Thanks Jack!
On Mar 4, 2016, at 11:05 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Really nice effect, Rick!
> J
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rick Womer"
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 6:49:19 PM
> Subject: PESO - Dusting of Snow
>
> My walk to work this morning requir
Thanks, Ann. I suspect there will more PESOs featuring this building as it
becomes occupied and the tree on the left (and a few others) leaf out.
Rick
On Mar 5, 2016, at 9:46 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Yup yup yup - love it
> ann
>
> On 3/5/2016 6:55 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>> This is one facad
That screening is very interesting - looks like a multi-layer thing. I'll
bet someone will try climbing it.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Rick Womer
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 1:55 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - New Building
This is one facade of Penn's new psych
Hope there are some flickr savvy folks here who could help me explain
something...
A week ago I posted 16 images at Flickr to share with local photographers; we
have just submitted a number of entries to an Austrian photo competition
together, and use flickr to excange info on our selections.
Funny you should ask...
Something like that happened recently to me on smugmug... the amount of
hits on my page on feb 16 zoomed to 5,000
yet, the photo I posted that day only had the usual approximatel 200 to
300 that I normally get when PEso'ing
Interesting that the anomally happens on othe
Your image was probably chosen by Flickr Explore. Congrats!
http://www.fluidr.com will show you all of the day's Explore shots.
You can also enter your username here to see what images are in
Explore: https://bighugelabs.com/scout.php
You should probably also see an Explore Invite for you to acce
> On 06 March 2016 at 01:08 Darren Addy wrote:
>
>
> This is a side discussion to Ann's purchase of a lightly used R2400. I
> agreed with Mike Wilson's caution, but not necessarily his view of
> "Irrecoverably". Using Epson's print head cleaning utility is
> guaranteed to use up a lot of ink, if
I tend to agree with you Mike.
With the prices at places like sharpprints.com I find it hard to
justify the expense of an inkjet. In many cases you are going to have
to gamble on $100 or more for a set of ink just to see what you've
got. I'm in that position right now with an old Epson R800. It was
> On 06 March 2016 at 17:40 Darren Addy wrote:
>
>
> I tend to agree with you Mike.
> With the prices at places like sharpprints.com I find it hard to
> justify the expense of an inkjet. In many cases you are going to have
> to gamble on $100 or more for a set of ink just to see what you've
> go
Thanks Darren!
You're right. There was something about explore. Is that some kind of curated
photostream? When I Google it, I only find dos/don'ts for how to get photos in
there, and nothing on how it is selected or presented to users...
Sorry about being totally noob here... :-(
Jostein
Den
Mike,
I'd love to have some links on how to do digital negatives for
cyanotypes on LASER printers. Didn't know that was possible. I've got
access to good laser printers at work (including a copier that can do
11x17) and I've got a Liquid Cyanotype kit from Photographer's
Formulary sitting here itch
It is a secret how it works, so people don't game the system, but my
sense is that Flickr has a special stream set up for Explore
moderators to view. The photos included in that stream are those that
get a lot of favorites/to views ratio. More immediate reactions and
time of day (or day of week) ca
Urgh... you're asking me to _remember_ something?
It's a very long time ago but I think I used one of the "artistic" filters in PS
to pick up the edges of an image, turned that into a negative as it made the
edges light against a black background before reversal, and then printed that
onto the fil
Thanks Mike. Fortunately Google-Fu is my superpower, so have turned up
some interesting things to investigate. The idea of layering two less
dense laser transparencies (carefully registering them) opens up some
possibilities (although the downside is using obviously more
transparency material). I m
As per another thread...
This photo had its moments of attention at Flickr a couple of days ago.
It's an oldie from my trip to Antarctica in 2009 that I have submitted to a
photo contest. If the flickr reaction is anything to go by, maybe it will do
well... :-)
https://flic.kr/p/EJ7yFi
Jostein
Antarctica! Wow!
Cool shot and worthy of the accolades. Low color images like that
always beckon me to see what they look like in monochrome (AKA Silver
Efex Pro 2).
:)
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
> As per another thread...
> This photo had its moments of attention at Fl
Possibly someone with a fairly large following found it,
clicked the "share" button and it snowballed from there.
https://www.flickr.com/explore
https://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/
On 3/6/2016 10:28 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Hope there are some flickr savvy folks here who could help me explain
A stark reminder of a terrible business. Just a rusting hulk in 2009 I
presume? My maternal grandfather (Swedish) was a marine engineer with the
old Union Whaling Company which operated from Durban. He spent about 7
months each year in Antarctica. There were many photos in his albums of
whale c
On 3/6/2016 12:30 PM, mike wilson wrote:
On 06 March 2016 at 01:08 Darren Addy wrote:
This is a side discussion to Ann's purchase of a lightly used R2400. I
agreed with Mike Wilson's caution, but not necessarily his view of
"Irrecoverably". Using Epson's print head cleaning utility is
guarante
Ricoh Imaging just shared this in their FB channel:
https://www.facebook.com/RicohImaging/photos/a.173724382692.132787.101083642692/10153226773752693/?type=3&theater
Google the photographer and this is his web site.
http://www.joeyskibel.com/#!bio/r8wkn
His bio says: "Skibel is now a Creative Ma
Costco prints are inkjet. Most stores print on Epson 7880. Some are Noritsu.
Not many shops print optically any more. In my opinion, inkjet are better.
Paul
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 2:11 PM, John wrote:
>
> On 3/6/2016 12:30 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>>> On 06 March 2016 at 01:08 Darren Addy wrote:
>
This may be of interest to only a few, but I pass it along anyway...
If you want a "Master's Class" in B&W film developers, you have to get
a copy of the 1998 "The Film Developing Cookbook". WOW. Just received
my copy and it is a well-organized, easy read on the various families
of developers, wha
Too bad. It wants me to "log in to continue."
EFF 'em. I ain't gonna!
On 3/6/2016 2:33 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Ricoh Imaging just shared this in their FB channel:
https://www.facebook.com/RicohImaging/photos/a.173724382692.132787.101083642692/10153226773752693/?type=3&theater
Google the photog
A Junco waiting for a spot at the feeder. I was pleased that the K3 in single
spot autofocus mode was able to nail him in the eye, rather than focusing on a
branch. K3 with 1.4X converter, DA F 150-450. F8, 1/800th , ISO 1250 +1.3
exposure comp.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18196639&
They just don't like you, I don't have an account and facebook lets me look.
On 3/6/2016 3:37 PM, John wrote:
Too bad. It wants me to "log in to continue."
EFF 'em. I ain't gonna!
On 3/6/2016 2:33 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Ricoh Imaging just shared this in their FB channel:
https://www.facebook
Costco offer a number of different print options, but you can still get
RA4 C-prints up to 12x18 (and if the operator knows what he's doing
12x36 panos).
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. You think inkjet prints are
better. I don't.
On 3/6/2016 2:48 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Costco pri
It's probably because they know what I think of them.
On 3/6/2016 3:45 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
They just don't like you, I don't have an account and facebook lets me
look.
On 3/6/2016 3:37 PM, John wrote:
Too bad. It wants me to "log in to continue."
EFF 'em. I ain't gonna!
On 3/6/2016 2:33 P
I keep myself warm at night imagining Zuckerberg, after a long and
fruitful life of screwing the public going to his just reward, and
finding himself in Micorsoft's version of hell. Most delicious because
he probably doesn't believe in it. It warms the cockles of me heart. You?
On 3/6/2016 3
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016, at 07:56 AM, John wrote:
> It's probably because they know what I think of them.
I'm sure I think pretty much the same of them - but they let me look at
the pic...
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org
John,
Try a different web browser, if you desire another attempt to see it.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 2:56 PM, John wrote:
> It's probably because they know what I think of them.
>
> On 3/6/2016 3:45 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>>
>> They just don't like you, I don't have an account and facebook lets me
I see we're going to have to go over the proper PDML procedure here.
First discern there is an issue.
Frame a question to the PDML and post it.
Then decided while waiting for a reply to check Google, Yahoo, Ask, (yes
each search engine get's worse), until finally trying Bing, not the
worst ex
Wellsome but not all of the heads are cloggedso that the nozzle check
doesn't even show a pattern
I did use the head cleaning once but then just printed a colorful page
of little squares and the colors were
off, of course.. the lightlight black was so low that I can't do
anything more until I re
A modest discovery today...
While going through boxes (trying to find my Gossen Luna Pro F) I
discovered a minty (still in snap case) Pentax AF240FT flash. This
apparently came in an SF1 kit (that was probably purchased for the F50
f/1.7 lens)
Some googling reveals that people used these with Pent
sometimes my 2400 sits for months and i have to do several haed
cleanings, just anFYI for you
Dave
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 5:09 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Wellsome but not all of the heads are cloggedso that the nozzle check
> doesn't even show a pattern
> I did use the head cleaning once but the
according to more than one of the guys in those you-tubes I've ben
looking at too much running of th head cleaning thing isnt good...
but with my R220 occasionally I had to run it two or three times -- but
it isn't as much of an ink guzzler as the r2400
This new computer of mine sat idle for ov
I like it - the snowy background somehow compensates for the tangle of branches
and keeps it from being too busy.
One could brighten things around the eye a bit to make it easier to see.
Rick
On Mar 6, 2016, at 3:42 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> A Junco waiting for a spot at the feeder. I was pl
I worked on the eye s bit but didn't want to dull the black eye or black
feathers. But I'm sure I could do more working on a pixel level.
Paul via phone
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 8:24 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> I like it - the snowy background somehow compensates for the tangle of
> branches and ke
Thanks Rick. Love snow for pics. Just have to remember that exposure comp.
Paul via phone
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 8:24 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> I like it - the snowy background somehow compensates for the tangle of
> branches and keeps it from being too busy.
>
> One could brighten things aroun
I decided to dig out a few lenses that haven't seen the light of day for
many, many years. One thing led to another, and I emptied my camera bag,
and took a few lenses out of the display case.
So I lined em up, and shot em down, then I did some cringe worthy post
processing.
http://users.acc
That's obscene, Bill!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 6:23 PM, Bill wrote:
>
> I decided to dig out a few lenses that haven't seen the light of day for
> many, many years. One thing led to another, and I emptied my camera bag, and
> took a few lenses out of the display case.
>
> S
On 3/6/2016 9:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
That's obscene, Bill!
Yeah, the processing is pretty bad.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
No, I mean the luxury of an obscene number of
lenses. ;-)
J
- Original Message -
From: "Bill"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2016 7:25:03 PM
Subject: Re: Peso: Glass Still Life
On 3/6/2016 9:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> That's obscene, Bill!
>
Yeah, the processing
Nice, makes me think of Shackleton.
Cheers,
Dave
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 7:42 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
>
> As per another thread...
> This photo had its moments of attention at Flickr a couple of days ago.
> It's an oldie from my trip to Antarctica in 2009 that I have submitted to a
> photo conte
You know you need to get out more when you take a photo of your lenses!
:)
(Now you're making me miss the ones I sold)
Cheers,
Dave
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 3:23 PM, Bill wrote:
>
> I decided to dig out a few lenses that haven't seen the light of day for
> many, many years. One thing led to anot
Gives new meaning to "rummaging".
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Bill
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 4:23 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Peso: Glass Still Life
I decided to dig out a few lenses that haven't seen the light of day for
many, many years. One thing led to another,
As we're having an opinion-fest..
My experience has been that inkjet prints are much easier to produce to an (at
least) adequate level of quality. I would guess that the effort required to
produce the equivalent of a highest-grade optical print is less than an order of
magnitude different. T
46 matches
Mail list logo