to
Hong Kong and came back with a video camera and Nintendo Game Boy (for my
little brother!)...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
Tanya, the GST on imports
5:23 PM
Subject: Aussie GST (Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?)
Hey Tan!
Well I'm not exactly sure, but in my (very possibly flawed) logic, I'll
try
to work it out...
As I understand it, GST here is what we (Eaters) pay the govt for the
right
to eat an apple in Australia.
Businesses pay GST
Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:59 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
John, even better, if you package up the manual/boxes/receipts and MAIL
them
to yourself in Australia, you can carry the camera in your luggage without
having
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
I wrote:
In regards to the *ist D - it seems that with my line up of lenses, it
would
probably be unwise to NOT purchase the 18-35mm, even though I don't go
wide
angle very often. So, I
Which might lead one to think that there will be few, if any, new lenses
coming out for film 35mm cameras.
shel
William Robb wrote:
[...]
I do suspect that a lot of wide angle zooms coming out for the digital
cameras will probably not cover the full 35mm format properly, [...]
And few if any new 35mm cameras.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
Which might lead one to think that there will be few, if any, new lenses
coming
sigh
Besides Leica, has anyone come out with a new 35mm film camera in the
past year or so? Something that's not just a bells-and-whistles rehash
of a previous model?
Bill Owens wrote:
And few if any new 35mm cameras.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Bill Owens
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
And few if any new 35mm cameras.
Bingo!!
William Robb
on 03.12.03 16:21, Shel Belinkoff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides Leica, has anyone come out with a new 35mm film camera in the
past year or so? Something that's not just a bells-and-whistles rehash
of a previous model?
Pentax *ist
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:23 PM
Subject: Aussie GST (Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?)
Hey Tan!
Well I'm not exactly sure, but in my (very possibly flawed) logic, I'll
try
to work it out...
As I understand it, GST here is what we (Eaters) pay the govt for the
right
to eat
How about the Pentax *ist? Not a ZX rehash.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, December 3, 2003, 7:21:05 AM, you wrote:
SB sigh
SB Besides Leica, has anyone come out with a new 35mm film camera in the
SB past year or so? Something that's not just a bells-and-whistles rehash
SB of a
Yes ... I was gracefully reminded of that ... guess the morning coffee
hadn't kicked in yet L
Bruce Dayton wrote:
How about the Pentax *ist? Not a ZX rehash.
Hi,
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
on 03.12.03 16:21, Shel Belinkoff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides Leica, has anyone come out with a new 35mm film camera in the
past year or so? Something that's not just a bells-and-whistles rehash
of a previous model?
Pentax *ist
Stretching the
- Original Message -
Yeah, but who exactly does the GST go to? Like if I haven't been charged
by
say BH for GST, then if customs charges me
with it and the transaction took place outside of the country, then how
can
the Aus Govt charge it as there is nobody within the country who
Naughty Tanya!
Although I know it is done more often than not
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
John, even better
... lol
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
Hi Tan;
I subscribe via the digest, so if this has been answered already sorry for
the redundancy.
The multiplier
very
slowww. OR, does it only affect the focal length? Anyone able to get
this through my thick skull?
lol.
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:26 AM
Subject: *ist D - with no lens
on 12/02/03 6:44 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Another question that I have, and I apologise if this sounds extremely
dumb BUT, if the effective
focal length of the *istD is 1.5times the focal length of the same lenses on
a film body, does this mean
that the f-stops
Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:26 AM
Subject: *ist D - with no lens?!?
Hi all, I have just found an Aussie site where I can purchase the *istD
WITHOUT a lens! It is only au$2497.00. Link is here:
http://www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au
Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 12:42 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
Unfortunately it's a bit of a gamble whether customs spots it
and whops you with GST..
- Original Message -
From: Robert Chiasson
Subject: Re: GST [was:*ist D - with no lens?!?]
Here in the Great White North, I've learned to never accept cross-boarder
courier shipments if at all possible, because these packages are
individually inspected by Customs and you get tagged
credits for it, iykwim?
bloody GST, what a pain in the proverbial...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
Hey Tanya,
I'm not going to get one anytime soon
, December 03, 2003 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
Hey Tanya,
I'm not going to get one anytime soon, but I'm trying to keep an eye
on
*ist
D prices, and just some extra info for ya, though you probably are
aware
of
it.. Unfortunately for us down under the best prices
Hello Tanya,
I'll do my best to give you some ideas. First let me say that I am in
the process of moving away from shooting 67 mostly for weddings and
portraits.
A friend of mine switched to digital from film in the Nikon camp a
while back. He thought that he would use the lenses that he
: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: *ist D - with no lens?!?
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: *ist D - with no lens?!?
Question to all of you who have it already - this is my
Here are loads of samples ordered by lens used.
http://www.geocities.co.jp/Hollywood-Studio/6838/list.html
on 9/10/03 9:56 AM, Patrick Wunsch at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could only have four lenses in your camera bag, which ones would you
chose and why. I ask this because I am trying to narrow down my choices and
assess my needs versus wants while still be able to pay the mortgage!
I
27 matches
Mail list logo
