This is way off topic, but I know there are other Mac users
here, and I figured maybe somebody besides me isn't using
MacOS X yet.
Anyone know a halfway decent, cheap or free, X11 server for
a PowerMac running MacOS 9.1? It's kind of hard to search
the web for these days, 'cause any search with
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 12:37:18 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2004 PUG Themes
- unfortunately it was a Nikon D1 outfit
minus the body - doh!
What a jerk
Kind regards
Peter
LOL Peter.
So far since owning the D1
If you don't mind electronic, the Sekonic L-308BII is a nice little unit.
Incident or reflected. One common battery. Lightweight.
One nice thing about it is the relative flatness. The dome does not
protrude far so it would be less vulnerable to damage in a front pouch.
I keep mine wrapped in a
What is his hobby, anyway?
Interviewing assistants?
:)
Collin
*
tom wrote:
I haven't found one tool that does everything well, I use
BreezeBrowser, SuperJPG, Canon FV, Capture 1, Imatch and PS.
Tom, do you still have time for your hobby ;-)
cheers,
The dome is not flatter. Just smaller, providing for an overall
flatter design to the whole unit. Hence easier to handle.
There's no effect to any degree that I've noticed.
I've not compared readings.
Under the dome is a lens which focuses light onto the sensor.
The results would be the same.
Nothing to do with photography or Pentax, but I did want
to share a holiday greeting with y'all.
Happy Cheese Weasel Day!
Who brings the cheese on April 3rd?
The Cheese Weasel
He's not a silly bunny or a reindeer or a bird,
He's the Cheese Weasel
He's got
Cool Mark..
I'm sure we know the time and place.. or.. umm... do we... or.. err.. ? :)
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 14:28:20 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Toronto PDML people...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
All you Photoshop and Digital Pros out there - A sign of things to come?:
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/04/02/1650258.shtml?tid=149
Article contains links to the pertinent info.
Slashdot, for you geeks not in the know, is a forum board.
Dave
I think the question that Brendan meant to ask was:
Where will you be staying/located Mark?
And what time would you like to meet?
This of course depends on your accomodation and itinerary :)
THanks
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 02 Apr
a scanner
that can do dust removal/grain correction on BW film, as long as you have
clean negs and good storage habits you should be fine with it.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: William Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 05:17:08 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
David R Spaulding asked:
Here's a little one-question quiz -
What is the one feature that a couple of Pentax cameras have
that, as far as I know, no other brand of film SLR has?
Hint: It has to do with exposure
Is it the hyper modes, or do other brands have something
similar? That's all I
Would make an intewresting PUG submission ehvbg
(sorry Pat)
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 22:37:10 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Let's Do It!! - So Vegas Then ?
I said we'd put Pat's ~wheelchair~ on the roof
Can you put me on a list Chris.I'd be interested.
Dave Brooks
Original Message:
-
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 20:17:52 -0600 (CST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Digital, Smidgital: I'm a new member of the 6x7 club!
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003
Remind me to let you listen to mine when we meet next...
Hopefully by that time I'll also have the Tokina and you can then listen to
the difference.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:40:45 -0500
To: [EMAIL
:
-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:48:46 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Brendan's Ears (Was:Re: Good-bye Pentax (was: Pentax needs
USMand IS))
Huh? I have no idea of what you are referring to.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remind me
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:20:02 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax needs USM and IS
USM and IS are not only for pro's. But speaking of pro's, I have seen many
pro's with EOS 3 and F100. They're lighter and capable of producing
professional results. Even EOS 30/33
Thank goodness one of the single malts I like is down in the
occasionally affordable despite my starving-artist budget
price range: Loch Du. The others I know I like (I'm still
a beginner, so there's a lot of tasting to do) are out of my
league financially. *sigh* Balvenie Portwood *sigh*
Well, I did do a little shooting after all. At our second gig
yesterday, a dance school performed during our breaks. So I
tried to catch step-dancers with both feet off the ground.
But I don't think I ever managed to press the shutter at quite
the right moment.
Today was spent, as expected,
Seeing as how you've got the Tokina 2.6-2.8 28-70 AT-X Pro, I was hoping
that you could show me some shots taken with said lens or at least offer me
an opinion on your likes/dislikes.
I'm shopping for one currently as I think it's my best option at a sharp
and fast 28-70 that doesn't cost me a
?
CHeers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:03:57 US/Eastern
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New toy
Hi all.
Thanks to list member Jeff,i am now the pround owner of a Minolta F
Spotmeter.
Jeff did me a HUGE
I'll help you move .. if you pay me with.. oh.. a Minolta Spot F meter ? :)
Smirkingly,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:13:25 US/Eastern
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: is it safe to come out now?
If not you are welcome to come
Same here Bob.
Took me over an hour to get into work this morning - usually it's 1/2 hour.
It's still coming down here in Toronto too.
At least 8 inches this time around.
CHeers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 08:37:50 EST
To: [EMAIL
Original Message:
-
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 08:58:16 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Shoveling in Chicago
10 inches here so far and more expected.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Time to go out and shovel
the 6-8 inches that fell
last
I had heard from an unconfirmed source that the *ist D was shown but it's
not a working model..
it is, a la Olydak, a prototype only ..
Anyone care to confirm?
Cheers,
Dave
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
scratch that question -
I hate having to sift through 130 odd messages sometimes..
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:20:18 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Prototype *ist D only ?
I had heard from
Quoth Frank:
I'm lucky if I know what film's in what body at any given time...
VBG I admire you're statistical acumen.
Nah, that's just data collection. Knowing how to _use_ the
info to spot meaningful trends that can show me better ways
to shop for film, _that_ would be statistical acumen.
Mike Johnston pointed out:
Not to ignore the content of Shaun's message, however--I agree with you
Shaun. The fact is, when you have only one product, you need to make sure it
is mainstream. If you try to make it too different, it will probably
appeal to too few people. The *ist D looks to be
I just created a directory with this name '*ist D'
No problem, so it is not correct to state that 'none of us' will be able
to do that, I love Linux.
If I remember correctly you can do that in UNIX, it may, probably will have
side effects. (I'm not even going to try to predict what then may
William Robb commented:
From: Malcolm Smith
80% BW - I assume that is because you process it yourself, something I
can't do for both technical and space reasons at present. It must be great
to have control over the whole process, from loading the camera to passing
round the processed
Malcolm wondered:
What percentage of film do you use in BW?
Of 815 rolls shot between 1997 and today:
(69%) 559 rolls of C41;
(20%) 163 rolls of real BW (23 of them IR (Kodak HIE));
(8%) 65 rolls of E6 (6 of them false-colour IR (Kodak EIR));
(2%) 15 rolls of Kodachrome;
(1%)9
Kodak VC400.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 10:43:08 -
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What film do you use?
Having just had Amateur Photographer's BW special (08-03-03) edition drop
through the door, I realised I
Bahahahah :)
And I was about to say that Pal = Bruce
What good would there be if only God existed without a Devil to keep him in
check and vice versa... :-)
Laughingly,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:51:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:58:51 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Uh-oh: Looks like I'm officially an artist now
P.S. Now that I'm an artist do I have to wear one of those damned
berets?
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Ziggy asked:
So, how many of you merry people are going to get an *ist-D and if not why
not?
Well, to keep this from being completely biased in favour
of folks who'll be buying it (self-selected sample error),
I guess I should speak: I won't be buying one, and the
reason is simple economics.
Cool..
June/July 2003 launch..
now the big question:
Price Price Price Price Price
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:23:54 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Andit's HERE
Gary L. Murphy observed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. The competition for Pentax glass just increased 5-10 fold. That's if the
D*ist looks as good as it seems to and is priced right. In other words, it
will probably be a seller.
Which could also mean the value of your Pentax film cameras just
Tom pointed out:
I don't think I can match the other stories in this thread.
I was under the impression that shooting anything in your neighborhood
is an act of bravery.
Oh yeah ... it's funny how risks you get used to stop feeling
like bravery, isn't it?
Actually, while there are still
Pat in SF commented:
I realize this comparison crossed the lines btw Fuji Press and Superia Xtra
lines but Superia doesn't seem to come in ISO 1600.
As far as I can tell (IIRC they use the same two-letter code) the
difference between Fuji Press 800 and Fuji Superia Xtra 800 is that
one is sold
never could use up the 10lb bag
of chocolate chip cookies that I bought there once :-)
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 15:34:52 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Real Pentax News
I was in a local Costco today
I don't think I can match the other stories in this thread.
In junior high school I shot a few frames with a Brownie
while riding my bicycle. And I perched halfway up a wall in
high heels to shoot over folks' heads at a wedding reception
(which amused another photographer enough to take a picture
Ann wrote:
Anyway, I missed the
deadline -
how many more of us also did?
I did. :-(
(Sheer distractedness here; my own damned fault, but still bummed.)
-- Glenn
the whole
through that).
This appears to have been made the same way as my own attempts:
cut a larger hole in a plastic body cap, then mount a piece of
metal with the pinhole in it covering the larger hole.
Peter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) observed:
I believe that it is possible to acheive such a tiny
It's a percentage I believe.
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:15:25 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Math term
I need a little help with terminology. If a guy has a batting average of,
say, .231, what kind of number
the Nikon.
Either one though is a good camera.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:40:41 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: N80 / Elan 7, WAS: *ist complete specifications
Add a touch faster continuous shooting. I love
a non-pentax issue camera, and Frank
had his MX at the end of the unofficial For Pentax strap.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:14:38 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My Official TOPDML photo
http://www.photo.net
it on a
standard film SLR (F100 for example).
Price points for high end Canon and Nikon goods are expensive but they seem
to be in line with current pricing of their other products so it's not that
incredible.
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Feb
Cotty mused:
Then why, when 35 mm was introduced, did not a suitable 'standard'
print size comparable with the aspect ratio if the 35mm frame also come
into being?
There did. It's 4x6. (Look at standard sizes of picture frames,
not just the standard develop-and-proof service that most labs
As an aside, how do you say '8X10'?
eight by ten.
Not sure why that feels more natural than 10x8, but it does.
Something about the rythym of the sounds, I think (plus the
phrase, Eight-by-ten colour glossy photographs with circles
and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one describin'
Quoth Wendy:
And it ~is~ a stupid name. Still not as stupid as Kiss, Sweet and Rebel
though. No way would I ever buy a camera with those names!
If a really spiffy camera with an uber-dorky name fell into my
hands, I'd certainly use it ... and make fun of the name the
whole time. I've got no
One of the three screws on the bottom plate of my Super Program
has fallen out. Where does one go to buy such tiny screws as
that? I don't think I've ever seen anything in that range at
Home Despot...
In the meantime, am I better off having the two remaining
screws at each end, or one in the
Alin Flaider explained:
Judging by the migration of TTL flash sensors from single-segment
OTF located under the mirror to multi-segment
off-the-focusing-screen housed in the pentaprism, I'd say the
latter.
#blink# Uh, how does that work? Isn't the focusing screen
blocked by
I'm also amazed that people keep insisting on including the megapixels from
the full 35mm frame, when standard print sizes such as 8x10 and 11x14
always lose a large part of the area anyway. Who prints 8x12s and 11x16.5
prints?
In addition to some full-frame prints on 8x10 paper (6.7x10
Dan Scott answered me:
[confused look] Which calendar am I supposed to pose for?
You get to pick one or the other, or maybe both, I guess (you haven't
committed yet, have you?).
Nifty! (And if you mean what I think you mean, no, I haven't
committed. I currently identify as
?
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Philippe Tempel
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 06:00:26 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HUG] Film presoak
I've recently found out that I get 1/3rd stop more
film speed without a presoak. The presoak I've been
using is for 5 minutes
Pat White asked:
Wasn't there a movie by Ed Wood called Glen or Glenda??
Yes there was, which amuses several of my friends. And it's
reported to have been inspired by Wood's own gender issues,
which is why one of my computers is named Wood. ;-)
The movie is somewhat corny, but you kind of
Frits said:
I use Mozilla, which is the same as Netscape basically, but it is the open
source version of it.
http://www.mozilla.org
One of the nicest features is the tabbed browsing. New windows open in the
same browser window, and ad a tab for the new window, rather then a complete
new
Jostein explained:
AFAIK, no camera will give you TTL on B. After all, the whole
concept of the B setting is to override every attempt from the
camera to electronically control the shutter. It stays open as
long as you say so...
Yeah, but TTL-flash mode tells the flash when to shut off,
Jostein wrote:
AFAIK, no camera will give you TTL on B. After all, the whole
concept of the B setting is to override every attempt from the
camera to electronically control the shutter. [...]
Yeah, but TTL-flash mode tells the flash when to shut off,
not the shutter when to close. [...] So
Frank !!
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:36:56 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kudos to Komeniks
Good gnus for a change!
Heard back from my repair shop here in Toronto, Komineks. It seems that
their second tech
Frank Theriault wrote:
Funny the way society values things, eh?
In many, many ways.
Many years ago, when I was a student, I worked at Canada's largest music
store in Montreal. Other than me, virtually every employee was a musican
between gigs - although the gap between gigs seemed to often
(This is the camera-geeking-enhanced version of half of the
LiveJournal post I just made about my day.)
Got some face-to-face time with friends today. Among them was one
who's currently an English teacher in China but came home for a
holiday. After using PHD cameras (Push Here, Dummy) for
When I and the friends mentioned in my previous message went into
a coffee shop, I noticed local-artist art on the walls with prices
next to each piece. So I asked our waitress whom I'd ask about
getting my photos on their walls, and she said that their art
director wasn't in, but she'd give him
Bad stuff:
Yesterday a lens fell off my camera while I was standing in the
checkout line at Wal-Mart. It was the 50/1.4 that came attached
to a bellows, and it fell off an H1a. Something must've gotten
bent inside -- focussing is much stiffer than before, and it takes
a lot of force to change
Graywolf, Keith,
Note that in certain contexts, linguists and grammarians distinguish
between standard written English and spoken English almost as
though they are two different dialects. Does that happen in other
languages as well?
-- Glenn
:
-
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 08:59:22 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Digital Ownership Up
From the Rochester, NY _Democrat and Chronicle_:
http://www.democratandchronicle.com/biznews/0116story3_business.shtml
Dan Scott noted:
I certainly enjoy reading all the 'commentates' on the subjectback
formation grows strange fruit.
Then you might also be amused to note that boxen shows up about
as often as boxes as the plural of box in the hackish dialect.
And Vaxen is used way more often than Vaxes. We
For some reason, I never new what a thorn was. Now I know it was a
Runic letter, representing the sound th.
Well, an English letter (as well as being in some Scandanavian
alphabets currently) ... I'm not sure whether it also showed up
in Runic or not (I'll have to check).
And you're welcome!
I had three different ideas for the digital theme, but didn't have
time to go shoot any of them. Feh. (And yes, foxglove was one of
them, and yes, I figured that would've occurred to others as well.)
-- Glenn
Quoth Mishka:
Mathematically, however, we always say three is
less than five; the symbol is called less
than. Interesting that when we actually compare
numbers we use the amount word, not the number word.
it sounds *very* logical: three is a noun/object here, and as objects,
,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 08:16:58 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: what a great place!
Last night I whined that I'm having some equipment problems. I may g
have exaggerated some, but in fact, over the last week
Money/ING GUY and buy a Pentax 67
now couldn't ya?) ;-)
Original Message:
-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 08:56:06 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AF Dilema
If you really want AF, I don't know why you're looking at an F4. I'm
seeing quite
Hey man.. I hear that Gumby(tm) Distortion is worth every penny :-)
Bring it out to the next TOPDML :)
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 11:56:11 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Vs: AF Dilemma
it's the 28-105mm F2.8
Message:
-
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 14:12:22 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: February PUG
humm does digitally manipulated count?
--- Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: How many people even have Pentax digital
cameras
as long as it's not being
recorded - but once you state something in an email or in a phone call
(because who knows what's being recorded for quality control purposes)
you better be ready to stand behind what you said.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED
than 8x10.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 00:17:40 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: More about DSLR lifespans: Canon D60 discontinuation
To make another comparison to the PC industry - who nowadays really NEEDS a
PIV
The recent DSLR thread (DSLR Lifespan) has me thinking.
For those of you who own one - and those of you who make money with it -
how do you get prints for your clients?
Do you get them professionally done by a lab or do you print them
yourselves? If you do get them done by a lab, at what
laying around, either buy a D90 for yourself or be
a nice guy and send one to me. ;-)
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 07:58:39 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: All the Leicas he wants
In that case (as I pointed out
Quickie for anyone willing to read:
Regarding the ME-F body.
This body is similar to the ME Super save for the autofocus connections
on the lens mount. Are there any other issues surrounding this body or is
it basically an ME Super with that bonus of autofocus ?
Thanks,
Dave
P.S. I use
to buy film further down the road.
Where is he saving? (i.e. how much moolah has he been able to stock away
by having to outlay $2000)
I'm so confused...
Smirkingly,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:12:31 -0600
To: [EMAIL
Last time I heard that term (swirlies) it was used to describe a prank that
kids pulled on other kids in the washroom.
Stick the kids head into the toilet and flush..
ergo
swirly (swirlies is plural)
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 14
They blow'd up good.
They blow'd up real good!
Second City Fan,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: David Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:27:52 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Aaron R.--new stuff
Sorry Mike.I was not trying to disagree with you
Hi Bill,
I'm looking for an ME Super body.
I'm not too concerned about the winder since I have other gear that I would
use if I needed speedy shots.
If you have a spare ME Super Body that works and is in good condition I'd
be willing to discuss.
The problem being of course is $$$.
I could
Needless to say.
I'm a goof :)
More sleep needed
cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 12:32:13 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ME Super
Hi Bill,
I'm looking for an ME Super body.
I'm not too concerned about
Turkey Baster
that's a classy turkey baster
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 13:10:00 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Really?
On Friday 10 January 2003 11:51, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
http
I've been considering a cheap prism as well for the Blad - likely the
revered Kiev prism that has TTL metering that seems to be so so :)
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 17:18:33 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Shaun Canning asked:
What HTML editors or web page creation software are PDMLer's using for
their web sites?
vi. Well, technically vim, but apart from word-wrap and multiple
undo, I treat it as if it were vi.
So far it does everything I want an HTML editor to do. (I don't
need a WYSIWYG
Peter Alling commented:
What HTML editors or web page creation software are PDMLer's using for
their web sites? I am still using Frontpage 2000, which does the job,
but is an idiosyncratic little bugger...
vi. :)
I'm opposed to most wysiwig editors on principal but you're just sick. :)
Viewing the PUG takes a long time when I keep getting to photos that
I don't want to stop looking at to look at the next one. There were
a few of those this month. (Oh, so that's where all my RAM goes --
browser windows I don't want to close...)
-- Glenn
Keith Whaley responded:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have opinions/information/anecdotes about photoblast.com?
Useful? Avoid at all costs? Toy? Unknown?
Insufficient info given.
I've been meaning to put more of my photos online for quite some
time, and to try to sell reprints that way
II) and it
seems to do just fine with Vuescan as well.
Silverfast does a decent job with most items, including my color MF negs
but it sometimes messes up the BW negs by making them too hot.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Carlos Royo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 06 Jan
Finally got around to looking at the PUG. Good stuff, as expected.
But I noticed that my own post was missing the comment that I'd
submitted with it. Argh.
(One of the things the comment said was that I would've cropped it
except that I wanted to show exactly what was in the frame that I
got
Damn you
:-)
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Brendan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:11:47 -0500 (EST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Least exspensive 4000-4800 dpi scanner
Aaron is the lead it's his old scanner :-)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
:
-
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:04:46 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Least exspensive 4000-4800 dpi scanner
model # ?
I wont need ICE/FARE as I'll be scanning
new clean negs.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto
I tend to think that the gentleman in that image is actually quite handsome
and a decent chap..
of course..
I'm biased..
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 13:12:12 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What toys
focussing (i.e. not taking macros with them) will you be
doing?
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 14:10:07 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT: Contax G1 and G2
Really? That seems like a considerable disadvantage
Folks,
Please verify that your AntiVirus definitions are up to date.
I've recently (i.e. today) gotten 3 emails containing this virus - Norton
covers it off fine so I'm protected - but I'm sure that everyone isn't in
the same position.
The virus info can be found here:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 12:15:06 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Konica S3
And if you like the Canonets, I'd also recommend the Konica Auto S3.
It's so tiny, but with a wonderful lens- and it happily accepts an
alkaline battery for the meter.
Ryan,
I tried to buy an S3 before
Raimo,
Love to hear how you like the Voigtlander - I've waffled on it for the past
2 years - what lenses did you/are you thinking of getting ?
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Raimo Korhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 17:51:59 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
lenses and not the Zeiss glass that most Blad users revere) makes the H1
decent but not earth shattering and does not signal whatsoever the death of
6x6. The only other benefit to the H1 is the digital back by Kodak.
Cheers,
Dave
Original Message:
-
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED
Original Message:
-
From: Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 21:29:19 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 6x6 - Waste of Space? (WAS: Re: Medium Format-Which one is
best?)
That has really not much to do with it. The new Hasselblad is not a 6X6
camera
301 - 400 of 907 matches
Mail list logo
