I was wondering how many of you are into photography for
fun or do you do it for profit? I fall into the fun category.
I used to shoot weddings for money, but I gave it up years ago
I find now I like to take my time and shoot what I want, not
having to sell my time for money from clients who a
> -Original Message-
> From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> I was wondering how many of you are into photography for
> fun or do you do it for profit?
Both.
> I fall into the fun category.
> I used to shoot weddings for money, but I gave it up years ago
> I find n
.
(This sad story coming to an after school special near you.)
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 10:00 AM
To: pentax discuss
Subject: Photography: Fun or P
Hi!
JCOC> I was wondering how many of you are into photography for
JCOC> fun or do you do it for profit? I fall into the fun category.
JCOC> I used to shoot weddings for money, but I gave it up years ago
JCOC> I find now I like to take my time and shoot what I want, not
JCOC> having to sell m
>
> I was wondering how many of you are into photography for
> fun or do you do it for profit? I fall into the fun category.
I guess you'd have to call mine 'fun' - I certainly don't make
a living from it. But sometimes it's not fun, either.
I mostly shoot for motorsports.com If I commit to
Photography is a hobby for me, but I try to make enough money at it to
defray the expense. Once I retire from my day job I might try to
substantially increase my photography income.
Paul Stenquist
On Dec 26, 2003, at 12:00 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I was wondering how many of you are into pho
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:00:13 -0500
> To: "pentax discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Photography: Fun or Profit
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 12:00:10 -0500
>
> I was wondering how many of you ar
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I was wondering how many of you are into photography for
> fun or do you do it for profit? I fall into the fun category.
> I used to shoot weddings for money, but I gave it up years ago
> I find now I like to take my
On 26/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I was wondering how many of you are into photography for
>fun or do you do it for profit? I fall into the fun category.
>I used to shoot weddings for money, but I gave it up years ago
>I find now I like to take my time and shoot what I want, not
>hav
> >I was wondering how many of you are into photography for
> >fun or do you do it for profit? I fall into the fun category.
> >I used to shoot weddings for money, but I gave it up years ago
> >I find now I like to take my time and shoot what I want, not
> >having to sell my time for money fro
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
>
> I was wondering how many of you are into photography for
> fun or do you do it for profit? I fall into the fun category.
> I used to shoot weddings for money, but I gave it up years ago
> I find now I like to take my time and shoot what I want, not
> having to s
Most of my involvment in photography these days is for money; either
shooting or assisting. Right now I like the challenge of having to get "the
shots", because someone is paying you to do so. It's very different than
shooting for friends, family or even second shooter. The pressure is
greater, but
is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "pentax discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Photography: Fun or Profit
Date: Fri,
Hi!
ft> But, you know what? As much fun as I get from it, I think it goes way
ft> deeper than that for me. I'm going to sound all stupid and pretentious now,
ft> but you know what? Photography is my form of self-expression. So over the
ft> last number of years, it goes way beyond fun. It's
This bit of discussion reminded me of a very profitable and very fun instance in the
summer of 1968, when I was just getting started in photography.
At the time I had very little money, and was living in a storefront in San
Francisco. The storefront had a big darkroom in back, and, downstairs, in
le worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photography: Fun or Profit
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:11:59 -0800
This bit of discussion reminded me of a ve
It may have been, but I'm not really sure. There was another that I received $100.00
for (big bucks for a starving photog in 1968) that
may have preceded the fish.
I was walking past a uniform store, and there was a mannequin in the window dressed in
a nurses uniform. The store owner saw me
fi
Fun. Can't say I've made a profit out of it.
Have sold some photos though. Quite a few, in fact.
Dogs are the subjects (surprise!). I don't think I'd ever sold a photo
before this year.
Must be me having a professional camera now an' all ;-) ;-)
Wendy Beard,
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.beard-redfer
Mostly for personal enjoyment. My wife has an alternate career as a food
writer. This has taken me all sorts of places, as I often take the shots
that accompany her stories. We've been published in the NY Times, Boston
Globe, Chicago Tribune, Dallas etc. On my own, I've had shots in San Diego
and s
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
> I was wondering how many of you are into photography for
> fun or do you do it for profit? I fall into the fun category.
> I used to shoot weddings for money, but I gave it up years ago
> I find now I like to take my time and shoot what I want, not
> having to sell
Definitely in it for the fun.
I have done weddings for friends. The most humbling experience for me was
when a friend said that she was willing to fly me up to New Hampshire and
take care of all expenses to have me do her wedding. Until then they had
all been local weddings.
I volunteer at a lot
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Photography: Fun or Profit
> Another question:
>
> If you shoot for fun, what gives you the most fun, the shoot
> or the results or both?
I like shooting portraiture, which is funny, because
At 10:09 PM 7/01/2004 -0500, you wrote:
what do you mean? You knock people over with
your tripod? :)
You should know photographers are nasty people. They ask you to smile, in
exchange they frame you, shoot you and then hang on the wall!
(*)o(*)
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't enjoy the shooting, but the rest of the process is fun. B&W
portraits are what interests me, but trying to come up with creative
shots while the subject is waiting terrifies me at times. Once the shot
is done I enjoy the rest. Processing isn't exciting but it is kind of
soothing, gently ro
> what do you mean? You knock people over with
> your tripod? :)
LOL! No, it's just that if someone tries to interrupt me when I'm
shooting, I might snap at them. :) Actually, every time I've taken my
tripod out, people have been very nice and given me a wide berth. :)
EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
-Original Message-
From: Amita Guha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Photography: Fun or Profit
&
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Another question:
>
> If you shoot for fun, what gives you the most fun, the shoot
> or the results or both?
Landscape photography during the winter months, in foul weather. Nothing
else, photographically, comes close to the enjoyment I have doing that.
Malcolm
mapson wrote:
You should know photographers are nasty people. They ask you to smile,
in exchange they frame you, shoot you and then hang on the wall!
You missed out the bit where they blow you up...
S
cember 27, 2003 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photography: Fun or Profit
Shel,
Please tell me that the fish was in exchange for the very first photograph
you ever "sold"!
That would make it the perfect story (not that such a thing exists ).
I truly enjoyed your re
On 27/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Very first photos ever sold? Guess this brings up another question,
>What was the subject of the first photo you ever sold and who did
>you sell it to?
Ultra-sonic flow meters. To my father's company when I was 17.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
, December 27, 2003 9:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Photography: Fun or Profit
Shel,
Please tell me that the fish was in exchange for the very first
photograph
you ever "sold"!
That would make it the perfect story (not that such a thing exists
).
I truly enjoyed your
This one time, at band camp, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Very first photos ever sold? Guess this brings up another question,
> >What was the subject of the first photo you ever sold and who did
> >you sell it to?
>
> Ultra-sonic flow meters. To my father's company when I was 17.
Portrait
8, 2003 12:39 AM
Subject: First Photo Ever Sold was: Photography: Fun or Profit
> Very first photos ever sold? Guess this brings up another question,
> What was the subject of the first photo you ever sold and who did
> you sell it to?
>
> Mine was a picture of a bunch of pelicans r
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Very first photos ever sold? Guess this brings up another question,
> What was the subject of the first photo you ever sold and who did
> you sell it to?
Just a few weeks ago in my case; a couple of panoramic landscapes made
using my Franken-RB67 with 35mm film in a 120
> -Original Message-
> From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > What was the subject of the first photo you ever sold and who did
> > you sell it to?
>
> Subject: A historic grindstone quarry, where you could see
> the unsuccessfully
> excavated stones still lying about and telli
Ann Sanfedele:
That reminds me of this road sign I once saw in Greece:
http://anders.hultman.nu/bilder/135/135-19.jpeg
Substantially underexposed, but the English text should be visible.
arrggh - the sign is totally unreadable on my monitor -- and since
I love funny signs (big surprize) would
Anders Hultman wrote:
>
> It's two lines of Greek text that I can't read either, and then there's
> this text in English:
>
> DANGER
> CORY EXIT
> 100 m
>
> We drove past it every day for a week, and couldn't figure out what
> it was all about. A hundred meters down the road it was a hairpin
> ben
Vern nice Ann. You caught that magic look where light snow clings to
trees. It doesn't last long. Perhaps it was still snowing a bit as
well? That would account for the frosty, foggy background. I also like
the way the light comes through the trees only in the center of the
shot.
On Jan 10, 2
38 matches
Mail list logo