Jens:
The SMC-FA 2.8 20mm us a great lens. Save your pennies or go into debt
to get one. :-)
Here's a shot I took with mine on the isDS in mid-February:
http://www.hemenway.com/P-isDS/pages/FA20mm-IMGP0085sm.htm
Jim
Jens Bladt wrote:
...B&H is selling an FA version for 499.95 USD - I g
I disagree, Mat. I found the CZJ 20mm to be especially flare prone.
It's nowhere near the quality of the Takumar 20mm M42 mount.
Jim
Mat Maessen wrote:
For a decent 20mm, you could pick up a Carl Zeiss Jena 20/2.8 in M42
mount. I have a Sigma Widerama 18mm in YS mount (basically a T mount)
Frank:
That's a great photo. Helpful that you know her... to get that nice
expression.
Jim
Godfrey:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/18q.htm
A fun photo.
Reminds me of they eyes of the "Georgia Runaway Bride"
Incidently, if someone would like to give her a
Good Luck wedding gift, I hear that she's registered at:
Bed Bath and waaaay Beyond :-)
Jim
More power to you in handling this giant Pentax. I recall when they first
came out and realize its size and weight were not for me. When I got a 645,
I knew this was the MF camera for me.
Jim a.
> From: Cesar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Tue,
A few years ago, a man offered to buy the box that my Nikon SP came in. If
the box had not be torn, I could have received $300 US for it.
Jim A.
> From: Ezio Capoccetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 22:47:24 +0200
> T
l has its place. Film has its place. Most of the folks on this list
started with film. Many have abandoned it. I will utilize my Spotmatics,
LX, 645, and PZ1-p with the film I can still get.
Jim A.
> From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml
Here's a plug for a couple of local photography shops in the Portland, OR
area: Citizens Photo and Pro Photo Supply. Shutterbug is another store
that is not tied in with one of those big chains.
Jim A.
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-d
ciao
are very easy to customize, the
only thing I want (aside from MLU with E*S Capture) is to be able to put Av
control on the main dial in "M" mode.
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
Here are some things I have on eBay today
7509735225 Vivitar Series 1 200/3 VMC lens, M42
7509735461 Vivitar 135/2.8 Close Focusing macro lens, M42
7509736469 Tamron 28/2.5 BBAR MC lens, Adaptall
7509737358 Vivitar 400/5.6 lens, (TX) Pentax-K
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
I don't know how many gold LX cameras were made by Pentax. Saw one several
years ago at the old Camera World of Oregon here in Portland. It was a
reward to Camera World for being a good seller of Pentax equipment.
I wouldn't mind having one of these in my Pentax collection, ugly or n
Where is Marin County in California? Thanks for the picture.
Jim A.
> From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:18:11 -0700
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: San Quentin Prison Pic
> Re
ck
of the card and you keep it as proof that the photo gear left Canada with
you. The card is good for as long as you need it, as long as it doesn't
wear out.
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
;t get
one because the cost would be very high.
Jim A.
> From: Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:10:44 +0200
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Pentax 645
> Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Resent-
is a similar festival in the Willamette Valley, but on
a smaller scale. That's a going concern there. Can't see that ever going
away as well.
Jim A.
> From: Alan Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 17:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
I have this lens and use it on my ES and ESII bodies. I think it is a
relatively sharp lens when closed down to f8. You got a steal with the
price.
Jim A.
> From: Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:43:32 -0500
>
Rob:
I agree with Shel... excellent product photography.
Jim
Rob Studdert wrote:
Hi Team,
I still haven't found the time to comment on others PESO/PAWs :-(
I will do eventually, however just to keep the list duly cluttered here is
another submission from me. I don't view the image as pa
Do you mean as in Star Dreck?
Jim
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Y'know Rob, I'm always amazed at the quality you achieve. I just can't
imagine doing anything like this I've tried product shots a couple of
times and all I get is dreck ... do you know what dreck is?
Shel
[Or
dding). I'll
put some pics on my web site update (which isn't yet finished, and is long
overdue).
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
c. The two heaviest lenses (300/4L IS
and 80-200/2.8L) lie flat and are secured with bungie cord, and the rest are
secured by the custom fit neoprene and the case itself. Flash & a few other
things go in my backpack, and my LowePro bags get stuffed into each other
and put in checked luggage.
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
53mm). If both are good performers (and I don't know
about that) then you might want to consider the choice as being between
ultra-wide for the film body vs. short-tele for the dSLR.
PhotoZone raw scores at: www.photozone.de/active/survey/querylens.jsp
Fred Miranda reviews at: www.fredmirand
Keith:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/04/15/bush.passports.ap/index.html
Jim
Keith Whaley wrote:
John Francis wrote:
William Robb mused:
That's just your country, and it isn't supposed to happen until 2006
IIRC.
By 2008. Although as the Pres. has just woken up to what it is he
s
, M42
7508033354 Vivitar 135/2.8 Close Focusing macro lens, M42
7508034106 Vivitar Series 1 200/3 VMC lens, M42
7508034642 Carl Zeiss Jena 135/3.5 MC lens, M42
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
My ebay bought, 14mm DA lens arrived a few days ago, here's a few
"tryout" shots taken with it:
http://www.hemenway.com/14mm/
I'm not in a position to comment on your sanity, but if the lens is in
"excellent" or better condition, then you just got a free MX - good deal.
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
Herb,
Thanks. I'll try a few things over the next few months & summarize in a
posting.
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
s get home - do you have any
specific information on how long these solid ink prints are expected to last
under 'normal' conditions ?
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
orth trying, and I'm going to assume
that it should be colour laser paper, since both the Phaser and colour
lasers are relatively hot printing processes, while an ink jet is cold (or
room temp) print process.
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
y own. Maybe this printer
will be a good way to 'develop' B&W prints in my digital darkroom.
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
for other
papers ? Thanks, Jim. www.jcolwell.ca
I own three transparent Pentax bodies, the SF1, PZ10, and a 110 Pentax.
It would be cool if Pentax had made a transparent *ist D- and I could get
one.
Jim A.
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:47:27 -0700
&
Ok, I know where that is... I used to live in "Bereserkely" in the mid
60s- mid 70s.
I was wondering if you were in someplace like Maine where the fiddle
head ferns reside.
Jim
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Thanks Jim. I am located in Roseville, California - just outside of
Sacramento.
It's probably a good thing that you didn't use the ultrasonic log-off
mode. One can only imagine what would have happened if you were
vibrated for two days!
Jim
Frantisek wrote:
JH> First, ask your Internet Provider to mail you an Unsubscribing Kit.
JH> Then follow these dir
Bruce:
That's a nice shot, almost looks like a fernhead.
Where are you located?
Jim
Bruce Dayton wrote:
An early morning walk is a most wonderful time to take the camera
along. The lighting presents very nice possibilities. In this case,
hazy backlighting helped to create the effect.
P
Peter:
I saw this somewhere on the internet a couple of years ago and think
that it may be helpful to you.
Jim
Here's how to unsubscribe:
First, ask your Internet Provider to mail you an Unsubscribing Kit.
Then follow these directions.
The kit will most likely be the standard no-fault
ality, but I've never had one so I can't
comment from personal experience. The price of $300(US) is about what you'd
pay for one in mint condition on eBay, at least it was last summer; prices
have been rising steadily since then. You can get more info on sale prices
at my web s
Nice, Boris... very nice!
Jim
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://boris.isra-shop.com/photos/paw/poppy-field.htm
Shot today (Apr 2)... Spring is all over the place.
Boris
cards.
Jim A.
.
Jim A.
> From: Powell Hargrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:09:55 -0700
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: More Film enabled!
> Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:09:28 -0400
Yes.
Jim A.
> From: "Peter Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 10:45:49 +1000
> To:
> Subject: RE: PESO: Ballard Locks Public Art
> Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Apr 20
I bought a bargain class Hasselblad Xpan. There were a few areas on the
camera's base showing paint had chipped off. Otherwise, it was in top
notch condition.
Jim A.
> From: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar
Nurses in capes was a common sight when I was going to college in the early
Sixties. They use to wear nursing caps, too.
Jim A.
> From: Pat White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:30:40 -0800
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
hem sold since 2004-11 is $1290(US), all [Mint-] or better. Pretty
soon these crappy new autofocus Canon EF L series lenses are going to be a
bargain...
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
I'm not sure about name length, but this one has lens length...
http://www.exaktaphile.com/images/klaus.html
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
Who was the other PDMLer that has the PH-RBL 67mm lens hood that is
available. W. Robb has one but it may belong to someone. My lens hood
ended up in a river and Pentax USA doesn't list this in items to buy from
them.
Jim A.
=ADME:B:EOAB:US:6
It'll give me 21 mm equivalency... my favorite focal lengths for 35mm
are 19 - 21 mm.
When/if I get a full format Pentax digital, then I'll sell the DA.
Easy peasy, lemon squeasy. ;-)
Jim
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have purchased two DA lenses because they are the best s
Better...
Jim
David Savage wrote:
John, Paul, Jim & Rob, thanks for your comments.
John, insect wings are pretty neat. I've got some shots of a dragonfly
and the detail & colour in the wings is amazing.
I agree Paul that more DOF would have been nice, but I was shooting
hand held
Francis:
A good shot of the little girl... I would have cropped it at her waist.
Jim
Francis Alviar wrote:
One of my very first shots from the recently acquired
*ist DS. This one taken with the FA 50mm f/1.4 lens.
My apologies for the cut-off right foot. Cropped to
eliminate dead space
I like it. Fake? It's not photojournalism, it's art! :-)
Christian wrote:
Jostein wrote on 3/28/2005, 4:17 PM:
> http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3469/display/2838096
>
> Any and all comments most welcome.
Not bad... for a fake! :-) seriously, the mountain looks great and the
moon add
Exacto!
Fred wrote:
This is because part of the mid-cape highway is only two lanes, no
highway lights and with folks behind you who want to travel at 65+ mph
in those conditions.
Ah, you mean "Suicide Alley" on Route 6...
Fred
That was the most important thing to me and the fact that I had a bunch
of AF lenses for my ZX5n clinched it.
Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
Having said that, the isDS viewfinder is as bright as that of my Leica
R8 and I don't have all that much trouble focusing eithe
s and with folks behind you who want to travel at 65+ mph in those
conditions. I can't see well far enough at night, to drive fast enough
to keep them happy, and there isn't a second lane to use instead.
Jim, "I used to drive fast" Hemenway
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mar 28,
t have all that much trouble focusing either camera.
Jim
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mar 27, 2005, at 8:46 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
... Then, why on Earth, Pentax reduced manual focus confirmation only
to the center most AF sensor? ...
Yes, the focusing mount is driven by the servo or the hand. E
For me the best 35mm camera ever is the Canon T-90.
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 22:45:05 -0600
> To: "Pentax Discuss"
> Subject: Enablement, The best 35mm camera ever
> Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Resent-
I'll have to do some shooting with
it on the isDS when things begin growing around here again.
Jim
David Savage wrote:
Happy Easter Guys & Gals,
It's been awhile since my last PESO, so :
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_004.htm
These guys are such a PITA to shoot, they don&
I'm looking for PH-RBL to fit my 18-35mm FA-J lens. It says 67mm on it.
Think it would fit?
Jim A.
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:52:53 -0600
> To: "Pentax Discuss"
>
eak as a modern zoom.
Jim
Powell Hargrave wrote:
Well it may not be a great picture but it sure felt great to be taking it!
Some may remember I was attempting to return a broken F70-210 to operation.
Last night I had another go at getting the lens to work.
The whole story is here with the Daffodil p
Cotty:
I like the way in which you've used the blur to convey motion. A nice bunch!
Jim
Cotty wrote:
Saturday afternoon. A lad with a football and a dad with a camera
:-)
<http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/footytricks.html>
Boris:
I didn't expect to see two photographs which are so different from one
another. I like them both, well done.
Jim
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Here they are:
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=172347
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=178171
Show when Jostei
John:
Good job! I also like the low saturation in this shot.
Jim
John Forbes wrote:
Tomorrow is the annual boat race between Oxford and Cambridge
universities. I went down to the river to cast an eye over the course,
and took this shot of a coxless four passing under Chiswick Bridge:
http
.
Regards,
Jim
Mark Roberts wrote:
> I have the A20/2.8 - if your hood is for a 67mm thread I'd love to have
> it.
>
Thank you, Dave.
Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's another shot taken that day, (last Friday) of the Red Kodak bldg,
aka Motif #1.
http://209.197.89.228/CapeAnn/images/Rockport1.jpg
or 55mm lens.
I took this of the original building in 1962.
http://www.hemenway.com/MotifNumber1.jpg
Koda
shot
sometimes.
I did a little bit of dodging, and hope that you don't mind.
http://www.hemenway.com/ForDave/CANGEESE.JPG
Whaddaya think?
Jim.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Managed to make my daughters riding lesson today,and just happened to have a
truck load of
Pentax/Sigma gear to
Bruce:
Nice, interesting shot... but I think you're too close!
Jim
Bruce Dayton wrote:
I took the family up into the mountains today. We took the cameras
and went for a hike. We were looking for a specific geocache (for
those GPS'ers) in an area with lots of gold mining tailings.
> This really reduces flare this lens.
I'm on my second glass of Merlot tonight... and it shows. :-)
Jim Hemenway wrote:
Hi Folks:
I apologize for the lousy photograph... shouldn't shoot handheld indoors
with an 80 ASA-only DSLR.
http://www.hemenway.com/20mmHood.jpg
This is a le
will
just put it on a shelf.
This really reduces flare this lens.
Jim
Thanks for the info, Dave.
The gate looked North American but the "East Gwillimbury" part made me
wonder if it was in The Old Country. :-)
Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jim.
The show barn is about a 10 minute drive East of Newmarket Ontario on Davis
Drive,if you
know the
area
Thanks... Yes, that's a seagull. I didn't see it myself until I
enlarged the image on my computer screen... to determine if it was my
first speck of sensor dust. :-)
Jim
Frantisek wrote:
ft> I like the two of the Thatcher Island Light best. How old must that
ft> thing be? At
think that the photograph shown in the PDF is very out
of date. It's a strange, stark sight to see both lighthouses without
the other buildings.
Jim
frank theriault wrote:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:46:28 -0500, Jim Hemenway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
North of Boston
http://www.hemen
For those of us who celebrate Easter, and anyone
else who likes visual puns.
"A true friend is someone who thinks you are a good egg even
though they know you are slightly cracked."
http://209.197.89.228/Cracked.gif
Keith Whaley wrote:
And, here's one for you, Frank...and any other PDMLer on line
What a great idea... Thanks!
Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
My cheap tool to remove the ring:-D
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/trucs/reparations.htm#outil
elephoto, TX Pentax-K
Jim
www.jcolwell.ca
I have some shots of Hatteras Light somewhere in the house but have
never scanned them... will have to look around for them. I didn't even
know, or at least can't remember Currituck Beach Light.
Jim
Scott Loveless wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 19:31:52 -0500, Jim Hemenway <[EM
00-300.jpg
$100.00, includes shipping in the US of A.
One sold on ebay today for $136.00, which is where I'll put it on
Saturday if no one here wants it.
Jim
Thanks, Scott. Are you referring to the very tall lighthouse with the
spiral stripe at Cape Hatteras?
Jim
Scott Loveless wrote:
Those are all very nice. I feel like you're trying to impart a
feeling of desolation, or obsolescence. Either way, or not at all, I
love lighthouses and it
that I still miss
California as well as Tennessee to some extent.
I'm not going to go anywhere else, all this nostalgia is making me old!
:-)
Jim
Ronald Arvidsson wrote:
Hi Jim,
Well that's exactly the weather we got where I am now, Uppsala , Sweden.
Since I grew up in the far north,
Shel:
I like it, great catch of their expressions.
Jim
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/bk09.html
Taken on Church Street in San Francisco, not far from my old studio and
darkroom. Broke a few rules with this one, and used the infamous "Bow-Wow"
Takumar. Feels
Thanks for the compliment, Tom.
Jim
Tom C wrote:
Hi Jim,
I like a number of these... #1 and then #'s 9 and 10 of the gray
lighthouses. Nice work.
Tom C.
From: Jim Hemenway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Cape Ann
Date: Mon,
Nothing beats a great pair of legs, or even three of them... but I like
http://fotof.wz.cz/selected3/_dsc7694.html most for the color.
Jim
Frantisek wrote:
Hi,
this is actually a feature (several photographs telling a story),
but I thought FESO wouldn't be nice abbrev. ...
NEW SHO
Scott:
She took a nice shot of Megan. I like the way the diamond patterns flow
softly over her face and the "what is that" expression that Christie
caught. The only thing that I would like to see is that it be a little
less warmer... on my monitors it's just a little bit yel
Sandhill Cranes and the Bear are, to me, the best... Well done!
Jim
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Wish me luck. I've entered 7 images in the BBC competition.
You can check them out @
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/entries2005bbcwildlifephotographercomp
etition/
I've been followi
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Very nice, Jim.
I guess the tide must have been out when you photographed the red Kodak
building at Gloucester harbor?
Joe
Dave:
Nice shot! Where?
Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/springday.jpg
View from the horse show Sunday. Welcome to spring in the Great White North.:-)
Dave
I'd like to second Cotty's comments.
Jim
Cotty wrote:
On 21/3/05, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's been a while since I posted a PESO, so might as well:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=43
Images are going up in my photoblog every day, or so I'm t
Bruce:
I would have liked to have seen more blossom and less stem, but it's
nevertheless a fine shot of the flowers.
Real men don't need tripods. ;-)
Jim
Bruce Dayton wrote:
This was taken of small wildflowers that are now blooming in the
fields.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4
ISO 400, 1/5
;-)
Christopher Oliver wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 10:35:55AM -0500, Jim Hemenway wrote:
H... a pretty girl. That may be the problem in that you forgot to
focus on the eye closest to you. ;-)
I've often heard this advice about focusing, but as far as closest eyes,
I can't figu
Hi John:
The lakes are just a little less frozen here, than up in the Marlboro
area. I don't think that there's any in Boston itself.
A nice remembrance photo, thanks. No blossoms here but some of the
weeping willows are beginning to bud.
Jim
John Francis wrote:
That looks jus
Peter... thanks for the compliment.
Jim
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Nice shot, I'm a sucker for this kind of picture if it's well done...
Jim Hemenway wrote:
About 10 miles NE of Boston
http://www.hemenway.com/1stDayofSpring-05/pages/TwistedTree.htm
isDS with 43mm Limited
Ronald:
Thanks! You're right about the blue skies, hardly any yesterday and
none today. A weather forecast of "Sunny and Clear" has a whole
different meaning here as opposed to the California and the rest of the
southwest.
Jim
Ronald Arvidsson wrote:
Hi,
Lovely picture.
I get
North of Boston
http://www.hemenway.com/CapeAnn/
isDS with various lenses
Jim
John:
I know what you mean... and I still miss the Bay Area a little, even
after 31 years. But then again, we don't have earthquakes! :-)
Here's the other 1st Day of Spring from today, it was about 44F:
http://www.hemenway.com/1stDayofSpring-05/pages/Fishermen.htm
Jim
John Francis
About 10 miles NE of Boston
http://www.hemenway.com/1stDayofSpring-05/pages/TwistedTree.htm
isDS with 43mm Limited
John:
A nice shot... good composition and also a great catch vis-a-vis the
seagulls. A bit warmer though, I think.
E-6? Whose chemicals?
Jobo?
Jim
Francis wrote:
Good evening every one!
I developed my first batch of slides yesterday! (a hundred and fifty
dollars! @#^&% )
Here is one of
The gulls make the picture. Before you tripped the shutter, were you
hoping for gulls to fly into the frame?
Jim A.
> From: Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:26:37 -0800
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subjec
Thanks for the list. If I ever get one of the Pentax dslrs, this list will
be ideal for deciding what lenses I might want.
Jim A.
> From: Powell Hargrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:36:12 -0800
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.
H... a pretty girl. That may be the problem in that you forgot to
focus on the eye closest to you. ;-)
Jim
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:35:17 -0500, Peter J. Alling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I decided to use a few prime lenses on the *ist-D just to see how they
preformed.
The oft maligned
acting with the audience with their eyes, gestures, smiles and,
see if you can get the lighting to be less flat by going for "low key"
shots.
Jim
frank theriault wrote:
Okay, ya gotta help me out here.
A couple of weeks or a month ago, I posted a couple of shots of my
buddy
Never posted a picture before. Taken with my ancient Optio 230 at the
Experience Music Project building in Seattle, Washington.
http://www.pbase.com/lordjames/image/40931121
Jim A.
d
one 19mm for 35mm... Nikon, Pentax and Leica.
The Flektogon has been spoken for, and I've been assured that payment is
on the way from a fellow PDMLer.
Jim
frank theriault wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 11:19:20 -0500, Jim Hemenway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have too much stuff an
601 - 700 of 1471 matches
Mail list logo
