this year. At the moment, my collection
of scans is just under 13,000. It has taken a lot of time and effort,
but it's great to have all my images in a format that is easy to view
and easy to share.
Andrew Robinson
Dr. Shaun Canning wrote:
Thanks for the post George. I think I'll end up buying a scanner
I'm in this group. I was never a fan of Reagan or his politics, but he
earned his funeral. Of Tom's pics, I like the hearse passing in front of
the Washington Monument the most.
Andrew Robinson
frank theriault wrote:
I'm no fan of Reagan, or his politics. Quite the contrary. But, the
man
!
Andrew Robinson
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Waterson wrote:
The shot with the mortar flame was captured using the *istD and the
360FGZ flash with rear curtain sync. The shutter was in bulb and the
aperature wide open.
Am I
graywolf wrote:
To me the greatest thing he has done is make unix
available at a price I can afford.
Amen!
Andrew Robinson
Steward. However, charging her with lying when
the feds could not make the original charges stick smacks of
vindictiveness to me.
Well, that's $0.02 times a few...
Andrew Robinson
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
She was convicted on the stock fraud charges for which she'd
been on trial.
Dr. Shaun Canning
That would make a great Mardi Gras costume! Any instructions on how to
build one?
Andrew Robinson
tom wrote:
http://69.93.124.90/truestories/flashhelmet/?page=2
tv
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/image/25524341
Couldn't imagine better composition and level of details ;-
http://members.aol.com/awrobinson/images/fuzzyeagle.jpg
One good eagle shot deserves another...
-by-side. However, I lost so much detail when fitting them both on
the monitor that I could not get the stereo effect. If anyone has any
suggestions on this, I would love to hear them.
Andrew Robinson
Jim Apilado wrote:
There's a place in California, Reel 3D, that sells a lot of stereo related
items
The USB2 interface gives it transfer speeds near firewire but allows it
to attach to any computer with a USB interface.
Andrew Robinson
Herb Chong wrote:
it's rated about twice as fast and 16-bit color versus 14-bit.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED
drive backups, it is noticeable.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:26 AM
Subject: Re: OT- Nikon announces new scanners
The USB2 interface gives it transfer speeds near firewire but allows
I was thinking the same thing...
Andrew Robinson
John Francis wrote:
Film is not yet dead...
http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1067358499.html
Aha. 4000dpi, 14-bit scanning in the low-end model.
Maybe it's time to replace the CoolScan III.
Besides this list, there is a mailing list devoted to film scanners. Those
folks will be happy to fill in any details you don't get here :-). You can
find info on the listserv at
http://www.cix.co.uk/~tsphoto/tech/filmscan/maillist.htm
Andrew Robinson
Luke Johnson wrote:
I know
this particular effect so I can zero in on the cause.
Thanks!
Andrew Robinson
and thanks Sylwek for the info!
Andrew Robinson
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
There is a mailing list dedicated to film scanners. You can find the details at
this site: http://www.cix.co.uk/~tsphoto/tech/filmscan/maillist.htm. You'll get
lots of opinions there.
Andrew Robinson
Alan Chan wrote:
i wish to scan 35mm negatives so i can print photos to A3 and A2 size
16 x
Alan Chan wrote:
In response to my queries about autofocus telephoto zooms, a couple of
folks have recommended the Pentax 70-200 f4-5.6 F or FA lenses. Someone
else instead recommended the Pentax 70-210 zoom. Elsewhere I found a
comment that the 70-210 zoom is not considered highly. Has
site does not list this lens. Anyone here know
anything about it? An extra half stop of brightness for an extra $10
sounds like a good deal.
Thanks!
Andrew Robinson
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
on these two (actually three) lenses?
Thanks!
Andrew Robinson
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
What exactly are high speed sync, P-TTL, flash exposure compensation and
wireless TTL flash? More importantly, what advantage do they provide the
photographer? Is there a tutorial someone can point me to?
Thanks!
Andrew
Lawrence Kwan wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bruce Dayton wrote:
On a
Lawrence and Heiko, thanks for the opinions. I understand I have to pick
for myself and I understand about the lens. I just want to see what other
people think.
Thanks!
Andrew
Heiko Hamann wrote:
Hi Lawrence,
on 30 Jul 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
It is really difficult for any other
Edward and Peter,
Thank you for pointing out the spot metering on the ZX-L. I went back
through all the literature I had downloaded and found no mention of it.
This morning I downloaded the owner's manual and finally found it listed
in the appendix on Pentax Program functions.
This is probably
22 matches
Mail list logo
