nice and sharp appearing for a 1/15 second exposure. Composition
wise, it is a classical perspective photo. Nicely done!
Godfrey
This was made handheld with the f1.2 Porst. Did I told you I love
Timber wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/timbercode/image/94028814
This was made handheld with the f1.2 Porst. Did I told you I love this
lens? :D
Beautiful shot, Timber. Is that in Budapest?
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Cotty: Very nice. Lovely lines. Good eye here. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:50 PM
Subject: PESO - Churchyard
One from a walk today.
Oh yes, that's the sapling effect I've heard about! WOW!
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One from a walk today.
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic47.html
R-D1 + 28mm Ultron 2.8
handheld ISO400 1/15th at f8
PS CS with Power Retouche mono conv.
Comments
Probably not. Maybe next year. Sounds like fun it would be VERY good to
meet everyone. I would enjoy that. Some very nice folks on the list.
BTW, Scott, I was looking at the previous PUG Galleries noticed the
Synchronization Project. Any way we might do that for 2008? Just a
thought.
Good one, Godfrey. Great facial expressions. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: DUG [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PDML List PDML@pdml.net;
PAW [EMAIL PROTECTED]; SeePhoto Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:22 PM
Subject: PESO
Timber: That's one terrific photo. Light, exposure, composition, subject
all work perfectly--and hand-held to boot! You clearly demonstrate very
steady technique. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Timber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent:
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
