Larry Colen wrote:
>Speaking of websites, I've been trying to look at doing some printing at
>Bay Photo, and I'm afraid that I have not been favorably impressed with
>their website or ROES software. To start with, they specifically
>disallow any characters other than alphanumeric in the passwor
Nice enough - but numbers 055 Garden and 056 Floral are my faves of
your recent stuff - especially the Garden
looks like a still from "Blowup" or a mid 50s French flic
ann
On 3/8/2016 10:40 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Out for a walk last evening at sunset ...
http://flic.kr/p/Et7cKK
enj
But can't you see! The sky was falling! It hit Pål! He's Gon.
On 3/8/2016 7:15 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote:
I accidentally clicked on the wrong Mail folder and wound up in an old
PDML-related stash from long ago. The timeframe for the following, July 2004,
is around the time the *
Interesting. Was that written by Pal Klevin, Pal Jensen, or Pal Smorvik?
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
> I accidentally clicked on the wrong Mail folder and wound up in an old
> PDML-related stash from long ago. The timeframe for the following, July 2004,
> is around the
I accidentally clicked on the wrong Mail folder and wound up in an old
PDML-related stash from long ago. The timeframe for the following, July 2004,
is around the time the *ist-D was introduced IIRC:
> Actually, Pentax have long had a FA 87/2.4 Macro Limited lens developed that
> have not yet b
On 3/8/2016 7:39 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Wheatfield dear,
If memory serves (though chance of that happening these days is slim to
none) one of those golden oldies
once belonged to me. True or am I imagining?
Back left hand corner, if I am not mistaken.
ann
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, Bill wrot
I agree with Ken! Thanks for passing the link along, John.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Extremely well done images on his home page.
>
>
> -Original Message-
>>From: John
>>Subject: OT: a photographer
>>
>>One of the local camera clubs I belong to had this guy as a
John wrote:
On 3/8/2016 1:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
No doubt, they do great work. There is a lot to recommend them, but we
are talking about a website where the User Interface would have been
considered clunky in the last century, and which has serious security
flaws.
Is it a problem
Extremely well done images on his home page.
-Original Message-
>From: John
>Subject: OT: a photographer
>
>One of the local camera clubs I belong to had this guy as a speaker last
>night.
>
>OT because he's a Nikon shooter.
>
>http://www.bernardchen.com/
>
>Plus he's doing a lot of dron
On 3/8/2016 1:41 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
Speaking of websites, I've been trying to look at doing some printing
at Bay Photo, and I'm afraid that I have not been favorably impressed
with their website or ROES software. To start with, they specifically
disallow any characters ot
Very similar. A view further into the "park":
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/14050286025/
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: John
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 8:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Floral Streetlight
Just be thankful it ain't kudzu.
On 3/7
He must be a lucky photo composer. ;)
J
- Original Message -
From: "John"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 10:28:53 AM
Subject: OT: a photographer
One of the local camera clubs I belong to had this guy as a speaker last
night.
OT because he's a Nikon shooter.
A high shutter speed was assumed from that light. Also thought it would be
allowed due to the anticipated silhouettes.
Thanks, Godfrey.
Effective image!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 9:00:20 AM
Subject: Re:
One of the local camera clubs I belong to had this guy as a speaker last
night.
OT because he's a Nikon shooter.
http://www.bernardchen.com/
Plus he's doing a lot of drone photography.
I'm still not sure how I feel about drones. He's getting some great
photos - photos I aspire to take.
But, t
Just be thankful it ain't kudzu.
On 3/7/2016 2:17 PM, Alan C wrote:
A well maintained, floral streetlight over the road from my house.
At least the light works!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/25500794091/
K7 with the DA 18-55 WR. A bit noisy at ISO 800.
Alan C
---
This email has
Thanks.
On 3/7/2016 1:16 PM, Richard Klein wrote:
Does this link work for you?
https://www.facebook.com/photo/download/?fbid=10153226773752693
I downloaded the photo from facebook. I could just email it to you,
but I don't know if that's considered acceptable. I have no idea what
licensing ap
Windex is a brand name glass cleaner made of water, detergent, amino
alcohol, ammonia & fragrance.
http://www.whatsinsidescjohnson.com/us/en/brands/windex/windex-original-glass-cleaner
On 3/7/2016 1:50 PM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
Not familiar with the brand, but isn't it just some kind of organic
Thanks Jack!
I used to walk with a tripod more of the time, but modern sensitivity and image
stabilization obviates doing that for most casual shooting. I still use tripods
with longer and ultra wide lenses most of the time.
This was handheld, the shutter time was 1/4000 sec. I was set up for
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
> I am glad you asked. Your question reminded me that I hadn't cleared out
> those backups in a while. I just did that, recovered 40g disk space…
See i'm good for something around here, other than spelling classes
Dave
>
>
>> On Mar 8, 2016,
Comfortable composition and sharp as usual. Is it rare for you to
carry a tripod on your walks? Thanks, G
J
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
To: "PAW Picture-A-Week project" , "PDML" ,
"SeePhoto Talk" , "BAPhotoShooters BAPA"
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 7:40:27 AM
Subject
Out for a walk last evening at sunset ...
http://flic.kr/p/Et7cKK
enjoy!
G
The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the l
This doesn't look like something I'll be trying after reading about it..
I really don't do a high volume of printing.. and some of the cautions
were scary
ann
On 3/8/2016 8:33 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Carlos, thanks
I have windows 7... so no that new :-)
ann
On 3/8/2016 5:50 AM, Carlos R.
I am glad you asked. Your question reminded me that I hadn't cleared out those
backups in a while. I just did that, recovered 40g disk space…
> On Mar 8, 2016, at 9:06 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Stanley Halpin
> wrote:
>> I assume you are not referring to yo
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
> I assume you are not referring to your image file backups, but rather your LR
> catalog backups. Right?
Yes correct
>
> You do not need to keep older catalog file backups unless for some reason you
> thought you might need to revisit what
I assume you are not referring to your image file backups, but rather your LR
catalog backups. Right?
You do not need to keep older catalog file backups unless for some reason you
thought you might need to revisit what your catalog looked like in June of 2013…
stan
> On Mar 8, 2016, at 8:03 AM
Wheatfield dear,
If memory serves (though chance of that happening these days is slim to
none) one of those golden oldies
once belonged to me. True or am I imagining?
ann
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, Bill wrote:
On 3/6/2016 9:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
No, I mean the luxury of an obscene number of
l
Carlos, thanks
I have windows 7... so no that new :-)
ann
On 3/8/2016 5:50 AM, Carlos R. wrote:
When I had a pair of inkjet Epsoj printers, one of them found in the
street and successfully recovered using this software, I used this SSC
Service Utility to clean their heads with great results.
I have LR back up files on an external drive, from Jan1 2011 to last
week. Do i need all of these files or would the last few saved be
sufficient in case of problems. I only have 3 gig left on the drive
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 06:25:10 -0600 Bill wrote:
>
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
>>
>>I had one of those, used a lot on film cameras, less on digital. Works
>>great, but it is such a big lens.
>
>It is, but the new digital lenses are also huge. The 15-30 zoom weig
El 08/03/2016 a las 13:25, Bill escribió:
On 3/8/2016 4:51 AM, Carlos R. wrote:
El 08/03/2016 a las 3:48, Bill escribió:
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
Right you are, Mr. Alling.
I had one of those, used a lot on f
On 3/8/2016 4:51 AM, Carlos R. wrote:
El 08/03/2016 a las 3:48, Bill escribió:
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
Right you are, Mr. Alling.
I had one of those, used a lot on film cameras, less on digital. Works
great,
El 08/03/2016 a las 3:48, Bill escribió:
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
Right you are, Mr. Alling.
I had one of those, used a lot on film cameras, less on digital. Works
great, but it is such a big lens.
Carlos
-
When I had a pair of inkjet Epsoj printers, one of them found in the
street and successfully recovered using this software, I used this SSC
Service Utility to clean their heads with great results. It hasn't been
updated for very long and I don't know if it will work in present
Windows versions,
Thanks for sharing, Bipin.
Jostein
Den 8. mars 2016 07.15.16 CET, skrev Bipin Gupta :
>Hi Jostein, you will get refillable cartridges (can be filled with ink
>at home a number of times) or one time filled cartridges (which I can
>also fill) for as low as $ 1 apiece from AliExpress (Ali Baba com)
34 matches
Mail list logo