That's nice. You're certainly right about the stare! I like that you left the
power lines in the frame.
Cheers,
Dave
> On Mar 25, 2016, at 7:58 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
>
> Because of the shocking stare.
> This AM.
>
> C appreciated!
>
> Thanks!
>
> J
>
>
I played with my camera on the way home from the dojo a few nights ago.
I mostly determined that I need to find some sharp, fast, wide glass,
preferably one that I can afford. The 31 was neither fast, nor wide,
enough for the shot that I wanted to get of trees sticking up through
the fog.
I have a focal-plane shutter tester app that uses the sound of the shutter
curtains to determine when the first and second curtains land, using that plus
the size of the format to calculate effective exposure time. It seems pretty
accurate.
I haven't used it in some time, I wonder if it runs
On 3/24/2016 2:49 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
And it isn't even April Fools Day!
https://www.google.com/nikcollection/
Yeah, I just saw that & stopped in here to let everyone know.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML
I _think_ it is a fig tree
ann
On 3/24/2016 1:22 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Mark.
Paul, unfortunately there was no sign identifying the tree--I was
wondering the same thing. The MoBo Garden is in the early stages of a
sign-replacement project.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Thu,
I have a guy about 6 miles from me whose auto generated estimate for the 3-base
and 4-base holders is a total of $34± However, I could also go with someone
further downstate with an estimate of $1042 or something like that. Obviously
much higher quality!
I haven’t decided whether to proceed
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:08 AM, steve harley wrote:
>
> On 2016-03-23 17:05 , Stanley Halpin wrote:
>> A different trick I picked up here many years ago. Take two rear lens caps,
>> epoxy them together. Once the joint is dry, I put a strip of electrical tape
>> or book
On 24/3/16, Donald Guthrie, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Sorry, haven't posted much here lately but I have been lurking &
>checking out everyone's posting. I have been saddened by the untimely
>deaths reported, enlightened by the tech info, and enriched by the
>quality of photography posted by
Nicely done, Don!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 1:15:51 PM
Subject: Re: Geso: 1st Spring walkabout
A nice gallery. Rich color, attractive compositions
Paul
> On Mar 24,
Captivating!
Thanks, Ann!
J
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 3:03:37 PM
Subject: Re: Peso-Voltage
Oh he is a cutie!
ann
On 3/24/2016 2:58 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> Because of
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 2:49 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>
> And it isn't even April Fools Day!
> https://www.google.com/nikcollection/
>
>
> --
> “The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ”
> ― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above
>
Thanks.
--
PDML
Oh he is a cutie!
ann
On 3/24/2016 2:58 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Because of the shocking stare.
This AM.
C appreciated!
Thanks!
J
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1041
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Thank you Paul, sometimes when under no pressure or time constraints,
compositions in camera, come easier.
On 3/24/16 3:45 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 5 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 16:15:51 -0400 From: Paul Stenquist
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
G'day, all
A bit of a slow start for this one - only one submission so far for the
April PUG:
Theme: A Fork in the Road
Submit here: http://pug.komkon.org/general/autosubmit.html
Nom. closing date 31 March.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney
John wrote:
Too late for that!
But, which one did you link to - the ones that work Ok or the ones that
suck? When I search the Fotodiox site, I only come up with the one rear
lens cap that says "PK (r)". How do I find the ones that are "cheaper
and OK"?
These are the good ones for $3 each.
John wrote:
Too late for that!
But, which one did you link to - the ones that work Ok or the ones that
suck? When I search the Fotodiox site, I only come up with the one rear
lens cap that says "PK (r)". How do I find the ones that are "cheaper
and OK"?
The ones that work the best, are the
On 2016-03-24 10:47 , Larry Colen wrote:
The best price for quality I've found was this on the fotodiox caps:
https://www.fotodioxpro.com/rear-lens-cap-for-pentax-k-mount.html
The fotodiox caps tend to hold on fairly tight. The ones that say "pentax"
are cheaper and OK, the ones that say PK,
Jack Davis wrote:
That's exactly what I thought.
Get help, Larry.
Huh? You asked for C I shared my ideas, they were suggestions of
what to try, not commandments. If you don't like them, don't do them,
you don't need to be snarky.
If, on the other hand, you're making a joke, I'm afraid
Too late for that!
But, which one did you link to - the ones that work Ok or the ones that
suck? When I search the Fotodiox site, I only come up with the one rear
lens cap that says "PK (r)". How do I find the ones that are "cheaper
and OK"?
On 3/24/2016 1:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Larry
I'll download it but it won't riun on my 10-6.8 but at least i'll have it.
Dave
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> David Parsons wrote:
>
>>"We’re excited to bring the powerful photo editing tools once only used
>>by
Ingrato
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> David Parsons wrote:
>
>>"We’re excited to bring the powerful photo editing tools once only used
>>by professionals to even more people now. ?"
>>
>>We are killing it, so grab it
It's because Pentax is the Rodney Dangerfield of camera systems.
That 3D printer base cap looks like it has links you can use to send the
idea to a PUBLIC 3D printer, although the nearest one to me is 354.6
miles away; they're available starting at $79.95 each with delivery in 5
days.
Not an
Thanks, Rick - no distortion, that is the shape of the staircase. Just
the wide end of the 17-70, cropped a little bit to exclude a painting
that intruded on one side.
On 3/23/2016 8:23 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Fisheye? I love the distortion; it and the guy at the rail and the monochrome
Thanks, Ken.
On 3/23/2016 8:29 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Unfortunate IMO, otherwise a really neat shot.
-Original Message-
From: Mark C
Subject: Peso - Spiral Stairs
Another from Charleston, SC:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/spiral-stairs
Thanks, Ann. The guide told us that the stairs were under conservation
and were not used (the tour group used the back stairs to go up) - so I
don't know if the guy on them was an errant visitor from another group,
someone associated with the house or... what. One night we went on a
ghost
David Parsons wrote:
>"Were excited to bring the powerful photo editing tools once only used
>by professionals to even more people now. ?"
>
>We are killing it, so grab it before we delete it from our servers.
Adobe has pretty much killed it, by adding features to
That's exactly what I thought.
Get help, Larry.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>> Larry,
>> Have you downloaded this image and made those changes?
>
> Nope, I held paper up to my computer screen. An
On 3/24/2016 3:58 PM, John wrote:
Appears squashed vertically. I'm guessing that is not the case, and the
spiral itself is oval shaped rather than round?
Yep - they are oval shaped and actually a little irregular. Free
standing cantilevered. I think I would have gotten a better shot if I
had
On 3/24/2016 1:20 PM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
Darren Addy wrote:
Kodak's advice:
http://support.en.kodak.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/33120/~/remove-mold%2Ffungus-from-negatives-or-slides/selected/true
This site also says that naptha can be used:
Appreciated, Paul.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Nice color, attractive symmetrical reflections. Works for me.
>
> Paul
>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Shot earlier
Also, shocking!
Thanks, Paul.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 1:14 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Electrifying.
>
>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Because of the shocking stare.
>> This AM.
>>
>> C
David Parsons wrote:
A year late, and a week early...
Actually, their whole site is satire. I thought people would appreciate
the reference to Voldemort at the bottom.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Seen on the facebook pentaxian group:
Jack Davis wrote:
Larry,
Have you downloaded this image and made those changes?
Nope, I held paper up to my computer screen. An alternate crop is to
draw a line for the lower left corner, through the hawk's eye, and put
the top right corner where it intersects a line a little above the top
A nice gallery. Rich color, attractive compositions
Paul
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 4:04 PM, Donald Guthrie wrote:
>
> Sorry, haven't posted much here lately but I have been lurking & checking out
> everyone's posting. I have been saddened by the untimely deaths reported,
>
On 3/23/2016 5:41 PM, Mark C wrote:
Another from Charleston, SC:
http://www.markcassino.com/b2evolution/index.php/spiral-stairs
K3 and DA 17-70. I'm of a mixed mind if the dude was a fortuitous
accident or an unfortunate accident.
Comments welcome.
Mark
Appears squashed vertically.
Electrifying.
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
>
> Because of the shocking stare.
> This AM.
>
> C appreciated!
>
> Thanks!
>
> J
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1041
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>
Nice color, attractive symmetrical reflections. Works for me.
Paul
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 3:34 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
>
> Shot earlier today.
>
> C Appreciated!
>
> Thanks!
>
> J
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1042
>
> --
> PDML
Sorry, haven't posted much here lately but I have been lurking &
checking out everyone's posting. I have been saddened by the untimely
deaths reported, enlightened by the tech info, and enriched by the
quality of photography posted by the members. So PDML goes on. With the
1st warm days
A year late, and a week early...
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Seen on the facebook pentaxian group:
>
> http://newcameranews.com/2015/04/01/shocking-nikon-canon-to-end-camera-development/
>
> Note the little request at the bottom about sharing.
> --
>
"We’re excited to bring the powerful photo editing tools once only used
by professionals to even more people now. "
We are killing it, so grab it before we delete it from our servers.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> They say:
> "Today we’re making
Shot earlier today.
C Appreciated!
Thanks!
J
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1042
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Larry,
Have you downloaded this image and made those changes?
Appreciate your commenting, Larry.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 12:15:12 PM
Subject: Re: Peso-Voltage
Jack Davis
Jack Davis wrote:
Because of the shocking stare.
This AM.
Very cool
C appreciated!
If you can, I'd go in a lot tighter, put the top just over the pole and
the right edge just to the right of the bird, perhaps a square crop,
about half the area of the current framing.
Thanks!
J
Because of the shocking stare.
This AM.
C appreciated!
Thanks!
J
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1041
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
They say:
"Today we’re making the Nik Collection available to everyone, for free.
Photo enthusiasts all over the world use the Nik Collection to get the
best out of their images every day. As we continue to focus our
long-term investments in building incredible photo editing tools for
mobile,
And it isn't even April Fools Day!
https://www.google.com/nikcollection/
--
“The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ”
― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Thanks, Mark.
Paul, unfortunately there was no sign identifying the tree--I was
wondering the same thing. The MoBo Garden is in the early stages of a
sign-replacement project.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
Darren Addy wrote:
> Kodak's advice:
> http://support.en.kodak.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/33120/~/remove-
> mold%2Ffungus-from-negatives-or-slides/selected/true
> This site also says that naptha can be used:
> http://www.old-photo.com/pages/35mm-slide-cleaning.htm
>
> Pure alcohol. Would that
Larry Colen wrote:
The fotodiox caps tend to hold on fairly tight. The ones that say
"pentax" are cheaper and OK, the ones that say PK, suck. I just received
an email back from Sara at fotodioxpro on quantity discounts, and she's
willing to go $2/cap.
Oops, I just heard that she didn't
steve harley wrote:
On 2016-03-23 17:05 , Stanley Halpin wrote:
A different trick I picked up here many years ago. Take two rear lens
caps, epoxy them together. Once the joint is dry, I put a strip of
electrical tape or book binding tape around the joint to stabilize it
against the torque
Kodak's advice:
http://support.en.kodak.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/33120/~/remove-mold%2Ffungus-from-negatives-or-slides/selected/true
This site also says that naptha can be used:
http://www.old-photo.com/pages/35mm-slide-cleaning.htm
Pure alcohol. Would that mean you could also use Everclear?
On 2016-03-23 20:38 , Igor PDML-StR wrote:
It got me thinking: how much of the shutter accuracy measurements matter
now? I.e., how accurate the shutter speed of the modern DSLRs is?
I haven't seen those tests done for any of the digital cameras.
I suspect that DSLRs would not be as easy to
I compare exposure differentiation from one shutter speed to the next. That
doesn't quantify it, but it does ensure a workable camer.
Paul via phone
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 11:04 AM, steve harley wrote:
>
>> On 2016-03-23 20:38 , Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>> It got me thinking:
Amazing. What kind of tree?
Paul via phone
Paul via phone
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Mark C wrote:
>
> NIce capture of a great specimen, Rick.
>
>> On 3/22/2016 8:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>> A tree in the (wonderful!) Missouri Botanical Garden:
>>
>>
On 2016-03-23 17:05 , Stanley Halpin wrote:
A different trick I picked up here many years ago. Take two rear lens caps,
epoxy them together. Once the joint is dry, I put a strip of electrical tape or
book binding tape around the joint to stabilize it against the torque from
NIce capture of a great specimen, Rick.
On 3/22/2016 8:49 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
A tree in the (wonderful!) Missouri Botanical Garden:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18202108=lg
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments appreciated.
Rick
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> You can still buy PEC-12, a liquid film cleaner, from most camera
> stores and numerous web sources. Not as good as the old stuff, which
> contained a chemical that's now banned, but it does a decent job.
> Paul via phone
Thanks Paul, I've just ordered some. I've already
You can still buy PEC-12, a liquid film cleaner, from most camera stores and
numerous web sources. Not as good as the old stuff, which contained a chemical
that's now banned, but it does a decent job.
Paul via phone
Paul via phone
> On Mar 24, 2016, at 4:41 AM, Malcolm Smith
Looks great for small lenses.
Wonder how much weight it can hold safely?
Jostein
-Opprinnelig melding-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:40 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss List
Subject: Carrying lenses, DIY experiment
A few nights ago, Nicole sent me a link to this gadget,
I've just been given 3 x 100 boxes of slides in sealed trays which date back
to the 1970s. They have been poorly stored and some of the slides (about
half) have some measure of mould damage or other damage. They are mostly of
family and local area of the period and are time worthy for me to try
Larry, as others have already commented, your bag baseplate idea is very
good. A thin Al or plywood base would do the trick. As far as the original
rail is concerned, the Nikon/Canon caps only need to be replaced by Pentax
ones. I can't understand why that option is not offered seeing they
I talked to the guy who did the 3-d printer caps and he has already done
a couple of designs very similar to what I was thinking:
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:1025793
There is a 3-d printer in sunnyvale that will do the 1x3 version for
about $23.
Larry Colen wrote:
A few nights ago,
62 matches
Mail list logo