project. What is the source of your facts?
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Rubenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: 18-35 FAJ
> If it is a
- Original Message -
From: "Roland Mabo"
Subject: Re: 18-35 FAJ
> Dear Mr Rubenstein,
>
> You claim that I'm wrong, but you don't provide any evidence that supports
> your claim.
>From what you are saying, the facts would seem to be that Pentax has
If it is a fact that the D100 uses a different sensor than the *ist D,
it does not mean Sony developed in any special way for Pentax.
Now, did you ever take geometry in school? Did your instructor tell you
to prove a theorem true? Did you respond by telling him to prove it
wasn't true instead?
Hi Roland,
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 15:52:02 +0100, Roland Mabo wrote:
>* The sensor is based upon the sensor used in the D100.
>* The sensor is *not* identical to the sensor used in the D100 (D100:
>23.7x15.6, *ist D: 23.5x15.7)
>* The sensor is not yet manufactured.
>* Pentax *ist D will be the fir
I don't have to, because I'm not making any claims. You have the burden
of proof for substantiating the existence of something that you claim to
be true. There is no such thing as proving that something doesn't
exist. Existence can be proven, and it is done so by the presentation of
material f
* Kodak uses a different size.
* Nikon has not presented nor announced any update to the D100.
* The major photo and computer shows this year, has already been held.
Yours sincerely,
Roland Mabo
From: Bruce Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if more manufacturers are going to use the same chip as
Pentax will use in the *ist D, but Pentax is the first one to use it.
You don't know this, because no camera is being sold with it yet.
It's not manufactured yet - Pentax has of course had access to
Roland wrote:
RM> I doubt that the FAJ 18-35 is going to be any worse than the
RM> Cosina/Vivitar/Soligor AF 19-35.
Hopefully Pentax won't settle for that low. :oT
RM> Pentax has promised new lenses, tailor made for the *ist D in fall. I don't
RM> consider the FAJ 18-35 to be custom made for
Whether or not the Pentax uses the same chip as the Nikon D100 is
irrelevant to the issue of whether or not the chip is special to Pentax.
Not only have you shown no proof, you have shown no evidence that Sony
is developing a special sensor for Pentax.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I'm sure
Dear beloved friend,
As I'm sure you already know - the *ist D has a 23.5 x 15.7mm sensor and the
Nikon D100 has a 23.7x15.6mm sensor. I'm sure that you agree with me that if
the sensor was *exactly the same*, then this difference (even if it's small)
wouldn't exist.
Another proof is that we h
And how do YOU know this? Have YOU seen the engineering specifications?
Have YOU seen the contracts? Have YOU seen the purchase orders?
You present speculative blabber as though it is fact.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you now that? To my knowledge, the Sony CCD in the *ist D is a
tweake
The FAJ 18-35 covers 35mm.
Best wishes,
Roland
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:26:32 -0600
Does the 18-35 cover the full 35mm frame or just the digital sensor?
_
Hitta rätt på nätet med MSN Sök htt
From: Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 12:56:27 +0200
Alarmingly low... it's half the price of the FA 20-35/4 - and it
looks to me the crippled mount and lack of aperture ring cannot
justify the price reduction by themselves. I'm afraid it's the
optics that may be
William wrote:
WR> Does the 18-35 cover the full 35mm frame or just the digital sensor?
Pentax said nothing specific about 18-35 being less than full frame.
On the contrary, they emphasize how well the new FAJ lenses series
fit the starist (the film camera).
Servus, Alin
- Original Message -
From: "Alin Flaider"
Subject: Re[2]: 18-35 FAJ
> Roland wrote:
>
> RM> 199.90 for the FAJ 18-35 sounds very low...
>
>Alarmingly low... it's half the price of the FA 20-35/4 - and it
>looks to me the crippled mo
Roland wrote:
RM> 199.90 for the FAJ 18-35 sounds very low...
Alarmingly low... it's half the price of the FA 20-35/4 - and it
looks to me the crippled mount and lack of aperture ring cannot
justify the price reduction by themselves. I'm afraid it's the
optics that may be compromised
y low...
Best wishes,
Roland
From: Rüdiger Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 18-35 FAJ
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 23:04:57 +0100
>>The UK list price for the 18-35 FAJ lens is just GBP199 inc VAT.
Hallo,
that seems not muc
>>The UK list price for the 18-35 FAJ lens is just GBP199 inc VAT.
Hallo,
that seems not much, as normaly 1 GBP = 1 Euro for photo equitment.
How is the price for the 4/20-35, for the 4/28-70, or 3.2-4.5/28-105 in GB.
So, we can compare how the price will be in our contry.
When will the
Folks.
The UK list price for the 18-35 FAJ lens is just GBP199 inc VAT. I have no
idea at this time what the import price will be.
We might get one or two *ist in (no delivery date as yet); certainly some
18-35.
Kind regards from sunny Brighton
Peter
19 matches
Mail list logo
