Should that be a MARK, Mark?
:-)a
On 9/13/2017 9:56 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
ooh very nice!
How conventional of you :-)
Hey! I might take offense to that!
;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIB
That certainly works well in this instance. Very pleasing balance and
composition.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> So. Most of the time you know I (and I realize this is just me) use
> HDR for artistic purpose
How generous! Thank you so
much, Dan!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:29 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Wow, I really like that image, Jack. The posture of the insect is picture
> perfect, and the level of detail in both the bug and the pod is outstanding.
>
> Dan Matyola
> h
It feels somewhat crowded without
some surrounding space.
Allowing an outlet at the far end
would be pleasing and more
comfortable for me.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 5:37 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> On the pond in New Hampshire:
>
> https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/PESOs-2017/New-
ann sanfedele wrote:
>ooh very nice!
>
>How conventional of you :-)
Hey! I might take offense to that!
;-)
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
ooh very nice!
How conventional of you :-)
ann
On 9/13/2017 9:39 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
So. Most of the time you know I (and I realize this is just me) use
HDR for artistic purposes, to combine multiple images to expand the
time being captured in the image and produce a specific effect. But
I
So. Most of the time you know I (and I realize this is just me) use
HDR for artistic purposes, to combine multiple images to expand the
time being captured in the image and produce a specific effect. But
I've discovered that every once in a while HDR is useful for...
getting high dynamic range. Who
When I hover my mouse pointer over the original URL in Thunderbird, the
correct URL with the slashes appears in the little pane along the bottom
of the window.
On 9/13/2017 18:31, Larry Colen wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
That's interesting, Ann. I gather Larry
was able to as well.
I had left out
Thank you, Jack and Rick.
I really like that lens, even though it is an older one. It captures
things that I could never get with one of my shorter macro lenses.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> Very nicely done
On the pond in New Hampshire:
https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/PESOs-2017/New-Hampshire-2017/i-3jZJmqD/A
(K-5, DA 50-200)
Comments appreciated!
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link d
Wow, I really like that image, Jack. The posture of the insect is picture
perfect, and the level of detail in both the bug and the pod is outstanding.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Went to Sacramento Ntl Pr
Exremely interesting images, of the highest quality.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Poke around and you can find the high-resolution version as well
> http://www.bastienfoucher.com/Astrophotographies/VoieLact
Suggestion appreciated, Larry!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 3:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>> That's interesting, Ann. I gather Larry
>> was able to as well.
>> I had left out a couple foreword
>> slashes.
>> Did you ask Larry? I saw his kind comment, but
Poke around and you can find the high-resolution version as well
http://www.bastienfoucher.com/Astrophotographies/VoieLactee/i-x9VVf6K/O
A friend pointed me to this post on facebook about it
https://www.facebook.com/BastienFoucherAstrophotographies/posts/2017416531814535
--
Larry Colen l...@r
Jack Davis wrote:
That's interesting, Ann. I gather Larry
was able to as well.
I had left out a couple foreword
slashes.
Did you ask Larry? I saw his kind comment, but received no actual
post from him.
As to my post, I did receive it back from the list, check your spam
filter, maybe it's bei
Jack Davis wrote:
That's interesting, Ann. I gather Larry
was able to as well.
I had left out a couple foreword
slashes.
Did you ask Larry? I saw his kind comment, but received no actual
post from him.
I just went back to the original post and it worked in chrome running on
OSX. I suspect t
That's interesting, Ann. I gather Larry
was able to as well.
I had left out a couple foreword
slashes.
Did you ask Larry? I saw his kind comment, but received no actual
post from him.
J???
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:25 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> actually - the first link w
actually - the first link worked fine for me
ann
On 9/13/2017 5:21 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanks, Larry & Ann!
If it wasn't noticed, I muffed the URL
and corrected it in the "forwarded"
message.
Glad I related my age to PDML members recently so you won't
expect accuracy.
I've posted so few image
Thanks, Larry & Ann!
If it wasn't noticed, I muffed the URL
and corrected it in the "forwarded"
message.
Glad I related my age to PDML members recently so you won't
expect accuracy.
I've posted so few images in recent
times that I have to re learn the wonky Photo.net system all over again each
t
I agree with Larry
ann
On 9/13/2017 4:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Went to Sacramento Ntl Preserve this AM (along with my wife and our
Dog).
Flooding has only begun, but where there was water, there ere ducks.
Ignored the ducks today and just kept scanning for whatever. Whil
- Forwarded Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 1:26:06 PM
Subject: Peso-Dragonfly on Seed Pod
Went to Sacramento Ntl Preserve this AM (along with my wife and our Dog).
Flooding has only begun, but where there was water, there ere ducks.
Ignore
- Forwarded Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 1:26:06 PM
Subject: Peso-Dragonfly on Seed Pod
Went to Sacramento Ntl Preserve this AM (along with my wife and our Dog).
Flooding has only begun, but where there was water, there ere ducks.
Ignore
Jack Davis wrote:
Went to Sacramento Ntl Preserve this AM (along with my wife and our Dog).
Flooding has only begun, but where there was water, there ere ducks.
Ignored the ducks today and just kept scanning for whatever. While
I did take a number of frames of passing ducks, but they were larg
Went to Sacramento Ntl Preserve this AM (along with my wife and our Dog).
Flooding has only begun, but where there was water, there ere ducks.
Ignored the ducks today and just kept scanning for whatever. While
I did take a number of frames of passing ducks, but they were largely just
long range
I never saw a photo of Alan either -- but have seen many of Bob and
Chris...
um and in terms of Chris - even ones Ive taken :-)
a
On 9/13/2017 10:17 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
OK, Ann, I've been admonished and
shamed. :(
Don't recall ever knowingly seeing a
photo of Alan, but had enjoyed his
except
Haven't had a chance to investigate yet, but do any of the trail cams have
floating ISO so that one only sets the aperture & shutter speed? Am thinking
that not using a flash might have certain value.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
t
Well, to clarify,
I sometimes combine it with focus bracketing. In night shots it can be
combined with using the AstroTrace for getting nice skies. Then you can
shoot the foreground with as long exposure as you'd like.
In general I find the technique most convenient for landscapes with a
focu
Time and again, yes. :-)
Den 10.09.2017 18:40, skrev John:
I know several of you are using focus stacking with macro photography,
but I was wondering if anyone is using it with landscape photography?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
OK, Ann, I've been admonished and
shamed. :(
Don't recall ever knowingly seeing a
photo of Alan, but had enjoyed his
exceptional photography.
I had simply become curious. Am
content now. :-)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 6:03 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Jack, you realise, of cour
What Bob said..
Really lovely, Mark
ann
On 9/11/2017 5:52 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
That's an interesting and unusual shot. When I read John's question my first
reaction was 'that would be pointless', but then I thought about it and decided
that people should experiment - this is a good example of
Dave - these are lots of fun -- I especially like 8985 from an aesthetic
point of view, and 8999 from a car I love point of view.. :-) but the
whole gallery is a reall nice job of covering the event... I would think
you would be able to sell some prints!
ann
On 9/12/2017 9:27 PM, Paul Soren
Jack, you realise, of course, that your need to know -that- means you
never paid any attention to the photos
of UK PDML meet-up photos for the last several years ... and I thought
BW and CM were famous -- guess not ;-)
ann
On 9/12/2017 8:48 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Appreciated, Bob W.
Thanks!
J
On 12 September 2017 at 13:43, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Love the GESO - much intersting stuff and the "obligatory" is fine, too...
> The juxtaposition of the guys with the three young ladies going the otherway
> and the
> tall building in the background raises it above the 'here we are getting
> to
33 matches
Mail list logo