Thanks Frank, and Walt.
One very nice thing about this weekend is that at times I felt that my dancing
didn't actually suck. The fact that at many of those moments I had attractive
ladies in my arms also improved my mood.
I did not put nearly the energy into getting good photos of the bands
a very interesting slideshow here about an exhibition of British art,
including a couple of stunning photos that I haven't seem before by Bill
Brandt:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-17829052
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On 4/27/2012 08:11, Adam Montoya wrote:
At my Uncle's third wedding, i brought along my DSLR just to take some
test shots and what not (2006 with my *ist DL). Only had the camera a
few days so i wanted to play with the high iso (3200) in a poor
lighting situation. Big mistake. Found out
Hi!
Since I sincerely don't need the K-7, it is offered for sale.
Included is/are?!:
* K-7 (approx 15,000 shutter activations)
* Installed and shimmed - Katz Eye (regular, not optibrite, no markings)
focusing screen. There're some marks on the screen caused by its
installation process. They
I wouldn't take a DSLR to a wedding ceremony anymore. Then again I
wouldn't take a DSLR to most places now for anything. If I did go to a
wedding, I'd take my X10 which has become my go anywhere/ do anything
camera. Its only weakness is at the long end of the bottle but for
everything else
On 4/26/2012 03:21, Larry Colen wrote:
All weekend long I felt like I was fighting with my K-5, rather than
just using it. I suspect that a lot of my problems were with my
inexpensive split prism focusing screen. At least the metering
problems. When I put the 18-250 on the metering flat out
You may remember me talking about a calender project some time ago.
The calendar is published. I'm pretty happy with the result.
Now it is time for exhibitions.
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/2012/04/nordic-light-2012-sarbar-sterk.html
I'm the pretty guy in picture number three.
The exhibition is
Congratulations, well done. It looks like a very interesting picture!
B
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Tim Øsleby
Sent: 27 April 2012 11:10
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Not a PESO, more a boasting post
You may
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Cotty
I wouldn't take a DSLR to a wedding ceremony anymore. Then again I
wouldn't take a DSLR to most places now for anything. If I did go to a
wedding, I'd take my X10 which has become my go anywhere/ do anything
Good to hear, Tim. Congratulations.
Paul
On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:09 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
You may remember me talking about a calender project some time ago.
The calendar is published. I'm pretty happy with the result.
Now it is time for exhibitions.
Excellent set. Well done.
Paul
On Apr 26, 2012, at 2:19 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Strong set.
I should not have looked at them (esp. the last ones) just before a
visit to our vet :(
Bulent
-
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/26/2012 7:23 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Practicing my retouching. Getting quicker now ...
http://www.flickr.com/bruce_m_walker/7116760695/lightbox/
K20D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 50mm, f/8, 125th, ISO 100
Two Elinchrom
Thank you, Frank.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:54 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Rawrrr right back at her!
Excellent photo.
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
That's terrific, Tim; congratulations!
What I can see of your shot makes me want to see it better. I bet it's
wonderful printed large like that.
BTW, who did the printing and mounting? Looks like a very pro job.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com wrote:
You may
Boris, your take on this thread has been very well said and is mine as well.
Jack
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 2:26 AM
Subject: Re: Wedding photography (or not), + peso...
On 4/27/2012 08:11, Adam Montoya wrote:
I'm very impressed with the picture you're in front of, Tim.
Congrats!
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 3:09 AM
Subject: Not a PESO, more a boasting post
You may remember me
The hight ISO performance ~is~ oustanding.
I couldn't believe how clean iso 6400 is.
Wendy
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:20 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I spent the weekend at a dance event, and one of the other people there had
just gotten a 5DmkIII. Even though I was officially the
A friend sent me this and I thought I'd pass it along.
A Connecticut Senator proposes a bill to make law enforcement
accountable for interfering with photographers:
One more reason i took my D200 to my daughters wedding. The second
photographer's SB800 died and i lent him mine. Two more reasons i took
my D200 to my daughters wedding, i had my pic's up for them to see the
next morning, it took the hired gun just under 11 months to get them
their photos.
Dave
Nice
Dave
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
My new used K mount Lensbaby 3Gf arrived today and I got my boy Jazz to pose
for a few pics - I love it, much easier to use (for me) than the Lensbaby
Muse.
A couple of snapshots -
Also one ofr the reasons i us my nikons more than Pentax, is the AF in
these low light conditions is much better.
Dave
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Bipin Gupta bip...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Larry, interesting post. If you can saw and file an old focusing
screen with split + micro prism
On 4/27/2012 7:15 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/26/2012 7:23 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Practicing my retouching. Getting quicker now ...
http://www.flickr.com/bruce_m_walker/7116760695/lightbox/
K20D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 50mm,
On 27 April 2012 22:21, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/27/2012 7:15 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/26/2012 7:23 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Practicing my retouching. Getting quicker now ...
On 4/27/2012 9:31 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 27 April 2012 22:21, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/27/2012 7:15 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.comwrote:
On 4/26/2012 7:23 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Practicing my retouching.
Got it.
Had to turn off the network selection option.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
On 27 April 2012 22:52, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/27/2012 9:31 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 27 April 2012 22:21, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
Your comfort in working with people on formal shoots will only come
with practice. I used to be a nervous wreck, now, not so
I've been going back and forth with this since I got back from Boston..
Anyone have strong feelings about which of these is better ?
The first is as shot, the second is adjusted, as you see, to straighten
it but that necessitated a different crop.
I like the original one.
But I don't subscribe the always level horizontals school of though.
DS
On 27 April 2012 23:06, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
I've been going back and forth with this since I got back from Boston..
Anyone have strong feelings about which of these is better ?
On 4/27/2012 10:06 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 27 April 2012 22:52, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/27/2012 9:31 AM, David Savage wrote:
On 27 April 2012 22:21, Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.comwrote:
Your comfort in working with people on formal shoots will only come
with
She looks like a lot of fun to shoot.
DS
On 27 April 2012 08:23, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Practicing my retouching. Getting quicker now ...
http://www.flickr.com/bruce_m_walker/7116760695/lightbox/
K20D, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 50mm, f/8, 125th, ISO 100
Two Elinchrom BX500 RI
I would vote for the 3rd one.
It would be similar to the 2nd, but not over-tilted.
While I am not a stickler to having all photos leveled,
a bunch of Pisa poles are disturbing my eye.
So, the 2nd one is more pleasing, but I think you rotated it just a bit
too much. I would back off just a notch.
The first one..by far. I prefer the perspective curve as well as the crop.
Very soft light omm.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 8:06 AM
Subject: Which PESO ?
I've been going
K-5 arrived today and battery is on its maiden charge, so my beloved
Stormtrooper AKA NASA Edition White K-x kit is for sale.
My feelings about the K-x are well-known. It is a terrific
bang-for-the-buck camera and the IQ improvement over my K200D,
especially at high ISOs is impressive. 9300
Ann - If it comes down to a choice between the two images, I'd pick the first.
I like the first one because it shows what the bridge is bridging,
but I would prefer the spires to be vertically upright.
I'm curious how you straightened it. Did you just rotate and crop or
did you try to use the
Ho hum... another pirate shot...
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List PDML@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:23 PM
Subject: PESO Raw!
Practicing my retouching. Getting
At the risk of redundancy, I'll echo the sentiments expressed by the others:
I like the first shot best, though the second shot certainly doesn't put
me off in any way.
(We don't have them there fancy bridges in western Kentucky, BTW.)
-- Walt
On 4/27/2012 10:06 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Now *here's* a shot you don't get many chances at:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/scott/bear-in-mid-air
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Mark,
I like the 2nd shot.
As for the Lensbaby lenses, - I've tried to look at them a few times,
and never got the sense of them.
The first time when I got them in my hands was at a photo exhibit
in San Diego in 2007. That was a weird experience. The
lady that at the manufacturer's booth was
The second is immensely more pleasing to my eye. I think it’s not the
leveling, it’s having lost the visual junk in the lower left, freeing
up the smaller streetlight curves to echo the larger ones in the
center. -T
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
I've
Of the two, the first is more dynamic. The second, cropped
straightened as it is looks to static to me.
-p
On 4/27/2012 10:06 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I've been going back and forth with this since I got back from Boston..
Anyone have strong feelings about which of these is better ?
The
From: Walt Gilbert
I'm in a bit of a sticky situation in that regard, living in a town of
about 350 people, and the biggest town within reasonable driving
distance being about 35,000 (Paducah, Kentucky). Though, despite the
lack of a big population center, I don't really have that much trouble
From: Ann Sanfedele
I've been going back and forth with this since I got back from Boston..
Anyone have strong feelings about which of these is better ?
The first is as shot, the second is adjusted, as you see, to straighten
it but that necessitated a different crop.
Thanks Bob, Paul, Bruce and Jack.
The print was done at Eurofoto.no located about 50 km away. At first
attempt they did a miserable job, but second try was spot on. Framing
was done locally. The framer gave us a very good price.
--
MaritimTim
My private photo blog:
On 4/27/2012 11:24, Igor Roshchin wrote:
I would vote for the 3rd one.
It would be similar to the 2nd, but not over-tilted.
har!
While I am not a stickler to having all photos leveled,
a bunch of Pisa poles are disturbing my eye.
So, the 2nd one is more pleasing, but I think you rotated it
On 4/27/2012 11:47, George Sinos wrote:
Ann - If it comes down to a choice between the two images, I'd pick the first.
You and Jack picked what I chose initially to show..
I like the first one because it shows what the bridge is bridging,
but I would prefer the spires to be vertically
I almost always go for straight verticals, but in this case, I prefer the first
shot. A lot more information there, and the tilt tends to complement the image
a bit.
Paul
On Apr 27, 2012, at 2:09 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On 4/27/2012 11:47, George Sinos wrote:
Ann - If it comes down to a
I see what you mean about the poles and over compensating... I think I
did the second, 1st then went back to the first one as a better choice.
And Tim pointed out visual junk that I couldnt even see in the lower
left . hmmm..
I like Paul's reason for liking the first better. Fascinating
Saw that item on the news here this morning.. but they didnt show the
whole vid - just a still shot
ann
On 4/27/2012 12:48, Walt Gilbert wrote:
Now *here's* a shot you don't get many chances at:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/scott/bear-in-mid-air
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Like it!
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 10:58 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
That's what they call these bike locking posts around here:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2012/04/lolllypops.html?m=1
Looks like University of Toronto has their own rings made; in the
Walt, MM lists 7 young ladies who live within 25 miles of Paduca,
Kentucky who will work TFP (ie trade-for-photo).
All you need to do is come up with an idea for a shoot, eg theme,
location, wardrobe, any props, and approach these folks with your
shoot description. If they think your shots will
I have a sorely neglected orchid on my kitchen windowsill. Despite the
lack of care over the last year it has been blooming like crazy for
about two months now.
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/142922688
K7 + DA 18-135
--
Wendy Beard
Carp, Ontario
Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I've always been somewhat of a bottom-feeder when it comes to
equipment (you remember me, Mr. Bang-for-the-buck Guy) so this K-5 is
new territory for me (but I think I could get used to it).
I'm very impressed by what I see of the K-5 so far. What I've never
heard anybody talk about before (or
Fun to shoot? Yes, and no. She's a serious model-in-training. She is
dedicated and very hard-working. She was fun to shoot in that it was a
breeze -- anything you ask her to do, she does, perfectly, no
questions. To the left, same on the right, roar like a lion ...
whatever.
But she was all
Ar! :)
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ho hum... another pirate shot...
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List PDML@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent:
A very nice image. My wife has a number of orchids and they *are*
quite beautiful flowers. I can see how they could become habit
forming.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Congratulations Darren!
--
Kent Brede
http://kentonbrede.com/
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I've always been somewhat of a bottom-feeder when it comes to
equipment (you remember me, Mr. Bang-for-the-buck Guy) so this K-5 is
new territory for me
The first, by a long shot.
Beautiful photo.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Sent: April 27, 2012 4/27/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject:
I sent a post a couple of hours ago but it seems to have gotten lost in the
ether. May yet show up, so apologies if there's a bit of duplication.
Anyway, it's a terrific photo and I like the first one by a long shot. So much
more dynamic!
Love it, Ann!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted
Wendy,
Nice picture. I think the orchid likes the light! Don't overwater.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 1:59 PM, wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a sorely neglected orchid on my kitchen windowsill. Despite the
lack of care over the last year it has been blooming like
If one was ever wondering if the Sigma 28/1.8 tended to flare, this should put
the question to rest.
Jeffery
On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I've always been somewhat of a bottom-feeder when it comes to
equipment (you remember me, Mr. Bang-for-the-buck Guy) so this K-5 is
There are no bad lenses. Only lenses used badly.
I'm not sure if some of those images are truly low contrast from
flare, or if they have been lomographied with Instagram or something.
In any event, in this day and age, there is no excuse not to know what
you are getting when you purchase a lens.
That's a beautiful photo. The light is amazing.
Every time I see an orchid I'm reminded of the movie Adaptation and my
favourite scene with the brilliant Chris Cooper:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2OeubjrX9Ifeature=youtube_gdata_player
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof
Oh Pshaw!
Here's what you do: Shave your head. Wear sunglasses all the time, even inside.
You may rest them on top of your freshly shorn head during the shoot if you
want.
Wear all black. Or all white. With matching gaudy cowboy boots. Smoke Gitanes
or Gauloises.
Call the models Baby and
I've started having problems with this lens that are weird. I don't
think it's operator error...
It didn't want to AF last time I had it on (was using more as a
telephoto). I just mounted it again, and had the same issue. It seems
to hunt a bit but does not achieve focus and stops.
It was on the
I guess the nation may fall by it´s lack of humor :-)
Thanks Boris, and Christine, Darren, knarf, Paul, Ann and Dan.
DagT
Den 23. apr. 2012 kl. 05:34 skrev Boris Liberman:
On 4/23/2012 01:08, DagT wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA70mm, 1/100s,
My is seriously prone to search wildly for focus when I'm shooting close
objects.
Jeffery
On Apr 27, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Tom C wrote:
I've started having problems with this lens that are weird. I don't
think it's operator error...
It didn't want to AF last time I had it on (was using more
Frank,
The clip is amusing.
The Seminoles never signed a peace treaty with us.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:51 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a beautiful photo. The light is amazing.
Every time I see an orchid I'm reminded of the movie
I run into operator error sometimes when I lock the focus
inadvertantly when I take the lens on and off.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
I've started having problems with this lens that are weird. I don't
think it's operator error...
It didn't
I'm looking forward to seeing some images taken with the Sigma. A friend of
mine just bought the Pentax 10-17, but I don't like the distortion of it. I'm
hankering' for a good ultra wide angle, and it is going to either be Pentax or
Sigma.
Jeffery
On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Darren Addy
You don't say if you are using the F, FA, DA or DA WR version. My
FA100 will sometimes refuse to get a focus lock and sit at infinity.
I press in the mount lock button to release the AF drive and manually
focus to approximate focus and it then seems to work ok till the next
time it decides it
Quoting David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com:
I like the original one.
But I don't subscribe the always level horizontals school of though.
As Dave knows, I do
But, while I would normally prefer the second, I think the amount of
cropping needed to straighten the image, spoils it's
You don't say if you are using the F, FA, DA or DA WR version. My
FA100 will sometimes refuse to get a focus lock and sit at infinity.
I press in the mount lock button to release the AF drive and manually
focus to approximate focus and it then seems to work ok till the next
time it decides
On 4/27/2012 16:32, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I sent a post a couple of hours ago but it seems to have gotten lost in the
ether. May yet show up, so apologies if there's a bit of duplication.
Anyway, it's a terrific photo and I like the first one by a long shot. So much
more dynamic!
On 4/27/2012 9:50 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Nice
Thanks, Dave - I'm looking forward to doing some macro work with this one...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Other than the smoking and the Canon, I've got the rest covered.
Now why isn't that damned phone ringing?
Better go smoke another Canon.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:12 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh Pshaw!
Here's what you do: Shave your head. Wear sunglasses
I had an A* 300 f/2.8 that had a problem with the aperture cam/lever
control/or? sticking wide open. Got some terrible over exposures.
Send it to Pentax for repair. When I got it back, I gave it a try by hand
before mounting it and it stuck. Tried it several more times and it did not
stick
On 4/27/2012 12:56 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Mark,
I like the 2nd shot.
As for the Lensbaby lenses, - I've tried to look at them a few times,
and never got the sense of them.
The first time when I got them in my hands was at a photo exhibit
in San Diego in 2007. That was a weird experience. The
On 4/27/2012 5:13 PM, Tom C wrote:
I've started having problems with this lens that are weird. I don't
think it's operator error...
It didn't want to AF last time I had it on (was using more as a
telephoto). I just mounted it again, and had the same issue. It seems
to hunt a bit but does not
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 04:34:57PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
Yeah that was stupid of me. It's the tank-artillery-shell-bodied
FA/100 2.8 Macro.
It seems to be related to the aperture lever/control on the lens. It
appears through the viewfinder that it's totally stopped down in 'A'
mode, even
On 4/27/2012 2:59 PM, wendy beard wrote:
I have a sorely neglected orchid on my kitchen windowsill. Despite the
lack of care over the last year it has been blooming like crazy for
about two months now.
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/142922688
K7 + DA 18-135
Beautiful!
--
PDML
On Apr 27, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I've always been somewhat of a bottom-feeder when it comes to
equipment (you remember me, Mr. Bang-for-the-buck Guy) so this K-5 is
new territory for me (but I think I could get used to it).
I'm very impressed by what I see of the K-5 so far.
Congrats, Mr. Bang.
You better be careful, next thing you know, you'll be buying LN-
lenses at KEH, and before long... you'll accept nothing but brand-new
from BH, at the new improved msrp!
:)
I do love how quiet the K-5 is. The other day, I had been shooting
with the 55-300, which makes a
Lovely.
You make me think that maybe even I could manage an orchid, as long as
they thrive on neglect...
:)
-c
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:59 PM, wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a sorely neglected orchid on my kitchen windowsill. Despite the
lack of care over the last year it has
Heh, that reminds me of the 645D lecture that we attended. I tried
out one of the SDM lenses that the Pentax rep had, and it was silent.
I thought the thing was broken until it came into focus. :)
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net wrote:
I do love how quiet
Everywhere is an office space:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2012/04/portable-office.html
Hope you enjoy. Comments welcome.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yep, when you mount the lens and the viewfinder is dark,
then your aperture lever isn't aligning with the body...probably bent.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:12 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 04:34:57PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
Yeah that was stupid of
On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:50 PM, David Parsons wrote:
Heh, that reminds me of the 645D lecture that we attended. I tried
out one of the SDM lenses that the Pentax rep had, and it was silent.
I thought the thing was broken until it came into focus. :)
Almost the opposite happened to me. I
Great catch, Frank.
She is certainly plugged in
Jack
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 6:51 PM
Subject: PESO - The Portable Office
Everywhere is an office space:
That's incredible!
Wonderful news. And from the photos I've seen from the project, most deserving.
Congratulations!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com
Sent:
Both pretty cool pictures. Looks like you'll be having some fun with that lens!
:-)
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net
Sent: April 27, 2012 4/27/12
To:
Bob,
I'm uncertain if you're saying that because Seminole never signed a peace
treaty that they therefore don't have rights to hunt, fish or harvest in
restricted areas? Are you saying that this scene is completely unrealistic?
Or did you mention the lack of treaty as an interesting bit of
Frank,
I think the Seminoles have the best claim to 'We are not be bound by your laws.'
The scene isn't realistic, but that's because of the ranger.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:01 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob,
I'm uncertain if you're saying
Okay, I understand now.
I agree the whole scene is pretty much a fantasy. Fun, though, imho.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Sent: April 28, 2012 4/28/12
Thanks, Wendy!
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: wendy beard pointyp...@gmail.com
Sent: April 27, 2012 4/27/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - Lollipops
Like
Just a quick grab shot.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20cresentmoon.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 43mm Limited f1.9
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20thelighttower.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 43mm Limited f1.9
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML
96 matches
Mail list logo
