This gave me a chuckle
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/22817939306/in/album-72157660557640441/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Thanks Bipin. The background is too bright. I'm not happy with the rendering
and will revise it today. The brightness setting on my monitor had change,
probably due to an inadvertent keystroke, and I didn't notice until after I had
posted this. The sky has some tonality on the neg.
Paul via pho
agree with Rick :-)
ann
On 11/7/2015 9:13 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Much better!
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 1:16 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
The sky isn't really blown out, it's an artifact of the Tri-X presets in
Filmpack 3 more than anything, else.
To really do jus
Thanks Rick. There are big building south of the pier, hotels primarily,
including Lowes where I always used to stay. But the beach houses north of the
pier are of modest size. But not modest price of course.
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 12:07 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> I like it. Perfect hazy LA back
Yup...me, too
-p
On 11/7/2015 8:18 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
agree with Rick :-)
ann
On 11/7/2015 9:13 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
Much better!
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 1:16 AM, P.J. Alling
wrote:
The sky isn't really blown out, it's an artifact of the Tri-X pr
I nominate Larry to go down the rabbit hole and report back if he finds
anything interesting.
On 11/6/2015 12:14 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Of course there is a Flash Bulbs group on Flickr:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/flashbulbs
Interesting discussions and photo pool, if you want to go down that
test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I do already have a good strong tripod & doesn't it came with a trunk of
its own (?), so hey! ... I'm halfway there already.
On 11/6/2015 3:45 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Nor, the nearly $6000 I'd need for a SMC Pentax-FA* 600mm F4 ED [IF],
assuming I could even find one for sale.
And don't forget t
On 11/7/2015 10:43 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
test
Everything's fine her
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDM
you get an A
On 11/7/2015 10:43 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Good to go here in MKE
Nice to see you back again
-p
On 11/7/2015 9:43 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
test
--
Being old doesn't seem so old now that I'm old.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi
Success. Good to hear from you!
G
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 7:43 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>
> test
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 7/11/15, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
>test
Get it sorted, Trouble !!
X
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net
Thanks everyone! I’m so behind on everything! I owe on-list comments; I owe
off-list comments—from months ago. I’m hoping to get up to speed very soon, so
I can jump back into PDML, which I miss!
Life is holding steady—can’t complain too much—just all the usual drama et al,
but Darrel & I ar
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 11:30 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
> On 7/11/15, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> test
>
> Get it sorted, Trouble !!
>
> X
Roger that! XXOO
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE f
I do already have a good strong tripod & doesn't it came with a trunk of
its own (?), so hey! ... I'm halfway there already.
It better be very strong - I went thru 2 'HD' Gitzos til I found one sturdy
enough to be almost vibration free.
The 600 FA does in fact come with a very nice luggage ty
Nope ! Never got the test.
Although I did take Ann's test yesterday.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: test
test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p
I think a trunk only helps you carry it, if it's attached to an elephant.
On 11/7/2015 10:55 AM, John wrote:
I do already have a good strong tripod & doesn't it came with a trunk of
its own (?), so hey! ... I'm halfway there already.
On 11/6/2015 3:45 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Nor, the nearly $600
Reminds me of the butcher that backed into the meat grinder & got a little
behind in his work !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: test
Thanks everyone! I’m so behind on everything! I owe on-li
Frank, Darren, John and Ann,
Thank you all very much for your comments.
To tell you the truth, this was not a spontaneous shot.
I was busy looking for a composition that featured clouds as an integral part.
Towards end of my walk around the neighborhood (after getting wet myself a bit).
I have no
Happy Birthday to Darrel. Rio Bravo - a man after my own heart. ;>]
Miss-read the thing about the chocolates...thought it said erotic...
-p
On 11/7/2015 11:37 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Thanks everyone! I’m so behind on everything! I owe on-list comments; I owe
off-list comments—from mon
I liked the revised version more.
Still, the images looks to be in need of some more touch.
And I don't know what that might be...
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the
This needs to be a favorite; and not only yours!
She looks not only cool but somewhat surreal, otherworldly...
And with just one light source!
Any info on the background?
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpres
No blown highlights on the hat...
Her face in the shadow is seen nicely.
I wonder how much of this was due the latitude of the film and
how much to the experience of the photographer.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasu
Oh my! Lovely story.
Thanks for sharing Ann.
I can never tell when I bought something I wear.
These days, I can not even tell if the thing on me at that moment
was originally mine or was one of my sons'!
And my wife swears she wore that particular shirt first before we got married;
that is befor
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
> This needs to be a favorite; and not only yours!
Thank you, Bulent!
> She looks not only cool but somewhat surreal, otherworldly...
>
> And with just one light source!
>
> Any info on the background?
Do you mean the green stuff? A couple
If you figure the all in cost at about $7500, I won't really have to
start worrying about it until I've managed to save another $7000.
On 11/7/2015 12:54 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
I do already have a good strong tripod & doesn't it came with a trunk of
its own (?), so hey! ... I'm halfway there alre
>Do you mean the green stuff?
Yes, indeed.
I was thinking of using some cloth for a background.
And did a few times, without much success.
The best background was the invisible one, which obviously defeats the purpose.
Now I see that this kind of textured, solid background can add an
image witho
Thank you Ann, Igor, Marco, Jack, Toine, Godfrey, Frank, Bob, and
anyone who looked. Glad you you enjoyed the humour in that! :)
And Jack ...
> Was that your only choice, Bruce?
Of course we shot a few variations, including having the hand reach up
from below to cover the model's crotch. But my a
Much of that was achieved in post. But Portra 400 has good latitude, and I
usually rated it at ISO 320, which seemed to make it even better.
Paul via phone
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
>
> No blown highlights on the hat...
> Her face in the shadow is seen nicely.
>
> I
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
>>
>>Do you mean the green stuff?
>
> Yes, indeed.
>
> I was thinking of using some cloth for a background.
> And did a few times, without much success.
> The best background was the invisible one, which obviously defeats the
> purpose.
>
> No
> Portra 400 has good latitude, and I usually rated it at ISO 320, which seemed
> to make it even better.
Thanks, Paul.
I remember storing a few rolls of that in the freezer.
Will shoot at ISO 320.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.ge
Another pic from 2-15-02 on the Venice boardwalk. Same drill: 6x7, Porta 400VC
at ISO 320. Not sure about the lens.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18123544&size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PD
You don't need chocolates for that when you have a beard like Darrel's!
> On 7 Nov 2015, at 18:57, Paul wrote:
>
> Happy Birthday to Darrel. Rio Bravo - a man after my own heart. ;>]
>
> Miss-read the thing about the chocolates...thought it said erotic...
>
> -p
>
>> On 11/7/2015 11:37 AM,
Thank you, Frank. And thanks everyone who looked or commented.
Regarding that ripped top, to allay fears that it represents violence
of any kind: it was purposefully torn by the model's boyfriend to
create a peek-a-boo garment for posing like this. Sans rips, it would
fail to allow the nipple to m
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 7:16 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> This is another shot from my first work with art model Dorrie Mack,
>> back in May. (It's actually work-safe unless you squint real hard.)
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/22533038336/
Thank you very much, Dan! Thank you too, Ken, P.J., and Mark!
Sorry you aren't partial to the pasties, but they were done to add a
more authentic Cabaret ala 1930's Germany look. I admit they don't fit
as snugly as pasties are supposed to do. The designer, Eva, had not
done then before and didn't
Welcome back, stranger!
:-)
Cheers,
frank
On November 7, 2015 10:43:51 AM EST, Christine Aguila
wrote:
>test
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.n
Nice. Love her look. Like the nipple, but I get a sense that the photo works
too hard to reveal it.
Paul via phone
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 3:36 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Bill wrote:
>>> On 10/29/2015 7:16 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>>
>>> This is another shot f
A noir-ish shot for the b&w fans ...
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/22824553196/lightbox/
645Z, DFA645 90mm/2.8, f:11, 1/125th sec, 100 ISO
One light: Buff 22" beauty dish with 10 degree grid, close to on-axis.
Model: Molly Fassbender, a much tattooed alt-model who you will see
mu
All choices brilliantly made!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> Thank you Ann, Igor, Marco, Jack, Toine, Godfrey, Frank, Bob, and
> anyone who looked. Glad you you enjoyed the humour in that! :)
>
> And Jack ...
>> Was that your only choice, Bruce?
Another pic from 2-15-02 on the Venice boardwalk. Same drill: 6x7, Porta 400VC
at ISO 320. Not sure about the lens.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18123544&size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
SHEESH, would you believe this PESO image was just picked for Flickr explore
i'm actually embarrassed for them.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 9:38 AM, John wrote:
> I nominate Larry to go down the rabbit hole and report back if he finds
> anything interesting.
>
> On 11/6/2015 12:14 PM, Darren Addy w
I prefer the new version. The sky/clouds of the first one wasn't such a bother
to me but I found there wasn't enough tonal contrast between machine and
background. It needed to jump put from the trees, and that wasn't happening in
version 1.0.
Version 1.1 is a huge improvement in tonality and t
She has an absolutely striking face. As usual with you, the photo is
technically flawless.
I'm looking at it on my phone, and when I "enlarge" it, effectively cropping
it just below her left hand, I find it a much more compelling image. It focuses
my attention on her face.
I find everything b
45 matches
Mail list logo